• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
September 10, 2007 9:22 PM PDT

AT&T updates its brand...again

by Adam Richardson
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 3 comments

AT&T is still struggling to convey the fact that it is a seamless blend of two companies--the "old" AT&T with Cingular. Cingular was a brand sensation, having been created out of whole cloth and gaining massive market and mindshare in a very short amount of time. I remember the first time I saw an ad for it, in a subway station in San Francisco, and was struck by how fresh it was, from the name to the color to the lively logo. At the time I knew nothing of its provenance (a merger of SBC and BellSouth), and the impression it left was clean and hip.

AT&T's logo had been updated shortly before this latest merger, an uninspired update of Saul Bass' classic ("Hey, it's 3D!"). According to BusinessWeek, in trying to combine the two identities AT&T is struggling to find the right balance of its old self with young upstart Cingular:

"The new proposition sees the company heading back to basics in an attempt to convey the seamless blend of both merged companies. And, in a move that suggests executives may regret having been so quick to ditch all things Brand Cingular (its quirky but memorable "Jack" logo, often shown bouncing around the screen in ads, was officially retired in May) the wireless company's characteristic effervescent orange will now get more prominent play throughout AT&T's wireless operations."

The warm orange color is the only carryover from Cingular days, and really it doesn't work harmoniously with the cool hues of blue and white in the AT&T logo. The combination feels forced.

Living on a fence like this is dangerous territory for a brand. AT&T is going to have to pick sides, and do it soon. Its relative weakness in the brand balance with Apple shows that it is not dealing from a position of strength, and its lack of clarity on who it is as a company is a part of that.

These days companies must have clear personalities to connect with customers who are more relationship-driven in the way they relate to products and brands that ignite their passions. No one particularly wants a relationship with someone who has a split personality--it's too unpredictable and trust can't develop. AT&T is hurting what trust it had to begin with by staying on the fence.

Adam Richardson is the director of product strategy at Frog Design, where he guides strategy engagements for Frog's international roster of clients, envisioning and creating new products, consumer electronics, and digital experiences. Adam combines a background in industrial design, interaction design, and sociology, and he spends most of his time on convergent designs that combine hardware, software, service, brand, and retail. He writes and speaks extensively on design, business, culture, and technology, and he runs his own Richardsona blog. Adam is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
The psychology of healthcare reform
Mad Men finale: So you like being in advertising after all?
The world's first crowdsourced creative agency
Forrester: Adaptive branding and the new four P's of marketing
California artist rebuilds world economy with antimatter
Lessons for Nook from Zune
Social media count shows how active the social web is
Berlin Twitter Wall lets you write on history
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
The ads do seem a bit forced...
by gsmiller88 September 11, 2007 5:24 AM PDT
Seeing the blue AT&T logo over an orange background with the trademark
"Cingular guy" voice over just seems weak. Much like that blue Dell logo on the
orange background right over there! *Points to right*

I was burnt out long ago by WAY TOO MUCH advertising from Cingular. They
need a new approach entirely.
Reply to this comment
Spelling +10 characters
by mjm01010101 September 11, 2007 6:01 AM PDT
"At the time I new nothing of its providence (a merger of SBC and BellSouth), and the impression it left was clean and hip."
Reply to this comment
C/Net needs proofers
by Sparky672 September 11, 2007 9:10 AM PDT
[i]"At the time I [b]new[/b] nothing of its providence"[/i]

You mean "knew"?
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for Frog Design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right