April 29, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Critics slam 'GTA IV' without test drive

Many critics started complaining about the violence and sexual content in Rockstar Games' 'Grand Theft Auto IV' before even seeing the game.

(Credit: Rockstar Games)

To many in the video game industry, the two words "Jack" and "Thompson" engender horror and disgust.

Thompson, a self-appointed uber-critic of the industry, has spent the last few years railing away at games he deems too full of sex or violence. Never was he out in more force than during 2005's so-called "Hot Coffee" scandal, in which the monster hit Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas was discovered to have hidden, but easily uncoverable, animations that mimicked sexual activity.

In the lead-up to the midnight Tuesday release of Rockstar Games' follow-up game, Grand Theft Auto IV, Thompson was at it again. (See GameSpot's review here: Grand Theft Auto IV (PlayStation 3).)

According to online technology news site Softpedia, Thompson wrote an e-mail to Take-Two Interactive CEO Strauss Zelnick's mother (Take-Two is Rockstar's parent company).

Click for gallery

"Your son last week was reported to have said the following about Grand Theft Auto IV," the letter allegedly began. "'We've already received numerous reviews, and to a one, they are perfect scores. My mom couldn't write better reviews...' Taking your son's thought, I would encourage you either to play this game or have an adroit video gamer play it for you. Some of the latter gamers are on death row, so try to find one out in the civilian population who hasn't killed someone yet."

In an e-mail to CNET News.com Monday, Thompson confirmed that he wrote the letter, but said he sent it to Strauss' attorney and not to his mother.

"I sent it to Strauss' attorney to make the point that if you drag your mother into your porn business pimping," Thompson told me by e-mail, "you had better be prepared for blowback."

There can be little doubt that the release of GTA IV will be one of the biggest events of the year in video games, both from a business and entertainment standpoint--and from the perspective of politicians, organizations, and individuals like Thompson seeking to derail the game due to what they expect to be an overabundance of violence and sex.

For example, California state Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco/San Mateo), recently put out a press release in which he exhorted parents not to buy GTA IV for their kids.

"Unfortunately, the makers of Grand Theft Auto have a history of deceiving the ratings board and the public on the true content of their games," Yee said in the statement.

Indeed, Take-Two and Rockstar got into pretty serious trouble over the "Hot Coffee" scandal because Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas was originally rated "M," meaning 17-year-olds could buy it. After the scandal broke, the publishers were forced to re-rate the game as "AO" for adults only. And in June 2006, Take-Two reached an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission promising to accurately depict the contents of its games.

Last week, the Parents Television Council issued a release demanding that retailers not sell GTA IV or, at least, not make it available to children.

Some say that even the violence in 'GTA IV' comes with an accompanying message: commit the crime, do the time.

(Credit: Rockstar Games)

But after sifting through all these press releases, e-mails, statements, and demands that the world's retailers and parents run screaming from GTA IV, it's striking that none of the people behind these missives has seen the game, and thus couldn't possibly know its full contents.

Part of the problem, said Aaron Muszalski, a visual effects artist formerly with Industrial Light & Magic who teaches at the Academy of Art University in San Francisco, is that critics of games like those in the GTA series pass judgment on a very small sample of the whole game.

"When it was reported that, in earlier GTA games, it was possible to have sex with prostitutes and then beat them to death," Muszalski said, "people who lacked a grasp of 'sandbox' gameplay were likely to have interpreted that news to have meant that to 'win' at GTA, one had to perform such tasks, perhaps even that they were a recurring stage in the gameplay.

"Of course, such a perception is grossly flawed, as anyone who has actually played GTA...will quickly tell you," Muszalski continued. "Many of the aspects of GTA that were most covered in the press were things that, in the actual course of gameplay, many people would never need nor choose to do."

Of course, no one denies that there is sexually suggestive or violent content in GTA and other games. And Rockstar Games didn't help its cause in its slow response to the "Hot Coffee" scandal, nor does it now with its reaction to critics who accuse it of serving up games that are harmful to children.

"We don't have any comment on that," Rockstar spokesman Steve Hahnel told me Monday.

Sen. Clinton takes a bye
But perhaps the more measured approach to the GTA situation evinced even by some of the series' more vocal critics might be a more fair way to go.

For example, Sen. Hillary Clinton, who was one of the loudest members of the anti-GTA: San Andreas coalition in 2005, has decided to sit this round out.

"We are not planning to issue a statement at this point," Clinton spokeswoman Sarah Gegenheimer wrote in an e-mail.

And the National Organization for Women, which, according to the International Game Developers Association took GTA III to task for "encourag(ing) violence toward and the degradation of women (and) glorifies violence and degrades women," has also decided to remain calm. For now.

"We would really like to see the actual game before we comment on it," said Mai Shiozaki, NOW's press secretary. "But it's not like we're going to go out and buy it."

To be sure, there's little doubt that the controversy over the release of GTA IV is music to Rockstar Games' ears, no matter how shrill the criticism from the likes of Thompson, Yee, the Parents Television Council, and others.

Promotional screenshots for 'GTA IV' are dominated by scenes of one character or another wielding guns or being near explosions. But is this game any worse than dozens of other titles that go unnoticed by critics?

(Credit: Rockstar Games)

After all, as they say, any publicity is good publicity.

"It's their leading franchise, and it's the driver of the vast majority of their profits," said Colin Sebastian, a senior video game analyst at Lazard Capital Partners, "and so the game needs to sell very well, and I think it will. It's one of the few blockbuster franchises you can count on, in terms of sequels and follow-ons."

Sebastian said that because of the game's huge existing fan base, plus solid early reviews and the fact that it's coming out initially on two platforms--Xbox and PlayStation 3--he expects GTA IV to live up to or even exceed the sales numbers of its hit predecessors.

Analysts predict that GTA IV could break Halo 3's entertainment industry record of $170 million for first-day sales.

What GTA means to EA's takeover bid
One major component to the GTA saga is the game's role in the ongoing merger discussions between would-be buyer Electronic Arts and Take-Two.

What's clear in that dynamic, especially now that the game is being released, is that its success could impact the amount that EA is willing to pay for Take-Two.

"The expectations for GTA were already justifiably very high," Sebastian said. "EA understood that when they made their bid....Every day that passes, they're (going to be) losing out on GTA revenues, so they're likely to lower their bid over time....But if GTA massively exceeds their expectations, that could be a scenario where EA might have to raise their bid."

None of this, of course, matters to critics like Yee or the Parents Television Council, both of which cited the oft-reported history of violence in GTA as reason behind their statements.

"We've seen a number of clips of the game," said Yee spokesperson Adam Keigwin. "From the clips alone, and based on GTA and Rockstar's history, (Yee) thought it very appropriate to issue a statement urging parents not to purchase the game for their children."

Similarly, Gavin McKiernan, the national grassroots director for the Parents Television Council, said that despite not having seen the game yet, "You can't necessarily wait until the cat's out of the bag...There's a huge (GTA) marketing and release push, and I'm sure this game will sell lots and lots of copies, so you can't wait."

Plus, McKiernan added, "this is a pretty established, known quantity. If there was going to be a significant change in style and tenor, that would be well known."

To which Muszalski might say, "So what?"

"GTA has always been memorable for the degree to which it succeeds at dramatizing the narrative, and contextually supporting the players actions," he said. "This is not crime for crime's sake, as anyone who has really played the game will tell you, but which, sadly, may not be apparent to anyone who has merely had the game presented to them, mid-gameplay."

Recent posts from News - Gaming and Culture
Are Demo and TechCrunch50 fragmenting their audiences?
iPhone to ingest EA's 'Spore Origins'
Behind the prototyping of 'Spore'
GameSpot review: EA's balancing act with 'Spore'
Xbox 360 to be lowest-priced next-gen video game console
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 160 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
Not again!
by McPlot April 29, 2008 5:14 AM PDT
You know, I am sick of parental groups trying to be a parent for me. I will decide if my kids should play the game or not. I actually watch my children and know what games they are playing and what movies they are watching. I am active in my childerns lives.

To slam the game without even seeing or playing it, is stupid. Yes, most likely it will have what they fear it will have. But to what extent? They have no idea. It is like saying a movie is a porn just because it has Ron Jeremy in it. Even though he has done many non-adult movies like Detroit Rock City. (I did not say good movies).
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Personally...
by jelloburn April 29, 2008 6:19 AM PDT
... I'm sick of the GTA series, I played it from the first GTA to
GTA III and I no longer see any compelling reason to continue
playing. The originals were fun, but there's only so many car-
jackings and cannonball runs hat you can perform before it just
all starts to feel formulaic.

The games were definitely revolutionary in their open-ended
nature, scope, and willingness to deal with mature subject
matter, but I personally think it is time for this franchise to shut
down. It mainly performs well still because people (mainly
children that shouldn't be playing the games in the first place)
like the shock value. Just like Howard Stern and Rush Limbaugh.
Reply to this comment View reply
Sometimes you can judge a book by it's cover (or author)
by reidme314 April 29, 2008 6:35 AM PDT
Rock Star's track record is sufficient to judge the content of this game. You don't have to watch a movie by Vivid Video to know what it contains.

Regardless, that's what ratings are for. Slap an M++ on it and let the buyer beware. As a parent I know it's hard to say no to your kid when "all my friends" have it, but then lots of things about parenting are hard. It's up to us to find better things for them to do.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Europe
by GrandpaN1947 April 29, 2008 7:11 AM PDT
I'm sure it will sell well in Europe where it will be sold without censorship and without government interference. Rock on Euro
Reply to this comment View reply
What did they think it was going to be?
by thedreaming April 29, 2008 7:13 AM PDT
You would think that after three successful games that the forth game would be what, a farm simulator? Give me a break. It's a big sandbox game where you can do pretty much anything you want and there's a story attached, if you're into that sort of thing, but in the end it's just a game. No one gets hurt, you don't make any actual money and no women are really hurt. Why are people complaining about a game that they haven't even played all the way through yet?!
Reply to this comment View reply
To little too late
by wilmepe April 29, 2008 7:18 AM PDT
Myself and hundreds of thousands of gamers already have our copies and this will become the best selling game of all time.
Parents who don't supervise what their kids play are the problem. Not the game itself.
Reply to this comment
DO NOT VOTE FOR CLINTON
by oliversolman April 29, 2008 7:19 AM PDT
one more reason not to!
Reply to this comment View reply
*sigh*
by PogoWolf April 29, 2008 7:27 AM PDT
I really wish these people would worry more about something important like gas prices, the homeless, the jobless, and REAL crime, then a bunch of pixels.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
so you don't like it
by pfletcher April 29, 2008 7:31 AM PDT
don't buy it, and don't let your kids buy it either.

there are plenty more scary things that happen in real life
Reply to this comment View reply
Grow up!
by davidamerland April 29, 2008 7:38 AM PDT
First, all this noise is just publicity for GTA IV, second how about campaigning to get guns off the streets and make it illegal to buy one, or is the NRA sponsoring the activities of people like Jack Thompson? Third, it's only a game. Can parents not decide if they should buy it on their own? (It is a possibility that they have been infantilised by the Big Nanny approach to the point that they cannot). Fourth ... looks cool! I'll buy a copy just from the screenshots but the furor behind it clinched it for me.
Reply to this comment View reply
Hypocritical short-sightedness
by dinojr April 29, 2008 7:49 AM PDT
Why's GTA evil when movies have equal amounts of sex and violence? Eastern Promises was chuck full of graphic gangster violence and sexual content and it was nominated for an Oscar! Where was the vilification of that movie?

Nobody's forcing players to fornicate with hookers and then beat them up. Nobody's forcing players to jump through major hoops to activate Hot Coffee. If there's anything wrong here, it's with the player that he/she chooses to do so.

The problem is the perception that video games are shallow meaningless pursuits for children and that they have no artistic, social or other value. We've been through this before with the Beatles' and Elvis' evil rock music and the scourge of comic books. History never fails to repeat itself.

I am an adult and I will buy and play the game and I'm not a death row inmate.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Here we go again....
by Zaunto April 29, 2008 7:57 AM PDT
It's stupid for anyone who hasn't even seen or played a video game to comment negatively about it. There are numerous games out there with the same level of violence and sexuality or more. These "Tipper Gore" tactics didn't work with the music industry, it has never worked for the movie industry, and these stuffed shirts have to know that all they are doing is raising the hype level and guaranteeing that the game sells well. At least Clinton has the good sense to shut up about it.
Reply to this comment
What we've been waiting for . . .
by fokkwp April 29, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
. . . some great prep material for Marine recruitment candidates!
Reply to this comment View reply
Just the facts.
by lifelonglego April 29, 2008 10:30 AM PDT
One fact that people don't realise is that epople who play violent video games are much less likely to go homacidal. Before you start pointing out columbine, you should realise that FBI investigation clearly indicates that the murderes of the columbine incident did not have access to violent material. Disallowance of videogames most likely only causes negative thoughts in the victims of the oppression. In the past years, violence and homacides are decreasing, but violent video games are increasing. I really don't think there is any correlation at all. And I did notice that someone in this discussion mentioned guns. I am going to point out that ill-meaning criminals are not going to obey gun laws. The only thing no gun tolerance is, is a gauranty that the criminals victims will be unarmed and incapable of defending themselves. I don' like Hillory, but I think it was a wise move not to comment or do anything about GTA IV. I will still not vote for her, but I think that it was a good move.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
HOT COFFEE
by basraw April 29, 2008 11:01 AM PDT
is this th eone with the hot coffee hack?
Reply to this comment View reply
Glorifying violence? Our military does that!
by Leria April 29, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
Our military already glorifies violence when it says that dropping bombs on innocents from 10,000+ feet in the air is 'just part of a war'.
No, that is part of a WAR CRIME!

If they really want to get rid of violence, we have to start saying that ANY violence done in REAL LIFE for ANY reason is wrong and will not be tolerated.
That means it will not be tolerated by the military, by the police, or by regular civilians.... PERIOD AND DONE WITH.
Reply to this comment View reply
Or, simple appreciation.
by ReVeLaTeD April 29, 2008 12:10 PM PDT
GTA has a decent story, sure. But there's more to it than that.

For some, a game is a diversion: something to do when you're bored or otherwise unoccupied. For others it's a career; they play games because that's what they're paid to do. And then there's people like me.

I grew up with games. Simple games like Pac Man didn't do it for me; I needed to have a reason for my playing the game. Even Pac Man has a backstory to it - minimal though it might be. Yearning for this story is the reason I play primarily RPGs all the time - I like to be immersed in what is essentially an interactive book.

Enter GTA. Since San Andreas is the only GTA I ever finished, I'll use it as the example. It had quite possibly the most involving story of any game at the time, beginning to end. The reason I really enjoyed it was the fact that I could in some parts relate to it - it reminded me of where I grew up and how things were. If you can relate and make yourself a part of the action, you appreciate it that much more.

It's easy to look on the surface and say, "oh he runs around with guns and blows stuff up and has sex with hookers and" whatever else, but that's not the core of what the guy does. It's only a small aspect of a larger experience: that being the character development...who he is, why he's doing what he's doing; the overall plot, why you're in the game and what you're intended to do; the scenery, the city and all of its various features; and of course, the dialogue, the meat and bones of any good story.

As has been said, the reason GTA games can't get a break is simple: the media and the general public believe that video games are and always will be only for kids, despite every effort by the game developers to counter that mentality. As long as we continue to assume games as kids-only stuff, we'll never be able to get past this nonsense.

PS - Why bother with an "AO" rating if Adults can't buy it because the stores won't carry it, and the console bigwigs won't allow it to be made?
Reply to this comment View reply
A cartoon that is just as bad
by McPlot April 29, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
I saw a cartoon that had sex, violence, smoking, drinking, and murder! This heinous cartoon was called, Tom & Jerry!
Reply to this comment View reply
Excessive Violence?
by umcrouc0 April 29, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
There's actually very little violence in a GTA game compared to most other games on the market. The amount of time spent doing violent acts in GTA is minimal compared to any FPS. Look at Bioshock for example. You spend the entire game constantly shooting people, electrocuting them, lighting them on fire, etc. And that's a requirement of the game, not something that you do as a choice. GTA has violence in it, but the vast majoirity is done by the player choosing to do so, not as a requirement to finish the game. Giving someone control of their character doesn't mean that they need to go around running people over, it's something the person playing chooses to do. If your kids are given the choice of driving normally or running people down and the choose the latter, I think the problem is with your children, not the game that gave them the option to do so.
Reply to this comment View reply
Really?
by smokified April 29, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
First of all, Why do people feel that they are so important that we just need to listen to their opinions even though it is clearly apparent that they really do not know what you are talking about.

I wish this comment could be forced down the throats of all of these ignorant simpletons because people that try to impose their opinions on other people based on complete lack of knowledge **** ME THE **** OFF.

The choice is simple. If you do not like it, Don't play it. If you don't want your kids to play it, try being good parents and monitoring what your children are doing. If you are worried about what they are doing with their friends, be good parents and teach them how to be individuals and choose right from wrong.

The bottom line is that I like the kind of people that complain about these kinds of games just as much as those people like these games that they are complaining about. You don't see me goind around trying to rid the planet of these people as they are attempting to do with these games. I seem to remember a certain historical figure that had that kind of mentality.....oh yeah...Hitler was his name.

******* grow up America. For those of you who are sick of hearing this kind of bleeding heart ******** just as I am, keep fighting, I think the day is near where the "poor me's" are going to get what they have coming to them.
Reply to this comment
 See all 160 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

About News - Gaming and Culture

Along with other reporters, CNET News' Daniel Terdiman, uniquely positioned to take you into the middle of another side of technology, chronicles the latest and greatest of the "fun beat," at the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, Legos, 3D virtual worlds, social networking, aviation, hacked Roombas, and much more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News - Gaming and Culture topics

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Nanotech: The Circuits Blog

    Intel ships low-power chips for servers

    New server chips from processor giant draw as little as 12.5 watts per core.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week

    Here are CNET Reviews' 10 favorite items from the past week, including the TiVo HD XL, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50, and the Dish Network's newest digital TV converter box.

  • News - Apple

    Apple watchers spot 'iPod Nano' pix, iTunes hints

    The rumor mill has long been predicting a longer, leaner new version of the iPod Nano, and now it's conjuring up some pictures.

  • Coop's Corner

    Chris Shipley 1, Internet lynch mob 0

    Demo's impresario goes public with a tart and smartly written riposte to the shoot-from-the-lip crowd.

  • Video

    Katie Couric reflects on first Webcast

    The political conventions are over and so are CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric's first series of Webcasts. CNET's Kara Tsuboi sat down with Couric on the final night of the Republican National Convention to discuss what she liked about Webcasting, some of her most memorable guests, and whether TV news will still be around by the next round of conventions.

  • Webware

    Google upgrades Gmail for IE 6 users

    The online e-mail application is faster for those using the 7-year-old browser and gets features already available to more modern browsers, Google said.

  • Video

    YouTube plays party politics

    During the presidential campaigning four years ago, YouTube didn't even exist. Now it's a tool candidates must master to get their message across. CNET's Kara Tsuboi stops by the YouTube upload booths at the Democratic and Republican conventions to find out why Google's video site has such a big presence in Denver and St. Paul, Minn.

  • News - Gaming and Culture

    Are Demo and TechCrunch50 fragmenting their audiences?

    With both events scheduled to start Monday, many press, as well as venture capitalists and others are having to choose which one to attend.

  • News - Cutting Edge

    Execs predict next Google-like tech

    On eve of company's 10-year anniversary, researchers and business pundits speculate about what technologies might someday have as much impact as Google.

  • Gallery

    Images: The art of 'Spore' prototypes

    Will Wright and his Maxis team worked on dozens of prototypes to test the elements of their soon-to-be-released evolution game. Here's a sampling.

  • Webware

    DemoFall preview: 10 to watch

    If you can only watch 10 pitches from DemoFall, these would be good ones.

  • Green Tech

    TI does energy efficiency on a chip

    Its line of Piccolo microcontrollers can reduce power consumption significantly of home appliances, hybrid cars, LED lighting, and even solar panels.