• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
December 27, 2007 5:53 PM PST

doof: Converging gaming and social networking

by Tim Leberecht
(Credit: doof)

Doof, says company spokesman Devang Chouhan, is all about "playing games and meeting people" -- in other words: fun. The UK-based "social gaming" start-up aims to mesh aspects of multi-layer online gaming with social networking, providing a highly personalized and visually rich user experience based on the Flex technology.

Liad Shababo, founder of doof, explains: "When we came up with the idea for doof we quickly realised there was nothing like it in the market, and there was a real hunger among social networkers for something new. We have spent months working to perfect the platform, trialling it in Beta, and it is now ready to be unleashed on the wider public. It has been designed to be highly communal and interactive - more so than any other site I have seen -- but, maybe unexpectedly, it's also simple and entertaining. And that is the point. Social networking can become dull and gaming can get too intense -- doof is about fun and taking time out of the day to chill and socialise."

As Tech Digest points out, doof's claim that it's a "pioneer of social gaming" is "more marketing message than reality. Games have always been social, whether played huddled round a C64 or SNES, or played online on Xbox Live." What's new about the site though are the social networking features that it has built in, such as virtual gifts, chat, avatars, and status updates. And yet, with casual gaming sites adding more social networking features and social networking sites adding more gaming features (see MySpace's recent partnership with Oberon Media, the world's leading multi-platform casual-games company), doof may face some stiff competition from both sides of an increasingly convergent playground.

Ps. As a native German speaker, one word of advice: "doof" means "stupid" in German, and I'm not sure if that helps build the brand there...(and, trust me, Germans want to have fun too!).

Tim Leberecht is Frog Design's of vice president of marketing and communications. He has worked in the media, entertainment, and high-tech industries. Most recently, he was the head of corporate communications at Mindjet, a provider of mind-mapping software for the enterprise. Prior to Mindjet, he served as a press chief for the Athens 2004 International Olympic Torch Relay and in marketing communications for Deutsche Telekom in Germany. Tim runs the iPlot blog, and has published and spoken about branding, organizational communication, social media, and attention economics. Tim is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
The world's first crowdsourced creative agency
Forrester: Adaptive branding and the new four P's of marketing
California artist rebuilds world economy with antimatter
Lessons for Nook from Zune
Social media count shows how active the social web is
Berlin Twitter Wall lets you write on history
New perspectives on the work/(life) conundrum
NPR hosts unique Digital Think-In with Silicon Valley thought leaders
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for Frog Design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right