• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
December 13, 2007 10:50 AM PST

What is the cost of "vampire energy"?

by Adam Richardson
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments
Vampire Energy graphic (Credit: GOOD Magazine)

I've been curious recently about how much electricity all our devices that stay plugged in all the time and in some sort of standby mode consume, even when we are not actually using them. And what does that translate into in terms of real money?

Coincidentally, GOOD Magazine has created this handy chart that graphically depicts the impact.

The real surprise on it is plasma TVs--who knew they were sucking so much energy when "off"? And that game console of yours? It's costing you $25 a year just sitting there, even when you're not using it. Have more than one console? Well, do the math...

The chart does not include all the wall-warts for cell phones, laptops, cameras, and the like that tend to stay plugged into the wall (and consuming some amount of electricity) even when not actually charging their devices. By some estimates these are responsible for 4 percent of all U.S. electricity consumption, equivalent to almost 100 million tons of oil. Hmm, no wonder the U.S. is 5 percent of the world's population but consumes 23 percent of its energy...

Adam Richardson is the director of product strategy at Frog Design, where he guides strategy engagements for Frog's international roster of clients, envisioning and creating new products, consumer electronics, and digital experiences. Adam combines a background in industrial design, interaction design, and sociology, and he spends most of his time on convergent designs that combine hardware, software, service, brand, and retail. He writes and speaks extensively on design, business, culture, and technology, and he runs his own Richardsona blog. Adam is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
Apple, Bloomberg: Two media brands in the social era
The psychology of healthcare reform
Mad Men finale: So you like being in advertising after all?
The world's first crowdsourced creative agency
Forrester: Adaptive branding and the new four P's of marketing
California artist rebuilds world economy with antimatter
Lessons for Nook from Zune
Social media count shows how active the social web is
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by jds3266 December 13, 2007 5:09 PM PST
What about turning a power cord off? Will this stop drawing power?
Reply to this comment
by suyts December 13, 2007 5:57 PM PST
Unpluging the power chord will.
by suyts December 13, 2007 5:50 PM PST
You should have asked your electric company. A plasma TV uses as much as a refridgerator. Computers, yeh, they constantly suck power but not much. The best thing one can do regarding computers (one doesn't want to constantly plug and unplug your computer) is to turn off the monitor. It doesn't hurt the monitor and eliminates the need for a screen saver that takes resources from your computer and saves significant electricity all at the same time.
Reply to this comment
by andrewrennie December 14, 2007 1:26 AM PST
The main problem with this article is the fact that you have failed to consider what impact constantly fully powering off and on the appliances has! Every time that you completely power down and then power up the tv, for example, you are wearing out the components more quickly than if you leave it on standby mode. Thus, the tv will need replaced sooner. Therefore costing you more money than if you had left it on standby mode. Also the environmental cost of manufacturing the television is far greater than the environmental cost of leaving it on standby mode.

So in summary, every time you think you are doing the planet a favour by not using standby mode, you are in fact wearing out the components and thus not doing the planet so much of a favour after all!
Reply to this comment
by rcrusoe December 14, 2007 5:54 AM PST
I agree with andrewrennie. $34/year to leave my computer on 24/7? That's a bargain compared to the wear & tear caused by multiple boots/day. My old G5 hasn't been turned off in over 4 years and is still running like a charm.

Some other devices like my series 1 Tivo have been spinning more than twice that long. For a lot of devices leaving them on is much better for their health.

As far as I'm concerned, if I can't afford to leave them running and available, I can't afford to own them.
Reply to this comment
by globehopper22 January 9, 2008 4:22 AM PST
Learning about wasted power is great, once you see a problem then you can take steps towards fixing it. Whether you wish to save money or not is each person's perrogative. When I consider that I am wasting money that could be put to better use, I am all ears to new ideas. When I consider that wars are being fought over energy resources, and the impact it causes such as global warming... again I am all ears.

If you do not want to plug and unplug your electronics please consider googling the Smart Strip a surge protector that automatically turns off and on your appliances for you... all you do is turn on your TV and like magic your DVD player, VCR player and anything else that you plug into the strip will turn on aswell. This makes being energy -conscious easy.

http://bitsltd.net/ConsumerProducts/index.htm
Reply to this comment
by despino June 23, 2009 7:35 AM PDT
This is a wonderful opinion. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.
<a href=" http://www.BookByYou.com/Vampire" rel="dofollow" rel="nodofollow">
Personalized Vampire Romance Novels from Book By You!</a>
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for Frog Design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right