• On ZDNet: Why I Will never buy a Mac
April 23, 2008 6:56 AM PDT

Denon, Marantz, McIntosh, and Boston Acoustics are on the sales block

by Steve Guttenberg

As reported in Bloomberg.com D & M Holdings Inc, makers of Denon, Marantz, McIntosh, Snell Acoustics, Boston Acoustics, and Escient, is on the sales block. I can't comment on the business aspects of the deal, but speaking as an audiophile I'm concerned. These companies are in the upper echelons of audio, the Marantz name goes back 50 years, McIntosh has been building some of the world's best electronics in Binghamton, New York for 60 years, I was a friend of Peter Snell, the founder of Snell Acoustics, and the D & M Holdings owned company still builds speakers with the same attention to detail as it did when Snell first started in the 1970s. D & M Holdings has treated these brands with respect, so now I can only keep my fingers crossed that if a buyer steps up, it will also leave well enough alone.

Audio today, as exemplified by the iPod, has become a mere commodity, most mainstream audio products are cranked out by anonymous subcontractors. What part(s) of an iPod was actually designed by Apple engineers? There's no there, there.

D & M Holdings products are different, they're designed and made by real people; when I visited the McIntosh factory a few years ago I was impressed by their dedication. McIntosh engineers still design McIntosh electronics, and the McIntosh workers don't merely assemble parts made by subcontractors, the make most of the things that go into a McIntosh in house. The workers actually get to meet McIntosh equipment owners on a regular basis. The faithful schedule factory visits to see the place where their amplifier was built. McIntosh still stands behind gear they built when Eisenhower was President of the United States. Amazing!

So my deepest fear is that D & M Holdings' new owners close the factory and move production "off shore." Sure, the profits would skyrocket, but the soul of the brand would go out the window. D & M Holdings' brands each have their own story, I'm hoping this isn't the end, but a new start.

Steve Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to magazines and Web sites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from The Audiophiliac
Poll: Why don't you have an iPod or MP3 player?
$249 baby amplifier wows audiophiles
Sound vs. picture: What's a better investment?
Mixtapes vs. playlists
Tom Waits is weird
What's so great about high-end audio?
Legendary high-end speaker gets major face-lift
The Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by acardes April 23, 2008 11:42 AM PDT
Stop it with the iPod bashing. We know isn't vinyl and we know you hate it, but keep in mind you blog on a site that praises the iPod. Most of your audience owns one out of convenience. Just let it go. Sorry to hear about these other great companies not doing so well.
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break April 25, 2008 5:55 AM PDT
No one's forcing you to come to the Audiophiliac pages. If you can't stand the heat for you precious little iPlods, I'm sure you can find the door, and even keep from little it hit your sensitive rear on the way out.
by ematcion April 23, 2008 12:39 PM PDT
While none of these brands are mainstream brands, the demise of D&M is yet another sign that the mass consumers are destroying the art of audio reproduction.
Reply to this comment
by moretroops April 23, 2008 3:39 PM PDT
What's destroying fidelity is not the demise of super-premium manufacturers like McIntosh -- or even digital music and the ubiquitous ipod. What's destroying it is needless and annoying compression, along with degraded recording standards. An ipod will never sound as good as a record, granted. But ipods (and of course CDs) can still sound fantastic if recorded correctly and transferred lossless-ly.

It seems to me that all of the talented folks who might have been sound engineers years ago are going into computer graphics or other visual media these days. The money and glory are definitely NOT in the recording studio -- unless you're a cookie cutter artist looking to stamp out a ringtone.

Don't blame the ipod or CDs for this. Blame the public for letting it happen.
Reply to this comment
by boh10 April 24, 2008 4:11 AM PDT
Agree with ematcion. Acardes, you are so wrong. When everything on TV is 'reality TV' you will know what we are talking about... Quality vs. mass procuced crap will always loose...
Reply to this comment
by standto April 24, 2008 9:33 AM PDT
High def sound certainly has taken a backseat to high def video. The "public ear" is not as demanding as those of music professionals and the reasons why are many, including music not being taught in public schools; popularity of easy to reproduce electronic instrumentsound over less popular acoustic sound; so many low priced earphones vs high-end earphones. What do we do about it?
Which reminds me of a recent triumph-of-the-mass-produced high-priced goods "Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster."
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break April 25, 2008 6:20 AM PDT
It isn't the iPod that's destroying hi-fi; it's a change in usage and habits. An iPod (or any other MP3 device) is versatile; nothing that McIntosh or Boston Acoustics does can replicate that. The traditional audio model was making equipment exclusive for home (or any other land-locked power grid site), exclusive gear for mobile (12v locked) and a third for on-the-go portable use. The iPod transcends that old way of looking at things, even if it's at the expense of superb fidelity (sorry, lossless on a iPod is still not an entirely satisfying replacement for my traditional audio sources, but I admit for most people it's good enough, and further justifiable as a viable option because of the inherent convenience built into its form factor). Once device can be used as a media source ANYWHERE, as long as the Li-Ion has juice. Frankly, that's a lot less repetition and drain on resouces (monetary, energy and material). Even though I still use and believe in the inherent goodness of my traditional gear, I still find myself using my MP3 player more and more. Yes it's not stupendous sound (fact is, I think some of the best headsets out there really bring out the performance FLAWS of these things), but for its convenience factor a iPod or Zune is awfully hard for trad gear to beat. And I don't even have to turn down the thermostat like I used to do when my electronics really got rocking in the summer months.
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break April 25, 2008 6:32 AM PDT
One other thing...there will always be the high end. Not everyone will be satisfied with mere run-of-the-mill iPod offerings (as long as iPods continue to be engineered in the manner that they are).

As for D&M Holdings...well, they made a go of it. Sorry to see that it hasn't been as successful has Harman appears to have been with their mega audio portfolio (Harman Kardon, JBL, Mark Levinson, Becker, etc., etc., etc.). I was glad when they bought McIntosh; never thought their association with their prior Clarion owners did the brand any real favors (except they DID get them into the car audio marketplace). Shame that D&M couldn't do more with their purchase of Rio, but then again nearly everyone was already in love with those viral iPods by then.
Reply to this comment
by jw55 May 9, 2008 10:26 AM PDT
There will always be a high end, unfortunately what's disappearing is moderately priced quality audio equipment. Listening to music on a ipod is like cooking with margarine instead of butter. Unless your senses are really fine tuned you may not notice the difference immediately, but over time the experience becomes much less satisfactory and rewarding than it should be.
Reply to this comment
by Claude-j April 22, 2009 7:58 AM PDT
I've been in audio business for 30 years, selling High end audio equipment like McINTOSH, HH Scott, Fisher, Crown etc. etc. I left the audio business when the market was invaded with cheap chinese, or japan made product (although there have been good audio from Japan) and then came the digital concept that sounded awfull compare to analog. The beautifull market for audio was killed when the manufacturer where looking for more money, Peoples are looking for low price equipment, like the cheap iPod and MP3, and it's been so long on the market that the new generation has never heard what good sound should be.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About The Audiophiliac

Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Audiophiliac topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right