• On The Insider: Shaheen Jafargholi Proud of What He Did
December 8, 2008 6:41 PM PST

Only open news is good news: Apture, Washington Post, Times Extra

by Tim Leberecht

These days, you don't need to launch portal sites that vie for new audiences. You're better served leveraging existing applications to provide new functionality for venues that already attract a fair share of eyeballs or that even cultivate their own communities.

Internet activist Lawrence Lessig points out a feature of Apture, a rich media content compilation platform, that promotes government transparency by allowing bloggers and other publishers to embed links to rich media background info on politicians and their records (i.e., key moments of testimony in videos, historical source materials, government documents, and even bills and resolutions).

Apture announced Monday that it will partner with The Washington Post to promote this application, offering readers "a highly engaging way to view political data, congressional records, video, news and abstracts within a single Washingtonpost.com browser experience."

The Apture technology will integrate with Washingtonpost.com's congressional votes database to provide up-to-date information on the latest House and Senate votes. In addition, Washingtonpost.com will make this data and content available to any blog or Web site that uses the Apture publishing platform.

This partnership marks a larger trend: no longer concerned about "leakage" (visitors exiting a site following external links), news outlets are opening their portals to dynamically aggregated third-party content. Another prominent example is The New York Times and its recent beta-launch of Times Extra. The service aggregates news headlines from other publications (including blogs) and attaches them to relevant articles on The New York Times home page.

Denise Warren, chief advertising officer of the New York Times Media Group, said in a statement: "We are addressing a common desire for comprehensiveness, enabling people to find all the news and information they could want from all sorts of sources. Initiatives such as Times Extra and our other new products allow us to do an even better job of responding to our audiences' demands for interactivity, community, multimedia and news and information on an increasingly wide range of topics."

Both The Washington Post and The New York Times get the new "openness" of news media: they are gradually morphing into software companies, serving as curators of digital content from both inside and outside of their own newsrooms.

Tim Leberecht is frog design's vice president of marketing and communications and has worked in the media, entertainment, and high-tech industries. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
The conversation wars
frog design, the book: How design strategies are shaping the future of business
Get social now!
Father's Day special: Baby care and meaningful marketing
Less is more. The tweet(ed) revolution.
The iPhone is a subscription
Is advertising dead? The third way of building brand equity
Microsoft Bing: The first real Google alternative
advertisement

Can RIM get its mojo back?

The new BlackBerry Tour, carried by Verizon and Sprint, arrives Sunday, even as RIM seems to be losing sales to exclusive devices like the iPhone and Pre.

With Chrome, Google reignites the OS wars

roundup Google Chrome OS, due in 2010, underscores the Web giant's cloud-computing ambitions and opens new competition with Microsoft.
• What Chrome OS has on Windows that Linux doesn't

About Matter/Anti-Matter

Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for frog design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Matter/Anti-Matter topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right