• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
July 31, 2009 9:00 AM PDT

Microsoft prices Windows 7 family pack

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 111 comments

REDMOND, Wash.--Microsoft said on Friday that it will charge $149 for the family pack version of Windows 7, which allows users to upgrade up to three PCs to the Home Premium edition of the operating system.

(Credit: Microsoft)

The software maker had previously said it would offer the family pack, but had not said how much it would charge. (It actually inadvertently confirmed the family pack by referencing it in the licensing terms of a test version of Windows 7 that leaked onto the Internet.) The family pack covers those moving from XP or Vista to Windows 7.

Microsoft also announced pricing for the Windows Anytime Upgrade option, which lets users move from one version of Windows 7 to another.

Microsoft said that the move from Windows 7 Starter to Windows 7 Home Premium will cost $79.99. That is one of the key upgrades Microsoft is hoping to sell by convincing Netbook owners that they really want more of the Windows features.

Among the other prices, the move from Windows 7 Home Premium to Windows 7 Professional will cost $89.99, while going from Windows 7 Home Premium to Windows 7 Ultimate will cost $139.99. Although that last move is pricey, it still represents a 12 percent drop in the cost of going from Windows Vista Home Premium to Vista Ultimate.

Because the move involves only entering a new product code, Microsoft said the Anytime Upgrade in Windows 7 can be done in as little as 10 minutes. With Vista, the move also required the use of a special Anytime Upgrade disk.

In the U.S. and 11 other countries, upgrade codes can be purchased at a store or online.

Microsoft noted in some of its communications that the family pack is available "while supplies last." Given that Microsoft would seem to be in a position to make as many boxes as it wants, I pressed the software maker to understand how limited this offer will be. A company representative would only say that it is a new offer that Microsoft is testing and declined to elaborate on the time frame or the number of copies it was limited to.

This post was updated at 3:33 p.m. PST with more information about supply.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.


Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Windows 8 in 2012?
Sinofsky's Windows plan: More data, less testosterone
Ballmer: Windows 7 selling like hotcakes
Windows boss on building his first laptop
Livescribe pen gets an app store
Office 2010 beta goes public
Windows Azure containers on display in LA
PDC Day 2 live blog: Office 2010, IE 9 on stage
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (111 Comments)
by zmjman08 July 31, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
will this work for xp users?
Reply to this comment
by zmjman08 July 31, 2009 10:04 AM PDT
never mind, didn't read the article carefully.
"The family pack covers those moving from XP or Vista to Windows 7. "
by BogusBasin July 31, 2009 10:40 AM PDT
This is a good price for Windows. Actually, I think Microsoft has been really trying to turn their tarnished image around. Windows 7 looks like a really nice upgrade. I might even start using Windows again. I realize now that all the troubles involved in dealing with a registry, DLL files, viruses and so on are really worth it for all the other advantages like dirt cheap hardware and thousands of versions of solitaire that you don't get on other Operating Systems. I really can't wait to start using MS products again. I hope I can someday become close friends with Monkeyfun, Seaspray, Vegaman and family.

EVERYTHING I JUST SAID IS A HUGE SARCASTIC LIE!!!!!!

DIE MICROSOFT DIE!!!!!

Amen
by monkeyfun14 July 31, 2009 10:57 AM PDT
@BogusBasin

Funny that you mention cheap hardware when I can buy higher quality hardware for PC then you'll ever find in a Mac box.
by BogusBasin July 31, 2009 10:58 AM PDT
@Monkeyfun

Source?

Amen
by BogusBasin July 31, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
@Monkeyfun

Oh, and once again, why are you bringing up Apple?

Amen
by Renegade Knight July 31, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
@BogusBasin

In spite of your dripping scarcasm, it really is hard to find Solitare on a Mac. It's also the sole reason one of our Mac's has Windows installd on it. I finally found something worthy to do with Vista. Solatare legacy support.
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 11:52 AM PDT
@BogusBasin:

You have to admit your comments were only meant to cause trouble and not to be of any help or add value to the conversation. This is one of the definitions of troll behavior. Don't act surprised when people don't respect your comments accordingly.

"Go shop at Walmart."

I do indeed shop at Walmart, as I suspect many hundreds of millions of people do world wide. Did you know they sell Apple products there too? Or are you dismissing Apple products as easily?
by BogusBasin July 31, 2009 11:57 AM PDT
@Renegade

http://www.freeverse.com/games/game/?id=38
by BogusBasin July 31, 2009 12:01 PM PDT
@Vegaman

Why are you bringing up Apple? What is your obsession with Apple? I am not bringing up Apple. Are you jealous of Apple? Are you mad because you can't afford one? Is that it? If you want to come mow my lawn, you can earn some extra income and get one if you want. Just trying to help. Hard times and all. Don't worry, things will get better. Maybe you could become a Walmart greeter?! Good point on the Apple at Walmart thing though. Keep up the good work.

Amen
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 12:18 PM PDT
@BogusBasin:

I brought up Apple because you fixate on it almost entirely here on CNET. I wasn't sure if you were not aware that Walmart, the store whose customers you were mocking, did indeed sell Apple products.

" Are you jealous of Apple? Are you mad because you can't afford one? Is that it? If you want to come mow my lawn, you can earn some extra income and get one if you want. "

I own and am using a 15" MacBookPro now as I type this. I purchased a 32Gb iPhone last week to replace my 32Gb Touch. I also own and use various PC's including those from Toshiba, Acer, Sony, and Dell. I run OS X, Windows XP, Vista, Win7, and Ubuntu.

There's a difference between you and I right there. I use whatever product does the work I need it to do for the best purpose. They all are good and bad at their areas of coverage.

Mocking others for their choice of an OS is simply sad and does not suggest an open mind. It really is okay if people do not agree with you. Don't worry about it so much. You take things waaaay too seriously. :)
See more comment replies
by slickuser July 31, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
rip off
Reply to this comment
by hafenbrack July 31, 2009 9:30 AM PDT
actually this a very good price as compared to purchasing 3 upgrades seperately.
by solu1978 July 31, 2009 10:12 AM PDT
Get a life man
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
@Slickuser:

Since you don't have any intention of purchasing the product, then any price over free would be considered too high for you. Perhaps you would prefer a bootlegged / pirated copy instead.

The price is quite reasonable. It's right up there in line with Apple's pricing.
by 1g2j July 31, 2009 9:23 AM PDT
Here comes the trolls...The first person that comes on here with an negative comments off topic will have proven that they have nothing better to do with their life..Back to work for me!
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher July 31, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
Windows sucks--get a Mac. How's that?
by gertruded July 31, 2009 9:54 AM PDT
or how about --- just switch to linux for free.
by Random_Walk July 31, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
FreeBSD, baby!

(actually, I use that, Linux, OSX...)
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 11:54 AM PDT
Caught three in one go. Good job, 1g2j.
by flaker55 July 31, 2009 9:59 AM PDT
Damn good price looks like MS is finally getting it.
Reply to this comment
by Yelonde July 31, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
Good price? Are you kidding me? This is a total rip off. The Snow Leopard Family pack (5 installs as opposed to 3) will cost only $50, and you are calling the windows 7 "family pack" a "good deal"?

Talk about "apple tax", the Microsoft tax is worse!
Reply to this comment
by Yelonde July 31, 2009 10:17 AM PDT
Oh, and I am still angered by the fact that Microsoft changed the price for windows 7. I was going to buy my $50 copy from microsoft until they upped the price. A good deal would have been a family pack for under $100. Apparently, that isn't going to happen.
by renGek July 31, 2009 10:18 AM PDT
Right because its much smarter to spend an extra $1,500 on mac hardware than an extra $100 on software.
by Yelonde July 31, 2009 10:21 AM PDT
I would rather spend $1500 on a computer that will last me a couple years. It's like buying a rolex in comparison to a fossil. Sure that fossil will tell the same time, but in 2 years, it will break down. I have a couple early 1990's macs that work as if I bought em yesterday. Can't say the same thing about a Windows PC.
by Zanny_Blowzsteve July 31, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
"The Snow Leopard Family pack (5 installs as opposed to 3) will cost only $50, and you are calling the windows 7 "family pack" a "good deal"?"

YES. It's a good deal. For WINDOWS users. The problem with that "Slow Leper Family Pack" that costs $50, is that there are 2 negatives: (1) You have to use a Mac (2) You have to use "OSXtinct-Slow Leper". For any of you "iTards" to complain about a "Microsoft Tax" is short sighted, considering you've already paid an "Apple Tax" for over-priced, underpowered hardware to run it on. A PC w/ more Ram, a larger hard drive, the same exact processor, & a superior graphic processor usually costs 40 to 50% LESS than the closest comparable Mac. Notice how the uptick in Mac sales coincided with the ability run Windows? Windows users usually have no need or desire to rum OSuX.
by Perry_Clease July 31, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
"Right because its much smarter to spend an extra $1,500 on mac hardware than an extra $100 on software."

True enough when you are buying a Mac.
by pstones578 July 31, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
Yeah but don't forget Leopard sucks which is why they have to give it away
by Yelonde July 31, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
@zanny_blowzsteve

I was waiting for someone to pull a comment like that. Let me tell you something about macs in comparison to PCs, because in the end, Macs cost less. Why?

$800 PC laptop vs a $1300 macbook.

Now, add on extra features to that PC to match the macbook.
Add $100 for an adequate warranty that compares that of apple computers.
Add $200 for the ultimate version of 7 because OSX is already the "ultimate version"
Add $400 for comparable software to iLife
Add $200 for Geeksquad which serves as a Genius bar replacement.

Lets see, that PC laptop costs $1700 for the same features, warranty, and service that the macbook has. Winpc = total fail.
by tsi26 July 31, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
@Yelonde

Hmmm...you must be doing something wrong with your "Windows PC's" cause my Win95 box from 95 still runs fine. Though I don't use it anymore. I won't bother to get into the fact that Apple's are PC's too...at least they are now.

[CNET editors' note: Personal attack deleted]
by gorgeclimber July 31, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
Apple knows what their software is worth. 29 dollars is reasonable considering the premium charged for the hardware. You failed to mention that Snow Leopard (Mac OSX 10.6) is only good on Intel machines. That cuts out a lot of Apple users. If you want it, you need to get a new machine. Considering that I have 4 Apples and 4 PCs, Windows 7 looks pretty good.
by monkeyfun14 July 31, 2009 10:58 AM PDT
And snow leopard is nothing but a service pack.
See more comment replies
by sting7k July 31, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
The family pack is a good deal. But I have 2 computers with Vista and one with XP (Pro). Will it work for the XP computer as well?
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok July 31, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
Yes
by tyshockner July 31, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
Now thats a good price! I would be happy to get Win7 on 3 computers for $150. Finally Microsoft is taking the average person into consideration.
Reply to this comment
by wmjohn3 July 31, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
A desktop and two laptops, I'm in!
Reply to this comment
by solu1978 July 31, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
Very good price .
Reply to this comment
by rbrown653 July 31, 2009 10:13 AM PDT
this is a great price
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder July 31, 2009 10:15 AM PDT
Windows 7 will rule. iCrap users cmon guys don't be so jealous
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher July 31, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
Jealous of what? When Snow Leopard comes out Windows will be 2 years behind again.
by Perry_Clease July 31, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
We are not jealous, compassion for your plight as a Windows user and being a troll, but jealous no.
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
Neither OS will 'rule'. Different products, different people. There's room for all.
by gertruded July 31, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
This Windows Premium, is it premium enough to include the feature to run XP vertualization? If not, how much will it cast for a Windows 7 to XP downgrade?
Reply to this comment
by Imalittleteapot July 31, 2009 9:38 PM PDT
As far I know the Microsoft version of XP mode where it's integrated with the 7 desktop won't work unless you have Profressional or Ultimate. But that's just where the programs run on an XP virtual machine, but looks like they're native 7 apps. In other words all XP mode does is make the virtual apps look not as virtual and you can download it and use it without having your own copy or license of XP because that's included in the7 Profressional and Ultimate licenses.

If you have Premium however, you can still download any other VM software and just run another copy of XP in another Window and switch back and forth between the two Windows. It's not as fluid, but it works.

I used to do this with Vista Home Premium and Virtual Box all the time. It should work just the same and pretty much just as well in the end.

I no longer have any software that requires XP to run anyway though.
by sharmajunior August 3, 2009 10:35 AM PDT
Virtual Box is not a good piece of software. It crashed my Vaio 2 times, actually took into a blue screen loop.

I prefer either Vmware or Virtual Pc.
by eriew July 31, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
I built a pc and installed 7. Would like OEM version of 7. Is this possible?

I'm not going to pay $300 for an OS. That's almost as much as the box cost me.

I have some other PC's that might benefit from a family pack.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
OEM versions of Win7 would only be available from the OEM with the purchse of the computer. If you built your own, then you have to buy a full retail version from a store. The family pack pricing would probably work well for you, but you'll need to have an XP installation to upgrade from.
by bmj2728 July 31, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
I have not seen the OEM versions available yet, but they ususally aren't available at release. There's a good chance that NewEgg/TigerDirect/etc... will have it by the time the RC1 versions expire.
by baconstang July 31, 2009 4:29 PM PDT
Welcome to the MicroSoft tax.
by pithenumber August 1, 2009 9:07 AM PDT
you can get an OEM copy from Newegg
if you want Win7 for your family, get an OEM 3pack
by sharmajunior August 3, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
Yes, and remember OEM versions are tied down to the motherboard and other components. It is very specific and any change would render your key useless.
by rustytoo September 20, 2009 11:09 PM PDT
@ sharmajunior
It's not that bad, I've been running MCE2005 on my main pc since it was availible to the public as OEM and I have reinstalled and reactivated at least 20 times( because of hardware upgrades)
I've been through mobo's, cpu's, you name it and it just takes a call to M$ to reactivate.
And It's always been one ONE pc at a time, so not "really" cheating the system(or M$)
by Mr. Dee July 31, 2009 11:21 AM PDT
So what about Anytime Upgrade prices for Windows 7 Professional directly to Windows 7 Ultimate?
Reply to this comment
by July 31, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
Mac OS X 5 user family pack is $199 = $40 per computer. Windows 7 "upgrade" pricing for 3 users is $149 = $50 per computer. Apple only sells 1 version of their OS...everyone gets the best of the best. This is yet more evidence that while buying a Mac is more expensive up front, cost of ownership over time is much lower.
Reply to this comment
by bmj2728 July 31, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
Apple sells 2 versions of their OS
by baconstang July 31, 2009 4:30 PM PDT
Server and otherwise?
by gphillips31 July 31, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
Why is it every time there is a OS X or Microsoft article you stupid troll fan boys come out of the wood work?
GET A FREAKEN LIFE. you are all trolls, shut up know body cares. Macs and PC's are both compelling, both with strong and weak points it's all about personal preference.
Reply to this comment
by tyshockner July 31, 2009 11:44 AM PDT
Amen Brother!
by beat_elite July 31, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
@gphillips

THANK YOU!
now on topic. I really like the Family pack deal since i can afford to give it away as a gift to my relatives who are complaing about vista. Thx MS for seeing the light
by Vegaman_Dan July 31, 2009 1:01 PM PDT
Unfortunately instead of having an open mind or letting products stand for themselves, we have become largely a polarized society of 'us vs them'. It happens in politics, cars, sports teams, religion, drink choices and in computers. In the end none of it matters.

Thankfully the noisy few do not represent the majority and regardless how loud they are, they are pretty much shouting to a room filled only with other fans and not those other people who actually use the product as it was meant to be.
by baconstang July 31, 2009 4:32 PM PDT
LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA
What did you say?
by sparky46er July 31, 2009 12:18 PM PDT
I don't understand why everything comes down to Mac vs. Windows topic. I recently switched to a Mac from Windows - it was a personal choice. I like it. But at the same time my wife uses a Windows laptop - which is cool. Each to his own, I say. Personally, my chief complaint with Windows 7 is that us Vista Ultimate users got hosed (yes I do own a Windows Vista machine, and Linux to boot, and manage Solaris servers...ad nauseam). I think they should have practically given away the upgrade for the lack of promise that Vista Ultimate should have provided. As far as the gnarly comments being tossed around - c'mon use what you like man. But if you want to impress me - write your own OS and build an empire. Then you have my ear...
Reply to this comment
by bmj2728 July 31, 2009 12:38 PM PDT
Amen Brother. Proud user of OS X, 3 varieties of Windows and 2 varieties of Linux.
by j_a_s_p_e_r August 1, 2009 12:03 PM PDT
The upgrade path is a problem a lot ultimate vista users now want to downgrade to home premium to avoid paying a premium 7 Ultimate. Everyone focuses on the Extras of Ultimate, but the real benefit is that it was a combination of Business and Home Premium features too. Business did not have Media Center and Premium did not have Shadow Copy and and - as I was sad to find out - also did not have Full Disk Image backup like Business (or Ultimate). The cost of the equivalent of drive encryption for Bitlocker and a disk imaging software (like Norton Ghost) would make Ultimate worthwhile, but only if you used them. I have home premium (I love media center) , but every now and then I miss shadow copy and full disk image backup I have on business at work. Many users never used any of the Ultimate features and now wish they could downgrade to Premium to take benefit of the discounted 7 premium upgrade, these people now find they can't upgrade. Does anyone know if they can do a clean install upgrade? I'm sure the disk image backup would come in handy in that case
by ngngokkiu July 31, 2009 12:18 PM PDT
But it's so fun to watch these trolls trample on each other!
Reply to this comment
by Gorifyny July 31, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
Since every time an operating system is mentioned on CNet the discussion degenerates into the exact same argument back and forth, why don't we just get a link to one master diatribe for all these subjects and save everybody retyping or copy-and-pasting the same old arguments over and over and over???

By the way, I run both Mac's and PC's and use each for what I find their best applications.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang July 31, 2009 4:33 PM PDT
Edit it all down to a paperback, it would make compelling bathroom material.
by gwailo247 July 31, 2009 4:36 PM PDT
Because too many people's self esteem seems to be tied to the brand of electronic hardware they buy. An attack on their computer is an attack on them...

This is no different than Chevy vs Ford discussions really, just a new generation of people with a new war to wage.
by Imalittleteapot July 31, 2009 9:56 PM PDT
But then I wouldn't have anything to do on the weekends :(
by Ricochet44 July 31, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
Now that's a nice price for 3 PCs. Now if only that could have said 5 for the amount of computers in my home. So maybe 5 is a bit much? =P

And on a side not, I can only sigh at the PC Fanboys and Mac Elitists thinking that their system is BY FAR the superior product. It's simply ridiculous. I have this feeling that Microsoft nor Apple is paying you to advertise their product. So waste your time bantering on the internet with a bunch of people you don't even know and, after simply closing the window, you will probably never communicate with again. Sounds pretty silly to me.
Reply to this comment
by lumpoco August 1, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
No, 5 is not a bit much considering that families now have a computer for every member of the household. A typical family has 2 parents and 2-4 kids. That's 6 computers if I did my math right. My household has 6 computers and two of us use 2 computers; one for personal use and another one for work.
by DrtyDogg August 2, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
Some more simple math for you 1 family pack = 3 installs so 2 family packs = 6 installs. 6 installs = your 6 computers. Everybody = happy.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (111 Comments)
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement
    Click Here

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right