• On TechRepublic: Windows 7 keyboard shortcut cheat sheet
May 28, 2008 9:22 AM PDT

Helping patent examiners examine patents

by Matt Wermager
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 1 comment

It's a simple fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the "USPTO") is inundated with patent applications. Given the sheer volume of applications, patent examiners can only spend a limited amount of time examining those applications. Further, given the fact that an applicant for a patent does not have to conduct a "prior art" search before filing, it is virtually impossible for an examiner to turn up all of the prior art that is relevant to a patent application.

Unbeknownst to many patent practitioners, however, the USPTO is getting ready to wrap up a yearlong pilot project directed at giving the examiners a little help in turning up prior art.

Last year the USPTO, in conjunction with the New York Law School, launched a program titled "Peer to Patent." This pilot project enables the public to comment on and submit prior art that may be relevant to pending patent applications. The project is somewhat limited in scope as only patent applications that relate to computer architecture, software, and information security are eligible for this process and applicants must agree to submit their patent applications to this process. However, preliminary numbers reported by the organization indicate that the project may be an effective means of reviewing patent applications.

According to the "Peer to Patent" Web site, over 2,000 people have signed up to participate as reviewers of patent applications and have submitted 192 pieces of prior art on 42 patent applications.

For more information about the process, see the USPTO's description of the program here.

Matt is a patent litigator with the law firm of Vinson & Elkins LLP. His views are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of Vinson & Elkins or its clients. He is a member of the CNET blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. The postings on this site were created for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Disclaimer.
Recent posts from BLIP: Blogging Patents
Supreme Court grants victory to Quanta in patent case
Helping patent examiners examine patents
Adidas wins big in trademark dispute
Reply to Mr. Ohman concerning patent dispute with Lance Armstrong Foundation
Lance Armstrong Foundation sued by holder of design patent for BARKSTRONG pet collar
RAMBUS: The battle over hold-ups in industry standard setting
Quick appellate review of patent claim constructions: Is the door opening for interlocutory appeals?
A unique brand of monopoly
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by zbyesok June 5, 2008 5:51 AM PDT
great.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About BLIP: Blogging Patents

Michael Valek, Chris Ryan, and Matt Wermager are lawyers with the firm of firm of Vinson & Elkins LLP. Here, they discuss recent developments in our intellectual property system, the role the law plays to encourage innovation, as well as why any or all of this should matter to the rest of us. The postings on this site were created for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Disclaimer.

Add this feed to your online news reader

BLIP: Blogging Patents topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right