U.K. turns CCTV, terrorism laws on pooping dogs
The United Kingdom has the most surveillance cameras per capita in the world. With the recent news that CCTV cameras do not actually deter crime, how can the local town councils justify the massive surveillance program? By going after pooping dogs.
In a recent interview with The Guardian, the head of the Metropolitan Police's Visual Images Office explained the failings of CCTV:
"Billions of pounds has been spent on it, but no thought has gone into how the police are going to use the images and how they will be used in court. It's been an utter fiasco: only 3 percent of crimes were solved by CCTV. There's no fear of CCTV. Why don't people fear it? (They think) the cameras are not working."
Conjuring up the bogeymen of terrorists, online pedophiles and cybercriminals, the U.K. passed a comprehensive surveillance law, The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, in 2000. The law allows "the interception of communications, carrying out of surveillance, and the use of covert human intelligence sources" to help prevent crime, including terrorism.
Recent reports in the U.K. media indicate that the laws are being used for everything but terrorism investigations:
- Derby City Council, Bolton, Gateshead, and Hartlepool used surveillance to investigate dog fouling.
- Bolton Council also used the act to investigate littering.
- The London borough of Kensington and Chelsea conducted surveillance on the misuse of a disabled parking pass.
- Liverpool City Council used Ripa to identify a false claim for damages.
- Conwy Council used the law to spy on a person who was working while off sick.
Privacy activists were, unsurprisingly, up in arms. Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights group Liberty, told the BBC that "you don't use a sledgehammer to crack a nut, nor targeted surveillance to stop a litter bug." Liberty and other groups have called for a complete review of the law and its unplanned uses.
Is this surprising? Not really. Just as we've seen in the U.S., once law enforcement and intelligence agencies are given new unchecked powers, abuse tends to happen. The more secretive and unchecked the powers, the more widespread the abuse. (See: Warrantless wiretapping, detainee torture, COINTELPRO, The CIA's Operation Chaos.)
Thanks to Dizzy Thinks for the tip.
Christopher Soghoian delves into the areas of security, privacy, technology policy and cyber-law. He is a student fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society , and is a PhD candidate at Indiana University's School of Informatics. His academic work and contact information can be found by visiting www.dubfire.net/chris/. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.




Frankly, I'd rather clean my shoes of dog poop, than have government spying on my every move. Frankly, big brother may become far worse than Orwell ever imagined.
<a href="http://aelsystems.co.uk/cctv.aspx" title="Darlington CCTV">CCTV Darlington</a>
http://aelsystems.co.uk/cctv.aspx
-
by securitymax
April 30, 2009 3:57 AM PDT
- CCTV Surveillance Laws
-
Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)CCTV video surveillance is subject to the laws concerning a person?s right to privacy.
You have the right to protect your home. But, you want to remain on the right side of the law.
So, when installing a CCTV system in your home, it is essential that you are sure of the legality of your surveillance.
Consult with a lawyer or your local law enforcement to ensure that you are meeting all the requirements of local, state,
and federal CCTV laws.
By: http://www.securitymax.co.uk