• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
February 26, 2008 12:11 PM PST

Agency explores feasibility of virtual worlds as terrorist havens

by Daniel Terdiman

Over at Wired today, the eagle-eyed Ryan Singel has a story about a new U.S. government initiative intended to root out terrorists working and playing in virtual worlds.

As Singel writes, the so-called Data Mining Report (click here for PDF) from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence includes information about "Reynard," a "seedling effort to study the emerging phenomenon of social (particularly terrorist) dynamics in virtual worlds and large-scale online games and their implications for the Intelligence Community."

The Data Mining Report continues, suggesting, "The cultural and behavioral norms of virtual worlds and gaming are generally unstudied. Therefore, Reynard will seek to identify the emerging social, behavioral, and cultural norms in virtual worlds and gaming environments. The project would then apply the lessons learned to determine the feasibility of automatically detecting suspicious behavior and actions in the virtual world."

This leads me to several thoughts.

First, it is by no means a new theory that terrorists either might someday use, or perhaps already are using, virtual worlds to gather, train, look for love or whatever else might occur to them. Of course, it's only a theory. No one has yet proven anything untoward is happening or will happen.

That doesn't mean it can't happen, but to date there's been no proof.

Still, the possibility is certainly there, and it can't hurt to have the government spend a little time and money investigating techniques for rooting out any potential terrorist activity in environments like World of Warcraft, Call of Duty 4, Second Life, or elsewhere.

Secondly, I have to quibble with the report's assertion that "the cultural and behavioral norms of virtual worlds and gaming are generally unstudied."

In 2003, I wrote my first story about the State of Play conference, a confab held at New York Law School that looked into, among other things, the cultural and behavioral norms of virtual worlds. Since then, there have been dozens of such conferences, symposiums, meetings, and gatherings to look into this exact subject. Just because no one from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence chose to attend those meetings doesn't mean the discussions weren't happening.

Still, to my knowledge, there hasn't been any in-depth study about how to find and eradicate terrorists in virtual worlds, and there's been no doubt in my mind that such efforts would come along one day soon. And I bid the government the best of luck in finding such evil-doers, because who wouldn't?

But what's important is that virtual worlds not be painted with the brush of terrorism before there's any actual evidence that such activity is going on there.

So, I'd like to urge the people working on Reynard to tread carefully and be sure about what they're looking at. If they're not familiar with virtual worlds, they will certainly encounter behavior that is well outside the norm--and it could be tempting to categorize someone dressed as a jihadi as actually being one. Yet it may just be a 14-year-old from Dubuque having some (admittedly poorly expressed) fun with his or her friends.

Daniel Terdiman is a staff writer at CNET News covering games, Net culture, and everything in between. E-mail Daniel.
Recent posts from Geek Gestalt
Q&A: Bringing back Mickey Mouse's dark side
Bad PDF formatting reveals Google Voice numbers
How the venerable PS2 made it to 9 years old
The tech behind U2's record-smashing tour
Piloting a lunar rover
NASA iPhone app full of surprises for space geeks
PS3: No longer the next-gen console punching bag
U2 concert to be streamed live from Rose Bowl
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Virtually impossible to do this
by rnieves1977 February 26, 2008 1:20 PM PST
Terrorist training would most likely be done using games like CounterStrike which allows users to create their own environments including models of actual real world buildings and these environments can be run on private servers. So no one would know except those running the game. I don't think that MMORPGs or MMO games in general would be a good place to pick up terrorists anyhow, seems TOO public, unless of course that games theme was terrorism...
Reply to this comment
Oh geez....
by R. U. Sirius February 26, 2008 1:22 PM PST
the only thing people in Second Life care about is virtual sex with their permanently elongated yoyo's proudly displayed as they walk around naked in the public squares.

As for WoW, my guess is it is a bunch of adolescent teens pretending they are Patton or Rambo.

The other virtual world known as Fox news is probably a bigger threat to democracy and freedom.
Reply to this comment
understatement of the year
by rnieves1977 February 26, 2008 1:29 PM PST
"The other virtual world known as Fox news is probably a bigger threat to democracy and freedom."
has got to be the understatement of the year
I have no problems with this
by n3td3v February 26, 2008 1:27 PM PST
The UK government i know monitor virtual world's for paedophiles rings, and have arrested and shut down certain world's because of it.

I don't see why we can't do it for terrorist's, maybe the general public are looking at this the wrong way.

read this link:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1290719,00.html
Reply to this comment
If they are only monitoring
by PzkwVIb February 26, 2008 4:08 PM PST
virtual "public" spaces then okay. But anything more in depth would require a warrant. Unlike so many Brits I have heard from, we care about our civil rights. Whenever we question like this comes up some Brit always asks what the problem is. If you all do that then the movie "V" isn't a fantasy. It is a prophecy.
virtual terrorism
by xcrusader February 26, 2008 1:42 PM PST
oh what a marvelously civilized world we would have if the only acts of terrorism occured in second life.
Reply to this comment
Monitoring for dissent
by scdecade February 26, 2008 2:38 PM PST
This so called study has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or preventing crime. In order to create a model of what terrorist behavior looks like they'd need a dependent variable. The dependent variable would indicate whether or not the presence of terrorism exists or not for a given set of virtual world data related to an authenticated indentity. This means they must already have identified an actual act of terrorism to use as the prototype for developing behavioral indicators. Better yet they'd need dozens of confirmed terrorist incidents along with the associated data to have any sort of confidence in the predictive power of the model. As we've all been told ad nauseum there haven't been any acts of terrorism in the US since 9/11.

Avoidence: so simply it's stupid.

So what is this really? It's just another government data dragnet. Having all the data allows the government to quickly identify centers of dissent. That's all this is about. The government wants to know who's saying what to whom about what the government is doing. Communication nodes are easily identified and a National Security Letter is quickly sent. The center of gravity of any group can be easily managed.
Reply to this comment
Such Models Do Exist
by Len Bullard February 27, 2008 6:17 AM PST
Actually, having looked into that some years ago, such models can be created and do exist. This isn't different from the same models of behavior used by your local police to ferret out confidence men, burglars, etc. Profiling for that is a well-established technique.

There are multiple variables but also multiple and reasonably easy detectable behaviors. The observations don't send them to your house. They raise the probability of the need for more observation, so the 'predictability' thresholds are much lower.

The essential term is 'probable cause' for observation. This has a different set of operational requirements depending on where one is in the world. The rights of a US citizen inside US borders are different from the rights of a person outside those borders under US law.

The obvious problem is a person inside a virtual world has a physical location and a virtual location. The murky legal bit is what laws to apply if any and who has jurisdiction.

But can such models be effectively applied? Yes, they can. It is standard police work. This is nothing new.
View reply
Perspective
by mikeburek February 26, 2008 4:57 PM PST
Well, if you go to other places in the world, their "terrorist" (to them the US) would already be doing that.
Reply to this comment
Government registration
by mikeburek February 26, 2008 4:57 PM PST
Also, this would lead to everyone having to do some type of government registration to get online and open up all your activity to logging by the government.
Reply to this comment
Imaginary world
by mikeburek February 26, 2008 5:07 PM PST
Isn't one great thing about games that you can pretend be someone else? Or that you get to do something totally not acceptable in the real world?

So if you're tense one day, you have the choice of fragging some people online, or you could go on rampage with a chain saw. Maybe that day they are watching your character and think you are extremely violent. In a few minutes, you have the cops at your door.

Or what if there is a lan party and everyone is playing a racing game. Does this show up as a lot of potential speeders? So then the DoD sends a heads-up to the local police to set a few speed traps outside.
Reply to this comment
This is super silly stupid!
by inachu February 26, 2008 5:44 PM PST
This is so CIA can go in and force game moderators to make paying customer delete any nic name found desirable to muslim people.

You know......
CIA sitting behind a GM at Blizz HQ.....
GM walks up to character...
Sorry but we know you are a legal paying customer but we do not want BONGHITSBURKA in the virtual world of WOW........... CIA only want the spin to be 100% all the time in the favor of neocons.
Reply to this comment
Crumbling Constitution
by Gamer4Life82 February 26, 2008 6:10 PM PST
I really hate this we the people have to draw the line its only getting worse as we let them snake there way into our everyday decisions we are giving up are rights without a fight and as I recall a lot of people gave up there lives for we today could have these rights we so blatantly disregard we keep letting them make laws like this and in 20 to 50 yrs were living in the movie Demolition Man with one obvious difference they the World power, Us government, NWO whatever you want to call them will have weapons and you better believe it wont be a little electric baton. According to a new law there trying to pass you could be arrested or imprisoned in a camp for being a enemy combatant of the state for raising your voice see it on www.youtube.com Alex Jones conspiracy theorist talk show in Texas also see the videos of the FEMA camps they are getting ready for us its no joke people and its pretty terrifying. A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.
John Adams
US diplomat & politician (1735 - 1826)
Please don't be fooled into believing that they cannot or will not get Info on you that can and will be used against you in the court of law or any other way they see fit because they can they will and they do. Should have voted Ron Paul he could have stopped us from heading where Mr Adams is talking about above.
Reply to this comment
Americas Army game too
by mrcoder February 26, 2008 8:05 PM PST
I think the terrorists would want realistic training

They will want to learn weapons on Americas Army

Swords and sorcery not so much

Somebody call the ARmy and get a statement

Dont want our ARmy training the terrorists with our own training systems

Oh wait a sec...

Ali Mohamed, Staff Sgt, US Army
JFK Special Warfare School, cica 1980s
Training videos
Unauthorized trip to Afghanistan
Triple agent
Expelled from Egyptian Army for extremism
Trained the 9/11 hijackers in commando techniques
"Most dangerous man I ever met." -- US Atty Patrick Fitzgerald

Google it
Read Triple Cross
Reply to this comment
Don't you get it yet?
by Dalkorian February 27, 2008 9:10 AM PST
The East German Stasi haven't disbanded, they just moved under
the control of fuhrer bushit. Sieg heil. Papers please.
Reply to this comment
Wylie Cyote will be in Abu Graib prison.
by inachu February 27, 2008 10:42 AM PST
This is little more than just freedom taken away but it is slapping you in the face as they do it.

This is purely a neocon agenda for American Imperialism that which is an oxymoron in itself as People must come to USA to have the american way of life and neocons want the americna way of life exported for a price..... american blood.
Reply to this comment
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Geek Gestalt

Daniel Terdiman, uniquely positioned to take you into the middle of another side of technology, chronicles his explorations of the "fun beat," from cultural phenomena such as Burning Man to cutting-edge aircraft to game conventions.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Geek Gestalt topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right