• On TV.com: New TV sex symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE
June 10, 2009 10:15 AM PDT

Microsoft to discontinue MS Money

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 127 comments

Microsoft plans to stop selling Microsoft Money, its venerable, but not market-leading personal finance program, CNET News has learned.

The software maker has been notifying financial institutions and plans to announce the move to customers over the next 24 hours via a posting on its Web site and a notification in the software. Although Microsoft will stop selling the product at the end of June, it plans to support it through January 2011.

Microsoft plans to stop selling Microsoft Money at the end of the month, although for the moment it continues to pitch the product on its Web site.

(Credit: CNET)

After that point, people can continue to use the product, but they will no longer be able to get automated data feeds from their banks, credit card companies and other financial service providers.

Last year, Microsoft stopped selling Money at retail stores, offering it only by Internet download. The company also said it would stop doing annual updates, but said at the time it planned to continue offering the product.

Microsoft's Adam Sohn said the company now plans to halt sales of the product at the end of the month. A variety of factors led the company to change course.

"It's a mix of what's going on in the market, what makes sense for long-term for us and a little bit on consumer behavior," said Sohn, a director in Microsoft's Online Business Services unit.

The discontinuation of Money is one of the more high-profile product cuts made in the wake of the company's cost-cutting efforts, which began in January. Microsoft said in March it was largely discontinuing its Encarta encyclopedia and has also scrapped its Windows OneCare antivirus product.

As of Wednesday, Microsoft had made no mention of its plans on the Web site. Rather it was offering to sell Money for $59 and featured a link for financial institutions to get more involved in the product.

Sohn said that the company plans to continue selling Money through the end of the month and hasn't made a plan to offer refunds to recent buyers of the product. Those who have recently bought the product, he said, still have a good while to get the value from it. (Microsoft will support Money slightly longer for those who have recently bought the product, per its licensing terms).

Plus, he said, some people will continue to use it even after the automatic services stop. At that point, consumers will have to manually download information from their banks and other service providers. "After Jan 31, 2011, the product will work," he said. "It just wont have the rich-services back end."

Although Microsoft will support current partners pushing data to Money users, it won't be adding any new institutions. It will, however, let current partners re-brand themselves.

The software maker also plans to continue its MSN Money Web site, although Sohn said the company opted not to try to recreate the full Money program on the Web.

Competing with Intuit and Mint
Microsoft has long been chasing Intuit's Quicken. Microsoft even tried to buy Intuit in the mid-1990s, but the Justice Department blocked the move.

In subsequent years, Microsoft has continued the product but also has continued to trail Quicken's sales. More recently, Money has also faced a new wave of Internet-based competitors, such as Mint.com and Intuit's free Web-based Quicken Online program.

The company has been trying for years to grapple with massive changes in the consumer packaged software market as much of that business moves online.

Although its core Office and Windows products remain strong sellers at retail, the company has opted to scale back in other areas, particularly in the purely consumer arena.

In addition to canning Encarta, Microsoft also stopped selling its Digital Image Suite product after the release of Windows Vista.

Update, 2:40 p.m.: Microsoft has now posted a notice on its Web site.

"With banks, brokerage firms and Web sites now providing a range of options for managing personal finances, the consumer need for Microsoft Money Plus has changed," Microsoft said. "We would like to thank the many dedicated users who have been enthusiastic supporters of Microsoft Money over the years, as well as our partner financial institutions who helped pioneer a digital vision of financial management."

Meanwhile, I also spoke with a spokesman for Intuit, who said that the company is looking at ways to make it easier for Microsoft Money users to bring their data over to that product.

"We look it as an opportunity to show Microsoft Money customers what they have been missing... over the years," Intuit spokesman Scott Gulbransen said.

Although Intuit has recently been bulking up its free online product, Gulbransen said that the company is committed to also offering PC-based software. "We are committed to those who would like to stay with a desktop software solution," he said.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Windows 8 in 2012?
Sinofsky's Windows plan: More data, less testosterone
Ballmer: Windows 7 selling like hotcakes
Windows boss on building his first laptop
Livescribe pen gets an app store
Office 2010 beta goes public
Windows Azure containers on display in LA
PDC Day 2 live blog: Office 2010, IE 9 on stage
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (127 Comments)
by kaibelf June 10, 2009 11:16 AM PDT
I'm glad they are trimming the portfolio a little. While the products weren't horrible, they weren't the steak on the plate. They were merely shoehorned side dishes.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk June 10, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
You know? Money is a good start, but if they really want to save some dough (and at the same time gain some support among their users), they could ditch Microsoft "Works" and just include MS Word in Windows 7... they'd still get their sales from folks buying Excel and PowerPoint (and etc), but seriously... even the non-geeks tend to avoid MS Works that comes for free w/ the OS.

OSX' Text Edit can natively read and write .doc files these days, and that comes standard with the OS... (curiously enough, OSX can also read PDF files with the native Preview app, while you still have to go download a bloated-as-hell Acrobat Reader or hunt down a 3rd-party PDF reading app just to read a PDF file in Windows...)
Reply to this comment
by Ina Fried June 10, 2009 11:25 AM PDT
FWIW, Windows 7 does include an update to the built-in WordPad software. Not a full word processor, but akin to OS X's text editor. -Ina
by BK216 June 10, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
I always thought that MS couldn't include Word/Office because of that whole Monopoly thing years ago

And yea although people love to bash Works, the MS Works that comes with Vista can natively edit/save .doc, .docx, .xls, .xlsx, as well as a bunch of other stuff. Basically, the new Works is WAY better than you think it is (but people never give it enough of a chance to discover that they dont need to spend that extra $150 to get the prettier interface that they didn't even want in the first place...ok now im just ranting)
by Random_Walk June 10, 2009 1:10 PM PDT
@Ina... never knew they finally coughed up and did that - pretty interesting.

@BK216: you're saying it can edit/save Excel files? I've love to see the documentation that says anything near that...
by massfat June 10, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
@Random_Walk,
Yes it can save Excel files. That includes Excel 2007 and the earlier versions. It can also open them. You would use Microsoft Works Spreadsheet to do this (It's also part of the package).
by Vegaman_Dan June 10, 2009 5:31 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

As has been brought up several times before, the best way to learn about a product is to simply try it. Then you'll be speaking from the point of experience instead of speculation and rumor.
by dhavleak June 11, 2009 1:36 AM PDT
@ Random Walk

MS doesn't have the option of including MS Word into Windows -- the DOJ will be on their case before you can say "Jack Robinson". They've seen all this happen before:
1) Google complained to the DOJ when MS included desktop search into Vista (MS made changes to make the engine pluggable).
2) Google complained to the DOJ when MS included a search bar in IE (MS had to add a customization dialogue that pops up when you run IE the first time).
3) The AV vendors complained to the DOJ when MS tried to turn on Kernel Patch Protection in Vista by default. MS had to relent and only turn it on in 64-bit Vista and leave it off in 32-bit Vista. Patch protection basically required that all modules loaded into the kernel were signed - that's all. So it was good for security. But the AV guys didn't like it because it messed with the rootkit-like techniques they used on install (which they simply should not have been using, and which they could work around).

Regarding OS-X's text edit app -- you can achieve the same thing with write.exe in windows (word pad). Of course, it's far from fully featured, and MS can't add new features there for the same reasons above.

MS would surely include a native PDF reader if it wasn't for Adobe dragging them in front of the US DOJ. Adobe sued MS when they added print-to-pdf capabilities into word. MS relented and made the feature a free download -- and Adobe withdrew the case. If Adobe sued for that, imagine the fit they'll throw for any PDF capabilities being included into windows.

You're right about Acrobat Reader being bloated. Give Foxit viewer a try (do a search and you'll find it pretty easily). It's *extremely* full-featured., and in some cases even has features that are missing from Acrobat Reader. What's more - Acrobat Reader has had a lot of security bullitens issued recently. Several security vendors (I think including Kaspersky who I trust) have recommended using Foxit for security reasons. I currently use Foxit and it's very fast compared to acrobat reader.
by NPGMBR June 11, 2009 6:30 AM PDT
That almost makes sense but Microsoft Works is the free word processor that Microsoft has offered for many years now that people ignore because they belieev they need Office. They should keep Works on hand for now particularly since Open Source alternatives are beginning to make inroads.
by kcotham June 13, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
@Ina
WordPad doesn't not include advanced typographical tools, does it? TextEdit does. "More akin", yes, "equal to", no.
by BigGuns149 June 13, 2009 6:38 PM PDT
Considering that Microsoft has NEVER included any of the MS Office applications with Windows and they still managed to become the most dominant Office suite I really seriously doubt that Microsoft would *ever* include any of the Office applications with Windows regardless of whether the DOJ cared or not. It just doesn't make business sense.

FYI, MS Works has never been part of Windows either. A lot of computer vendors include it with their consumer machines, but since I have read that it only costs them $2/machine it doesn't hurt their profit margins much to include it for the handful of people who just want a really basic stripped down version of Office. While a lot of heavy Office users consider Works a joke there are some home users where Works is fine. For those who need a little more features you could go download OpenOffice.org for gratis.
by BogusBasin June 10, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
Now if they could just discontinue that dreaded Windows OS................Flame on suckas!
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee June 10, 2009 11:38 AM PDT
Let me guess, you are blaming your sorry life on a operating system?
by sanenazok June 10, 2009 11:44 AM PDT
@BB don't buy it if you dread it.
by BogusBasin June 10, 2009 12:40 PM PDT
I agree. Don't buy things you don't like. Too bad I am tortured by it 8 hours of every day at work. Both using and supporting it are painful to me compared to my Mac at home. But to each his own. Enjoy Windows guys! You can have it.
by monkeyfun14 June 10, 2009 12:51 PM PDT
@BogusBasin

You must not get laid much do you?
Complaining about the type of computer you have to use you must be good with the ladies eh.
by Methuss June 10, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
BB if you don't liek supporting it, change professions. The world, being vastly Windows-based in the business market, is not going to change for your personal preferences. If you don't like working with it, do all of us professionals a favor and go sell used cars or something. Whiny IT people complaining about what they have to work with is pathetic.
by sanenazok June 10, 2009 1:36 PM PDT
@BB oh no your JOB doesn't allow you to play with things you want to. Bah bah, go and take your toys back to the sandbox.
by BogusBasin June 10, 2009 1:47 PM PDT
Wow..... That's all I got.
by Vegaman_Dan June 10, 2009 5:35 PM PDT
@BogusBasin:

"I agree. Don't buy things you don't like."

Like nobody has to buy into your argument or comments? :)

If you feel so strong about hating Windows so much, then simply quit your job and get another one. Unless you are willing to do that, then you're really not that convincing beyond just whining. Unfortunately *my* job is supporting people like you.
by Seaspray0 June 10, 2009 7:07 PM PDT
"Too bad I am tortured by it 8 hours of every day at work". You're also tortured with growing old every day, but I don't hear you b**ching about that.

"Enjoy Windows guys! You can have it." For someone so intent on ignoring it, you can't leave it alone.
by rubenerd June 10, 2009 10:12 PM PDT
BogusBasin did make a good point. People in the business world have no choice but to use Windows most of the time, just as people had to use DOS in the 1980s. It doesn't mean you need to like it, as he said he uses a Mac at home primarily because of his long experience with using and supporting Windows.

The only rebuttals I've seen from people here are childish non sequiturs such as "you're getting old", "change professions if you don't like Windows" and "you don't have a girlfriend?". I think that says a lot.

Regarding Microsoft Money, I think they made a smart decision ending it. That's not to say Quicken is any better mind, some of Intuit's shenanigans are legendary.

(It's a sorry state of affairs that I would need to include this to prevent flamers, but for the interests of disclosure I am a Mac and FreeBSD user.)
See more comment replies
by darkxeno June 10, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
Wow didn't see this one being being the next product they where going to cut.
Oh well just add it to the list of under preforming software they are killing off.
Good to see they are cutting losing software and slimming down somewhere else besides people even tho they have done a lot of that.
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee June 10, 2009 11:40 AM PDT
If I were Microsoft, I would have repositioned these products for the web using Silverlight technology. Money Live, Encarta Live, Photos Live. Create both free and premium experiences that integrate tightly. Then again, I love Wikipedia and Flickr and Windows Live Photos.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan June 10, 2009 5:37 PM PDT
This may very well be a move in that direction. Microsoft isn't being very forthcoming about some of their web strategies, but I could easily see this being a move to a web app.
by Seaspray0 June 10, 2009 7:10 PM PDT
I like the idea, Mr. Dee.
by rubenerd June 10, 2009 10:16 PM PDT
WIth Microsoft's latest suspect moves to quiety install .Net into the competing Firefox browser with Windows Update without any means to uninstall it without editing the registry, this may be a sign they're planning to push stuff that leverages their new frameworks like this down the road. I hope that's not going to be their continuing strategy though.
by sanenazok June 10, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
As a permanent Quicken user I'm pretty mad. The only thing that kept Intuit from getting completely greedy was the off chance that people could switch to Money and still maintain auto-updates from the bank. Now I can expect "sunset" schedules for Quicken products to occur every 2 years, max. I got bit by the Sunset BS when my Quicken 2005 expired. Upgrading to the '08 version made me feel like I was paying for a new color scheme (gold to blue yipee). Soon enough it will be yearly updates.
Reply to this comment
by nabberiam June 10, 2009 2:02 PM PDT
You can always switch to peachtree. I like it much better than Quicken
by sanenazok June 10, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
Yeah and about half my entries don't transfer correctly and 2/3 of my financial instutions' downloading doesn't work.
by PRGully June 10, 2009 3:27 PM PDT
Scott from Quicken here...

@sanenazok We do stop supporting (sunset) products after three development years...not two. And we won't be changing that. I understand your frustration but it's not possible for us to support products that far back.

Thanks for the comments.
by claystorm June 10, 2009 3:39 PM PDT
I think services like Mint.com will keep Intuit on their toes. Personally, I use Mint and love it. All it does is auto updates, so I do not have to worry about any time of data entry (yes, I am the true lazy american)
by sanenazok June 10, 2009 6:00 PM PDT
@Scott: I never bought into the "we can't support it" argument. How about NOT releasing a new version every year on schedule, especially where the improvements are slight to nil. When my Quicken 05 expired I could have gotten the '09 version but the '08 version with the latest patches was more stable than the then-new RTM '09. What's funny is that I'm a power user (the Home & Business version) and while I'm locked in by my old data, I may just ditch this and go with a cloud-based system, and you know it would be NOT the Intuit one.
by mgc6020 June 11, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
Give Moneydance a shot. It not only works with Windows but also Linux and the data files can be opened with either OS. It's not as glitzy as MS Money or Quicken but it works very well and I don't believe they have sunset schedules on the software. I've been using it for 8 months now and no issues to date. Google Moneydance and check it out.
by Renegade Knight June 11, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
I used Money till it scrambled my files. Then I used Quicken until the Sunset clause kicked in. Then I quit. I am not paying for programmed obsolesence. Espeically since my money didn't get to have a sunset clause.
by Renegade Knight June 11, 2009 12:42 PM PDT
I used Money till it scrambled my files. Then I used Quicken until the Sunset clause kicked in. Then I quit. I am not paying for programmed obsolesence. Espeically since my money didn't get to have a sunset clause.

@PRGully

It's not your support I neeeded. Downloading data from my bank doesn't take support. Just a willing bank and myself to downlaod it. Quicken shoudln't even be involved once the data format was set way back.
by darkebinary June 10, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
I really like Microsoft Money, and I'm not a fan of Quicken, but I guess I have no choice but to change now. I could name a lot of other Microsoft products I would like to see go before this one.
Reply to this comment
by otte-o June 10, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
Try MoneyDance. It's much cheaper and comes in third in features. (Second now)
by wdoyle0447 June 10, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
MSMoney is only 1 of 2 reasons I still keep Windows around on one machine. With a plethora of less liked solutions I will soon be free of all MS products in my home.
by Seaspray0 June 10, 2009 7:14 PM PDT
@darkebinary. I would have been interested in your list... as long as it doesn't include spider solitare. :-)
by random_user_333 June 11, 2009 5:53 AM PDT
Exactly. Quicken on the Mac is this huge pile of crap. I've used Money since 1997 and I'm really disappointed that they decided to do this. I use the Home & Business version and there is no Quicken Home & Business for the mac.

Really disappointed, this severely messes up how I keep track of things, and was one of the few MS products I pay for.
by Methuss June 10, 2009 11:49 AM PDT
I always liked MSMoney over Quicken for its simplicity and, in earlier versions, the ability to syncronize with a Windows Mobile smartphone. I was very disappointed when they dropped the sync feature. It was nice to keep my check register and card account info right on the phone instead of having to mentally keep track of limits and a paper check register.

Hopefully, they will do one last software patch to remove all the links and hooks to on-line syncing so it can be used stand-alone without inadvertant download starts and the resultant errors.
Reply to this comment
by geeman1082 June 10, 2009 11:52 AM PDT
It's really amazing to me that nobody (including, or maybe I should say especially, Intuit) has a stable, dependable, and truly useful personal finance package ... I still use MSMoney03, even though it is quite mediocre, because nothing else is worth spending any money on ... I never say never, but I don't see myself moving to a completely online service anytime soon ... maybe I'll just write my own and quit whining ... cheers, all ...
Reply to this comment
by Franko234 June 10, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
I use Money 2006. Subsequent versions had less features. the writing was on the wall. They just weren't into it. I have to say, however, that it is still better than Quicken.
Reply to this comment
by gertruded June 10, 2009 2:43 PM PDT
i use Money 98, still the simplest and best Money program. The problem is converting 15 years (with data from Money 95) of transactions to another program.
by The_happy_switcher June 10, 2009 11:58 AM PDT
Slowly but surely the empire continues to crumble into dust.
Reply to this comment
by BogusBasin June 10, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
Amen
by monkeyfun14 June 10, 2009 12:53 PM PDT
If you honestly think Apple would spend millions on R&D with no competition I got a bridge to sell you.
by sanenazok June 10, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
A dust particle is a good way to describe MS Money in proportion to the rest of the MSFT business.
by gertruded June 10, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
Money was the last program that I needed Boot Camp for. Good by Microsoft.
by rubenerd June 10, 2009 10:25 PM PDT
While his username is "AppleRocks1963", he made no mention of Apple whatsoever, only the people responding did. I think if people are going to moan (or be condescending) about how brash Apple fanboys are, they should stop and look at how quickly they are to jump the gun and launch into attacks themselves. It makes you look like hypocrites, and lowers the tone of online discourse.

I almost worry when Apple and Microsoft news comes onto CNET because of all the mudslinging, from both sides. It's juvenile.
by ralfthedog June 12, 2009 10:44 AM PDT
"If you honestly think Apple would spend millions on R&D with no competition I got a bridge to sell you."

Apple has quite a bit of competition from Linux and all the different BSD versions. I think Apples best bet is to ignore Microsoft and focus on the true competition. Why give Microsoft free advertising?
by joetesta70 June 10, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
Money was terrible. I kept giving it a second chance. I'm OK with Quicken but after all these years they should have more in the product so Quicken employees, get off your *** and get to work
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight June 10, 2009 12:17 PM PDT
Hopefully they donate the code to open source. It was a good product with a couple of nits (data scrambling and the 3 year forced upgrade cycle).
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 June 10, 2009 7:21 PM PDT
They would most likely give it away free first. That way they could still retain the rights to any proprietary code in it. Lets face facts. Microsoft isn't known as an open source company. It would be nice if they did give it away to the open source, but I won't place any bets on that.
by HowMuchWoodWouldAWoodCC June 11, 2009 2:33 AM PDT
Agree totally - if you can't beat the competition with a paid product, release it as open source and let the others die quietly.
by anothernwmom June 11, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
I think Renegade's idea is superb and I hope Microsoft scans this forum/listens. Like others, I have been using Money Plus and business version happily for years and years and years. I am highly reliant on the budget screen and desktop notifications re reaching budget limits, plus auto-downloads. I came here because I freaked when I saw the notice in Money about the software no longer being sold. I also use Drupal CMS for web site devel and that open-source community is a great example of how software can keep moving ahead by people committed to it, with users providing volunteer support. I also use OpenOffice, the MS Office equivalent via OpenSource, and I haven't looked back to MS Office. I think it would be superb for MS's image -- and would change many people's perception of the company, perhaps -- if they announced loudly that there were moving Money into OpenSource. Certainly there must be a way for the smart people in MS to hammer out how to deal with proprietary code -- if, in fact, it's critical or beneficial to MS for it to remain proprietary.

Anyway, great idea Renegade. I'm hoping others will support this idea and communicate it loudly to Microsoft.
by Amyaz June 10, 2009 12:17 PM PDT
I HIGHLY recommend Mint. Makes seeing where all your money is/goes ever so easy. And it's free :)
Reply to this comment
by abcd9009 June 10, 2009 1:58 PM PDT
@Amyaz - I completely agree with you. I stopped using Quicken and Money long time back since I first heard of Mint.com

It's free and most importantly - very easy to use and navigate unlike Quicken. Granted Quicken has more features but I bet only 10% of Quicken users (or maybe even less than that) ever use all those features.
by GippySD June 10, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
I'm kinda on the fence between Mint and Quicken Online - right now, I'm using Quicken Online. Either way, I've happily left the desktop world of personal finance software behind.

There's so much room to grow in online personal finance tools ... looking forward to Quicken and Mint duking it out.
by PRGully June 10, 2009 3:28 PM PDT
Scott from Quicken...Quicken Online is absolutely free and a completely different product than desktop Quicken. You should check it out...see if it fits your needs.
by Renegade Knight June 11, 2009 12:45 PM PDT
I might try mint. Wouldn't touch Quicken Online. The sunset philosopy would eventually spill over into a pay to play (and how do you get your data out?) in time.
by dgutf June 10, 2009 12:20 PM PDT
I've used both Money and Quicken over the past 10 years. At first, I thought Money was much easier to use and more useful; however in the past 3-4 years Quicken has taken the lead in that regard.
Reply to this comment
by Alex Alexzander June 10, 2009 12:34 PM PDT
MS Money is a million times better than Quicken for Financials. Quicken is horrible in that area. Quicken is also a joke in my opinion. I own both, and Quicken still does not work with ING, and I get mixed results with my old ScotTrade account. I can't believe the version number they are on and still they cannot make a product that actually works.

Microsoft, you should do this little thing called, advertising, so that people know you even have MS Money and know what it offers. And as said earlier, why didn't MS have a mobile version for the current mobile devices. MS just doesn't seem to get themselves sometimes. They don't leverage themselves at all.

Alex
Reply to this comment
by Methuss June 10, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
They did have a Mobile version. It was included with MSMoney 2004 and worked on Windows Mobile smartphones up to version 5. They discontinued support for it when Windows Mobile 6 came out.

Funny that. When they did have it, no one used it because it was ahead of its time. Smartphones were ungodly expensive and few in number. Once they stop supporting it, everyone wants it.
by shycelticwitch June 10, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
Would LOVE to see them get rid of MS Publisher next! It's a sorry excuse for a design program, most professional designers hate it simply because it is the only desktop publishing program that is NOT cross-platform. It is good for nothing except making scrapbook pages and laying out simple newsletters. Having MS Publisher does NOT make you an artist. It makes you a pain in the butt to the publishing world.

I also think Adobe Creative Suite (Adobe favors the Mac platform in case you didn't know), should require a "license to drive" in the form of at least a 4 year degree in design arts. Hmmm maybe not. I might lose that extra income I get from taking screwed up artwork done by amateurs and fixing it!
Reply to this comment
by geeman1082 June 10, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
Ah, but you're looking at it all wrong ... I agree that MSPub is not a graphic design program (and I would never hire a "professional designer" that counts on it), but it is excellent for laying out quick docs with multiple zones and types of objects ... of course you can theoretically do it all in Word if you have the time to wait while your machine chokes on the bloatware, but I'm more interested in results ...
by Vegaman_Dan June 10, 2009 5:45 PM PDT
Being in the small press business on the side, I learned early on to not believe what the OEM's wanted you to use. Instead I contacted the actual printers and asked what file formats and types they would work with, which had the least issues, and what they could give to their associated partners in the industry. Their answer? It wasn't MS Publisher (which is a home user app only, never was meant to be a professional app), Quark? Perhaps a decade or more ago that may have been the case, but it was left behind long ago.

Nope, it was PageMaker. And not even the current generation, but PageMaker 6.5. That took some time to track down, but it's been worth it. It is the last version that came out before Adobe decided to try to 'improve' it by adding o many features and redesigns as to make it unusuable. P65 was and is the defacto standard.

Now they want Adobe Acrobat files, but prefer if you build them in PageMaker first before conversion. Still, it's better than what else is available.
by Seaspray0 June 10, 2009 7:24 PM PDT
@vegaman dan. I take it you would agree that it's the apps that makes the money for the company, and the apps are the #1 priority?
by zarrik June 10, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
Mint is completely USELESS until they add the ability to add manual and future transactions. Apparently Mint developers have never had to manage a checkbook, because recording future transactions is critical in any money management program. Without it, you can't really manage your money with Mint. However Quicken's free Quicken Online is a good choice for ex-Money users.
Reply to this comment
by Methuss June 10, 2009 1:03 PM PDT
I disagree. You can put your personal financial information on-line with a company that could any day have a breach, but I think I will keep that stored locally in an encrypted folder, thank you. I don't even let Money2006 keep my stuff on-line even though that is the default. Took me a bit to figure out how to block that function.
by cdwilliams1 June 10, 2009 1:03 PM PDT
Unfortunately Mint.com didn't work with all of my institutions. I use a Mac and stubled across Moneywell. AWESOME app for a personal user. Much better than Quicken. It can import in Quicken and Money formats, and even works with the online feed provided by financial instituions for either of these products. Great way to visually see what categories you are spending your moeny on, but still simple to use. I love it!
Reply to this comment
by dbloyd June 10, 2009 1:05 PM PDT
I liked Money better than Quicken.

Microsoft stopped producing a program called Photo Draw that I liked very much. It was a good balance of easy and professional. I also miss the CD reference titles from the early 90's. They had high production standards of that time compared to other vendors with similar products.

I also like MS Publisher. InDesign makes you do everything and my documents looked like crap in compared to publisher.
Reply to this comment
by gerrrg June 10, 2009 2:11 PM PDT
User error.
by shycelticwitch June 16, 2009 9:39 AM PDT
You like MS Publisher because you don't have the professional knowledge or training to use InDesign. But when you use Publisher it must make you THINK you are a professional. Almost EVERY person I contact regarding problems with their Publisher files tells me "I don't know why there are problems, it's a graphic design program and it lets me design my own stuff."


LOLOLOL
Showing 1 of 3 pages (127 Comments)
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right