Print on the cheap with $64.99 laser
Brother HL-2040 laser printer
(Credit: Brother)Sometimes good deals come by way of the morning paper. To wit: Wednesday's Staples insert lists the Brother HL-2040 laser printer for $69.99.
That's pretty good, but I wondered if any e-tailer could do better. Sure enough, Newegg.com has the same model for $64.99 shipped, and you don't have to pay that pesky sales tax. (Note: Actually, many states do require you to pay sales tax for Internet purchases, but few people know this and fewer still comply.)
The HL-2040 looks like a fine choice for homes and small businesses, as it can churn out about 16 pages per minute. That's according to CNET's review, which gave the printer a respectable 7.1 out of 10 rating. I wish it had network capabilities, but I can forgive that given the $65 price tag. (Plan on an extra $5 or so for a USB cable, not included.) Even if you already own an inkjet or multifunction printer, you'll love having a laser on hand for fast, cheap, razor-sharp document printing.
Rick Broida, a technology writer for nearly 20 years, is the author of more than a dozen books. In addition to writing CNET's The Cheapskate blog, he oversees BNET's Business Hacks. Rick is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CBS Interactive. Disclosure. Deals found on The Cheapskate are subject to availability, expiration, and other terms determined by sellers. Follow Rick on Twitter at cheapskateblog. 





To tax that is an unreasonable restraint on interstate trade (Commerce Clause). A citation to such a law would be appreciated.
This isn't meant to be a business workhorse, but rather a personal laser for home users or small businesses with minimal printing needs.
- by Pixelslave December 19, 2007 1:12 PM PST
- I just bought a Samsung ML 2510. There was a rebate that made the total price down to $59.99. I had some bad experience from my previous Brothers printer. It emitted such a strong odor that I couldn't tolerate putting it near where I would stay.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(9 Comments)