T-Mobile says software error behind outage
T-Mobile said on Wednesday that a software glitch was to blame for a massive outage on Tuesday that left many customers unable to send or receive calls or text messages.
"After investigating the cause, we have determined that a back-end system software error had generated abnormal congestion on the network," T-Mobile said in a statement. "T-Mobile has since implemented additional measures to help prevent this from happening in the future."
The wireless service provider did not say which software caused the issue.
"We again apologize to those customers who were affected and may have been inconvenienced," T-Mobile said. I've also asked the carrier what, if any, compensation it plans to give those who were without service.
The service disruption began on Tuesday afternoon and lasted, for some, until late into the evening Pacific Time.
T-Mobile has stated that the outage affected about 5 percent of its users.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina. 





In that particular case, you do get compensation, and it is exact: You don't pay for the electricity you're not using. Anything above that, you have no right to demand or expect.
Same with mobile service, come to think of it, with one caveat: they should compensate you (pro-rata) off the ordinary monthly charges for the time spent not able to access their services.
You're right on the estimated bill thing. When we had a severe storm in our area several years ago, many people were without power for a week or more. We weren't using any power, but as the power meters weren't running either, the utlity billed us for what they thought we would use based on prior usage- even though they acknowledged no actual power was provided. Think it's illegal? Nope, not our our state and not with the sweetheart deals made with the state government.
Later on, the utlity was approved a 'temporary' rate hike for one year to make up for the money they would have otherwise earned but didn't actually give service for. They expected to make $X amount, but only made $N. Rate hike was imposed to make up the difference and was to last a year. Four years later, that 'temporary' hike is still in place.
The utility was bought up by a foreign investment group and they have announced plans to double the rates as soon as they are permitted to bring the rates up to that of the northeastern US where the profits are higher. Illegal? Nope. After all, its not a monopoly- you're free to use flashlights if you want, after all.
*chortle*
If it really was only 5% being affected then why is Cnet even bothering to cover it?
30% to 45% if not more I can understand.
5% shouldn't even be enough to make a blog post about it.
- by Mike Acker November 7, 2009 6:42 AM PST
- I've had numerous similar problems on my Sprint/NEXTEL. The last one was when the put all the BOOST phone on the IDEN net -- which is supposed to be for NEXTEL units only.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(27 Comments)