• On The Insider: Miley Cyrus in Sex and the City 2
August 7, 2009 12:01 AM PDT

Exclusive: Getting up close and personal with Natal

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 84 comments
Share

Project Natal is both great gaming and a great workout, as CNET News' Ina Fried experienced firsthand when she got to try out the technology last week.

(Credit: CNET News)

REDMOND, Wash.--One of the reasons that Microsoft got such buzz for Project Natal is because it is so easy to see how the technology could change the face of gaming.

But it's even easier to appreciate once you get a chance to try the gesture recognition technology yourself. When I was in Redmond, Wash., last week, I got a chance to do just that.

Playing Ricochet, a 3D breakout-like game, I found myself wanting to do whatever I could to stop the balls from passing me. It felt less like a traditional video game and more like I was a soccer goalie and an entire team was firing shots at me. (For a firsthand look, check out the embedded video below.)

It was both a lot of fun and a bit of a workout. Apparently, I'm not the only one who has noticed that.

"Since I started working on this project, I've lost almost like 10 pounds," said Kudo Tsunoda, general manager of Microsoft Game Studios and the creative director for Project Natal. "We're going to have the most in-shape development team you've ever seen."

The effort is important to more than just the waistlines in Redmond. Microsoft is counting on Natal to give an important bump to the Xbox 360, which Microsoft has said is only mid-way through its lifecycle, even though it has been on the market since 2005.

After Ricochet, I tried my hand at an existing driving game that had been connected to the Natal interface. And while my steering hasn't gotten any better than when I checked out a set-up from GestureTek earlier this year, Microsoft's technology is quite impressive. The steering and other controls were both intuitive and responsive.

I moved my foot forward to accelerate and backward to slow down, brake, and eventually reverse the car. To steer, I simply used my hands like a steering wheel.

Although Microsoft demonstrated Natal at this year's E3 trade show, the software maker hasn't said when the technology will be available. The company has said that Natal, which incorporates face, voice, and gesture recognition technologies, will be sold as an add-on to the current Xbox 360 console.

The effort to turn Natal from concept to shipping product has been something of a mini Manhattan Project inside Microsoft, according to former Carnegie Mellon researcher Johnny Chung Lee, who is among those working on the effort.

And while smashing bricks and cars are some of the first ideas on how to use Natal, the vision clearly goes a lot further.

Inside Xbox, Tsunoda noted that Natal can be useful for more than gaming. He noted that for many first-time console users, the controller itself can be intimidating, even when trying to do things like navigate through menus. Oftentimes people get their first experience with the Xbox when they are at the house of a friend or family member who has an Xbox and they are handed a controller with lots of buttons.

"For a lot of people that can be intimidating," Tsunoda said. "You don't really know what to do and you're starting to feel stupid and everyone is looking at you and you are not being successful. That's really not a good first way to interact with our console."

Tsunoda and Entertainment Unit President Robbie Bach both said they are confident that Natal will also have great appeal for the core gamers already spending hours a week playing on the Xbox.

"Even the folks who are hard-core Halo or Splinter Cell players, they are also going to want to play Natal games," Bach said in an interview.

In an interview with CNET News last month, Bill Gates talked about how the technology has applications well beyond just gaming.

"I think the value is as great for if you're in the home, as you want to manage your movies, music, home system type stuff, it's very cool there," he said. "And I think there's incredible value as we use that in the office connected to a Windows PC. So Microsoft research and the product groups have a lot going on there, because you can use the cost reduction that will take place over the years to say, 'Why shouldn't that be in most office environments?'"

At last week's analyst meeting, Bach and Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer, also outlined the broad appeal of being able to interact more directly with computer interfaces. After Bach tried his hand at some Natal gaming, Mundie offered a demonstration of how gesture recognition might function in a work setting, saying that the desktop PC of the future could in fact encompass the entire office.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Microsoft labs tests a Wikipedia of average Joes
Windows 7 family pack starting to sell out
Behind last night's Bing outage
Microsoft's Bing goes down
Bing's iPhone plans (and more)
Microsoft's Mehdi on financial impact of Yahoo deal
Microsoft: November security updates are fine
Using tunes to tout Windows 7
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (84 Comments)
by hatmon August 7, 2009 12:36 AM PDT
I'm a big fan of the ps3 as microsoft simply abandoned me in the days of the original xbox as soon as their new toy was ready. However if MS release this I think it will be a nail in Sony's coffin.
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ August 7, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
Eh? They WILL release it, its been confirmed.
by dhavleak August 7, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
@ hatmon

Why do you say they abandoned you? The console had a short but pretty decent lifespan of 4 years, new titles were still released even after the 360 became available, and the original Xbox is still supported.

Natal looks great, but it won't necessarily be the "nail in Sony's coffin". The PS3 does extremely well in Europe and Japan and will continue to do so.
by anonymuos August 7, 2009 3:39 AM PDT
MS has abandoned quite a lof of its products and its userbase in favor of something that is demonstrably better. original Xbox -> Xbox 360, Windows 2000 -> XP, Visual Studio 2003/.NET1.1 -> VS 2005/.NET 2.0, Windows Vista -> Windows 7. But the new product in such cases has always been better.
Reply to this comment
by FutureGuy August 7, 2009 10:33 AM PDT
Actually MS is pretty good with supporting older versions, still on my 1st gen Zune but on the latest firmware for free.
by dhavleak August 7, 2009 12:04 PM PDT
@anonymous

I'm not entirely sure if you're trolling or not -- but I'm not inclined to give you the benefit of doubt right now. I'm so sick of seeing every thread related to MS/Apple/Google/FOSS turned into a silly slug-fest by silly comments like the one you just posted.

So I'll keep things simple by replying with bare facts.

You say "MS has abandoned quite a lof of its products and its user base"

Here are the facts:
1) " Windows 2000 -> XP"
- Windows XP was released in mid-2001
- Windows 2000 mainstream support continued until June 2005 (four years after XP's release)
- Extended support for windows 2000 (including security hotfixes etc.) will end in July 2010!

2) "Visual Studio 2003/.NET1.1 -> VS 2005/.NET 2.0"
- .Net 1.0 released in 2002. Mainstream support ended in 2007. Extended support ended July 14th 2009.
- .Net 1.1 released in 2003. Mainstream support October 2008. Extended support July 2015!!
- Are you beginning to get a sense of how ludicrous your comment was now?

3) "Windows Vista -> Windows 7"
- Windows Vista released in early 2007. Mainstream support will end in April 2012 (5 years)
- Extended support will end in 2017.
- Extended support for XP will end somewhere in the middle (2014 -- a *thirteen year* lifecycle -- based on customer demand).
by chrkeller August 7, 2009 5:42 AM PDT
We shall see. I still don't buy these kind of motion devices working for deep games such as Halo, Gears and Fallout 3. With the Wii most of the games that use the motion controls are bit limited in scope such as Sports Resort. Larger games such as Galaxy and Zelda don't really use motions that much. I am not sure the Natal will be anything other than a niche for some party games.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 August 7, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
I really think gaming is just the gateway application. Computational biology visualization applications would be able to do a lot with this. In fact, any application where you are dealing with a lot of data visually represented would benefit from it.
by FutureGuy August 7, 2009 10:35 AM PDT
This will create a whole new type of games, paintball would be so much fun and less painful.
by August 7, 2009 10:45 AM PDT
The main problem is that there's no controller to grip when using Natal (unlike the Wii or even the PS3's new system). Doing some weird motion just isn't the same as pushing a button (on a controller or on a mouse) to fire. And besides, how would you aim the gun? FPS's just don't fit with Natal. IMHO, FPS's only truly work on the PC and the Wii, thanks to mouse and keyboard (try turning around to get someone shooting you in the back in halo. CAN'T! You're dead. PC FPS's never suffer from that problem) and the Wiimote (which has plenty of buttons for use).
by squished August 7, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
What stopping you from grabbing a lid from one of your kitchen pans and using that for a steering wheel? The Natal software could be written to handle that scenario and you wouldn't need to buy another expensive controller.
by DrtyDogg August 9, 2009 6:36 PM PDT
look at some of the demos and you will see that Natal can not only tell if there is something in your hand, but interact with it.
by Rolker August 7, 2009 5:58 AM PDT
Looks very interesting, and I'm eager to see how this project will be implemented beyond the gaming world.
Reply to this comment
by absolUtmagnitUd August 7, 2009 6:05 AM PDT
I'm most interested in what this means BEYOND simply playing games. Everyone that seems to touch this thing give the impression of being EXTREEMLY impressed with the technology and accuracy. The implications for the medical, educational, consumeer arenas could make this a true LIFE changer and not simply a knock off control system for gamers...
Reply to this comment
by bonesbautista August 7, 2009 7:31 AM PDT
Exactly what I was thinking, with implementations tied to voice-recognition software and sign-language-recognition software, transcription software - enabling people to free themselves from physical interaction a keyboard as a requirement to use a computer...

Good stuff.
by Astrodude0 August 9, 2009 7:27 PM PDT
While this technology isn't exactly new (MS just got the existing technology from some company), I agree that this stuff will be more useful for Windows than Xboxes.
by Hokulea August 9, 2009 9:04 PM PDT
Just imagine what the pr0n industry could do with this technology. Dancing with the stars move over, here comes dancing with cougars!
by CylonCheese August 7, 2009 6:05 AM PDT
I'm all for out with the old and in with the new, we have to move forward.
Reply to this comment
by redmarine August 7, 2009 6:22 AM PDT
I seriously hope it will be possible use a reallife gun to aim with. That would own so much.
Reply to this comment
by captain_numerica August 7, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
That would own. But remember when Wii came out and there were numerous reports of broken TVs/mirrors/etc from wiineses accidentally being thrown? It would be like that x100. :)
by Seaspray0 August 7, 2009 2:39 PM PDT
Don't forget to put blanks in the reallife gun or you might put some reallife bulletholes in your reallife walls. :-)
by pithenumber August 7, 2009 6:36 AM PDT
xbox360 turns into Wii2.0
ps3 will follow soon

and pc will get natal and ill be jumping around trying to manage my finances
Reply to this comment
by sting7k August 7, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
Natal makes the Wii look like a child's toy.
by BingItOn August 7, 2009 11:48 AM PDT
Wii = WHY?
by Byteme2009 August 7, 2009 7:05 AM PDT
It looks very promising - I just wonder how well it would work if you have pets running around your house! My dogs wander around the living room where I have all my game system and home theater equipment and I would think this would negatively impact the ability for control. I know this would not be a problem for a lot of people though.

I am still holding off on purchasing a 360, and certainly would not buy one because of Natal the second it comes out unless there was plenty of software supporting that would actually interest me. The game shown in this article - neat but I'll pass. This really could revolutionize gaming, but early days yet IMO. Still, if this technology can deliver on its promise then it would more than likely result in me purchasing a 360. That being said, when I think of the games I usually play I wonder if this system would really work effectively (at least without having some sort of handheld unit to supplement it). I've been playing a lot of Fallout 3 most recently - it would be interesting to see how this sort of technology would work on a game like this. Aiming a gun, punching out an opponent, swinging a bat - this would be great for that, but then again the Wii could do those motions at the moment. Navigating a bunch of menus, running around wastelands and sewers - not sure if this would translate so well. Certainly will be interesting though to see what happens with this technology.
Reply to this comment
by NervClaX August 7, 2009 7:22 AM PDT
Within weeks of Natal's release I predict an exaflood of shovelware and Wii ports. I'm sure it's really nice technology, but where do they expect the creative and fun games to come from? Microsoft will have to do all the heavy lifting developing games for this thing just as Nintendo is the only company making decent titles for the Wii. Third-party developers have shown very little respect for the intelligence of casual gamers on the Wii. Chicken Shoot, anyone?

I see a brighter future for project Natal in the non-gaming areas of Microsoft. It seems like a wonderful way to navigate a menu and control media playback.
Reply to this comment
by Super2online August 7, 2009 7:50 AM PDT
Take the development of Natal 3-5 years into the future and I see a world with PC's that are gainfully employed automatically by voice and gesture through facial recognition for everyone with a user account on that PC:

Imagine walking into your home office and your PC reconizes you and says: Good Morning Roger, would you like an your normal morning update? Roger replies, "yes". The system reports todays weather, traffic issues, morning and afternoon appointments as you sit down behind the desk. A similiar Natal unit siting on your desk does a quick scan again for security purposes and brings up all the apps you normally use this time a day on your full glass 3 ft x 5ft wall of glass monitor.

Using a combination of voice and hand gestures you open a doc and create it through dictation. Creation is fast and easy as the system does not mispell words and corrects grammar automatically. Once complete, you request a voice dictation at 1.5 times normal speed to confirm your satisfied. You apply some formating through a combination of voice and hand gestures from menu and available layout options and ask the system to save, attach the an email that came in late last night and send to a business colleage.

You walk over to pour yourself a cup of coffee as you ask the system to scan this mornings incoming emails from anyone on your high priority list of business clients. Two are read to you as you watch hightlights of last nights basketball game from the opposite side of your glass monitors since your desk faces out to the room and you are not on it's opposite side, Everything is reversed but it doesn't matter to you.

Your ready to go to work now and ask the system to forward those two emails to your work computer as you walk out of your home office. The system complies and goes into hibernation mode after 5 minutes of you leaving the room. However once inside, your Ford Tauris notifies you of a change in this mornings work appointments and asked you asked to quickly go to a meeting with a report ready by 9:30. You request two docs and one spreadsheet to be sent from your home system to your work system and smile.

This last scenario is made possible by the Ford Sync features of your Taurus that have been upgraded to include Natal components and software. The Ford/Microsoft collaboration has now begun to make real strides in making scenarios like this in the near future possible.
Reply to this comment
by Astrodude0 August 9, 2009 7:32 PM PDT
Why would you want to talk to your computer, and put your arms up to make gestures, when you can just sit on your arse and just use the keyboard and mouse?
by lil-yankee August 30, 2009 9:02 AM PDT
I dont know if this is just me, but dude, more than amazing, that sounds creepy. That means that the computer will know your every move and report it to somebody who's watching you and whom is not on your best side, your boss...
I wouldnt want to have another wife at work....... silly
by BankAdmin August 7, 2009 8:19 AM PDT
I'll set the over/under at 1.5 years before Natal becomes nothing more than an expensive paper-weight.

While I agree that Natal can be used for other purposes. (I definitely think menu navigation / interaction is a good idea) Natal will be nothing more than a novelty for video games.

How will Natal work with fighting games. (It won't)
How will Natal work with First-person shooters (It won't)
How will natal work with RPGs? (It wont)

I can only see limited uses for Natal in video game enviroments.... Wii has a huge jump-start in the motion control area of video games... but what truly innovative titles have you seen from the Wii outside of Wii sports or Wii Resort?
Reply to this comment
by chrkeller August 7, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
I agree completely. I just don't see how it will work with deep games. I mean Natal is certainly notches above the Eyetoy, but it will suffer from the same thing, it will be used in shallow games. Plus what console add-on has ever took over and did well? At best I could see Natal working well with a standard controller. For deep games that require a lot of buttons, I just don't see Natal replacing it.
by Zoobie August 7, 2009 8:44 AM PDT
Even though Natal sounds like it is more advanced than EyeToy, I think Sony is right when they say, "we've tried using just motion control and learned that for somethings you just need something physical in your hand with a button."

Get ready, folks. Natal will only be purchase number one. After that, you'll find yourself buying $100 games with plastic peripherals that work with Natal and have normal controller components built in. I can't wait until everyone has to create silicon sleeves (ala. WiiMotes) for their peripherals that busted someone's TV. It will be like a room full of toy guns, swords, and steering wheels in bubble wrap!
by rapier1 August 7, 2009 8:50 AM PDT
What console add on has done well? Ummm... Guitar Hero/Rock Band?
by chrkeller August 7, 2009 9:18 AM PDT
1) I do agree, there absolutely needs to be something physical in hand, just moving around isn't going to work.

2) Guitar Hero isn't a console add-on, it is a game that comes with a unique controller. It was released across all systems. A console add-on is something like the Power Glove, Eye Toy, N64 Ram Upgrade or that N64 Japanese add-on drive. The Sega CD and 32x are more examples. Add-on type stuff have never worked in the console world, perhaps this will be the first time, however I am skeptical.
by FutureGuy August 7, 2009 10:44 AM PDT
I think you are missing the point, you could grab a real life steering wheel and natal should just pick that up. It doesn't care what you hold in your hand, just how you move it. Think of it this way, when you look at a person holding a steering wheel your brain can compute where he wants to turn based on the visual input, Natal works the same way, its software makes decisions based on visual inputs, you should be albe to hold whatever you want in your hand and I am pretty sure there will be a ton on accessories that combine Natal with traditional button imputs to create all kinds of controllers.
by FutureGuy August 7, 2009 10:50 AM PDT
@Zoobie, Natal can easily come with a cheap controller that looks like the PS3 controller (without that bright ball) that does nothing more than turn on a colored led in frount based on what button they pressed and Natal picks up the conbination of motion and light to do the rest. Such a controller should cost no more than a couple of bucks.

I think Natal team is doing a very bad job conveying this message.
by chrkeller August 7, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
Picking up a real life steering wheel isn't going to help the issue, there is no resistance when turning a wheel simply held in the air. Same goes with using your foot top 'push' the gas pedal down... without resistance moving around is going to be odd and strange.
by dhavleak August 7, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
@ BankAdmin

One thing I've learned after many years as a (self-titled) hardcore gamer, is never to underestimate the creativity of game developers.

How will Natal work with fighting games you ask?
>> You already have to know all kinds of button and stick combinations for fighting games. Imagine that getting converted to gestures that bear a closer resemblance to the actual move you're trying to make.

How will Natal work with FPS games?
>> By enhancing them. Here's an idea. Imagine an FPS game in which you have to take cover a lot because there's no respawning. How do you glance out from under cover / tuck your head back in quickly without getting sniped? Guess what -- with Natal, you could just stick your head up and then back down.

How will Natal work with RPGs?
>> Depends on the RPG -- but I predict this will actually be one of Natal's strengths. I mean, it mostly depends on the specific RPG, but in general RPGs are actually limited by what you can do on a controller. Natal increases the possibilities big-time. Same case for open-world games.
by CrashPad63 August 7, 2009 3:09 PM PDT
How will Natal work with fighting games. It does already
How will Natal work with First-person shooters It does already
How will natal work with RPGs? I does already.
You dope look up the original video releases of this. Man this thing rocks.
by jonathan_a August 7, 2009 8:46 AM PDT
If Project Natal is done right, and gets A LOT of 3rd party developer support, the Wii is gonna be dead. The Wii itself, to me, feels dead, there's a huge lack of quality games, and the motion sensing is TERRIBLE without the additional adapter.

But this.... Project Natal... this is the future of motion sensing gameplay! If it's as good as it sounds, the 360 could dominate the console market over the Wii and PS3.... actually the 360 already outsells the PS3, so now all it has to do is kill the overrated Wii.
Reply to this comment
by chrkeller August 7, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
For starters all consoles die. The Wii at this point is one of the most successful gaming consoles ever.. It could die tomorrow and it was still a major win for Nintendo. Nintendo went from N64 and Gamecube sales to killing the competition. While I personally hate the Wii lineup, nobody can deny Nintendo won with the Wii no matter when it dies.
by Zoobie August 7, 2009 11:40 AM PDT
Do you really think MS would be going down this path if it wasn't for the Wii? Sorry--they thought it was a horsepower race with Sony, and Nintendo blind-sided them both. Nintendo thought differently and, for a first generation product, it's been a huge success. Is there room to improve? Absolutely, but give credit where it is due. Competition is good, and the fact we are having this discussion is proof of that. If Sony and Nintendo die, MS will do to Xbox what they did to IE when there was no competition. Be careful what you wish for.

Oh, yeah... don't cry when all the first Natal games are just ports of what already exists on the Wii rather than the future of gaming you are so hoping for.
by iwuzbord August 7, 2009 8:46 AM PDT
essentially in one sentence,
i think natal will be everything the wii wanted to be.
Reply to this comment
by jsjohnson August 7, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
Well think of some other benefits to this on a larger scale. Games are really the low hanging fruit but they will ultimately be the least of concerns in the revenue stream....

How about learning martial arts, tai chi, yoga, pilates with appropriate form and feedback in your own home, without being embarrassed in a class of 20? Multiple levels could be taught all through the system. What about learning to play an instrument? How about learning proper workout technique to avoid injury before you go to the gym using simulated weights as a way to demonstrate form? This could be used to assist Olympic athletes by analyzing biomechanics. How about a computer that knows when you are slouching at your desk and changes your personal ergonomics? This is just the beginning folks.

Sure it might be difficult to use Natal to control complex games, but then maybe complex gestures will accompany that make a compelling argument?
Reply to this comment
by lil-yankee August 30, 2009 9:10 AM PDT
dont think so, sorry
by beeroge1020 August 7, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
I think Natal will be a much more popular device than a lot of people on here are predicting. They've already said they want to make it available on PC also and that will generate a ton of user created content. Also kids will go crazy over this and when older people who don't normally associate with games/technology see it and experience it they will more than likely purchase it, similar to the iPhone. Whether or not it stays popular depends on the quality of the product and the ability to keep it updated and supplied with new content.

On a side note does anyone know if Ina is a man or woman? I always thought that Fried was a man but I was confused by the video. I'm not trying to be rude I just don't like being ignorant.
Reply to this comment
by cmsb1214 August 7, 2009 9:24 PM PDT
Ina was a man and became a woman after a sex change operation.
by codynews August 8, 2009 9:53 AM PDT
Ina looks 100% like the dude in "Big Bang Theory"
by megustansalchichas August 7, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
it is impressive for about 5 minutes but then you think about it and there's no way you're going to be jumping around hitting balls for 5 hours without having a heart attack. even games that have simple controls, like the driving games, are going to get tiring after a while (how long can you hold your arms out in front of you?). remember, the only reason people can sit in front of the boob tube for hours playing games is because it takes no physical effort.
Reply to this comment
by beeroge1020 August 7, 2009 9:40 AM PDT
true but i think it will fill a niche and if people get tired they can always switch to a controller.
by monkeyfun14 August 7, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
Well anything to get people healthy is good =P
by lil-yankee August 30, 2009 9:15 AM PDT
I agree with you. Although if it works as advised i will say that most people will want to try it just for being something new and cool, i dont see how it can sustain itself. To me, even if it works as they say it will, it will be nothing more than a luxury in your console. I dont see myselft playing for 3 hours in call of duty, marching arround, running, crouching, throwing away granades, clipping and who knows what else. The thing is cool, we might just be lazy. Who knows, i hope it works, im just sitting on the fences right now........
by ArsFragica August 7, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
This should attract those damn Wii casual gamers to the 360. Hoepfully Nintendo will lose their lead, I hate Nintendo, they sell really cheap products, taking advantage of casual people who want to be gamers. The 360 is an all-around appealing device, to the movie-goers, the hardcore gamers, and soon with Natal and Facebook/Twitter/Last.fm it's going to attract way more people. Go Microsoft! =)
Reply to this comment
by Astrodude0 August 9, 2009 7:44 PM PDT
You mean the RROD product is better than Nintendo products? Give me a break. 360's failure rate is something like 30%, while the Wii's failure rate is less than 1%. If anything you should thank Nintendo for bringing in more people into gaming.
by ospideyo August 7, 2009 10:07 AM PDT
I will put this on the shelf next to my 32x. I can't stand gimmicks and this is just another gimmick designed to be all the rage today, sell out fast and then forgotten tomorrow. I am predicting these will be very popular at launch and sell out fast, within a years time sales will drop, the price will lower and in a little over a years time no one will want one. If Microsoft is smart it will do the same thing Nintendo did with the Wii and keep supply low and demand high. That way it can prolong the life of these units. Just like the Wii it will be fun for a short period of time but become redundant over time.
Reply to this comment
by csingh August 8, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
The wii promised a brand new control scheme, new inituitive gameplay. No one thought it was going to be a set of predetermined waggle controls. It was supposed to be what the Wii Motion Plus is now. I wouldnt be suprized if it brought on some serious tittles and gained back some of its hardcore fanbase.

If Natal can follow through with its promise and not just put out something half-arsed like wii did. I wouldnt be suprized if this did change the way users interact with AI forever.
by kwhsy82 August 7, 2009 10:16 AM PDT
There's a reference to a Manhattan-style project -- maybe MSFT is having challenges getting this out in a cost-effective fashion?

Also, I vaguely wonder if the folks at Nintendo are taking all this in. I doubt they want to cede their current position in the market. I really like our Wii -- if Microsoft can produce something better at a reasonable price, more power to them.

I think all this dialog about "more complex games" is a bit off track. Maybe you can, maybe you can't. But Wii took off because it makes simple games more compelling or created new alternatives, like exercise or yoga.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (84 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right