• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
February 8, 2010 1:30 PM PST

Microsoft denies Windows 7 battery problem

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 83 comments

Although some users have been grumbling about a variety of battery issues related to Windows 7, Microsoft says that its testing shows that nothing is amiss.

(Credit: Microsoft)

The software maker initially thought that there might be a problem with the firmware in some PC models causing an error message to appear where one was not warranted. However, Microsoft now says that it believes that the operating system is behaving properly.

In a blog posting on Monday, Windows division President Steven Sinofsky said that the company's follow-up research shows that those seeing a notification that their batteries need replacing are getting the message because, in fact, the batteries are not performing up to a certain threshold.

"To the very best of the collective ecosystem knowledge, Windows 7 is correctly warning batteries that are in fact failing and Windows 7 is neither incorrectly reporting on battery status nor in any way whatsoever causing batteries to reach this state," Sinofsky said. "In every case we have been able to identify the battery being reported on was in fact in need of recommended replacement."

He noted that the error message is new to Windows 7, so people upgrading to Windows 7 may indeed see the message where no warning appeared before.

"We recognize that this has the appearance of Windows 7 'causing' the change in performance, but in reality all Windows 7 did was report what was already the case," Sinofsky said.

The company and PC makers have received a total of 20 support inquiries related to this error message, all of which have turned out to be older batteries whose performance had degraded, he said. Although there have been complaints on Microsoft's TechNet and other forums, Sinofsky said it has not seen anything in the cases it has followed up on to suggest anything other than the system correctly identifying underperforming batteries.

Sinofsky said it is actually seeing a smaller percentage of systems producing the error message than it had during the testing of Windows 7, in part because more and more new systems (with new batteries) are running the operating system.

"Only a very small percentage of users are receiving the 'Consider replacing your battery' notification, and as expected, we are seeing systems older than (around) 1.5 years," he said.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.

Recent posts from Beyond Binary
IE 9, Windows Phone in the Mix
Microsoft Outlook makes friends with MySpace
Microsoft looks to 'Elevate' California
Windows Live support via e-mail ends
Microsoft researcher wins Turing Award
MSN decides to keep its makeover
Musings on the future of Microsoft, Windows
A closer look at Windows Phone 7 Series
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (83 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by SlimGem February 8, 2010 1:52 PM PST
Once again a few people have an issue and it gets blown out of proportion by the media.
Reply to this comment 21 people like this comment
by solitare_pax February 8, 2010 2:19 PM PST
Agreed - it's not Microsoft's fault that the people who make the laptop hardware cut corners on everything - especially the batteries.

I swear, you can't get a replacement laptop battery for a bad one - they either change the design so it won't work with the old model, or its so expensive you might as well buy a new laptop.
11 people like this comment
by Lerianis4 February 8, 2010 2:29 PM PST
solitare_pax.... I've gotten replacement batteries for my laptops, and they have been under 100 dollars, even the one for my gaming class PC.
by AppleJihadHunter February 8, 2010 5:12 PM PST
@solitare
"I swear, you can't get a replacement laptop battery for a bad one - they either change the design so it won't work with the old model, or its so expensive you might as well buy a new laptop"

you swear? all it takes is 5 secs to take dead battery out and 3 days for a replacement. Need it fast? there's Craigslist. oh!! PC (dell/HP, etc..) batteries are dirt cheap!!
by Random_Walk February 9, 2010 6:34 AM PST
To be fair, I have yet to see any such problem, but it's good to know - if it does crop up, we know where to point the finger.

As far as batteries, it depends on the brand. Dell and HP tend to be fairly universal, and eBay is jam-packed with new batteries that will fit older laptops. *shrug*
1 person likes this comment
by Seaspray0 February 9, 2010 6:51 AM PST
Then again, it would be much harder to replace a battery that was not designed to be removed by the user. Who would be stupid enough to design a laptop like that?
by solitare_pax February 9, 2010 7:45 AM PST
Apparently the problem resides mainly with the bargain-basement PCs that I am told work as well as a Mac - the sort of PC my brother prefers, then curses like crazy because the battery dies, and he goes out and gets a new one when I try to point out his options.

He's on his 3rd laptop now due to battery failures over the past five or six years. He junks the old one.

I'm on my first from 2003, and it's battery still works fine - even though its a refurbished Macbook.

I guess I just take better care of my stuff - and get things that last. :)
by kharris February 9, 2010 9:46 AM PST
This actually happened to Macs when 10.6 came out. 10.6 more prominently displays battery health; you had to dig a bit to get at this information in prior releases. So it looked like Snow Leopard caused the battery issue, when it was really due to the age of the battery. Mine was replaced under Apple Care after a quick trip to the local Apple Store.
by Henaway February 8, 2010 1:58 PM PST
Wow, 20 Win 7 users have old, worn out batteries, Windows now actually TELLS YOU IN ADVANCE (instead of just leaving you unexpectedly stranded one day), and it's a problem? Must be a slow news day.

This just in - people still find UAC annoying. Microsoft claims it's working as it was designed to. People get irate and demand easier access to spyware and trojans.
Reply to this comment 14 people like this comment
by mickytricky February 8, 2010 2:33 PM PST
"People get irate and demand easier access to spyware and trojans."
Awesome!
2 people like this comment
by Rolker February 8, 2010 11:08 PM PST
I guess people need to complain about MS from time to time. I guess it is hard to swallow that MS has a good OS.
by demner February 8, 2010 2:02 PM PST
While it sounds plausible, I worry when a 1.5 year-old system is considered in need of replacement.
Reply to this comment
by assman February 8, 2010 2:09 PM PST
Some batteries are just crap.. I my new laptop started having battery problems after about 1.5 years. I still haven't replaced the battery I just keep it plugged in. The system doesn't need to be replaced.. just the battery.
12 people like this comment
by Henaway February 8, 2010 2:27 PM PST
You're confused. The message isn't that your COMPUTER is in need of replacement ... just the BATTERY!

That would be kind of like saying my 2 year old car needs a new battery, so I have to buy a new car.
by Lerianis4 February 8, 2010 2:43 PM PST
Hey, computer equipment is obsolete quite fast today.... my gaming class PC is only about 1.5 years old, and I am thinking of replacing it with another one from the same company that has better specs.
by bluemist9999 February 9, 2010 5:28 AM PST
They aren't saying the system needs replacement. They are saying the battery needs replacement.

Rechargable batteries can only perform a finite number of charge/discharge cycles, before the maximum amount of charge they can hold drops significantly.

So I feel it is a very helpful change in Windows 7, that it warns the user when the battery isn't working well. It's much better than finding out when you need it.
by assman February 8, 2010 2:06 PM PST
My laptop has this bad battery message. It is completely correct. The battery dies after 15min of use, it's completely dead. I was actually impressed by the notification when I upgraded to Win7, shows that it is more intelligent than Vista.
Reply to this comment 8 people like this comment
by Renegade Knight February 8, 2010 3:06 PM PST
Funny, Linux gave me the warning when Vista/XP didn't. Yes my bettery is crap. However Win 7 Beta didn't catch it. Maybe that was the beta version?
by sanenazok February 8, 2010 2:38 PM PST
This is actually very good news for users. Let's say my laptop is 10 months old with a 1 year warranty for everything (including battery). Now if the OS tells me a component is faulty, I can call up the manufacturer and tell them to send me a replacement since the OS is complaining. Before you could get a replacement but only if it was a complete failure.
Reply to this comment 3 people like this comment
by XiroMisho February 8, 2010 3:49 PM PST
wow... I'd like to know what laptop manufacturer you're dreaming of! Because Dell/HP/Compaq/Acer/Apple all don't warranty a battery past 90 days. That's the "Limited 1 Year Warranty." they mention. 90 days for consumables (Battery.) and then 12 months for everything else... which never breaks within 12 months usually.

it's in the fine fine fine print you get in that 100+ page warranty card. This is why I buy a laptop with a protection plan - just make sure it mentions "1 battery replacement" in there
by sanenazok February 8, 2010 9:15 PM PST
@Xiro... Uhmm I've had Dell replace bad batteries further out than 90 days. HP too. Maybe some cheap $300 retail model has a shorter warranty but not a regular laptop.

The policy states that batteries are warranted for 1 year:
"Portable computer batteries carry the lesser of either a 1-year limited hardware warranty or the length of the limited hardware warranty for the Dell computer with which the battery is shipped."


This is from Dell's website (http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/policy/en/policy?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~section=010)
by power_guy February 8, 2010 2:41 PM PST
Batteries don't last forever! Most notebook manufacturers will only give you a 1 year warranty because how long they last depends on how you treat them.
The problem here is that some manufacturers have there own diagnostics to determine whether a battery is "failing". So you only get one hour instead of the original 2 or 3. If you don't like that, buy another battery.
Why is Micorsoft making Hardware decisions ?! Tha's the big question.
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by debasisg February 8, 2010 2:46 PM PST
I find the post and the comment dumb. There are h/w supporting driver issues that can tell an incorrect status to the OS and hence the OS can give you a false information. Regardless of whether this is the cause or not, all the cross comments are retard.
Reply to this comment
by February 8, 2010 3:10 PM PST
I have an issue with the battery on a Lenovo IdeaPad Y510 and didn't get this message when I upgraded to Windows 7. I bought a used battery that looked OK, but as soon as it charged up to 100% it died just like the old one. Won't hold a second... I am sure I have somekind of a hardware issue, but I never got Windows giving me any messages like this. So as another poster said, I just keep it plugged in until it dies.
Reply to this comment
by kevin7626 February 8, 2010 3:37 PM PST
People can't wait to take a shot at Microsoft for things they didn't cause. Cuss at the computer manufacturers for crappy hardware not Microsoft for making improvements to their software.
i have a hp computer decent mid-range machine i hate the batter life i get like 1.5 hrs on a full battery nowadays i used to get like 3-3.5 hrs when i just bought it.
Reply to this comment
by XiroMisho February 8, 2010 3:46 PM PST
I find it funny that people actually got upset that the Windows 7 Power Management system was being honest. This leads to one funny little saying:

"Don't Shoot the Messenger."

your battery died - too bad, it happens... there are certain uses that kill your battery (decharging to 80-50% and recharging constantly at the same level, or keeping the battery plugged in all the time when the laptop is plugged to the wall 24/7) the one thing I tell everyone is to attempt a full cycle with the battery - meaning when it's at 100% - unplug, wait for the PC to shut down COMPLETELY - as in no hibernate at 5% ect... run it till it just plain dies - then plugging it in - Laptop powered OFF and let it charge for 2 hours.

usually this can HELP the battery life - in reality you really should discharge the batt completely - then recharge the laptop with the power off on the laptop all the time... but that's not normal laptop use.
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by richard993 February 8, 2010 6:12 PM PST
Windows draining your Laptops battery is a normal occurance which results in reduced battery life (frequent discharging and charging). Finally a new version of Windows (Windows 7) that tells you (indirectly) that the operating system you ran on it before (a previous version of Windows) has sucked the life out of your batteries and it needs to be replaced.
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by guest86 February 8, 2010 6:58 PM PST
Yeah! That is big problems with Windows 7!


Plug your netbook or laptop in car's rechargeable battery will running about 1 to 3 weeks! Car's battery is more powerful enough for your netbook and laptop to running longer time!

I must buy car's battery for my netbook to running longest than standard rechargeable battery is made in CHINA. CHINA sucks!!!

I only trust rechargeable which is MADE IN USA! USA FTW & FOREVER and save our money a lot!!!! This is truth!

We must block and drop support on rechargeable battery which are made in CHINA! DO NOT BUY CHINA products!

You been warned! I suggest you get USA products are a lot stronger than CHINA products!

RIP to CHINA products! RIP CHINA
1 person likes this comment
by guest86 February 8, 2010 6:48 PM PST
Microsoft sucks! Microsoft miss error inside Windows 7 OS unlike Vista.


Go back to older Operating system where you started! DUH!!!

Too much money for Windows 7. NO NEED TO BUY WINDOWS 7 PERIOD!
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by sanenazok February 8, 2010 9:18 PM PST
Borat? Is that you?
2 people like this comment
by Knightro2 February 9, 2010 6:53 AM PST
"Too much money for Windows 7. NO NEED TO BUY WINDOWS 7 PERIOD!"

Hmmm, it seemed like the company I work for was saving money by going to Windows 7. This is because we are rolling it out to all our 2000+ laptops so we can use Direct Access (instead of Cisco VPN) and BitLocker (instead of purchasing a 3rd party tool). Oh wait...WE ARE saving a crap load of money by upgrading to Windows 7 from XP instead of purchasing 3rd party tools. Good thing I didn't listen to an uninformed user or we would have just been wasting our time.
by baconstang February 8, 2010 11:56 PM PST
It's not a problem,,,, it's a feature.
Reply to this comment
by lokanadam February 9, 2010 12:26 AM PST
windows 7 is cool
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by shycelticwitch February 9, 2010 6:13 AM PST
After running a mostly Apple network for the last 10 years, I was excited at the prospect of being able to add a few more PCs. Last month I added two, with W7. They now sit idle as I do not have time to fuss with all the errors, lockups, missing drivers, etc. Yes, the interface is now more user friendly (almost looks like Mac... hmmmm) and virus protection is better, but it's still the same bloated, unstable OS it has always been.... the new and improved experience from Windows...

"Windows is.... A 64-bit shell for a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical interface, sitting on an 8-bit operating system, originally written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company without ONE BIT of common sense."
Reply to this comment
by kojacked February 9, 2010 8:14 PM PST
Still doesn't trump a 2-bit troll...

You really paint a believable picture especially with that ending.

Shy? Right... Celtic? What a way to ruin the name of a good group of people. Witch? That's probably pretty accurate!
by shycelticwitch February 10, 2010 1:51 PM PST
LOL the truth hurts... doesn't it? Tis' a shame you can only post personal attacks instead of actual information to refute my claims.

Kojacked? How about a lollipop? Perhaps that will soothe your ire.
by dhavleak February 11, 2010 4:19 PM PST
@ shycelticwitch

You were excited about Win7? No really? Tell the truth now. I promise I'll believe you.

You've probably become the top Mac troll on CNet now. You're on every Microsoft/windows related article talking trash about microsoft / windows, and trumpeting Apple's virtues. Even if you see an article about Jobs or Gates you're there to sing Job's virtues and call Gates the devil incarnate.

I've got news for you:
1) It's obvious that you don't have the technical skills / knowledge of a hamster. So understand that you're opinion on technical matters is unimportant, uninformed, and not sought after.
2) You *are* a troll.
3) You need to get a life.
2 people like this comment
by shycelticwitch February 12, 2010 1:24 PM PST
dhavleak... LOL are you the troll police? At best you're not even a good liar. I don't comment on EVERY Windows article. And not all of my comments regarding Windows are derogatory, try reading them all in my profile instead of just a few here and there.

I happen to have a VERY busy life, as the owner of a design co-op, and director of art and marketing for a 36 company conglomerate. I also am far too mature to return the favor of name-calling (something that most people outgrow by the age of 12...). So pack up your playthings and move to another corner, I have adult things to attend to.
by santuccie February 12, 2010 6:00 PM PST
'So pack up your playthings and move to another corner, I have adult things to attend to.'
>>>>Like posting pro-Apple, anti-MS comments one after another on CNET? "Far too mature," indeed. It's true, some of your comments about Microsoft have been positive, mostly talking about a good experience with Windows 7 "thus far." What happened to that? Did someone steal your two units and replace them with lemons?

And how about your "facts?" When you talk about an 8-bit operating system, I assume you're referring to DOS. Just FYI, no NT-based Windows operating system depends on DOS. It is not an 8-bit operating system, nor is it even a 16-/32-bit hybrid. NT is a self-contained, 32-bit platform. Sure, you still have safe mode and the command prompt, but don't mistake these for the foundation of NTFS; only FAT operating systems are based on DOS.

I make no effort to defend kojacked or dhavleak on their comments to you; mature they are not. But aside from the fact that you are able to refrain from direct name-calling, you aren't much better yourself (I feel for your children, doomed to grow into adultescents). And I think you've gone overboard with your remarks about personal rebuttals to actual information (sounds like a previous conversation I had with you) here, as well as another forum in which you tell a member that you know more than he ever will. A) You don't know him or how much he knows. B) You have a technician to maintain your Windows machines.

You might know plenty about Apple, but very little about Windows. Your increasingly bold - and consequently easily disprovable - comments of late make this inescapably clear. Is business slow in your huge graphics design conglomerate you keep talking about? You seem to have a lot of time on your hands for whizzing in the wind...
by santuccie February 12, 2010 6:26 PM PST
BTW, every member of CNET is expected to help serve as "troll police," even a so-called "cockroach" like myself who is unintelligent and makes purchases, rather than investments (you're such an amiable person). There is a reason why we have links to report offensive content (including name-calling, of which "troll" qualifies from any side).
by dhavleak February 16, 2010 4:09 PM PST
@ shycelticwitch

"are you the troll police?"
>> No -- just hate trolls and I hate negativity. If you like something (like Apple products) -- go to the Apple posts and say so -- people there will appreciate it. If you troll, don't be surprised when you get called out.

"And not all of my comments regarding Windows are derogatory"
>> Yes -- they are. There's always a direct insult or a thinly veiled insult or a backhanded comment.

"try reading them all in my profile instead of just a few here and there."
>> You've got a long history of trolling Windows/Microsoft/Bill Gates. Long history. Not just a few here and there.

"I happen to have a VERY busy life, as the owner of a design co-op, and director of art and marketing for a 36 company conglomerate."
>> Good for you. You've shared that many times. That doesn't mean that you have any technical proficiency whatsoever. So your opinion on construction quality of hardware and quality of software is purely subjective and completely biased. Understand that. You obviously have your opinions, and you *should* feel free to share them, but there's a difference between sharing an opinion, and trolling (repeatedly lying about stuff, name-calling, and general negative BS).

" I also am far too mature to return the favor of name-calling "
>> You only *think* you're mature. You called windows users cockroaches in another thread. I haven't called anyone a cockroach since I was 5 years old. You and I had a long thread about gross capitalism, garbage collectors and such. Go read that thread again and judge how mature you are -- you don't understand simple economic concepts, and you have a "my s--- don't stink" attitude, and you were disrespectful when I was nothing but respectful through the entire thread. Calling yourself mature does not make it so.

"So pack up your playthings and move to another corner, I have adult things to attend to."
>> Very mature.
2 people like this comment
by dhavleak February 16, 2010 4:46 PM PST
In fact, while we're at it, how about this response you wrote to me not so long ago (when I again called you non-tech-savvy):
"that's your opinion... and like a**holes, everybody has one, and some smell pretty bad to others. As for being tech savvy... I know more about OSs that you'll ever try to learn. LOL"

I could say so much here. You claim to be more tech savvy than me? Very well -- next time you pan something, make sure you're commenting at a technical level, and I'll be there to point out the 'gaps' in your assessment. I could very well tell you about my two engineering degrees in electrical engineering and computer science, my lifetime spent working on and learing about electronic devices and computers in general, and my decade plus of work experience as a software enginer (mainly cryptography, but also done a lot of work at the app layer and os layer, briefly workd on web services, and paid my way through school by working as an IT Admin in a mixed Novell Netware / Unix / Windows environment).

Credentials aren't everything. Academics aren't everything. Experience isn't everything. Honesty, truth and insight are much more important. There is no honesty in your claim that you do not troll and you do not resort to name calling -- you are a troll, and you have frequently resported to name calling. There is no truth in many of your negative claims regarding windows / regarding your 'eagerness' to try Win7, etc. And there is no insight in any of your posts because they always contain bare-faced hate, or thinly-veiled hate.

If you had any technical prowess, then when you said something negative, you would be able to add some insight there, that would give your point some weight. You've never been able to do that. No trolls ever can.

Like I said before, you're entitled to your opinion, and entitled to share it as well. But this is a public forum. If you post nonsense, you will get called out from time to time. If not by me, then by someone else.
2 people like this comment
by santuccie February 17, 2010 1:39 AM PST
It is rather amusing to watch a so-called co-owner of a "high end" graphics design "conglomerate" go. I'd have to agree with pretty much every word dhavleak posted here, and humbly admit that I couldn't have said it better myself. He's even right about the backhanded negativity in the few seemingly positive posts on W7 that one can find in shy's history. Rather than simply saying, "so far, so good," they all say instead, "so far, so good, but not as good as Apple." Go figure.<br /><br />As far as technical discussion goes, dhavleak is right on the money. There are Apple trolls around here who get into enough detail every now and then that I tend to believe in the credentials they claim (except when you get into security; they all share a common deficiency here, probably because they're soft from being out of the line of fire, as is OS X itself). Ms. shycelticwitch is not amongst them; all of her comments are quite lay in detail, even her original post here where she tries to get clever with a bit scale. And since she says her mother is 70-something, I'm assuming shy is somewhere in the neighborhood of 40-50; it's likely she'll remain a novice, as even Core Components would be pretty tough to learn from scratch at such an age.<br /><br />Some people don't seem to comprehend just how exclusive the jargon gets in IT. You can't use Google Language Tools to make yourself sound halfway fluent here; there are some common words that have very specific meanings in this arena, and you'd never pick up on it from context if you didn't know to begin with. You try to act like something you're not, and those who aren't faking will make a complete fool out of you every single time. And shy herself is no stranger to embarrassment, which is why her "cockroach" metaphor and attempt to front off kojacked with that bit about ad homimen attacks vs hard data (which she got from me a month or so ago) are so hilarious.<br /><br /> @shycelticwitch: Whether or not you actually work in graphics design is pretty much irrelevant, unless you write the software yourself. There is a difference between a computer user and a computer technician (as well as a tech to an engineer), and that difference measures in the orders of magnitude. And even if this wasn't the case, it wouldn't matter anyway. Dhavleak is right; credentials, academics, and experience aside; the only thing that is left standing when all's said and done is the truth. Go ahead and run to the next forum, and the next, and the next. There will always be someone there who knows better, and is willing to write a book to back you into a corner again. And you don't make Apple look any better by losing over and over.

[CNET editors' note: Personal attacks deleted.]
by shycelticwitch February 21, 2010 9:08 PM PST
LOL.
1 person likes this comment
See more comment replies
by Squashman2 February 9, 2010 6:49 AM PST
I have been wondering about the battery in my wife's new Windows 7 laptop. We got a 12 cell with her new HP and for what my wife does it sure doesn't last very long on battery. Lucky to get 1.5 hours before we have to plug it in again. And that is just basically surfing the web while we are in bed.
Reply to this comment
by fenix666 February 21, 2010 4:58 AM PST
How can you assume that we are only making this up. I experience getting only 30 minutes after a full charge from the 2 hours i usually have last week only!!!

what it is doing is not only send a warning, it restricts the battery to be charged fully. hope you will experience it too so you can see it for yourselves!!!
Reply to this comment
(83 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
CNET River
  • image
    mollywood: Thank you to everyone who came out to the BOL meetup last night! VERY fun to meet you all and hang out. Now, to review the photos ...
    by Molly Wood
  • image
    stshank: Practical tip for the husband newly relocated to the UK: skip the Marmite gift for Mothering Sunday. #LessonsLearned
    by Stephen Shankland
  • image
    acedtect: What if there was a time revolt and everyone refused to give up their hour.
    by Tom Merritt
  • image
    natalidelconte: Happy Pi Day! Here is an interesting interview with the Japanese researcher who discovered 2.5 trillion decimals of pi: http://bit.ly/4ubbYX
    by Natali Del Conte
  • image
advertisement

Tech finds its place at SXSWi

roundup As the Web generation descends on the South by Southwest Interactive show in Austin, several location-based start-ups try to put themselves on the map.

Top 10 must-have gadgets

This month's picks include the Nexus One and the Squeezebox Radio. See what else is hot on our most recent Must-Have Gadgets list.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.

Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right