Is Google's PageRank algorithm changing?

If you want to watch a bunch of A-list bloggers and business folks at big-name news sites go a little ape, I recommend observing them when their Google PageRank takes a hit.

According to blogger Andy Beard, a number of high-profile blogs and news sites have had just that happen to them in recent days.

Some examples, according to Beard, include Engadget, which saw its PageRank drop from 7 to 5; Joystiq, from 6 to 4; and SFGate, Forbes.com and WashingtonPost.com, all of which had their PageRank drop from 7 to 5.

What's behind this?

Well, speculation in the blogosphere today has it that Google has decided to punish popular sites that accept paid links to lesser sites. As Valleywag puts it, "Google's bean counter, naturally, would prefer that you pay Google for sponsored links instead."

I'm working on getting comment from Google, but so far no luck. I'll update this post if I do get some comment.

Anyway, part of the buzz about this move is that some of the sites that are taking PageRank hits are the very sites (Search Engine Journal, Copyblogger, Search Engine Guide and the Blog Herald, among them) that cover search engine optimization issues, and some suspect that perhaps the search giant is punishing them for being critics.

Is that possible? Well, who knows?

But as Beard points out, not all the sites that saw PageRank losses engage in the practice of selling paid links. Instead, many of them are part of blog networks that have plenty of internal links between sites. For example, Engadget, which is part of the Weblogs Inc. network.

The guidelines that these sites may have abused? "Don't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to Web spammers or "bad neighborhoods" on the Web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links."

The real question is, what has changed? It's hard to imagine that all these sites suddenly changed their practices overnight. So for all these sites' PageRank rankings to have changed at once does indicate somebody over at Google is playing with slide rules or something.

[8ball629]

Some datacenters..

After checking 12 Google.com datacenters using seochat.com's "Future PageRank" tool I was able to see that 5/12 of them are still showing a PageRank of 7.<br /><br />I didn't check the others but I'm sure they're the same.<br /><br />I've seen this happen before and it usually bounces back to the previous PageRank but sometimes not.

[JohnT32]

PageRank in the Google Toolbar is 4-6 weeks behind

Google has publicly stated that the PageRank as shown in the Google Toolbar is 4-6 weeks behind what is baked into the algorithm.<br /><br />According to Matt Cutts, the PR changes incrementally on a regular basis. <br /><br />A better question that these Bloggers should have is has their traffic from Google search gone down with the PageRank? PageRank is just one of a huge number of factors that go into the search engine result when a query is searched upon.

[welcometowallyworld]

Is Our Children Learning PageRank?

Sorry for the Bushism - just wanted to get your attention. Yeah <br />the famous (Larry)PageRank - its gone a bit nutsoid lately hasn't <br />it? But then so has Google Search and how they rank the pages. <br />Case in point - Google "affiliate elite" and you'll see that the <br />inventor/owner of AffiliateElite.com, Brad Callen, has been <br />usurped for the top spot by AffiliateElite.org - owned by a Greek <br />graphic designer in Corinth - with a PageRank of Zip and 42 <br />Yahoo links from 2 or 3 PR3/4/5 sites. AffiliateElite.com only <br />made it to the front page this week and is still only on #6. More <br />here - <a href="#">Who's on <br />First</a><br /><br />Strange the way Google doesn't make a public statement on <br />something as important as this. These aren't rinky-dink sites <br />they are downgrading - some of them have lots of traffic and <br />credibility.