• On MovieTome: Pixar's new film has characters from Up
October 9, 2009 9:34 AM PDT

Microsoft hints at another cheap Office option

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 25 comments

In addition to the bare-bones Office 2010 Starter that will come bundled on many new PCs, starting next year, Microsoft looks to have another low-cost option up its sleeve.

As part of the announcement of Office Starter on Thursday, Microsoft said consumers will be able to go to retailers and get a "product key card" with a code to upgrade to a full version of Office, such as the Home and Student, Home and Business, and Professional versions.

(Credit: Microsoft)

If you look closely at the image for the Office Home and Student card, it says "for one preloaded PC only." Now, typically, Office Home and Student is licensed for up to three PCs. That means that this card, which is good for only one PC, has the potential to be cheaper than the standard retail package, which includes a DVD copy and is good for three computers.

Microsoft isn't talking licensing details yet for Home and Student, but I'm told by those in the know that my logic is correct. Office 2010, in all its versions, is set to debut next year, with a beta test version of the product due later this year.

The software maker is clearly looking for as many ways as possible to put the latest version of Office in the hands of those willing to be legitimate users. In addition to the client-based Office 2010 versions, Microsoft also plans its Office Web Applications, browser-based versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote. Those products will be free and ad-supported for consumers, offered as part of Windows Live.

The other interesting part of Thursday's announcement is the "click to run" download method, which allows users to download Office over the Web but quickly get started before all the code has run. That method uses application virtualization. A side benefit is that such an installation can constantly be checking for updates and keeping itself current.

Although Vice President Takeshi Numoto told CNET yesterday that Microsoft had nothing new to announce on the subscription front, the click-to-run approach would seem an excellent technology to use to power a subscription version of Office (or any other Microsoft product, for that matter).

There was a subscription version of Office 2007, dubbed Equitpt, but that product also came bundled with Windows Live OneCare and was scrapped, as Microsoft discontinued OneCare.

Microsoft has spent years looking for new ways to sell Office, exploring everything from ad-funded software to prepaid cards good for a certain number of months of Office use.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Windows Mobile glitch dates 2010 texts 2016
CES: Windows 7, Natal talk on tap from Ballmer
Microsoft sets Office 2010 pricing
Understanding Windows 7's 'GodMode'
Visual Studio launch delayed by 'a few weeks'
Glitches mar launch of Livescribe app store
Windows 7 leaving Redmond's help desk less busy
Microsoft top lawyer: EU deal opens new chapter
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Super2online October 9, 2009 10:21 AM PDT
All of these options bode well for Microsoft. Each one has it's own special appeal, and should fair well with differing segments of the market. It seems to me that when you combine the enhancements to the software and the new marketing initiatives, they are making all the right moves to stay ahead of the competition.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk October 9, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
Wow - not a bad idea. It appears that Google Apps, OOo, iWork, and all the other competition is starting to make Microsoft sweat a little.

Before the Koolaid-drinking campers among us start shouting "troll!", know that this is actually a good thing. Anything that fosters active and healthy competition is a good thing.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan October 9, 2009 10:58 AM PDT
I would disagree with this plan- not that the plan isn't good- it is, but now there are several options available and by different methods which may lead to confusion on what program is for what promotion, etc.

Heck, even I don't quite follow excatly which promotion is being focused on at this point.
by xenophod October 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT
Random_Walk - you are spot on. Competition is a good thing. Microsoft got fat and happy and OO and others have made them start looking in the rear view mirror again. Hopefully they also wise up and realize that businesses, not just home & student users are looking at other options.
by bbneo2 October 13, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
Microsoft's bloatware product line is going to continue to drag them into the crapper.
Now they are trying to give it away for free.

It sucks. It's slow, and inefficient with your time and computer resources. C'est la vie.

Thank you Google. Thank you Open Office.
by censorshipblows October 9, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
Ummmm no thanks, I'll stick with Google Docs.
Reply to this comment
by wixostrix October 10, 2009 12:54 AM PDT
Please, I work at Salesforce.com and we use Google Docs like 90% of the time for collaborative purposes. It f**king sucks. I mean the collaboration is good but could be better and if your changing formatting and stuff you have to be super careful because it is very easy to for the formating and alignment of the whole document to is screwed. It works, but I could be way better.
by cary1 October 9, 2009 10:49 AM PDT
I am looking forward to browser based Office. That will make my work so much easier
Reply to this comment
by darkebinary October 9, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
I'm curious to know how. Not that I'm doubting you as I have no idea what you do for a living, but I see no advantage in browser based applications unless you're someone who is always using shared PCs, like in a college computer lab.
by censorshipblows October 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT
darkebinary, how about if you're collaborating? Much easier to do in the cloud.
by cayhorstmann October 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT
The advantage is that you can easily share your documents, avoiding the nightmare of an inbox filled with a dozen versions of the same document. At least that's the advantage with Google docs--don't know if Microsoft will allow collaboration with the free version.
by cary1 October 9, 2009 12:02 PM PDT
@darkebinary

Lot of times, I have to share files with different people which makes it difficult to track the latest version. Google Docs in theory can solve the problem, but it is has very basic feature set and is not fully compatible with Office documents. That's why it will be nice if MS Office is available online.
by darkebinary October 9, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
Ahh, I can see your point there. We used EMC eRooms and eventually SharePoint for that kind of functionality, but if you didn't have something like that available I could see how a web based office system would be helpful. Thanks for elaborating.
by xenophod October 9, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
Random_Walk - you are spot on. Competition is a good thing. Microsoft got fat and happy and OO and others have made them start looking in the rear view mirror again. Hopefully they also wise up and realize that businesses, not just home & student users are looking at other options.
Reply to this comment
by EvanSei October 9, 2009 11:12 AM PDT
if they make the price reasonable I will get it, I have ben wanting office home and student for a while now (trial version just ran out) but $140 is ridiculous, google docs is free,open office is free, works is free (pre-installed) and iwork is reasonable why does MS feel the need to milk us lower the price make some deals. Sure they have a student discount but if you have ever seen the deal it is ****, MS start doing what apple is doing with their student discount give ALL students a discount (k-12, college), not all of us are college students, and not all of us have an email ending in "edu." .
Reply to this comment
by zeroplane October 9, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
nope still going to go with Open Office and google docs.. never going to pay for office productivity software ever again.. And if Open Office because a pay to play I am sure there will be other open source alternatives.
Reply to this comment
by JCPayne October 9, 2009 2:07 PM PDT
Open Office still beats that "price" and still does everything I need. No thanks Ballmer and crew.
Reply to this comment
by beat_elite October 9, 2009 6:51 PM PDT
As long as i'm not paying anything more than $70 for Office 2010 then I might feel a little better about Office software. However, I'm sticking with OOo for now.
Reply to this comment
by October 9, 2009 7:11 PM PDT
How much more junk can you put into Office? It was bloated 10 years ago. I guess running it through a browser loads the extra garbage on someone else's machine, but this is a BAD idea. Software is a product, not a service. You buy it - you don't rent it - and you don't need no stinkin' upgrade.
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder October 9, 2009 7:57 PM PDT
All the editions of office except starter will come with ultra-cool OneNote :)
Reply to this comment
by aafuss October 10, 2009 3:03 AM PDT
As long MS considers that many people don't need to upgrade ther PC's-they should offer a home version of Office at $39 (Works cost this much).
Reply to this comment
by rmullen0 October 10, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
Why would I want this when I can get OpenOffice for free? The new version of Office doesn't even have a stinking menu!!!!
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 October 13, 2009 6:01 AM PDT
Rumor has it that eventually OpenOffice won't either. Ribbons rule!
by mlcgruhlke October 14, 2009 5:58 PM PDT
I have an idea that's even better than this - forget Microsoft and download OpenOffice.org. It is the office pack of choice for Linux and Mac users. Why pay for a bloated MS program when you can have the same thing free??? Open source software will be the eventual undoing of conglomerates such as Microsoft and Apple.
Reply to this comment
by lewac October 26, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
we agree... we abandoned win2000 several years ago and now only "borrow" a system that is compatible for turbotax... turbotax does not yet install under WINE unfortunately. we're wondering if the makers of this type of proprietary software know that they can sell their product to linux users if the thing runs under WINE?
(25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right