• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
October 15, 2009 2:43 PM PDT

eBay sales of Windows 7 party packs halted

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 69 comments
Share

Attention those with leftover Windows 7 house party kits: don't try to sell them on eBay.

Readers report that several auctions of the house party kits have been canceled. Among other things, the kits provided to those hosting Windows 7 house parties include a Steve Ballmer "signature edition" of Windows 7 Ultimate.

It appears partygoers may just have to hang on to their Steve Ballmer-signed copies of Windows 7. Several eBay auctions of the "party packs" have been canceled.

(Credit: M3 Sweatt)

The auctions may have been canceled at Redmond's request, although several other auctions appear to be ongoing.

"While we cannot confirm why eBay has removed these specific auctions, Microsoft routinely works with online auction sites such as eBay to remove infringing auctions," the company said in a statement. "The Signature Edition of Ultimate that was included in the Party Packs is clearly marked on the outer wrap Not For Resale," Microsoft said in a statement.

Microsoft hasn't said where, if anywhere, it plans to sell a Ballmer-signed version of the operating system. With Windows Vista, Microsoft sold a Bill Gates-signed version at Amazon.com.

Unsigned copies of the operating system, though, should be easy to spot come October 22, when Windows 7 gets its formal launch.

In the meantime, partygoers will just have to hang on to their Ballmer-signed copies of Windows 7.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.

Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Microsoft labs tests a Wikipedia of average Joes
Windows 7 family pack starting to sell out
Behind last night's Bing outage
Microsoft's Bing goes down
Bing's iPhone plans (and more)
Microsoft's Mehdi on financial impact of Yahoo deal
Microsoft: November security updates are fine
Using tunes to tout Windows 7
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (69 Comments)
by baconstang October 15, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
I STILL love watching that video.
Reply to this comment
by sciontcya October 15, 2009 6:37 PM PDT
And those are the only ones that would buy a "Ballmer edition" off of ebay.
Lord, this is hilarious...
by JessicaInPink October 16, 2009 9:11 AM PDT
My gosh... Who would want a Steve Ballmer edition of anything? Does it stink like him? This little bald FUGLY guy running around with his Toshiba Protege. Does he even know how to use a computer beyond MS Office? All Ballmer can do is take credit for the hard work of others.

I would MUCH rather have a Ray Ozzie edition.

In fact, Microsoft should put Ozzie out there more. Ballmer is the face of Vista! Don't make him the face of Windows 7!
by egghead1619 October 15, 2009 3:25 PM PDT
*Disclaimer: I have received and installed my copy of the Signature Edition Windows 7 Ultimate*

I find it rather ridiculous that an individual cannot sell an item to another individual just because it displays the phrase 'Not for resale.' I seem to recall that should I choose to sell individual candies, I can even though they say 'Not labeled for individual sale.' Is it illegal for me to sell someone a t-shirt I received for free? What about donating it and receiving a receipt for tax purposes? Doesn't the item officially belong to me? Can't I give it away freely to someone else in exchange for another item? Such silliness these days.

Besides, eBay lost me when they decided to block sales of 'virtual goods' regardless of the fact that most of those auctions were really the sale of 'personal time.'
Reply to this comment
by faceless128 October 16, 2009 12:00 AM PDT
did you read the EULA when you decided to participate?

not that i did, but i assume there's some language in there that forbids reselling.
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 7:17 AM PDT
@faceless128

The EULA applies to using the software. Not reselling it. If you never clicked "yes" when the EULA pops up, you are not subject to it. That doesn't mean that MicroSoft won't claim a DMCA violation and shut down your auction. I had them to this to me on an unused copy of Vista. eBay refused to show me the notice, and Microsoft refused to work with me on the issue. And that is why I avoid MicroSoft like the plague. They cost me money and then refused to talk to me in good faith to resolve the problem.
by Vegaman_Dan October 16, 2009 9:12 AM PDT
@egghead1619:

Tell you what... if you pay Microsoft the full OEM retail price for that copy of Windows 7 Ultimate you have there, then you are free to sell it. That's a fair and honest solution. If you don't do that, then when/if you sell the product, you should send all the money from the sale to Microsoft to compensate them for this product you DID NOT BUY.
by egghead1619 October 16, 2009 9:36 AM PDT
@Vegaman_Dan:

Your logic is faulty. If I use the product they gave me, which I am for the record, then how is it any different to them? They gave the product away, expecting someone to use it. Why couldn't someone else use it instead of me?

Technically, I did 'buy' the software, just not with direct cash. I have put forth my effort to host a party promoting their software and in return they have supplied me with the OS and other supplies. That sounds like a transaction to me; you know, like bartering before cash existed.


@faceless128:

Most EULAs have been found to be unenforceable. Am I able to negotiate the terms of the EULA? No, they are all or nothing and are set up so that the consumer has no protections and is always in the wrong.


@ Renegade Knight:

I would have gone and talked with one of my lawyer friends and have him request the notice from eBay. Then it is almost certain that the DMCA notice sent by Microsoft was false and they are now under penalty of perjury/fraud.
by odubtaig October 18, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
When you signed up for this kit, were there terms and conditions? Do they say that you're not allowed to resell any of the kit? If so, you agreed to such conditions and whether you think they're fair or not MS is perfectly within its rights to halt such a sale. I don't understand what the big surprise is here as 'not for resale' promotional material has been around for donkey's years including good old vinyl.
by egghead1619 October 19, 2009 1:15 PM PDT
@odubtaig:
"I don't understand what the big surprise is here as 'not for resale' promotional material has been around for donkey's years including good old vinyl."

And I bet you can find many of those for sale on eBay, in garage sales or on other trading websites. Also, There was nothing at all stating that sale of the party pack was prohibited.


@ everyone else:
What if I were to raffle the software off and donate the proceeds to a charity? Do you still think that Microsoft has 'lost' money and I should be the one to reimburse them? I just cannot see how a company can continue to claim ownership of an item after it has changed possession (i.e. 'sold' or 'traded').

Besides, what makes more business sense; attacking consumers publicly or thanking them for spreading the word? If I sell a promotional item, I have just increased their potential user base. If they attack me publicly for doing so, then they have just decreased their potential user base. In the first scenario, they possibly gain more revenue; in the second, they will most definitely lose revenue due to bad public relations.

Again, I have already installed my copy and am using it at home on my personal computer. I just feel that eBay is wrong to pull down those auctions and that Microsoft is wrong if they indeed are behind the removals.
by AKCHEF72 October 15, 2009 3:35 PM PDT
The tupperware party of the 2000's
If you are having a party with windows 7...your not a geek...your just a wierdo........
Reply to this comment
by timber2005 October 15, 2009 4:14 PM PDT
A rose by any other name...
by Mr. Dee October 15, 2009 6:12 PM PDT
Didn't get a kit huh?
by odubtaig October 18, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
Evidently he didn't even apply for one.
by Mr_fleabite October 15, 2009 3:37 PM PDT
This video is painful, does anyone anywhere throw a party like this?
Reply to this comment
by baconstang October 15, 2009 4:55 PM PDT
Yeah, for the Magic Bullet.
by unknown unknown October 15, 2009 3:44 PM PDT
First Sale Doctrine has consistently trumped the "not for resale" and "licensed not sold" language companies place in EULAs and on packages and media. The courts have found time after time that consumers have the right to resell physical products (including discs containing software) they have legally acquired. Universal Music found this out with radio station promo CDs (UMG v. Augusto) and Autodesk just recently learned it over eBay sales of AutoCAD (Vernor v. Autodesk). It's seems it's Microsoft's turn to learn this lesson.
Reply to this comment
by mistasandman October 15, 2009 4:05 PM PDT
Apparently some idiots think "Not For Resale" excludes them... I'm glad Ebay got these losers.
Reply to this comment
by SpeedPsycho October 15, 2009 4:46 PM PDT
Apparently some idiots don't realize it doesn't legally INCLUDE anybody. Read unknown unknown's post. He's correct.
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 7:18 AM PDT
Apparently some idiot thinks that "Not For Resale" is a binding contract when only one party agrees to it.
by Dalkorian October 16, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
Slaves aren't used to choices, they're used to doing what they're told.
by Mr. Dee October 15, 2009 4:07 PM PDT
Serve them right, what a bunch of free loaders. Microsoft actually provides a complimentary copy of the software and additional extras and this is how you say thank you? You can imagine some of the dramatic request made by these individuals when they were begging for a kit to host a party. Microsoft is not saying you are obligated to host a party and demonstrate the software, you could install it and don't do a thing, but to turn around and actually sell it? Just lame. Another case of the good suffering for the bad, don't expect Microsoft to do this again in the future. Once bitten, twice shy.
Reply to this comment
by catbutt5 October 16, 2009 12:52 AM PDT
Don't be so sure... remember... MS did something link this not that long ago with developers, I think they had to pay 'though. It came with MS Windows Server and an Opteron motherboard with 2 procs if memory serves me. ebay was FLOODED with this developer combo for months.
It seems no matter what's being given away, there's always several people who think they can make a quick buck by defrauding the system.
RE: unknown unknown's post... This isn't about a contract, it's about selling items that one received in bad faith - that is, they defrauded a system of that was setup to give free software to participants under very clear restrictions.
Let's see, words that TV watchers can understand... It's like when those people applied for tickets to Michael Jackson's funeral merely to scalp the tickets. The people at the door were fully within their rights to deny admittance to anyone who wasn't the original recipient.
Ahh... the greedy.
by SJ2571 October 16, 2009 2:24 AM PDT
"Microsoft actually provides a complimentary copy of the software and additional extras and this is how you say thank you?" -- So you've never seen sales where people describe the item as "unwanted gift" ? It's perfectly legal to sell anything to anyone. Cites have been given elsewhere in these posts. It's a fact, so get over it.
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
You are half right. If they accepted the software in exchange for thowring the party they should do the right thing and throw the dang party. Then they can sell it.
by censorshipblows October 15, 2009 4:20 PM PDT
Microsoft can go eff itself.
Reply to this comment
by bananaphonerules October 15, 2009 4:48 PM PDT
[Insert random comment here] oh...you already did.
by Mr. Dee October 15, 2009 6:11 PM PDT
Heh, you can't even spell.
by mistasandman October 15, 2009 7:07 PM PDT
You get your auction pulled? :)
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 7:22 AM PDT
@mistasandman

Yes, I did. Unused Vista got a Microsoft DMCA takedown notice. eBay pulled the plug on my auction, then refused to show me the notice citing the need for me to go to court to get a supoena (can't spell that...) in case there was a "trade secret" involved. Trying to work with MicroSoft was worse. Their employees aren't allowed to talk or think outside a carefully worded script. They would not talk about my specific auction or address my specific concerns which is to say "since I never used the software where is the violation of EULA in reselling it". There was no violation and I was out the money. Who the heck needs two copies of Vista on one computer?
by Dalkorian October 16, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
@Renegade Knight, that second copy is in case WGA blows up in their customers faces - again. Besides, slaves do what their masters tell them to do, not the other way around.
by sharmajunior October 15, 2009 4:34 PM PDT
I don't understand how can someone sell something that says "NOT FOR RESALE" on its packaging.

It also says "PROMOTIONAL DISC" on it, so I don't know how this can be legally sold. THere should be a better way of figuring out who is a genuine person and who is getting it just for the sale value of it.

I am happy with my Party pack, I distributed the goodies to family and friends and had a jolly time. I still think Microsoft should have provided a copy or a coupon for Windows 7 to the party guests.

BTW Windows 7 ultimate RTM rocks...really happy with it as compared to VIsta. On the other hand, anything will seem to work better than Vista.
Reply to this comment
by SpeedPsycho October 15, 2009 4:47 PM PDT
lol
by unknown unknown October 15, 2009 6:50 PM PDT
"I don't understand how can someone sell something that says "NOT FOR RESALE" on its packaging."

Just because it's in writing doesn't mean it's necessarily enforceable. In this cause the First Sale Doctrine which is an exception to the rights of the Copyright holder (17 U.S.C. § 109) that allows consumer to sell or give away any lawfully obtained physical copy (including CDs with software) of a copyright work without the permission or compensation of the copyright holder.

"It also says "PROMOTIONAL DISC" on it, so I don't know how this can be legally sold...."

The fact they printed it on the disc doesn't really mean anything. Fact is there is a law protecting reselling reguardless of what they put on the disc.
http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/umg_v_augusto/LA07CV03106SJO-O.pdf
by sharmajunior October 15, 2009 9:29 PM PDT
@ unknown unknown

Thanks for clearing that up. I was gonna go google it up to see what kinds of laws are in place for this kind of behavior. Now it is a bit clear.
by topgunb2 October 16, 2009 4:40 AM PDT
@unknown unknown , does it stand true for concert tickets with reserved seatings being sold for a higher price (i.e. in black)? a ticket is a physical item as well.
by kmomrik October 16, 2009 7:18 AM PDT
Everyone keeps on talking about the "physical discs" as if that is the problem. I don't believe (and I could be wrong) that MS cares about physical discs... it is the license code printed on the packaging that they don't want resold. Does your First Sale Doctrine cover licensed goods that you don't acutally OWN (like Windows)? If NOT, then you may want to peel off your license code before reselling!
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 7:24 AM PDT
Giving something away is the same as selling it. You get a smile instead of some money but the consideration is there. Just because some company wants to saddle me with an obligation doesn't mean I'm gong to sign on. Now if you actually siigned an agreement, that would be another thing.
by Vegaman_Dan October 16, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
Ebay also pulls music CD's that are sent out to radio stations for their promotions as well. Those CD's are also marked as promotional only and not for resale.

This is no different.
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 1:01 PM PDT
@Vegaman_Dan

Thats eBay running scared and not so much the law.
by mathmeister October 15, 2009 4:47 PM PDT
"Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 2 Security Update for Windows Vista Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (KB974470)"

Good grief.

...and this was just 1 of 17 new patches.

(Nothing to do with this article, but I had to post this somewhere...)
Reply to this comment
by gwailo247 October 15, 2009 5:55 PM PDT
Do you feel better about yourself now?
by Vegaman_Dan October 16, 2009 9:15 AM PDT
And a month or so ago there were 20+ new updates for Apple's OS in one day for their release. It's not a big deal.
by Dalkorian October 16, 2009 11:39 AM PDT
Notice he didn't mention Apple Dan, you did. Maybe he's a *nix fan (Ubuntu, Fedora, CentOS, Slackware, OpenBSD).

Troll much? ;-)
by Blah34783487 October 15, 2009 4:55 PM PDT
Good
Reply to this comment
by delraydoc October 15, 2009 5:14 PM PDT
I just went on eBay - there are MANY Win 7 Party Packs for sale. This article by Ina is either outdated or bogus. Go check for yourself. They are selling for about $150 to $250 on eBay right now.
Reply to this comment
by vmlenigma October 15, 2009 5:51 PM PDT
I would much rather have my wisdom teeth take out with out any type of pain killers rather than go to a party with this bunch of losers
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee October 15, 2009 6:10 PM PDT
Steve Jobs will be there.
by stickfu October 16, 2009 7:10 AM PDT
...too laugh
by Seaspray0 October 16, 2009 8:32 AM PDT
Linus Torvalds is bringing the dip.
by casanegro October 15, 2009 6:09 PM PDT
How about a Mac Lanch Party? Now, that would be cool!!!
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 October 16, 2009 8:39 AM PDT
Do you feel left out because apple didn't have any when they relased snow leopard?
by Dalkorian October 16, 2009 11:40 AM PDT
Mac's don't need pathetic "Launch Parties".
by magicmaster October 15, 2009 6:14 PM PDT
Please google First Sale Doctrine, or at least read Unknown unknown's post above.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan October 16, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
The question becomes was this a product intended for sale? No. This was a promotional item with conditions attached to it.

Think of it this way.... you are given a new car to drive for a year or two as a loaner. You know, try it out. But instead of doing that, you decide to sell it instead.

Should you get to keep the money or should the car company be coming after you for theft?
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 1:03 PM PDT
@Vegaman_Dan

Ir you were loaned the car, you will be giving it back. If you were given the car it's yours to re-sell. Your example was a loaner. Were they guys supposed to send the kit back?
by Blackfoot4 October 15, 2009 6:24 PM PDT
Do they have the same restrictions on tupperware promotional items?
Reply to this comment
by resqtech October 15, 2009 7:26 PM PDT
It is what it is though. If you don't approve of it fine, but last I checked, Microsoft wasn't associated with UNICEF and therefore is a FOR PROFIT corporation....at least until our presidential cabinet gets a part of them too.
Reply to this comment
by tektaktyks October 15, 2009 7:39 PM PDT
yea i watched few auctions of the "signed" copy of 7 ,sold for under $250,i think its lame to sell it,i know im keeping my copy.spreading the good word is least i can do in return.
Reply to this comment
by SJ2571 October 16, 2009 2:20 AM PDT
"Not for resale" is a load of tosh and not legally binding anyway. Anyone can sell absolutely anything they own to another individual for whatever price they want. It's how commerce works.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
Unless MS abuses the DMCA take down notice and then eBay pull your auction. Then commerce is stiffled. I'm glad they are being outed like rats on this one since this is exactly what they did to me when I tried ot sell my unused copy of Vista (which didnt' say "not for resale' on it.)
by bookshire October 16, 2009 8:15 AM PDT
I'd be interested to know where you get that from. True you CAN sell what you own, but you don't own the software. You own a license that says how you're allowed to use it, but the software itself doesn't belong to you. Therefore they can dictate if you can sell or transfer that license or not. If you did own the software then you'd also have the right to de-compile it, modify it and sell as many copies of it you want without paying MS a dime.

it's like having a lease. I lease my apartment. I use it it, I live in it, but it's not mine. I can't re-sell it or rent it to someone else because the owner doesn't want me to. When you lease a car it's the same concept. You can drive it around and do nearly anything you want with it, but you can't re-sell it because it's not yours. Leases also can say if you can transfer the lease to another person or not, though most don't allow it.
by Vegaman_Dan October 16, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
That is unfortunately, not the case in the United States. There are plenty of precedents to point to.
by Renegade Knight October 16, 2009 1:07 PM PDT
@bookshire

Yes and no. I don't own the sofware but I do own the media and such thus there is something physical to sell long before I even come near the EULA. Even though I 'lease' the software it's a perpetual lease giving me full right of use and when I "sell it" I transfer that right of use. It pretty much comes back to I can sell it the same way I can sell a book without owning the words in it.
by sargess25 October 16, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
"... Steve Ballmer "signature edition" of Windows 7 Ultimate."

sounds like the epitaph to his career
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (69 Comments)
advertisement

Google hopes to turn the river into a canal

Searching real-time services like Twitter at the moment is like standing in front of a firehose on a hot day: you'll get cooled off, but you'll get knocked over. Google wants to change that.

Will video site Vevo be next-gen MTV?

Vevo is the Web music-video service built by the big record labels with help from YouTube. Can it make an MTV-like splash?

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right