July 14, 2009 7:20 AM PDT

$6,910 buys world's best headphone sound

by Steve Guttenberg
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

The Woo WES: eight tubes on top, two in the lower half.

(Credit: Steve Guttenberg)

Lucky me, I've reviewed most of the world's very best headphones, including the Audio Technica ATH-W5000, Denon AH-D7000, and Sennheiser HD 800. But now there's something even better: the Woo Audio WES headphone amplifier ($4,500) and Stax SR-007Mk2 headphone ($2,410). The complete review can be found on the Home Entertainment Web site.

Yeah, it's a lot of dough, but the Woo/Stax combo creams the other contenders for world's best headphone sound, and the pair goes for less than the price of a world class, high-end camera, like the Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III. The camera's great now, but in a couple of years it'll be hopelessly out of date. Great audio is simply a better long-term investment.

Stax headphones use a very different operating principle than dynamic headphones (pretty much every headphone from lowly earbuds to full-size headphones are dynamic designs). Stax has been making electrostatic headphones since 1960 in Japan, and the company's current flagship model, the SR-007Mk2, is what I'm using with the Woo WES amplifier. The Stax is a big and comfy design.

The Stax SR-007Mk2 headphone

(Credit: Stax)

The Woo WES is an all-triode tube drive, fully balanced design; the prototype unit I'm reviewing has a total of 10 tubes (four EL34 power tubes, four 6SL7 drive tubes, and two 5AR4 rectifier tubes), but production models will have 11 tubes. It works with Stax and Sennheiser electrostatic headphones only. The machined, all-metal dual chassis is beautifully crafted.

The WES, like all Woo amps, was designed by Wei Wu, and handcrafted in Woo Audio's factory in New York City. Each WES will be built to order over a four-day period; it's slated for release in October 2009. The preintroduction price is $4,500, and full retail is expected to be $4,990. Woo prices start at $470 for the WA 3. All Woo Audio electronics are sold direct from the factory, the waiting list is three to four weeks.

A look inside reveals no circuit boards; all wiring will be "point to point." That's a very expensive way to manufacture amplifiers, but Woo Audio thinks point-to-point wiring makes for better-sounding amps. The amp also features handmade inductors, and even the machined cone feet are designed specifically for the WES.

The clarity of the Woo/Stax combo with acoustic jazz mimics the way live, unamplified music sounds in a good concert hall or club. The Woo/Stax is the closest thing to being there I've heard to date.

"Sticky Fingers," newly remastered and one of the Rolling Stones best albums, and one I've heard hundreds of times, revealed new details. Keith Richards' guitar wizardry lights up "Sway" like never before, and I'm hearing a sense of depth and space around Charlie Watts' drum kit for the first time. I feel like I'm hearing a band live in the studio, not a recording. Quiet details such as the mix's subtle reverberation are newly audible.

Amy Winehouse's "Back to Black" uncorked heretofore unheard details residing the CD's brash electric guitars contrasting against lush orchestral strings. And Amy cooing in my ears topped off the experience.

I wish I had the best headphone I'd heard up to this point, the Senneiser HD 800 ($1,400), to compare with the Woo Audio WES/Stax SR-007Mk2, but as memory serves it wouldn't be close. The HD 800 is still superlative, it's just that the system under review here trumps it on every count, except one: the HD 800's out-of-the-head imaging was more speaker-like. The Stax isn't as wide-open, but it's more dimensionally developed.

Listening to my older Grado RS-1 and Sennheiser HD-580 headphones plugged into a Woo Audio WA 6 SE headphone amplifier, the sound was more "contained"--flatter, and more two-dimensional than the Woo/Stax combo. Those two dynamic headphones are, on their own, still excellent, but they now sound veiled compared with the Woo Audio WES/Stax SR-007Mk2. The magnitude of difference is huge, and that's rare in the audio reviewing game. I'm still trying to take it all in.

Steve Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to magazines and Web sites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from The Audiophiliac
World's most 'perfect' speaker gets even better
Oppo's newly upgraded Blu-ray/SACD/DVD-A player isn't just for audiophiles
Will recorded music survive the 2010s?
The best audio products of 2009
Don't buy an iPod speaker (if you care about sound quality)
Einstein Audio: 'Genius' vacuum tube amp maker
Piano maker Steinway moves into the hi-fi business
Marantz' $6,000 Blu-ray, SACD, DVD-Audio player
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by mattharms July 14, 2009 7:58 AM PDT
I want your job.
Reply to this comment
by troyoverton August 6, 2009 10:52 AM PDT
He has to give the stuff back. That's the hard part.
by JonathanGMurray July 14, 2009 8:50 AM PDT
To settle the "Best Headphones in the World" question you'd really need to put this Wu/Stax combo side by side with the legendary Sennheiser Orpheus tube/HE-90 electrostatic offering from the late 90's. Admittedly the Orpheus was strictly limited in production, and did cost somewhere in the range of $15,000 when released, but my guess is they stand up very well in comparison.
Reply to this comment
by spoondoggydog July 14, 2009 9:11 AM PDT
I heard you mention these on the 404 podcast - good to see them here.
Reply to this comment
by alegr July 14, 2009 9:52 AM PDT
Why do you need tubies to drive just itty-bitty headphones? Even if you need some 100V for those electrostatics, even a class A transistor amplifier will do that, assuming you use the right parts.
Reply to this comment
by stepyourgameup July 14, 2009 1:49 PM PDT
I wonder how good 2LiveCrew would sound with those!!!
Reply to this comment
by vincent8706 July 20, 2009 2:33 AM PDT
world's best headphone ?

PLS chick out web , you will foud the world's best headphone
Reply to this comment
by wudai_e August 14, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
To compare a 5k Canon full frame with a 5k headphone amp and claim a headphone is a better investment is just false. Most people who buy the camera will use it to generate more income and use it as a tool compare to a headphone amp which is only served as an expensive recreational "gadget".

So over the span of 5 years, the pro photographer who makes say 30k a year, will generate income that can buy 30 MKs in that time frame, you can't do the same with a headphone amp, not even close.
Reply to this comment
by TonyGottlieb August 14, 2009 12:34 PM PDT
I don't get it. Nearly $7K for a set of headphones in order to listen to stolen MP3s.

What discerning listeners will detect the Nyquist frequency cutoff of the upper partials?

This is beginning to smell like the BS of the wine business but this time it's not improving with age.
Reply to this comment
by stxscott October 10, 2009 11:23 AM PDT
If you are going to write about hi end audio and music at least get it right. Keith Richards did not even perform on "Sway". That is why the Stones rarely performed it after Mick Taylor left the group.
Reply to this comment
by mustangjoey October 15, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
Wikipedia: "Sway" is a song by the English rock 'n roll band The Rolling Stones from their 1971 album Sticky Fingers. It was also released as the b-side of the "Wild Horses" single in June 1971.

Credited to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, "Sway" is a slower blues song and was the first song recorded by the band at Stargroves. Although the song is credited to Jagger/Richards, Mick Taylor has always stated that he wrote this song with Mick Jagger, as well as "Moonlight Mile" from the same album, when Richards was not even present.
? Ain't flinging tears out on the dusty ground for all my friends out on the burial ground. Can't stand the feeling getting so brought down. It's just that demon life has got me in its sway. ?

The song features a bottleneck slide guitar solo towards the middle of the song and a dramatic outro solo performed by Mick Taylor. The strings on the piece were arranged by Paul Buckmaster, who also worked on other songs from Sticky Fingers. The Who's guitarist Pete Townshend, The Faces' Ronnie Lane and Billy Nicholls provide background vocals along with Keith Richards, who later added his backing vocals but had provided no guitar to the track.

It was performed live for the first time in Columbus, Ohio, and then at many of the shows on the band's A Bigger Bang Tour in 2006.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Audiophiliac

Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Audiophiliac topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right