• On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD
June 19, 2009 9:56 AM PDT

Safeguarding your wireless network

by Dave Rosenberg
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 13 comments

It seems like every few months I have to set up a wireless network for someone. And while it's certainly an easy task I am fairly sure that the security choices people make in the process are probably not the most iron-clad.

Whether by design or by default, every company and, now, most homes have a wireless network. Unless you understand, control, and manage this network, you are creating vulnerabilities that threaten network security. As more and more companies begin using wireless as a primary medium for data services, including VoIP and video, preventive measures should be taken to better safeguard your Wi-Fi.

I spoke with Jay Botelho, director of product management at WildPackets, who provided three tips to safeguard a wireless network:

1. Ad-hoc mode: Turn it off--forever.
I'm amazed how often I continue to see laptops in public places, like airports, coffee shops and trade shows, that are configured with ad-hoc mode enabled. Just "view available wireless networks" next time you're in a public place and I'm sure you'll find a neighbor or two with ad-hoc mode enabled. If they're a colleague of yours, do them a favor and tell them to disable ad-hoc mode--forever. There's nothing it can do for them, except create a possible security breach. And whatever you do, don't connect to an unknown ad-hoc network. You may just be taking someone else's bait.

2. Use WPA-2.
The word has been out for awhile, but usage of sub-standard wireless authentication/encryption, including WEP, is still prevalent. There's no reason to be using anything except WPA-2. Every wireless adapter and every AP for sale today supports WPA-2. Some of your gear is 4-plus years old and doesn't support WPA-2? Replace it! I'm sure there are some killer deals at your local electronics store. And the risk far, far outweighs the expense. You don't have to look far to find evidence of this--remember TJ Maxx?

3. Establish firm security policies.
The above concrete actions are just examples of what is truly needed: a complete security policy for your organization. The policy must tie overall network security with wireless security. It's all one network--it needs a single unified policy that incorporates all levels of network access. Wireless is only one of them.

Follow me on Twitter @daveofdoom

Dave Rosenberg dishes up "Software, Interrupted" with nearly 15 years of technology and marketing experience that spans from Bell Labs to multiple start-up IPOs to open-source enterprise software companies. He is co-founder of MuleSource and currently serves as the general manager of Hardy Way. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can contact Dave via e-mail at softwareinterrupted@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter @daveofdoom.
Recent posts from Software, Interrupted
Survey: IT's key role in global economic recovery
Five free tech PR tools you need to know about
The 802.11n land grab
Trend watch 2010: Mobile movies
Survey: IT spending to recover in 2010
Nintendo launches paid video content for Wii
Analyst: Money transfer soon to be No. 1 phone app
Apple's App Store review irking developers
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Brent212 June 19, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
I just turn mac filtering on, so only mine and my roommate's computers can connect. If I want to add a machine or someone happens to come over with a laptop (these things might only happen like twice a year), I just turn the filtering off until they connect, add their mac address to the list, and turn the filter back on. I've never really looked into wifi security since I'm assuming this is pretty secure. I like to hear feedback if it's not.
Reply to this comment
by Weeji June 19, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
That's what I do, and what the company I work at does as well. I remember reading a while back that this was actually the most secure method. I'm guessing that this article assumes most people would rather pass out a password than jump on a computer and allow each computer that needs access individually.
by wp-jay June 19, 2009 3:33 PM PDT
I agree this is a good alternative. It's just that many users, especially less savvy home users, don't even know what a MAC address is, so assuming they'll use MAC filtering is really a stretch.
by pburkeiii June 19, 2009 8:06 PM PDT
completely agree, this is exactly what i do, better yet completely disable network broadcasting so it can not even be seen, it is a lot more secure because you are the only one who can access it when you are the only one who knows the network name
by odubtaig June 20, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
As pointed out below, MAC addresses can easily be spoofed and turning off the SSID broadcast is no guarantee as it's still contained in packets between the router/AP and clients and is easily detected.

Yes, lock down by MAC. Yes, switch off SSID broadcast. Just don't think they're any substitute for having an ancrypted connection. The moment you're broadcasting everything in the clear (and unlike with ethernet you _are_ broadcasting) you might as well just hand the crackers all your passwords, access to your servers, the company accounts...

Not that encryption can't be cracked but not having encryption because it's not perfect is like not having a lock on your front door because they can be drilled.
by zo6freak June 19, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
Is it relatively easy to hack a wireless network that is WPA secured??
Reply to this comment
by wp-jay June 19, 2009 3:31 PM PDT
No, it's really not easy to hack a wireless network secured with WPA, especially if other good practices are followed, like using very secure passwords. There's lots of good information out there on the Internet. A quick search will turn up many artlicles, blog entries and even videos. My only point is that WPA-2 is better and readily available in all equipment today, but WPA is certainly still a viable alternative, and much more secure than WEP.
by zo6freak June 19, 2009 2:39 PM PDT
i dont want to know how, im just wondering how secure my network really is...
Reply to this comment
by tipoo_ June 19, 2009 3:53 PM PDT
I stick to WPA, WPA2 seems to bog down the router noticeably more.
Reply to this comment
by tikoro June 19, 2009 6:39 PM PDT
If you're really paranoid (like me) You use wpa2 with mac filtering, with as long a password as you can manage in to the interface of the router. I don't trust anyone, not even my wife can get in to the router interfaces (either hardwired or the wap). I've seen a lot of networks that use mac filtering and then leave the default or a blank password on the admin console. All it takes is about 30 seconds to nab a mac address if you're somewhat familiar with the equipment's interface...and you can certainly spoof a mac address easily enough. They don't have both mac filtering AND encryption schemas in there as a pick and choose which one, they're both there to be used. Another note would be to always make sure that remote management is turned off on the WAP unless there's some DIRE need that you be able to administer it.
Reply to this comment
by axioms June 19, 2009 9:28 PM PDT
I'm paraniod like you. I have wpa2 (AES) + Mac filtering + 22 character password for my wpa key and a 16 character pass for my router.
by peco412 June 19, 2009 7:09 PM PDT
How easy is it to break WEP encryption, anyway?
Reply to this comment
by odubtaig June 20, 2009 5:40 AM PDT
On a scale of 1 to 10? Hilariously.

http://wirelessdefence.org/Contents/Aircrack-ng_WinMain.htm

Just remember, the tools used for cracking are usually the same ones used for securing.
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

advertisement

About Software, Interrupted

In "Software, Interrupted," Dave Rosenberg discusses disruption in the software market, as well as the products and services that keep business technology norms in perpetual flux.

With nearly 15 years of technology and marketing experience spanning from Bell Labs to multiple start-up IPOs, Dave co-founded open-source software company MuleSource and now serves as general manager of Hardy Way. He also happens to be a U.S. patent holder and a workaholic. Technology is his best friend and mortal enemy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Software, Interrupted topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right