November 13, 2009 3:27 AM PST

Microsoft's new ad target: Windows 7

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 118 comments

Seizing what is perhaps its most valuable advertising real estate, Microsoft said on Friday it has launched a pilot program to sell ads on the Windows desktop.

Advertisers can buy the right to offer various themes that customize the desktop image and that promote various gadgets and even custom sounds for the Windows 7 operating system. Microsoft stressed, however, that users will choose which, if any, of the customizations they want to download.

The Windows Personalization Gallery offers a desktop branding experience for users throughout the operation of their Windows 7-based PC, including backgrounds, slide shows, borders, and application audio elements.

Microsoft's pitch is that the program will allow consumers to connect with brands they particularly like.

"The new Windows Theme Experience and Windows Personalization Gallery in Windows 7 allow consumers to customize their technology to reflect the things in life they are most passionate about," Microsoft vice president Darren Huston said in a statement. "These are great examples of Microsoft innovation and technology coming together to enable top global brands to reach audiences in new and interesting ways."

Microsoft said that the advertising program is a test that will run through October of next year. Early partners include Porsche, Infiniti, and Ducati, and Microsoft itself is participating.

"Microsoft is a key partner in our global advertising strategy; they constantly provide new ideas and opportunities which are tailored to our brand and exciting for our customers," Infiniti marketing director Jon Brancheau said in a statement. "The Windows Personalization Gallery and Windows Theme Experience are unique offerings that will provide Infiniti with a new set of tools to integrate our brand elements into the lives of consumers everywhere."

Twentieth Century Fox, another early advertiser, will use the Windows desktop to promote its movies.

"People connect emotionally with films and the stories they tell," vice president Bettina Sherick said in a statement. "These are the same people who personalize their digital experience. We are thrilled to be able to bring our film properties to consumers and let them engage more deeply with the stories that move them."

Microsoft said that the themes are available globally from Microsoft's Web site.

"We pride ourselves on listening to our clients and developing the most innovative, accessible and relevant products based on their feedback," said John Nicol, general manager, Last Mile Innovation, Microsoft Consumer & Online.

Although new to Windows, sponsored themes have been common in other PC experiences, such as instant-messaging programs.

So, Windows 7 users, what do you make of this?

In addition to the usual collection of pretty pictures, Microsoft is now selling businesses the option of offering sponsored desktop themes for Windows 7.

(Credit: CNET)
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.

Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Visual Studio launch delayed by 'a few weeks'
Glitches mar launch of Livescribe app store
Windows 7 leaving Redmond's help desk less busy
Microsoft top lawyer: EU deal opens new chapter
Microsoft: We did copy Plurk's code
Boeing's 787 takes flight
Hands-on with the Entourage Edge
Microsoft's server chief talks cloud (Q&A)
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (118 Comments)
by doubtthat November 13, 2009 4:28 AM PST
Let me get this straight, they expect us to give up our desktops to ads and we get to pay more than $100 for this privilege? At lease when google hits you with ads, they give their products away. If MS wants me to view ads, they can give me the OS for free. Until then, I will not be opting into this kind of program. I do wonder how many suckers will though.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk November 13, 2009 6:52 AM PST
I doubt that many people will opt in... though I wonder how many OEMs will take more than full advantage of it by making it hard to opt out of their defaults?
by Super2online November 13, 2009 7:12 AM PST
This is actually old news. It was reported on Liveside weeks ago. I looked at them and downloaded the fall image set at the time and was pleasantly surprised at how nice it was. You would think changing the background at whatever interval you set up would be distracting, but it turns out to be a nice change of pace and the transition is very smooth. As for advertisers gaining a spot on your desktop, there are many people that are devoted to certain brands and will jump at the chance to proudly display a connection to it. My wife and kids loved them.
1 person likes this comment
by MrZook November 13, 2009 7:24 AM PST
Its not really a "program". If you want a pre-made theme pack from microsoft they have some put together by companies. They are mostly gaudy, full of product names. The BING one is OK... been using it on the release candidate for some time now.
by zyxxy November 13, 2009 7:28 AM PST
You can always go to the 'personalization' window and choose any theme you want. There is even an 'add themes' button. What you all seem to be missing is that people willingly display advertising on their bodies every day. Walk down the street an look at the clothes. A Nike 'swoosh' here, a "Russell Athletic" tag there, a big old 'Coke' tee shirt walking next to a 'Do the Dew' dude.

No body is forcing you to have the adds. Try this, go to the 'themes' page and take a look. You can get highly stylized 'Ferrari' or 'Porsche' themes. Some people are going to download those in a heartbeat.

Not me, but I am sure that a lot will.
by pentest November 13, 2009 7:33 AM PST
Super2Online,

Other OS's have given the ability to have background slideshows for many years, without having to give anything up.
by Random_Walk November 13, 2009 8:35 AM PST
"What you all seem to be missing is that people willingly display advertising on their bodies every day. "

At times, certainly, though most often those adverts are discreet at best. Then again, people don't have to stare at their own clothes to get something done, either. ;)

==

"Other OS's have given the ability to have background slideshows for many years, without having to give anything up."

To be fair, Windows 7 has this (minus the adverts) and it is set by default.
by BlutoNYC November 13, 2009 8:57 AM PST
I think this move is paving the way for Microsoft Windows 7 Billboard Edition
by wixostrix November 13, 2009 9:28 AM PST
I don't understand why you guys think this is such an issue. It's not like a video will pop-up periodically and make you watch it. It's friking backgrounds and sounds that YOU choose. Half the people I know have a background on their desktop for something they like. I think this is a cool personalization idea. Plus it adds sounds and colors that all relate. Fanboys and girls would eat this up if it was advertised properly by the sponsors. Think how many New Moon themes would be downloaded right now.
by shurbetr November 13, 2009 9:50 AM PST
No one has a gun to your head forcing you to click the download button.
by Rod Roddy November 13, 2009 11:10 AM PST
This is actually the best time to unvail this, since everyone is going Ga-Ga over Windows 7
See more comment replies
by lazycat202 November 13, 2009 4:40 AM PST
are they forcing you to do it? it's your own decision. For me, i'll get "Live Traffic by Bing"
Reply to this comment
by Ted Miller November 13, 2009 4:43 AM PST
THAT DOES IT! Ive had enough of MS bully tactics!
Reply to this comment
by Grem135 November 13, 2009 5:16 AM PST
Read TFA ...you dont have to use these, it is totaly up to you to use those themes
by hafenbrack November 13, 2009 5:49 AM PST
UMM...they aren't bullying you into anything. YOU choose whether you download the themes or not. They aren't even pre-loaded.
So if YOU really like a product, you can put their ad on your desktop, if not, then you don't have to anything different than you already are, except maybe read the articles before you comment.
by jhoeforth November 13, 2009 6:23 AM PST
THAT DOES IT! You're officially an idiot!
by KazikliBey November 13, 2009 8:02 AM PST
Did we both read the same article... *shrugs*
by rmullen0 November 13, 2009 12:23 PM PST
No, he is not an idiot. Idiots are people who are willing to accept this crap. I have a novel idea for Microsoft. How about making a simple and secure, non-bloated operating system???? Windows 7 is NOT impressing me. The UI is getting worse IMHO and it still has **** loads of services and assorted other crap running in the background. I guess bloatware wasn't enough, so, they've decided to throw in adware also.
by jakemochas November 14, 2009 2:37 PM PST
@rmullen0 just like how we asked this guy to read the article, how about you use windows 7 for real? like not on virtual machine on a core solo mac mini? how about a computer in the last 3 years? windows 7 improves machines on every front and the UI is highly improved
by jakemochas November 14, 2009 2:39 PM PST
my comment implies that the machine has to be compatible with windows 7 in the first place
by solitare_pax November 13, 2009 4:45 AM PST
So in exchange for getting the best darned operating system around, we have to endure an eternity of advertisements and endorsements all over the computer even when we are NOT online? And we get to pay for this by upgrading or buying a new box?

Sounds vaguely _EVIL_

Wait until the political hacks on both parties get their hands on this concept.
Reply to this comment
by bearlyandme November 13, 2009 5:57 AM PST
i think you meant second best operating system, with OSX 10.6 being the best... i mean after all, mircosoft did admit to copying the mac os with windows 7. you can read about it here....

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10395980-71.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
by najaboy November 13, 2009 6:04 AM PST
@ bearlyandme
Uh, no they did not. That statement was made by an employee who had absolutely no involvement in the development of Windows and his comment has been officially disavowed. It would be akin to someone at Ford Motor Credit, for instance, stating that elements of the Lincoln Navigator were copied from the Chevy Suburban.
by najaboy November 13, 2009 6:08 AM PST
@ solitare_pax
You don't have to "endure" anything unless someone is holding a gun to your hea and forcing you to navigate to the site, download a sponsored theme, and then install it.
by catch23 November 13, 2009 6:14 AM PST
@bearlyandme
No, I've used both, and Win 7 is the better of the two.
At least it won't delete your files...

And Sol, if you don't want the themes, don't download them.
No one is going to have to 'endure' anything. Only people that like and want a theme will have it.
by bookshire November 13, 2009 6:54 AM PST
@bearlyandme

Actually there is no such thing as an absolutely best operating system. What makes one the best is relative to the perception of the person using it.

You like Mac. Fine.
I like Windows 7. Deal with it.
by Random_Walk November 13, 2009 6:55 AM PST
"That statement was made by an employee who had absolutely no involvement in the development of Windows and his comment has been officially disavowed."

Nice spin! If Windows's UI were some unseen creature that no one could verify, then maybe you would have a point. ;)
by najaboy November 13, 2009 8:22 AM PST
@ Random_Walk
Since you say it's spin, could you please point to some evidence indicating that this employee was ever involved in the development the Windows UI. By virtue of his position, he wouldn't be privy to that which he claims.
by rapier1 November 13, 2009 8:51 AM PST
You do realise that this is something you have to actully serach out and download on your own right? MS is not pushing advertising out to the consumer. These are just branded theme packs - just like the ones you used to be able to get for windows 95/98.
by shurbetr November 13, 2009 9:51 AM PST
Where's the gun to your head forcing you to download the themes?
by Super2online November 13, 2009 11:04 AM PST
@najaboy - He doesn't have any evidence.
See more comment replies
by Ted Miller November 13, 2009 4:51 AM PST
Adaware, Spybot, ASquared, Malwarebytes, Sophos, Norton, SuperAnti Spyware, and AVG: you all will really have your work cut out for you now! Boy this really sucks to the extreme. Microsoft has fallen to an all time low on this one. Can these guys really be able to remove an operating system since it has become the ultimate chunk of MALWARE!
Reply to this comment
by najaboy November 13, 2009 6:11 AM PST
Next time, please try actually reading and comprehending the article before commenting. It will make you look far less foolish than you do right now.
by zyxxy November 13, 2009 7:31 AM PST
Ted is troll. He doesn't have time to read the article and actually get the facts. He is too busy typing his nasty stream of spittle.
by cary1 November 13, 2009 8:40 AM PST
Fenny. You must be a Mac user since you sound really dumb
by renGek November 13, 2009 11:50 AM PST
Its not the malware that is the problem its the clueless user behind the keyboard. I'm happy to filter all those dumb dumbs to the mac. I deal with thousands and thousands of users and every few weeks its the mac users who spits venom left and right complaining about something. To date not one of them was right and always end up apologizing because they didn't READ the screen and just assume things. So yay apple for being the bucket for all the suckas.
by dechah November 13, 2009 5:07 AM PST
Do any of you people have any idea what the hell you are talking about? It is totally optional. It is not mandatory. There is no force involved. You have the OPTION to download and install a theme pack for a product if you want to. If you are not interested in commercial artwork, then there ar eplenty of non-commercial themes to choose from as well. But I just used the Coke one for a few hours, and I loved the artwork. It is now gone, and I am running the Netherlands theme pack.
Reply to this comment
by CylonCheese November 13, 2009 5:18 AM PST
Exactly! Someone offers an OPTION and all of a sudden the shy is falling! Move along, nothing to see here.... next?
by Grem135 November 13, 2009 5:19 AM PST
I think they are all Mac or linux fanboys just thinking they can blast MS without RTFA. If they had read the artical... then they would not be spouting such stupid nonsence.... but then if they are fanboys guess it would not make any difference.........
by lazycat202 November 13, 2009 5:24 AM PST
all MS haters are blind and can't see the different between "MANDATORY & OPTIONAL" is
by joshsc November 13, 2009 6:05 AM PST
It's just Mac Tards pulling everyone's chain. It's quite obvious. Go with it..beat them at their own game.
by Seaspray0 November 13, 2009 7:06 AM PST
That's all the mac tards have left... the mud machine. The thing is, you can only scream "the sky is falling" so many times before people stop listening. And yet they still scream.
by protagonistic November 13, 2009 8:39 AM PST
To most of the comments to the above reply. Do you know what the difference between a Mac and Windows fanboy is? The OS. You are no different that those you profess to abhor. And yes, I read the article. I use the OS that is the best tool for the job at hand, and I have several computers with different OSs because there really are people out there smart enough to realize that no one OS does it all.

And just to elucidate my order of preference is OS X, BSD, Ubuntu, Windows 7, but with a special spot in my heart for BeOS which I am now running as Haiku.

The article was actually good, but MS lost me when they called this innovation. Optional or not IMO this isn't even close to being innovative.
by Renegade Knight November 13, 2009 9:55 AM PST
Do you have the option to download and install a theme pack posted to Joe Thememaker's home page?
by Super2online November 13, 2009 11:15 AM PST
@protagonistic - Frankly it's not the OS that really does much, it's the apps you can get for it that makes the difference. The place you're going to find the widest variety of apps for any given need is Windows. Not that you can't find what you need on you're prefered OS, just saying.
by renGek November 13, 2009 11:50 AM PST
They're not used to options. They're used to steve telling them what to buy and when to buy it. There's an app for that.
by protagonistic November 13, 2009 2:30 PM PST
@ Super2online

"Frankly it's not the OS that really does much, it's the apps you can get for it that makes the difference. The place you're going to find the widest variety of apps for any given need is Windows. Not that you can't find what you need on you're prefered OS, just saying."

Actually, you make the mistake most people do. It is not the number of applications that counts, rather it is the quality of those applications. Having a thousand different applications to perform a task is useless if none of them will actually do what you want to do. OSx, BSD and linux actually have access to the vast store of freely available programs many of which have been around for a long time. The sooner people get past the old "there are thousands of apps for Windows" and realize that quality is much more important than quantity the sooner we can move on. (iPhone users are just as bad with their touting the number of Apps for the iPhone and for the very same reason).

The main point I was making, however, was that the Windows fanatics are no different from the Mac or Linux fanatics. A computer is a tool. A real craftsman chooses the the tool that does his work best. Most people just use their choice of OS as a reason to tout their superiority. I have probably been guilty of that myself occasionally. :-) And I will admit to kidding my friends when they call me up to ask for my help fixing their computer problems. The OS in question shall not be named. :-)
by AnubicDarque November 13, 2009 5:13 AM PST
Looks like some people have not taken the time to read this article. To have these Adverts, you have to literally look for them and ask for them.
Reply to this comment
by jakemochas November 14, 2009 2:35 PM PST
well ads + microsoft = a lot of apple fanbois swarming to the page... you're right though, you would have the CHOICE to do it... I could see if you really like a company (like VOLCOLM or BILLABONG) and they made a sweet wallpaper theme, I might get it...
by jeffmalec November 13, 2009 5:47 AM PST
I just downloaded a couple. The artwork is really cool. I don't know why folks are negative on this, it's not madatory. I used to be leary about downloading themes for other OS's from websites, since it turns out those smileys and fish aquariums were only interested in my credit cards and passwords.

Coming from Microsoft, I know it's not full of phishing programs, etc.

Plus, if Microsoft makes a couple of pennies when I download, good for them.

Finally, how many of you whiners actually paid for your Windows 7 software? My guess, very few.
Reply to this comment
by November 13, 2009 5:50 AM PST
Really, the title is somewhat misleading. These are sponsored themes, not quite traditional advertisements. Traditional ads require you to sit through something in order to get to the content you want to view. These are integrated themes to style your desktop as a sponsor wants to see it. It is a neat way for a company to get brand awareness out there, but not force you to endure an ad. Lets say I drove an infinity, I might just like their theme.

As this currently stands, its a great idea. If MS ever forces me to have desktops themed by companies that i do NOT choose, then it is a problem.
Reply to this comment
by Super2online November 13, 2009 11:16 AM PST
Nicely explained.
by shellcodes_coder November 13, 2009 6:10 AM PST
Windows 7's market share has exceeded 4% worldwide :)
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 November 13, 2009 6:51 AM PST
I just want to know if you had an orgasm after reading the article.
by pentest November 13, 2009 7:36 AM PST
4%?

Wait a minute, I thought you ****** thought market share equaled security? 7 is already far less secure than Linux or OS X.
by cbscowards November 13, 2009 8:50 AM PST
And what does that have to do with this article? Back to your trolling, huh shelly?
by Super2online November 13, 2009 11:17 AM PST
@pentest - The moment you decided to start calling people names was the moment you became one yourself.
by BruceLawrence November 13, 2009 6:13 AM PST
Really !? Do you people read? Half these posts are screaming about bully tactics and how bad it is.

YOU DONT HAVE TO DO IT! YOU ARE NOT FORCED!

my god. Those are the people who need to switch to a mac because its so much "easier". Like its hard to understand the concept of this article. Seriously, please leave and clean up the PC gene pool.
Reply to this comment
by KazikliBey November 13, 2009 8:37 AM PST
This very powerful practically new notebook I'm on was given to me by a realtor who thought she wanted a MAC so much she named it "Wish I Was A MAC" in exchange for setting up her new MAC and transferring her files. She didn't ask my opinion, and became a little upset when I inquired about her reasoning. Why wouldn't I, she's my friend, I was just trying to determine whether she had thought things through. Next couple times I saw her and asked how it was working for her, she said well, but lacked the former enthusiam. After a couple months she stopped by and asked how this one was working. "Great, thanks." I replied. Then she asked to trade. No can do, I use my computers for more than dinking off, I explained. When people want to learn on their own, let them. These are the best learning experiences.
by kpcar November 13, 2009 6:22 AM PST
I can't wait to see the "Hi, Im a Mac" ads popping up on Win7 screens everywhere (^0^)
Reply to this comment
by yellowepi November 13, 2009 6:23 AM PST
I may be wrong, but didn't apple just submit a patent for something like this(maybe not exactly, but close). Maybe they were just trying to prevent it...I get sick of advertisements in programs, but if they are out of the way I don't care. But on your entire screen/background...no thankyou
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 November 13, 2009 8:54 AM PST
Branded theme packs have been around since Windows 95. That's all this is.
by Motyoj November 13, 2009 11:48 AM PST
yellowepi: Yes they did. It was something along the lines of embedding advertising in the operating system.
by agriffith96 November 13, 2009 6:38 AM PST
Being a hug Pepsi drinker I have the Pepsi theme. Doubt I'll use it much. Plus I'm sure you'll be able to get movies, games, and music for themes as well. I know I'd like a Windows theme based on an upcoming album of my favorite band. Or a theme based on Transformers 3. I already made my own Modern Warfare 2 theme. It's not the end of the world it's an optional theme.
Reply to this comment
by Tirleton November 13, 2009 6:41 AM PST
I have always used Microsoft's operating system and user applications and have no bias for or against them. Yes, these themes are optional and a person can elect not to use them. However, you can bet that overtime the themes will become compelling and will offer users additional value in their computing experience in exchange for a piece of their desktop real estate. Is this a bad thing? Maybe. Your desktop now becomes open to a third party which, via updates to the advertising, may affect your computing experience. Personally, I don't like the thought of this but understand how it might not bother others. Over the years I have probably had 10-15 PC's all running Microsoft's OS. My current laptop runs VIsta, which I have hated from day one. I plan to buy a new desktop in 90 days and have been trying to decide if I should try a Mac or go with Windows 7. This newest move by MS adds another consideration. For MS, desktop advertising is a very good idea. For the consumer, it is a question of how far MS might go.
Reply to this comment
by November 13, 2009 8:37 AM PST
So this is really strange as company logo'd themes have been around for Windows since Windows 95. The fact that Microsoft may be making some money by putting them on their web site is interesting, but this is not a new advertising option for those brands. You can find windows 95 themes for most of these brands and since for both you have to go to the web, download, install and then not chose another theme, this is not "badness". You can simply delete an gadget or theme, hide it or just not use it.
by lazycat202 November 13, 2009 8:46 AM PST
if MS go to far, all you've to do is uninstall/disable the gadgets. simple!
by bookshire November 13, 2009 6:47 AM PST
As long as it remains optional then there's no problem here. You look around at enough free wallpaper collections and plenty of them have photos of commercial products, from soda pop to automobiles. People use these for free already, so this concept, as presented, wouldn't be much different. Anything it might evolve into in the future is speculation at best and will be addressed when they move in that direction.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight November 13, 2009 9:53 AM PST
The option I want is a theme from any source. Not only one option to get my theme and that's via MicroSofts Website. I like custom boot and login screens. MicroSoft doesn't really make that easy.
by DrtyDogg November 13, 2009 2:08 PM PST
@Renegade Knight: You are free to download Windows 7 themes from anywhere you want, there are plenty of websites already hosting them. As for login screens, it is very easy, there is even an installer on the net.
by Ted Miller November 13, 2009 6:47 AM PST
You Stupid Idiots ;-)

Yes it is optional, but history tells you that kind of thing is always the first step to commerical windows or what ever else.

I can hear it now "Many happy users haven chosen to put Ads on their screens, and we will now make it permanant in windows 8.0". After all isn't that how we got VISTA and Windows 7 in the first place? Judging from previous posts on CNet the majority of the resonders prefered XP (Now if that was a survay....).

NOTE THIS: I will bet that the hackers are going to find a million holes just in this area and we will see a lot of "patch Tuesdays" in the coming days.
Reply to this comment
by bookshire November 13, 2009 6:51 AM PST
Because, of course, insulting everybody just shows how good a person you are.

In either case, the point you raise is valid, but I would see it more as evolving into a model where MS says "Ok, here's a FREE version of windows that's Ad-supported. If you don't want the ads, then buy the software." This type of business model has been used by websites for years, and it works pretty well for them. Maybe it could work for operating systems too.
by zyxxy November 13, 2009 7:36 AM PST
Hi Ted. Obviously you have not read the article, and you have no clue. They are just collections of images and sound clips that get used to drive the desktop theme engine. No .exe files. And no forcing. The user actually has to navigate to a web page and select the theme and download it.

The first line in your post applies perfectly to you. Look in the mirror.
by Ted Miller November 13, 2009 7:40 AM PST
To bookshire and others: I apoligize for the idiot comment. I hoped that the winking smily would have showed that I was not being serious about it. Apparantly that did not work. and for that I apoligize. I for one really hate it when I see big companies take out on the little guy (Us). Many people all over the world have lost alot, and are still losing because of big corporations and their greed. Sad to say no one is stopping it.
by najaboy November 13, 2009 7:44 AM PST
Ted, are you mentally challenged or are you just being intentionally obtuse? Try employing some logic for a change.

These are downloadeable themes, not ads. They are themes that are sponsored by various third parties and made available to those who wish to download them for their own enjoyment.

Yeah, the hackers are going to find a million holes in themes, as if themes are something entirely new.
by November 13, 2009 8:40 AM PST
Gadgets arrived in Vista and various companies have them. Google, Apple, Yahoo and Microsoft. This is not a "new" area and many have been sponsored / designed to advertise a product or brand for years, so this is unlikely to be a new security risk.

Also, Microsoft made the ability to customise the OS in Windows 95, themes and other extras, either free, sponsored, blatent advertising or more have always been available.

If it was exploitable, it would already have been exploited.

Also, since the option to customise has been around for over 14 years, it is unlikely we are about to see this beign the step to you HAVING to have adverts.

David
by lazycat202 November 13, 2009 8:49 AM PST
ohh! I figured it out. MS haters don't know what the different between "themes and ads" and "mandatory and optional" are. lol!
by jerrymacGP November 13, 2009 7:02 AM PST
I think the real point here is that I don't see a lot of home users wanting this; far too much of our computing life is already cluttered with ads already. Therefore, I don't see M$ making a lot of money on this in the home computer world, as they won't have a lot of eyeballs to sell to advertisers.

Where I can really see this take off, however, is in those settings where the computer owner does not equal the computer user: Internet cafes, public access points, libraries, and perhaps even the corporate world. Owners will see this as a revenue source, and there will potentially be a lot of captive eyeballs who will not have the access privileges to get these ads off the desktop while they're using the computer.
Reply to this comment
by fredtheviking November 13, 2009 7:13 AM PST
They say I can opt-in or opt-out. However, like being asked if I want my nuts smashed. Why would I say 'Yes, please'? I suprise by the number of users posting comments defending Microsoft for doing this, by saying it is not a big deal. Of course, it is a big deal, because it is a freature that has no value to me and has a clear value for Microsoft. Microsoft should be seeking to increase my value in using thier OS, not the other way around. I will opt-out, I know they are inspired by what Google is doing, but thier products come to me at no cost. I actually have to pay for Windows 7.
Reply to this comment
by bookshire November 13, 2009 7:28 AM PST
You defeated your own argument. If you're opting out, why is it a big deal?
by najaboy November 13, 2009 7:37 AM PST
Do you even comprehend what this is? There is no opting in or opting out. If you do absolutely nothing- life goes on just as it did yesterday, and the day before, and the day before that.

The one and only thing this means is that, since 22 Oct, third party themes which are sponsored by various companies have been available for download. If you like the video game Gears of War, you can download a theme for it. If you like Coca Cola, you can download their theme. If you love your Porsche, then you can download that theme. That's all it is, and nothing more- a simple concept that a few paranoid delusionals are getting up in arms over..
by zyxxy November 13, 2009 7:38 AM PST
Not opt in / opt out, you have to actively navigate to a page and select the theme package, download it, and install the theme. Please read the article, then actually visit the site. Nothing, and I mean nothing, is forced. I already visited the site, and I downloaded a few of the 'nations' themes. They are actually quite nice.
by KazikliBey November 13, 2009 8:14 AM PST
"I actually have to pay for Windows 7." You may want to reconsider how you worded that sentence (unless Bill and his wife held a gun to your head). You chose to pay for W7, and apparently you may choose or not choose to opt into pay for themes. The author of the article even offered the alternative of making your own that I imagine you could choose to sell.

Personally, my standard theme is no theme, my desktop is it's usual blank. This was a good idea when our computers were much wimpier. Guess it just stayed with me, or maybe I'm lacxking creativity, who knows.
by November 13, 2009 8:42 AM PST
This is not an opt-in/opt-out situation.

IF you go looking for new themes ONLINE (you are not promtped or told to do so) then some of them will be theses branded themes. If you don't go looking for new themes, you will never know they existed. I don't think of that as opt-in/out. I think of that as allowing people to customise the OS and some of the customisations have been done by commercial organisations.

If you want to see this at the extreme, go look at the wincustomize.com web site - not MS, been around for years and offers a wealth of extreme and sponsored options.

Thanks

David
by WileySkier November 13, 2009 7:37 AM PST
The comments from Ted are ridiculous. Why are you so confrontational? Is it your job to prevent everyone from trying something new?

I downloaded the Bing theme. It really just adds nice artwork and there is a small bing watermark on the image. Microsoft seems to be doing a much better job at listening to customers. The article states that this is a trial program. If the themes are intrusive and customers hate it, I imagine they'll bag it.
Reply to this comment
by KazikliBey November 13, 2009 7:59 AM PST
So true.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (118 Comments)
advertisement

Behind the scenes: NORAD's Santa tracker

For decades, the defense group has let you follow the Christmas Eve travels of the jolly old elf. These days, technology is playing a bigger role than ever.

Intel redesigns Atom chip for Netbooks

The chipmaker officially announces the next generation of its popular Atom CPUs for Netbooks, the N450, weeks before the CES trade show.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right