• On TechRepublic: Why VISTA HATERS will love Windows 7
June 14, 2008 6:00 AM PDT

Anti-swimmer system bad news for frogmen

by Mark Rutherford
(Credit: USCG)

You can't really say you have a private beach until you've installed a SM 2000 Underwater Surveillance System by Kongsberg to keep out the riffraff.

The system is designed to protect commercial piers, government and military vessels, cruise ships, terminals, and other high-value assets, but it'll work just as well for your hideaway surf break. You know it's good if the oil sheiks buy it. Kongsberg installed an integrated system at a "High-Value Seaside resort" in the United Arab Emirates; the exact location is classified.

The U.S. Coast Guard just picked up $2 million of Kongsberg gear to enhance its Integrated Anti-swimmer Systems (IAS) program at the nation's ports. The purchase follows the initial IAS contract worth $3 million.

Using software and sonar the system can detect and differentiate between "malicious swimmers and divers" and other targets, such as marine life and debris, at up to 1000 meters, according to the British Columbia-based company. A processor "captures a wide acoustic swath" to positively identify and localize the threat, then notifies security (PDF).

You'll be relieved to know that the Coast Guard and the EPA have concluded that the system will not "adversely affect threatened or endangered species or critical habitat." Whether a diver could do enough damage to justify the multimillion-dollar investment is open to debate.

Someone poaching in your favorite abalone patch? A frogman can be warned that he is in a restricted area and should surface immediately by "underwater loudhailer." If that doesn't work, deploy the "nonlethal interdiction acoustic impulse," an underwater shockwave emitter--which, despite its name, can be set on stun or kill.

Mark Rutherford is a West Coast-based freelance writer. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Email him at markr@milapp.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Military Tech
Next up in body protection: Cement armor
Killer robots can be taught ethics
Reading machine to snoop on Web
Kamikaze drone loiters above, waits for target
Blanket provides protection against dirty bombs
Hair test reveals travel, lifestyle
Where to go for fried chicken in North Korea
Avoid sinking feeling with bulletproof lifejacket
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ducttape36 June 16, 2008 10:15 AM PDT
wow, i love that picture. its either an advertisment for a middle eastern scuba diving resort, or a racist portrayal of how smiling middle eastern men must be terrorists.
Reply to this comment
by JohanBlitzen June 16, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
So look who's quick to judge.. it could very well be one of the satisfied customers from the UAE, smiling because he's about to implode that diver's ear drums. Not everything should be looked at in such a dark way.
Reply to this comment
by ducttape36 June 17, 2008 6:51 AM PDT
ok... so if youre right, is someone smiling joyfully at the fact they are about to harm someone else less dark? do soldiers in battle have big smiles on there faces as they shoot enemies? if thats the messege they are going for its still in bad taste. but im pretty sure you are wrong anyways.
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Military Tech

The military establishment's ever increasing reliance on technology and whiz-bang gadgetry impacts us as consumers, investors, taxpayers and ultimately as the "defended." Our mission here is to bring some of these products and concepts to your attention based on carefully selected criteria such as importance to national security, originality, collateral damage to the treasury and adaptability to yard maintenance-but not necessarily in that order.

Mark Rutherford is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Military Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right