• On GameFAQs: What causes the Red Ring of Death?
The Cheapskate
 DEALS LEFT
June 16, 2009 6:43 AM PDT

Get an Insignia Blu-ray player for $129.99

by Rick Broida

This Blu-ray player doesn't have any bells or whistles, but it does have a dirt-cheap price.

(Credit: Best Buy)

I said it before, I'll say it again: Blu-ray won't really take off until you can buy a player for $99. We're not quite there yet, but we're close: Best Buy has the Insignia NS-2BRDVD Blu-ray player for $129.99 shipped (plus tax in most states).

That's just about the lowest price I've seen yet on a nonrefurbished, rebate-free player. (Actually, Walmart has a Magnavox model on sale for $128, but it's in-store only. I like stuff that gets brought to me.)

The Insignia (Best Buy's house brand) features the usual features: 1080p output and upconversion, Dolby Digital Plus and DTS-HD audio, a one-year warranty, and so on. Unsurprisingly, an HDMI cable is not included--but by now you know how to get one for just a few bucks, right?

The player supports Blu-ray Profile 1.1, meaning you won't get to take advantage of BD-Live and other 2.0 features. Interestingly, CNET's review of the NS-2BRDVD indicates that a March, 2009, firmware update will add 2.0 support--but the last update was in February. My advice: Don't hold your breath.

You will, however, need to apply that February update, at least according to a smattering of user reviews on the product page. And to do so, you'll have to download the ISO file to your PC, burn it to a CD or DVD, then install on the player. That's because the NS-2BRDVD lacks Ethernet and USB ports, which would make firmware updates a lot easier.

So, yeah, this isn't the world's most advanced Blu-ray player. But it should deliver dazzling images and audio, and that's the most important part, right?

What do you think? Is $129.99 a good enough deal for you to pull the Blu-ray trigger, or are you waiting for that magical $99 price tag?

Rick Broida, a technology writer for nearly 20 years, is the author of more than a dozen books. In addition to writing CNET's The Cheapskate blog, he oversees BNET's Business Hacks. Rick is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CBS Interactive. Disclosure. Deals found on The Cheapskate are subject to availability, expiration, and other terms determined by sellers. Follow Rick on Twitter at cheapskateblog.
Recent posts from The Cheapskate
Get a Wi-Fi multifunction printer for $59
Get a 16-inch Windows 7 laptop for $350
Get six Mac apps absolutely free
Get a Motorola Droid for $149.99 shipped
Get The Beatles: Rock Band for $99.99 shipped
Get a 32-inch LCD TV for $298
Get Serif PagePlus X4 for $16.99 shipped
Get a 5-inch Magellan GPS for $129.99 shipped
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (35 Comments)
by zgreenwell June 16, 2009 7:08 AM PDT
It makes me miss HD-DVD players. I bought a $99 player while the format was still viable and it had an integrated ethernet port and, like all HD-DVD players, had comparable features to Blu-Ray live. I guess we're getting there slowly with Blu-Ray. Now if they would only make the movies cheaper.
Reply to this comment
by pscull June 16, 2009 7:43 AM PDT
With VOD getting more popular and TV's w/ built-in internet access becoming common, the days of physical media are numbered. I watch Vudu movies in high def and love the picture. Plus, I never have to leave the house or wait for the disc to arrive!
Reply to this comment
by Forked_Tongue June 16, 2009 6:52 PM PDT
Agreed, I think cable and satellite days are numbered as well, watch shows when I want and with more internet appliances coming out cloud, streaming sites, and VOD will be the future.
by don_bidarian June 17, 2009 7:31 AM PDT
You know the bitrate is different right? You can notice the difference in fast moving pictures and also big TVs.
by Haroldnca June 16, 2009 8:37 AM PDT
I'm holding off on buying. Personally, I think the future is in streaming HD content and not having an actual disc that you pop in a machine. I think DVD's will go the way of the CD. But that's just my opinion.
Reply to this comment
by NervClaX June 16, 2009 8:44 AM PDT
A little off topic, but in case anyone is interested, Dell has the most-excellent PSP-2001 slim for only $119.99 and free shipping.

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Sony_PSP/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=A1320879

Mine is being delivered today. :)
Reply to this comment
by tcr071 June 16, 2009 9:29 AM PDT
Hm. We are almost to the point that HD-DVD was 18 months ago where you can get a player for $99.99. Only that player came bundled with two free movies, you got to pick five free movies from the store, and then Toshiba mailed me 5 movies for free as well. I paid $99 for an HD-DVD player with features still not available on most blu-ray players and 12 free movies. Still waiting for a blu-ray player to hit $99 WITHOUT a dozen free movies.

Yup. Definitely sounds like the best format for the consumers won. Right...?
Reply to this comment
by chrkeller June 16, 2009 9:32 AM PDT
Yeah the best format did win. BR offers far more storage space.
by ospideyo June 16, 2009 10:35 AM PDT
I remember when Toshiba was trying to keep HD DVD alive and they lowered the price of the player to $99. That was a last ditch effort to keep the format alive. By the way how did that work out for them? We all know the answer.
by June 16, 2009 9:04 PM PDT
"Yeah the best format did win. BR offers far more storage space."

That's the kind of idiotic thinking that sunk HD DVD in the first place. When you watch high quality 1080p content, at what point do you think "man this looks bad since the disk only holds 30 gigs of data"? The BD platform was always poorly implemented overkill with superior marketing that has obviously taken you for a ride.
by tcr071 June 16, 2009 9:11 PM PDT
@chrkeller - Actually just before HD-DVD died there were announcements of a 50GB HD-DVD disc. Not that storage capacity matters, at all, because even at 30GB there was ample space left on the disc that wasn't be used at all. HD-DVD had far more features going for it two years ago than blu-ray has even now.

@ospideyo - They were able to lower the price because the format was cheaper and easier to produce, not because it was a last ditch effort. Blu-ray players were being slashed in prices as well but the cheapest they could possibly make it was to $199.99 which was a price point HD-DVD was at WITHOUT a sale back in January of 2008.
by chrkeller June 17, 2009 4:26 AM PDT
Taken me for a ride, yeah I don't think so. HD-DVD was nothing but Toshiba being greedy and not wanting Sony in control of a clearly superior format. The extra storage space BR has to offer makes it easy for uncompressed audio, something HD-DVD struggled with. If anybody was taken for a ride it was those who thought HD-DVD ever had a chance.
by the_iceman June 16, 2009 9:34 AM PDT
lol @ insignia, best buy's house brand. I'll pass...no matter the cost.
Reply to this comment
by xophaser June 16, 2009 9:49 AM PDT
BB commissioned LG to make a bare bone Insignia, so not a bad machine really. Just design looks bad.
by dc137pd June 16, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
I got one for $99 at Best Buy, took it home and went to hook it up and found that I didnt have an available HDMI port. Wasnt gonna hook it up via component so I took it back.....
Reply to this comment
by ev61 June 16, 2009 11:12 AM PDT
good story, could have used a vampire.
by felderga June 16, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
I think this machine is a barebones Samsung and not LG
Reply to this comment
by 1kingsfan June 16, 2009 10:44 AM PDT
I'm with the_iceman - I wouldn't touch Insignia with a ten-foot pole. I already have a samsung BD and a PS3 and I think Blu-Ray will take off when the standard is finally set AND you can buy a GOOD BD player for $99 - not some stripped-down piece of junk.
Reply to this comment
by Robert Griffith June 16, 2009 11:05 AM PDT
Got an HD DVD player and 2 Blu-Ray's and while they're great machines,the player manufacturers have waited far too long to lower the prices ,especially Sony. What i want to know is when will Sony distribute a firmware to lessen the spin up and play times on their players? Too much money for too little satisfaction. Don't know what they did that caused their demise ,but HD DVD is still a great format
Reply to this comment
by felderga June 16, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
I would only buy this as a player for my bedroom. I think the $119.99 deal for the PSP Slim from Dell is a better deal if you have money to burn right now :)
Reply to this comment
by C0mmanderB0nd June 16, 2009 2:01 PM PDT
Will any of the new movies even play in a 1.1 player??????

The few Blu rays I have that were BD Live would not even work in my Laptop player until I updated to 2.0, which wasn't as easy as it should have been btw (thanks to Dell). The Auto update feature kept looping and saying the updated completed sucessfully but it did not.

Buyer beware picking up a player this cheap as there maybe no 2.0 upgrade and that could leave you out of luck with all the latest movies all using BD live/2.0..

For example "The Dark Knight" is BD live.
Reply to this comment
by felderga June 16, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
I just saw this at BB on clearance for $99.

Also unless you hook this thing up to the Internet, BD Live is not a big deal. You do as mentioned in the review need to install the latest firmware to work with newer disc.
Reply to this comment
by paulimusmaximus June 16, 2009 3:49 PM PDT
I'll wait. I got a philips dvd with upconvert that looks pretty darn good. I never buy movies anymore, I get them all from netflix, or redbox, so since netflix raised their blu ray price, and redbox doesn't offer blu ray in my area, I'll just wait till blu ray is more prevalent, and I get get a better brand than insignia for under a hundred.
Reply to this comment
by ean_kile June 16, 2009 4:12 PM PDT
I think 129.99 would be a magic number if it was on a player that reviewed better than two and a half stars. Whatever happened to that Vizio player that was supposed to come out in April? The only info I can find on it is dated back to January.
Reply to this comment
by jjayguy23 June 16, 2009 4:14 PM PDT
In my opinion disc media is dead. We should all look towards the cloud for our media/entertainment. We should download everything.
Reply to this comment
by gvortex June 16, 2009 6:18 PM PDT
This player is actually made by Funai (and not by either Samsung or LG), and it's actually not that bad. The only gripe I would have with it is that lack of regular firmware updates. But, for the price it would make a great gift to someone new to Blu-ray, or even a good second player for the room or the kids.
Reply to this comment
by Stories84 June 16, 2009 9:44 PM PDT
I'm surprised at the number of folks on this thread who are absolutely clueless on so many aspects of Blu-ray.

1.) A movie with BD-Live (2.0) features on it will still play on a BD-Bonus View (1.1) player. It just won't activate the BD-Live features. If the player won't play a disc, it's because of the DRM on the disc, not the fact that it has BD-Live features on it that makes the disc unplayable (see: Samsung P1400 player).

2.) HD DVD is constrained by the 30gb size. Transformers, Bourne, and a few others released on HD DVD lacked lossless audio. The BD releases have TrueHD. If that's not proof of the size limitation, give me an explanation of why the HD DVD release didn't have lossless audio.

3.) Triple layer HD DVDs didn't have a prayers chance of reaching the mass market. You know why? Existing HD DVD players were incapable of reading the discs. So the triple layer disc (and its 45GB space) could not be utilized by the (approximately) 1 million people who bought a HD DVD player. Finished spec? Right.

Blu-ray won the HD format war because it had larger support/backing from the studios. More options for DRM allowed more content producers to sign up and make content on Blu-ray. Also, let's not forget the PS3 for helping to push extra BD players into the laps of gamers.
Reply to this comment
by felderga June 17, 2009 8:10 AM PDT
Actually there were quite a few HD-DVD disc that had either TrueHD or DTS HD. Bourne Ultimatum had TrueHD and Pan's Labyrinth had DTS HD just to name a few. True the majority of disc were encoded with just Dolby Digitial, but I don't think size was always a factor.

I'm really curious as to how many people actually play back using True HD or DTS HD? Remember when HD-DVD first hit there were only a few high end recievers that offered this feature. For me, it's not major reason to upgrade as I fine with Dobly Digital.

Again if you're looking for a second BD player (i.e. for your bedroom / office) then this is probably a good deal for a player. However in a year from now I suspect most players will be in the $125-$175 range anyway.

Also check your local BB as I've seen this one marked down to $99.
by Stories84 June 17, 2009 8:58 AM PDT
The first two Bourne (Identity and Supremacy) only came encoded with DD5.1+ on HD DVD. The subsequent BD releases had TrueHD on all three movies. Often, you find this trend is fairly common throughout most HD DVD releases later released on BD.

Currently, only the mid-range and up receivers have DTS-HD MA and TrueHD decoding, but almost every single player now decodes the lossless codecs on the player itself you get PCM audio out of your player (all the big name players: Panasonic, Samusng, LG, Sony, etc.). The great thing about this is that you can connect your audio receiver via HDMI or Analog and get the lossless sound. So even those with older receivers can still get lossless sound if they don't want to upgrade to a HDMI receiver.
by chrkeller June 17, 2009 9:06 AM PDT
Excellent post, I agree 100%. BR was clearly the superior product and I am very glad it won out in the end. DTS-HD MA and TrueHD are a fairly large step up from 5.1 digital. My Onkyo receiver was $600, not top end and it has on board decoding.
by prberg June 17, 2009 12:37 AM PDT
I think blu-ray is great. If I didn't already have a player I probably would scoop up this deal. The picture and sound quality are just the best. Plus when I get a blu-ray burner for my PC I will be able to put alot of my RAW pictures on one disc. How cool!
Reply to this comment
by douggdangger June 17, 2009 9:27 AM PDT
Just buy a Bluray drive for your PC, rent the movies and rip them to your HD.

For the price of 4 bluray movies, I can buy a hard drive and store about 80 1080p rips in them with no loss in quality. All I pay for is the rental membership.

For about the same price as purchasing 1 bluray movie, that gives me a full month's rental of about 10 bluray discs in my que (if I rip and return them fast enough). Not bad.


That should do it for me in the next year or two until the disc media dies.

Sony and the movie industry help destroy the superior format that was working since day one, friendlier to the consumer, and was more affordable.

I'm taking revenge for Toshiba by giving my money to Netflix and hard drive manufacturers and not to Sony and the studios. ;-)
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (35 Comments)

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

advertisement

About The Cheapskate

The best things in tech are cheap. "The Cheapskate" scours the Web for great deals on PCs, phones, gadgets, and all the other tech stuff that makes life worth living. Send your own cheapskate tips to thecheapskate@gmail.com. Rick is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Deals found on The Cheapskate are subject to availability, expiration, and other terms determined by sellers.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Cheapskate topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right