• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
October 30, 2007 10:36 AM PDT

Let's drag office phones into the 21st century

by Adam Richardson
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments
Share

Why is it that your typical office phone stinks compared with the one you have at home? Here are a few of the ways they are harder to use, do less, and look uglier.

Office phones are ugly: They are typically anonymous black blobs with boring key shapes and colors and utilitarian speaker grills. Stylistically they are circa 1985 and made with shiny black textured plastics that would embarass a home phone or cell phone.

Office phones are hard to use (part one): They typically come in two types: Those with just one cryptic "function" button that through a combination of numeric keys controls a variety of functions like call-forwarding, changing the ring volume, and so on. Or they are of the type with an LCD screen, a bunch of soft keys, and equally cryptic abbreviations of functions like "RngAgn" and "SScUsr". Either way, to do anything more advanced than take and make calls requires a trip to the manual (if you have one). Why is it still considered a blessed miracle when a three-way conference call is successfully connected?

Office phones are hard to use (part two): And don't get me started on the voice mail commands. Have you met a voice mail system yet that has numeric key commands that make sense? Why is the first choice always to leave a message rather than pick up your messages? Since when have I called my voice mail to leave a message for someone else? Yet on many voice mail systems button 1 is for leaving messages, and button 2 is for retrieving them. And then you have things like dialing 7-6 to delete a message, or 8-4 to "administer your outgoing message"--where is the logic in that?

Office phones are hard to use (part three): We have VoIP phones at our office that have lots of snazzy features. Problem is they are impossible to access without a manual to remind you about what they can do, and how to do it. Office phones have blown the integration of hardware, software and services to such a degree that they are now the hardest piece of equipment to use in an office. In software development it is common knowledge that 70 percent of features never go used by most users. With office phones I'm sure it is over 90 percent. It's hard to even do the basic things one expects in a cell phone, such as storing names in a phone book or speed dial. (I'm not holding up cell phones as a paragon of usability, far from it, but it shows how archaic office phones are.)

Office phones have cords: Why am I tethered to my desk? You almost cannot buy a home phone with a cord anymore, even the cheapest sub-$40 phones are cordless. Now I'm sure there are practical reasons for this--interference from lots of phones in one area, mixing up which handset goes with which base--but really there must be ways around these. Cordless and cell phones have led us to expect untethered talking, and it helps with productivity because one can do other things while talking on the phone. So at the office, where productivity is very important, why am I prevented from doing so?

There's probably more, but you get the picture. Can someone please step up and drag office phones into the 21st century? We'll all be better off.

Adam Richardson is the director of product strategy at Frog Design, where he guides strategy engagements for Frog's international roster of clients, envisioning and creating new products, consumer electronics, and digital experiences. Adam combines a background in industrial design, interaction design, and sociology, and he spends most of his time on convergent designs that combine hardware, software, service, brand, and retail. He writes and speaks extensively on design, business, culture, and technology, and he runs his own Richardsona blog. Adam is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
Fiesta Movement--will it catch on?
Apple, Bloomberg: Two media brands in the social era
The psychology of healthcare reform
Mad Men finale: So you like being in advertising after all?
The world's first crowdsourced creative agency
Forrester: Adaptive branding and the new four P's of marketing
California artist rebuilds world economy with antimatter
Lessons for Nook from Zune
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Halitosis Baby.
by Mousefinger October 30, 2007 2:12 PM PDT
Rats...And here I thought this post was going to be about halitosis. Guess I'll go home.
Reply to this comment
Does your car suck too? How about your cell-phone?
by leoboulton October 30, 2007 3:08 PM PDT
I hate to see people complain of silly things. Office phones are simple to use. How different is it from a cell-phone, or your car with a gps system, or the new Windows Vista?
Certainly not all are created equal, the problem is that the human being resist change. The telephony industry is changing in very different directions: one of the most fascinating ones is enteprise IP telephony, where applications are merging and coming up with ways to improve productivity.... of course, if we don't want to change, and just complain that it seems to difficult to use, or that we don't need that, that's another story.
Reply to this comment
cordless phones
by CommandoSolo October 30, 2007 6:03 PM PDT
I think that there are two reasons why corded phones are still being used. By the way I'm writing this more or less as it applies to me at my school which is in many ways in terms of infrastructure similar to a corporation. Anyway back to the phones. One reason I can think of is to keep people from stealing them. Many people when leaving a place of employment or another similar situation try to load up on the free stuff they take with them. Secondly a lot of supplies including phones could easily be left over from the 1980's. Many corporations don't replace items until forced to do so.
Reply to this comment
Good office phones
by jammer2k November 4, 2007 7:20 PM PST
About 2 years ago my office converted to Zultys VOIP phones, the complaints of this article really don't apply to this phone system. Everything from phone usage (xfer, conference, VM, etc) to computer integration is well done and very easy to use. I train all the new employees on using this system and the phone section usually takes 20-30 minutes and rarely does anyone have a fundimental failure to understand or use this system.
Reply to this comment
And expensive
by MRubenzahl November 5, 2007 10:14 AM PST
And expensive, too.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for Frog Design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right