• On TV.com: Confession: I Like THE BIG BANG THEORY
November 15, 2009 5:39 PM PST

Managing your mobile data sync

by Dave Rosenberg
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

As consumers increasingly purchase sophisticated smartphones such as the iPhone, BlackBerry, and Droid, they are developing expectations for how these phones allow contacts, calendars, e-mail, and social networks to remain in sync across all their devices.

One of the big challenges is that users don't always maintain the same source of inputting data--they switch from browser to desktop application to smartphone as their data access and entry point, introducing many variables into the data chain. And data integrity will only get more complicated as more applications become browser-based and keep no local data storage.

Most enterprise users have a local store in addition to the cloud storage, something that I still find puzzling from the T-mobile Sidekick outage, where consumer data that should have been in multiple locations (or at least present on the device) was thought to be lost.

The most common sync services are not provided directly by the mobile operator. Generally this is a good thing, as the more you can dis-intermediate the carrier, the more control you have over your data. But because the sync services are provided by others--notably Microsoft, Google, and Apple--you end up locked-in to their data structures as well as whatever privacy and data management issues that might arise in relation to advertising or other usage of your information.

Today, you can fairly easily sync your mobile device with most common online e-mail and PIM services although the BlackBerry, Droid, and the iPhone differ in their approaches--or at least in the visibility of how they work. For example, you can sync with Gmail and other services on the iPhone, but it rather perversely requires the Microsoft ActiveSync protocol.

By controlling the address book, Google and Apple effectively lock-in users to their sync service, leaving the carriers and devices to be easily replaced (minus the cancellation charges.) The user would barely notice the difference, aside from the sticker on his phone that says AT&T or Verizon.

Mobile operators do not want to cede control of the address book to Google or Apple, but they are late to the game and do not yet have sync solutions of their own. As a result, they are scrambling to add this functionality, but building a sync solution that works with all different devices and email services is no easy task, thanks to the widespread problem of device fragmentation in the industry.

One option is to deploy a white label solution, like the open mobile cloud sync offered by Funambol. Funambol CEO Fabrizio Capobianco told me the company has been approached by many of the top mobile operators, with several of them looking to setup sync services for their customers. They all recognize the issue, and according to Capobianco can turn to Funambol as a way to quickly bring a high-quality solution to market.

With all the different players in mobile sync, users will begin to question who owns their data. Enterprise users, in particular, should have privacy concerns about trusting their data to someone else. In the case of Android users, there is a growing anti-Google sentiment, and if Google already owns your email, calendar, and search queries, do you really want them to own your phone contacts as well?

Dave Rosenberg dishes up "Software, Interrupted" with nearly 15 years of technology and marketing experience that spans from Bell Labs to multiple start-up IPOs to open-source enterprise software companies. He is co-founder of MuleSource and currently serves as the general manager of Hardy Way. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can contact Dave via e-mail at softwareinterrupted@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter @daveofdoom.
Recent posts from Software, Interrupted
Trend watch 2010: Mobile movies
Survey: IT spending to recover in 2010
Nintendo launches paid video content for Wii
Analyst: Money transfer soon to be No. 1 phone app
Apple's App Store review irking developers
Moving to the virtual layer (and taking advantage of the cloud)
Why Windows Mobile and Palm will continue to fail
Is Ohai the next big thing in social games?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by paddytan November 16, 2009 12:53 AM PST
We see a picking up trend as stated in your article that more of these demands will come into place more quicker than we anticipated with the mass adoptions of smartphones.

When we launched this standalone backup software for BlackBerry users, we were still positioning how others will perceive it, with many others providing free sync or backup service.

One of the interesting feedback that came to us were that they prefer to own their data and contacts, by not going through any 3rd parties. Thus the software proves to meet some customers' requirements of receiving what they want to the email that they defined.

Paddy Tan
CEO
BAK2u
Reply to this comment
by rcrusoe November 16, 2009 6:01 AM PST
I disagree that Apple or Google "owns" any data. I used .Mac/MobileMe for years before permanently switching to Google Apps a couple of years ago. Moving from one to the other was trivial and has been made even more simple by Apple's "sync to Google" (as well as Yahoo) feature. (And, if I had done nothing, when leaving MobileMe, I'd still have had copies of everything on my hard drive.)

And, being a "belt and suspenders" person when it comes to my data, I routinely make backups of my calendar and address book data - so regardless of what happens to my cloud based copy I still have my data.

Google has a site specifically for the purpose of showing its users how to export / backup /move their data from Google.

Privacy is another matter. If you have sensitive data that you don't want anyone to read, it should be encrypted, whether in the cloud or on your hard drive or on your mobile.
Reply to this comment
by ncmacasl-y November 16, 2009 7:49 AM PST
Actually the Sidekick devices DO store data locally in Flash memory, but when the device cycles through a Hard Reset, all data is wiped - and then refreshed from the servers. Sidekicks have always occasionally done self-Hard-Resets (due to a signal from the carrier or the software on the phone crashing) . these normally only would happen every few months. However, the latest hardware version (Sidekick LX09) had a bug that would cause it to hard-reset several times per week (and in some cases, daily). This would not be a problem (more of an annoyance) if the data were still backed up on the server, but this combined with the server failure caused nearly every LX09 user to lose their data. I was fortunate and had an older LX07 and did not have this problem. Though, had my phone done a hard-reset, I, too would have lost my data. After several weeks, Microsoft/Danger *was* able to re-synch the data on my device with their servers. (BTW, 100% of services, including the use of the download Catalog, was FINALLY restored this past weekend - over a month since the initial outage!! However MANY users have reported on various forums & blogs that they still have lost some, most, or all of their data. And most of these are LX09 users) --ncmacasl ( http://twitter.com/ncmacasl )
Reply to this comment
by daverosenberg November 16, 2009 8:39 AM PST
Thanks--that makes sense now. Still kind of a weird way to setup the data management.
by foneAddict November 17, 2009 2:04 AM PST
Has anyone checked our SmrtGuard (SmrtGuard.com) for BlackBerry / Android / Nokia? I have the service and it love the simplicity of it. Also, they signed with Indosat just this year... Wished VZW would sign with them too so I can get SmrtGuard for FREE like the Indosat subscribers.
Reply to this comment
by rshah9 November 17, 2009 10:21 AM PST
There are also very affordable desktop sync solutions that are one-time expenses less than $100. Like CompanionLink: www.companionlink.com.

They go above and beyond solutions like Google Calendar Sync (which only does Calendar, no Contacts), and they offer free technical support. Plus, they support a multitude of PC software like Outlook, Lotus Notes, GroupWise, and others.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

advertisement

About Software, Interrupted

In "Software, Interrupted," Dave Rosenberg discusses disruption in the software market, as well as the products and services that keep business technology norms in perpetual flux.

With nearly 15 years of technology and marketing experience spanning from Bell Labs to multiple start-up IPOs, Dave co-founded open-source software company MuleSource and now serves as general manager of Hardy Way. He also happens to be a U.S. patent holder and a workaholic. Technology is his best friend and mortal enemy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Software, Interrupted topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right