How Intuit managed to hold off Microsoft
The defeat of Microsoft Money at the hands of Intuit's Quicken marks a rare chapter in the annals of software history.
Intuit is one of the few companies to take Microsoft head-on on its home turf--packaged software--and come out on top. Even more notably, Intuit has managed to do it several times, with Quicken of course, but also with QuickBooks and TurboTax.
Of course, it was more than just Intuit's success that led to Money's demise, which CNET News first reported on Wednesday. The product was ultimately doomed by several factors, including a shift away from packaged software, the rise of Internet-based rivals like Mint.com, and a brutal economy that has forced Microsoft to scale back ambitions in several areas.
In its heyday, though, the battle between Intuit's Quicken and Microsoft's Money was a fierce one. While Quicken dominated in retail sales, Microsoft landed some key deals with banks and was able to get many computer makers to pre-load Money on new PCs.
Robbie Cape, who ran the Money business from 1999-2001, said that while the company could keep pace on the software end, it could never duplicate Intuit's marketing prowess or its dominance of the retail market.
Robbie Cape, who ran Microsoft's Money business in its heyday from 1999-2001, now runs Cozi, a Seattle-based startup.
(Credit: Cozi)"It really has very little to do with technology," said Cape, who is now CEO of Cozi, a Seattle-based start-up. "What Intuit and Scott Cook were so formidable at was consumer marketing. He treated marketing Intuit very much the same way as one would treat marketing a bar of soap or bottle of shampoo. He made Quicken a household name. He spent outrageous dollars to get there."
Intuit spokesman Scott Gulbransen said his company simply had the better product. "Customers voted with their wallet," he said.
NPD analyst Stephen Baker said that Intuit won out because it was aggressive and built critical mass in the finance software arena, adding a number of adjacent products and dominating the retail channel.
Whatever the case, it was an epic battle that stretched on for years. Microsoft tried to buy Intuit in the mid-1990s but saw that effort halted by regulatory disapproval.
In the wake of the failed takeover bid, Microsoft doubled down in its efforts to take on Quicken. The company added a ton of partners, revamped the product's design, and tried to integrate a host of new financial planning tools.
Cape said the pinnacle of its effort came in 2000 when Wall Street Journal reviewer Walt Mossberg gave Microsoft Money the edge over Quicken in his review.
However, even with some positive reviews, Money never managed to overtake Quicken and Microsoft's product has been on the wane for some time. The clear sign that the end might be near came last year, when Microsoft announced it would stop annually updating the product and would shift to an online-only sales model as opposed to also offering the product at retail stores.
"The writing was kind of on the wall," Gulbransen said.
Baker says Microsoft's inability to make a viable business out of the online-only sales model shows that a Web-based sales approach isn't enough to keep all consumer software alive.
"While the retail packaged software market is tough it is not easier to be online only," Baker said. "Your audience is much more limited and (the) potential customer base is much smaller when you go to the cloud. That business model is not a panacea when you are in a struggling market."
Still up in the air is another Microsoft product that aimed to take on Intuit but fell short--Microsoft's small business accounting product. It was launched amid some fanfare in September 2005, but struggled to make inroads in a field dominated by Intuit's Quickbooks. Microsoft discontinued boxed sales of the product and last year made it available for free download as Office Accounting Express 2009 for free download.
A modest payoff from Money
As for Money, while it was never the dominant player, it did break some technical ground for Microsoft. It was one of the first programs at Microsoft to merge Internet content directly into a desktop application and it was also among the first PC-based programs to include advertising directly from a CD.
In many ways, Money was the precursor to Microsoft's "software plus services" strategy, in which the company posits that desktop software won't be replaced by online options, but will rather lead to hybrid products.
Scott Cook founded Intuit in 1983. He's now chairs the executive committee.
(Credit: Intuit)Indeed, when Microsoft was plotting the future of its consumer software lines earlier this decade, it often pointed to Money as the archetype of how advertising and online content could merge with locally run code to form the hybrid application of the future. In a series of ThinkWeek papers seen by CNET News, Microsoft researchers argued that the company might need to even take things further and make many of its desktop products free, tapping advertising to support their development.
Of course, the question that lingers is what went wrong with Money. Was it that the strategy itself was wrong? Was Microsoft just too far behind, or did the company just not go far enough. Microsoft never opted to make Money entirely free, though it did offer a $20 Money Essentials product and included it in one of the Microsoft Works bundles often included on new PCs.
For his part, Cape moved on from Microsoft in 2001 and now runs Cozi, whose online tool aims to help families juggle a busy calendar. Cape said he learned a lot from working on Microsoft Money. Chief among those lessons was that user experience matters.
"Managing your family logistics and your family calendar is about as fun as managing your personal finances," Cape said. "It's not exciting. What we've done at Cozi, which is very much like what we tried very hard to do on Money, is to take that mundane, ho-hum experience and not only make it fun but also make it beautiful."
As for Microsoft and Intuit, the longtime rivals are now working together--building a tool that will allow Money users to move their information over to Quicken.
"We're working with Intuit to help develop a file conversion process that will help Money customers more easily convert their existing data files to Quicken," Microsoft director Adam Sohn said. "Both Intuit and Microsoft hope this will be ready to go for the new release of Quicken this fall."
Intuit says it is happy to have the business.
"We look it as an opportunity to show Microsoft Money customers what they have been missing...over the years," Gulbransen said.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina. 



It's about time that the big and mighty Microsoft Corporation learns that they can't buy someone else and take over another industry (i.e. Yahoo).
One set of rules for judging Microsoft, one set of rules for judging everyone else... enjoy your hypocrisy...
Actually, it's true.
Microsoft has a history of buying out companies to monopolize the industry.
Mergers are one thing, but hostile takeovers such as the failed attempt with Yahoo are another.
I am not suggesting that two wrongs make a right as in your perfect example of SUN and Oracle.
And Apple has a history of doing the same damn thing.
Sometimes I fell very sorry for MS.
CNET is awash in paid M$ shills who will defend any behavior their master
commands. M$ could be boiling puppies and there would a line of marketing
chimps coming to M$'s defense. When commenting on M$'s corrupt tactics
all that is accomplished is to bring out the trolls. To use the words of that
famous reporter, Ford Prefect, "It's Pointless!"
If they can't leverage their monopoly(s) they won't do well competing on product quality and stability.
They actively improve their products every release.
The story of how Intuit beat Microsoft is detailed in an excellent book called 'Inside Intuit' - can't remember the author or publisher off the top of my head.
But I've quit using Quicken. Their customer service is now about the most horrible service you can find. And the way they effectively require you to update no less than every 2 years is just wrong. I'm a software engineer, so I've been volunteering time to a promising open source project. I don't think Intuit even likes Quicken anymore; and I'm sure they no longer care for Quicken customers. It is really, really sad - they used to be a great company, the David and stood up to Goliath, but now I'm not sure what they are.
Your customer service remark is spot on in my experience as well. A friend of mine used Quickbooks and had nothing but problems with support. Their attitude seemed to be we couldn't care less if you are not happy because we are really the only game in town. Same thing with a friend who uses Quicken. She called me last month about a problem. She was having trouble with online banking access. Seems the bank updated their software and it wouldn't let her access the bank unless she upgraded her version of Quicken as well.
Intuit has turned into just another ruthless company. In battling MS they turned into a mirror image using the same business practices. Intuit bought the company that made a great little finance program, and a nice little tax program, that I had used since back in the DOS days and promptly killed both within a year and then sold what remained of the company about a year later. It appeared that they only bought the company to kill of two competing products.
I do use open source both on my Mac and on my PC. Are you willing to pass on the name of the project? :-) I am a Source Forge member if it is on there.
Quicken also always had the feeling of only wanting to do one thing and do it well, while with Microsoft it was always painfully obvious that they were trying to be all things to all users.
Also, Quicken just worked better.
What the hell does it matter if something is integrated with the companies other products if they run all the servers for them? O_o
Internet-based apps are killing both software platforms. Why go to the trouble of downloading and integrating financial information from banks and brokerages -- a weekly chore with Quicken -- when the same institutions are only too happy to create web apps to manage your money for you? You already trust your bank with your money. Legal recourse and deposit insurance reinforce that trust. Neither Intuit nor Microsoft truly back their financial software.
After that, MS Money was basically languishing and dying a slow death.
-Adam
Hmmm, I wonder how Microsoft was able to do *that*.
/sarcasm re: Microsoft's monopoly bullying power
- by dedwardstx June 11, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
- It doesn't surprise me that Microsoft lost this battle, as they really have a clear understanding of the market. Robbie's quote "...take that mundane, ho-hum experience and not only make it fun but also make it beautiful" pretty sums up the problem with Money. Microsoft was more concerned about the "beauty" of the program rather than the actual function. Let's face it when it comes to your finances, would you rather have a very pretty program or one that just actually works. With their annual release, one that only occured b/c they were trying to keep up with Intuit, they actually didn't have the required time to significantly improve the product. Money was also used as a weapon in to help their MSN plight when they tried to tie it to MSN MoneyCentral now MSN Money. Is that really what their customers wanted?
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (54 Comments)