• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
June 19, 2008 4:02 PM PDT

Craig Venter's CO2-Eating Organisms

by Adam Richardson

Craig Venter, who led the charge to decypher human DNA, is now on the green hunt. According to Treehugger he's looking for a double-wammy: take CO2 in the atmosphere and convert it into fuel (rather than fuel creating CO2 as is mostly the case today).

As we've described before, Venter's overarching goal is to produce microorganisms that are able to "convert things like sugar or sunlight or carbon dioxide into fuels that people are very familiar with, like diesel fuel and gasoline," as he himself put it. These would constitute not only the fabled second- and third-generation biofuels we keep hearing about (like cellulosic ethanol and other plant biomass-derived fuels) but even so-called "fourth-generation" biofuels -- those produced directly from CO2.

Venter hopes his bugs will supplant the need for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies by making CO2 a commodity, instead of a byproduct to be disposed of. According to Venter, large, bacteria-processing fermenters, similar to those used to make beer and wine, would replace traditional refineries. He expects the first generation of his engineered bacteria to be commercially available within the next year or two years. He made it a point to stress that he and his colleagues were thinking "in terms of years, not decades."

There are some obvious concerns about releasing such organisms into the wild, nevertheless it's this kind of thinking we'll need to help move us away from the global warming brink.

Adam Richardson is the director of product strategy at frog design, where he guides strategy engagements for frog's international roster of clients, envisioning and creating new products, consumer electronics, and digital experiences. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
The conversation wars
frog design, the book: How design strategies are shaping the future of business
Get social now!
Father's Day special: Baby care and meaningful marketing
Less is more. The tweet(ed) revolution.
The iPhone is a subscription
Is advertising dead? The third way of building brand equity
Microsoft Bing: The first real Google alternative
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by amandachuck June 20, 2008 11:05 AM PDT
Block out the sun when it's very active? That's one "cure" for global warming. Now, are you talking about man made global warming? In that case, it's sort of like taking vitamin C to prevent a cold. If you aren't sick, you aren't sick. Performing some feel good but pointless acts doesn't change that fact that you aren't sick.
Reply to this comment
by Ebediel June 26, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
I feel a movie coming on. "Attack of the CO2 Suckers!" People being attacked by large hovering organisms that suck the CO2 right out of your body killing you instantly! It use to be that humanity was the main hunter on this planet but not anymore! Coming to a theater near you! I'm all for ending our dependency on petroleum but do we have to create a life ending tragedy to accomplish it?! I wish the tree-huggers would give it a rest. I still remember the 2nd ice age scares of my elementary school days and when they found out the earth was actually getting warmer instead of colder. Immediately it all changed from 2nd ice age to global warming. Same people different mantra.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for frog design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right