Editorial: It's time for a child porn czar
With the recent news of the ham-fisted filtering of Wikipedia for over 95 percent of British Internet users by an unelected and unaccountable industry/government hybrid body, it seems like a good time to turn our attention to the issue of the fight against child pornography here in the U.S., and in particular, the freedoms we are willing to hand over along the way.
In this blog post, I will argue that the the time has come for President-elect Barack Obama to appoint a child pornography czar, whose office can take over the tasks currently performed by the powerful yet oversight-free organization: The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC).
However, before we begin, let me state that I, along with the rest of the civilized world, believe that child pornography is a Bad Thing (TM), and those who create or traffic in it are evil people. However, just as one can still support the troops while criticizing the war, I too have an objection to the way we're fighting this war. Actually, to be more accurate, I support the war on child porn, but object to the fact that it's been outsourced to Blackwater NCMEC. But in any case, I'm getting ahead of myself.
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
NCMEC was created by a congressional mandate in 1984, and coordinates the the efforts of law enforcement personnel, social service agency staff, elected officials, judges, prosecutors, educators, and elements of both the public and private sector to fight against all forms of child exploitation.
While NCMEC was created by Congress, is mostly funded by the U.S. government (and in particular, the Department of Justice), and plays a key role in assisting the FBI in its fight against child pornography, the organization isn't part of the U.S. government. It is, instead, a nonprofit, and thus not subject to the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, or limited by constitutional protections guaranteeing free speech, due process, and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
NCMEC's power
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children already wields significant power as an unofficial Internet regulator, some of it granted by Congress, but most of it achieved through "consensual" agreements with Internet service providers. Consider these examples:
NCMEC acts as a clearing house for information and reports on child pornography. Thanks to the Protect Our Children Act of 2008, which was signed into law by the president in October, Internet service providers are now obligated to provide NCMEC with reports on any suspected child pornography that they detect on their networks. Failure to report such information to NCMEC is a crime.
As a result of a quasi-secret deal signed between NCMEC and the major cable companies earlier this year, NCMEC now provides these Internet providers with regularly updated lists of objectionable Web sites run by those cable customers. Upon receipt of a suspect URL, the ISPs immediately remove the files from the Web, with no appeal process for the owners of the Web sites. Oh, and as an added bonus, the ISPs are forbidden from mentioning NCMEC's name when notifying their customers of the takedown.
In June 2008, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and NCMEC strong-armed several major ISPs into terminating their customers' access to Usenet news groups--due to the fact that a few hundred (of the tens of thousands of total Usenet groups) contained child pornography.
Likewise, just a few weeks ago, Craigslist was forced into a deal with 40 state attorneys general and NCMEC in which the site agreed to take steps to root out certain sexually themed or "erotic services" listings. Why NCMEC was concerned about consenting adults selling sex-related services via Craigslist remains unclear.
No oversight, no problems?
The sad truth is that no company can say no to NCMEC. Faced with the possibility of a press conference (perhaps even with an AG or two standing nearby) held in order to criticize the company's noncompliance with an anti-child porn project, any rational company would buckle. The bad PR from not doing so is simply too great.
NCMEC performs an extremely important task, one that has no doubt saved hundreds of children, and I'm glad that I don't have to do it. However, it is also rather strange to entrust this job to a private organization. If this is such an important task, why not give it to the FBI?
The answer to this might be the benefits that come from not being a federal agency: the complete lack of oversight or any requirement for transparency. NCMEC is able to sign secret deals with ISPs and strong-arm companies into cooperating without fear that a FOIA wielding public-interest lawyer or activist will unearth any information on the group's tactics or methods.
Criticism and fear
Over the past several weeks, I've spoken to a number of experts in the field of Internet law and policy. Many of those have strong feelings about NCMEC, but due to the extremely sensitive nature of the child pornography issue, few would go on record to voice their criticism.
Adam Thierer, a senior fellow at the libertarian Progress and Freedom Foundation told me that:
"Despite having the best of intentions, NCMEC has attained a level of authority over the Internet that should now qualify it for closer government scrutiny. The organization should either be covered by the Freedom of Information Act and other relevant government oversight laws and processes, or it should be converted entirely into a federal agency so that it is accountable for its actions as an Internet regulator."
John Morris, senior counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology voiced similar concerns, telling me:
"We have very significant concerns about the outsourcing of prosecutorial and investigative functions to a non-government entity. And we believe that those functions should only be done (by those subject to) the First and Fourth Amendments, the Privacy Act, and The Freedom Of Information Act."
Other than these two gentlemen, no one else would go on the record.
Reform via a czar
Given its status as a sacred cow, we cannot expect any politician pay heed to calls to overhaul NCMEC or subject it to oversight. However, what we can do, is call for the nationalization of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Think of it this way: We have a drug czar, a war czar, a copyright czar, and will likely have a cybersecurity czar and car czar under the next administration. Why not throw a child porn czar into the mix? Nationalize NCMEC, make all of its workers federal employees, with good health care and job security, and perhaps even expand its budget--after all, it does good work, right?
NCMEC's job is simply too important to be entrusted to a nonprofit group--such a task can only be performed by a fully trained and funded law enforcement agency (one, which conveniently enough, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act, congressional oversight, and constitutional requirements for due process.)
Best of all, if anyone criticizes this call for a child exploitation czar, we can turn the trump card against them, and accuse them of not caring about the children.
Christopher Soghoian delves into the areas of security, privacy, technology policy and cyber-law. He is a student fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society , and is a PhD candidate at Indiana University's School of Informatics. His academic work and contact information can be found by visiting www.dubfire.net/chris/. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. 
And, isn't that how the government has seized more and more power from unwitting Americans?
We're in a war! Something must be done!
We're in a Depression! Something must be done!
The Russians are building nukes! Something must be done!
Troubled kids are shooting up schools! Something must be done!
The WTC was attacked! Something must be done!
And so on, and so on, and so on...
We should nationalize NCMEC. It would not only provide better oversight but it would cost the American taxpayer less as well. It?s a win win!
- by no_to_missing_child_fraud August 7, 2009 9:13 PM PDT
- Given the increasing regulatory and investigative powers of the NCMEC (USA) under federal law, it is no longer clear whether or not the FOIA applies to NCMEC (USA) records. I am right now bringing a case against the NCMEC (USA) in federal court under the FOIA and, failing that, for discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a).
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)If anyone wishes to contribute an argument in favor of the notion that NCMEC (USA) records should fall under the FOIA, now is the time to do so. I would especially welcome any amicus contributions from public interest groups. The case is no. 1177 of 2009 in the District of Columbia.
Messages intended for me may be sent to the ncmec.eu secretariat. Please indicate in the caption of your mail that its contents should be forwarded to me. Thank you.