• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
November 5, 2007 10:10 AM PST

Windows Home Server really available, sort of

by Ina Fried

Bill Gates announced Windows Home Server to much fanfare at January's Consumer Electronics Show.

The energy seems to have dwindled some during the product's elongated path to market over the past year. Microsoft finalized the code back in July, but HP said it would wait for an update to the software before releasing its MediaSmart server, in what was seen as the biggest endorsement of the product.

On Monday, Microsoft announced "general availability" for the software, although HP's product will not be shipping to consumers until later this month. Some servers from smaller computer makers have been available for a short while, though it's not totally clear what marks today as the day for general availability.

Medion and Fujistu Siemens still plan releases in Europe later this year, while Iomega's product is not aimed for arrival until next year.

Even when HP does start shipping its MediaSmart server in the next few weeks, the product is not expected to be a staple on store shelves. CompUSA is planning to sell it in some stores, while Circuit City and Best Buy are only committing to online availability for now, according to Microsoft. Other online retailers, such as Buy.com and Amazon.com, are also expected to sell HP's server, while Microsoft is holding out hope that retail availability will improve later in the year.

Amazon has started taking preorders for HP's server, which as of mid-morning Monday had climbed to the top of Amazon's best-seller list in the computer category.

The idea of a simple server to serve as a repository for media such as photos, music, and video holds some appeal, but it is something most consumers are going to have to learn more about and see and touch before being sold on the idea. That's going to be tough to accomplish with limited marketing and limited retail presence.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Microsoft launching health tech video show
FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade
T-Mobile says software error behind outage
T-Mobile users still reeling from outage
Microsoft cuts 800 more jobs
Microsoft gives the MSN butterfly a makeover
T-Mobile experiencing widespread outage
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (59 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
a workgroup can perform this function
by Seaspray0 November 5, 2007 11:09 AM PST
Since a home environment seldom will exceed 10 computers, a microsoft "home server" is really not a requirement to share data. A workgroup of computers can share data fine. The one advantage to having a domain environment vs a workgroup is the ability to authenticate to a centralized source for resources located on networked computers. That benefit is most realized when you have many computers to manage, not a small group of 10 or less.

Another sticky hitch to this... A computer running XP home will not join a domain environment. I could see some small businesses that could find this useful, but for the home where most people are running the home edition? I just don't see how it would be feasible.
Reply to this comment
maybe you should do some research
by amarkj November 5, 2007 11:34 AM PST
Read up on it here: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver/default.mspx

click on "see what the excitement is about" for some features.
Look before you leap...
by yipcanjo November 5, 2007 11:36 AM PST
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Home_Server

...and learn about the product you're commenting on.
View all 2 replies
... And
by jltnol November 5, 2007 11:20 AM PST
Once everyone sees how laden with DRM it is..or most likely will
be, my guess is it won't last long.
Reply to this comment
Lets clear up where DRM really resides
by Seaspray0 November 7, 2007 11:40 AM PST
Do you know what DRM is? Digital Rights Management. It typically takes the form of an encrypted certificate imbedded in the digital media and will prevent use of the media unless you provide a key or matching other half of the certificate. Windows has DRM to the extent that you must provide a product key for activation and the validity of your key is checked when you attempt to get updates.

Understand where DRM resides... IT IS PART OF THE DIGITAL MEDIA, NOT THE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Microsoft, apple and linux operating systems support the use of DRM media by being able to read the certificates imbedded in the media and verifying the validity of that certificate.

Have you ever been to a secure website? Have you ever downloaded from itunes? Yes, these are all DRM MEDIA. They are based on certificates. You must provide the counterpart to the SSL certificate in order to view secure websites. Windows, linux, and mac os's today come preloaded with the matching half certificates of over 2 dozen public certificate authorities... verisign, godaddy, thawte.... You never knew that websites that use SSL require a certificate to do so? Yes, they do. The webserver (where the media is stored) has the certificate. Why won't a regular mp3 player not play a song from itunes? Because it doesn't have the software capable of reading the imbedded certificate in downloaded itunes songs. Apple will not release that, nor the encryption method used in the certificate.

You don't like DRM? Fine, neither do I. Just understand where it truely resides. Operating systems are not loaded with DRM, they only have software which will support using media that has DRM imbedded in it.
View reply
Just get a MAC
by justageek November 5, 2007 11:33 AM PST
Nothing new here, the combination of a MAC and Apple TV does
this job just fine and does not require hardly any setup and
configuration. Hardly anything new and a little disappointing that
the article did not even mention this (as well as other alternatives)
that have been around and are proven. Just another Zune.
Reply to this comment
Really?
by yipcanjo November 5, 2007 11:43 AM PST
Your Mac + Apple TV combo can backup your other home systems? You can keep "file version" info to retrieve older copies of files? You can stream all types of media? How much data can your Apple TV hold? You can support redundant drives for fault tolerance? You can do this while managing the server remotely? You can centralize user accounts / permissions??

Wow. I had no idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Home_Server
View all 3 replies
Apple is not end all cure all
by speel007 November 6, 2007 6:12 AM PST
You mention the AppleTV, what a worthless piece of crap that is. To get the storage of the WHS, which is another non-essential piece of equipment, you would need to purchase 3 of them at $400 each. These WHS system are designed to be easier for the home user that will not do a little extra work to use that old computer in the basement and add hard drives to it and create the shares and map to them from their other PC's around the house. Nothing new, just presented in one nice PnP package. BTW, there is a new trojan out there attacking Mac computers. Be careful out there.
Re: Just get a MAC
by imacpwr November 6, 2007 6:27 AM PST
I love my Mac but using an Apple TV as a home server is the goofiest thing I ever heard of. Hey maybe we should use our iPod classics instead..? ;-)
Mac? Get a TiVo
by Stormspace November 6, 2007 11:03 AM PST
If you really want to have a media center, use your existing PC and a Free TiVo. Between those two you'll have plenty of access to your music and photos in a grandma easy kind of way.
really
by FutureGuy November 5, 2007 12:32 PM PST
your ignorance on this matter is baffling. read a bit before making such bold comments.
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/Windows-Home-Server-the-Ars-Technica-review.ars
Reply to this comment
was meant to be @justageek
by FutureGuy November 5, 2007 12:33 PM PST
-
Great, but ...
by GuardBoy98 November 5, 2007 12:34 PM PST
This is a great product. However, I would think that their target audience would be the folks who buy cheap computers, and might not be willing to spend $600 for a computer for their other computers to talk to. If it were more of a media center PC that ALSO served as a central hub for storing media, it might be a winner.
Reply to this comment
Who backs up the backup?
by lorcro2000 November 5, 2007 1:03 PM PST
WHS does look like a very nice device for a home with more than one computer in it. Having the ability to store stuff centrally and thus accessible for everyone as well as from outside the house can be a great feature.

Unfortunately, when you have a terabyte or two on the server, and virtually nothing on the clients - what good is it to be able to back up the clients when the server is not backed up and has become a majorly important "single point of failure" in the home? It's bad enough if you lose, say, photos on one machine, but to lose all the photos for everybody seems pretty Microsoftian - making failure even more catastrophic than it used to be. ;)

It's only a great solution when all the data is checksummed on disk, on redundant disks and further backed up to another device. Until then it's nice, but dangerous.
Reply to this comment
WHS can duplicate files across different disks
by PumpkinPositive November 5, 2007 1:15 PM PST
Windows Home Server has taken this into account - If you have more than one harddrive, and/or external hard drives you can tell it to duplicate files on the shares across 2 disks so that in the event of a disk failure, you don't lose any data.

Adding new disks into the storage pool is dead easy as well if you suddenly need to add more space.

WHS is quite a neat product in this respect.

Regards,
PP
View reply
I reckon use a network drive instead
by 999reasons.com November 5, 2007 2:32 PM PST
One valid alternative is to use a Network Attached Storage device to share files. I've done this... here's some more info on this..

http://www.999reasons.com/content/view/116/65/
Reply to this comment
To give the devil his due
by lorcro2000 November 6, 2007 4:16 AM PST
WHS is a lot more than just a shared filesystem on attached storage. It has flaws, but several of its features are quite compelling for a multi-PC family. It's not for me, but it's pretty interesting. People apparently don't read up on what it actually does before posting stuff like this - WHS is more than shared storage.
"How It Works"
by timber2005 November 6, 2007 11:41 AM PST
Anyone who's reading this, really should take a moment to learn about the features of WHS.

Network storage, either automoated or manually, COPIES files. WHS looks at files, and does copy them, but if the same version of that file (down to the checksum) is on each of your computers, it only saves it ONCE. So my entire 3GB photos archive, my 8.9GB of video production files, which are on all three of my machines, it would only take those IDENTICAL files once. Now, some computer have some diffrent diffrent file version (say a jpg that is an origional, and one I shrank), it knows that although they are the same file name, same take time, the file size is diffrent, and therefore two seperate files to backup.

Network copying would OVERWRITE those files if they are in the same folder.
Authoritative comment from beta and RTM testing
by Microsoft_Facts November 5, 2007 3:40 PM PST
This product is like many others from MS, it is pathetic on many fronts when put up against comparable products.

Performance; very noticeably slower compared to a Linux server on the same box.

DRM from MS; 'nuff said.

It isn't totally worthless, but I'm guessing that the cost of it will be more than the $12.50 I would pay.
Reply to this comment
You have no clue
by DrtyDogg November 5, 2007 6:26 PM PST
A biased comment from someone named Microsoft_Facts. What DRM? What are you talking about. Performance issues, I'm running it right now on a 6 year old box and it doesn't have any slow downs at all, no reboots since setup either. Stop worrying about Microsoft_Facts and just try and get some actual facts before making worthless posts.
Missing the point...
by yipcanjo November 5, 2007 4:44 PM PST
While our resident Apple "fan boys" will tell us that you can do this with Mac + AppleTv, Linux for the past 20+ years, Unix for the past 100+ years, a picture of Steve Jobs and a coax cable....yadda, yadda, yadda....

You know what? We don't care. You can do this with XP, Windows 2000, and probably Windows 98, if you cared to bother. That's not the point. The point is a single product offering that is *intended* as a media/backup hub for the home. Can this be achieved in other ways? Yup. You betcha. But most folks aren't doing it, and if they are they're typically more "tech savvy" than the average household and aren't necessarily the candidates for this product. It's a "niche" product, folks, and contrary to POPULAR C-NET FANBASE OPINION, they're aren't a lot of products in this niche. Microsoft didn't invent the wheel with WHS, but it serves a purpose and consolidate existing functionality into a new package for consumers.

And guess what.... Apple didn't invent the wheel either.

<enter more Apple fanboys>
Reply to this comment
You're wrong! It's all about the Geekery!
by Vegaman_Dan November 5, 2007 5:24 PM PST
CNET members don't want to actually READ the article- come on, it's only an excuse to say why OS X is superior to Linux which is superior to Windows which is superior to OS2 which is superior to OS X and round and round you go again forever.

The discussions rarely have anything to do with the actual subject.
Yes, you did.
by Penguinisto November 6, 2007 7:31 AM PST
So where is the value in paying $200+ for the OS lashed onto
even more expensive gear?

How do you justify it?

Most households have perhaps a laptop and a PC at the most...
nothing that a fat USB HDD or two can't handle.

If you have more than three computers in one house, odds are
very good that you're going to be familiar with it enough to go
digging for a solution of your own.


[i]"It's a "niche" product, folks, and contrary to POPULAR C-NET
FANBASE OPINION, they're aren't a lot of products in this
niche."[/i]

On the media side, there's XP MCE, Vista MCE, AppleTV... two of
those are MSFT's own products.

OSX already has easy-to-use facilities for doing all of the things
this Windows Home Server thingy purports to do.

Hell, XP already has these... and it doesn't take any real acumen
to use it.

Oh, and the point you've been missing? MSFT nor Apple invented
the wheel - UNIX did that ;)

/P
View all 2 replies
It works great
by myracleworks November 5, 2007 7:12 PM PST
I bought the System Builder version and built a system, housing 2 TB of storage. It, so far, works near-flawlessly, backing up all clients and it's share drives. I'm really happy with it.
Reply to this comment
Buy a QNAP, they're cheaper, smaller and better..!!
by imacpwr November 6, 2007 12:36 AM PST
http://www.qnap.com/

QNAP TS-209 Pro Turbo Station, a 2-bay, hot-swappable All-
in-one NAS (Network Attached Storage) Server supporting up to
2TB storage capacity with server functions and RAID 1. It can
share files across Windows, Mac, Linux and UNIX. These little
boxes can blow away anything MS and Dell can come up with
AND at a lower price..!!

Features include:
500MHz CPU
128MB DDR II RAM
Gigabit Ethernet
File Server
FTP Server
Backup Server
Remote Replication
Web Server
MySQL Server
Printer Server
UPnP Media Server (with built-in TwonkyMedia Server)
Photo Sharing
Download Station
iTunes Server
One touch USB auto copy
Network Recycle Bin
Built-in DDNS support
PS3 and Xbox 360 compatible
Reply to this comment
Nice
by DrtyDogg November 6, 2007 3:06 AM PST
That's a nice little box, it almost has all of the features of windows home server, but at a higher price tag.
I'd rather have these guy's stuff
by Fire37 November 6, 2007 1:04 AM PST
I saw them at a home show in Denver and they had this cool device called an MC that ran Windows Media Center and controlled lights thermostats ect... Pretty cool and pretty affordable. www.teslahomecontrol.com
Reply to this comment
Why?
by speel007 November 6, 2007 5:59 AM PST
You can do this already with a spare pc or a USB external drive. Good marketing will make this a decent seller though. Most non-tech savvy people will think this is something new, and graned it will be easier for them.
Reply to this comment
Kind of the point
by DrtyDogg November 6, 2007 2:18 PM PST
It is for the non tech savvy people. Simple setup for backup and shared folders. I've had almost everything this product does for years on my network, but after testing WHS I bought it, and have re-done my entire network around it. Now my wife and kids rarely have to ask for help. It was cheap and made things a little easier.
yaaawn
by The_Decider November 6, 2007 11:17 PM PST
Another bug ridden, DRM infested "me too" product from MS.

It is still putting all your eggs in one basket which seems to be the goal of MS. From entripre level apps like AD down to this pile of rat excrement.
Reply to this comment
(59 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right