• On ZDNet: Why I Will never buy a Mac
September 24, 2007 8:41 PM PDT

A designer as CEO: Should Jonathan Ive be Apple's next leader?

by Tim Leberecht

Steve Jobs shows no signs of retiring any time soon, but Jess McMullin, who runs the great Business+Design blog, thinks ahead and pre-emptively wraps his head around Apple's succession planning. In an open letter to the Apple board, he urges the directors to consider Jonathan Ive, Apple's SVP of industrial design, as Jobs' successor, if need be. (Mullin was obviously inspired by Bruce Nussbaum's "CEOs Must Be Designers, Not Just Hire Them" post several months ago.)

Jonathan Ive

Jonathan Ive

(Credit: Apple)

And yet--a designer as CEO? (Wearing the marketing hat for a renowned design consultancy, I am posing this question as innocently as I can without getting harassed by my creative colleagues.....)

McMullin: "It's not that there's no talent in the C-suites at Apple. But those people are well-oiled parts of the Steve-machine. They do their work to enable Jobs to do his. They're amazing catalysts for Steve's chemistry, and because of this they will never have the independent vision to provide continued market leadership. You might argue that Jonathan Ive is no different. But that's not true: he's a designer who taps into the wells of unmet consumer need that fuel Apple's ongoing growth. With the exception of Steve himself, he's tuned to the zeitgeist that determines winners more than anyone else at Apple. Moreover, he's able to articulate that vision with consistent grace and precise execution. He's got a track record of hitting home runs. If you want to keep the innovation leadership that makes Apple, well, Apple, then you've got to have the driver's seat firmly bolted to the flow of trend, meaning, and consequence. That's the domain of Design, and Jonathan Ive is your Designer."

McMullin may have a point, but in the subsequent paragraphs of his letter, he sort of backtracks. "Of course," he concedes, "he [Ive] may not turn out to be the consummate sales guy that you need to sell dreams to the switchers of tomorrow, or keep the Apple legions loyal." And "he'll need coaching to round out his business fluency." And of course "he'll need a strong team of C-level support."

In other words: maybe what Jonathan Ive needs is an MBA? Maybe it's not such a good idea to lift a designer into the chief executive chair after all? Maybe there's still a vast gulf between managing design and managing a business? Maybe design is "more than just style" but business is also more than just design?

Tim Leberecht is frog design's vice president of marketing and communications and has worked in the media, entertainment, and high-tech industries. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
frog design, the book: How design strategies are shaping the future of business
Get social now!
Father's Day special: Baby care and meaningful marketing
Less is more. The tweet(ed) revolution.
The iPhone is a subscription
Is advertising dead? The third way of building brand equity
Microsoft Bing: The first real Google alternative
Downstream solutions. Upstream problems.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Should Ive be Apple's next leader? No.
by thriftyT September 26, 2007 10:48 AM PDT
Apple needs a visionary, not just a designer. Apple would be lucky to have Ive stay on as a designer to do what he does best.
Running a company, deciding strategically which technologies and products to pursue, and managing a tight supply chain aren't necessarily Ive's strengths. Anybody running Apple successfully needs those and other traits.
Reply to this comment
by jackson649 June 3, 2009 8:18 PM PDT
I have waited 23 years to say this but I was the one that gave Apple the idea for the candy colored shells. I like many people was a diehard mac user and back in the late 80's things at apple were a mess. So I thought I could help come up with a great idea and I did! I wrote a 3 page letter and couriered it to CA. It contained all of my ideas including the idea to color the shells in the colors of the Apple logo I thought it was brilliant. I was shocked when I saw the product presented at the apple show and it turned out to be Jonathan Ives' idea? I don't think so and he knows it! Maybe that is why Ive dosent do interviews shy maybe concerned about a slip of the tongue. I thought in time someone would pass along a thanks or two but nothing. I think it is about time don't you?
Reply to this comment
by jackson649 June 3, 2009 8:39 PM PDT
sorry my mistake i am losing it! it feels like 23 yrs but I wrote the letter in 95' 14 years ago apple was a mess in the early 90s what triggered me to write the letter was when I heard about Apple computers being taken out of some Universities because they were no longer compatible with the majority of PC users it was a huge sales and marketing blow to the company. I agree I did not engineer and create the form of the iMac but I planted the seed maybe someone should simply ask Ive "where did the idea come from to color the shells" I think he would be hard pressed to answer its not like it was in the mainstream I knew it was a great idea and so did the five or so people who initialed the letter I sent because someone at Apple sent it back to me so I know they read it!
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for frog design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right