• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
March 15, 2008 7:34 AM PDT

China baffles world with mystery bomber

by Mark Rutherford

China's H-8 stealth bomber may be more advanced than the American B-2A and capable of delivering a 350-kiloton nuclear warhead to the continental United States, or it could be a mock-up of the A-12 "Flying Dorito."

(Credit: PLAAF)

Those are just two of the rumors accompanying a video trumpeting some recent triumphs of Chinese aviation.

Although it's "top secret," Chinese quasi-official Web sites brag that the Xian H-8 is a stealth carbon fiber, "special nanotechnology"-coated strategic heavy bomber.

What we know for sure is that it has a range of 11,000 kilometers, without refueling, but it could refuel if it wanted to--possibly. In any case, it has extralarge fuel tanks. It has a crew of two and travels at Mach 1.2, or maybe 1.4. It carries an 18-ton bomb payload and/or 12 new stealth cruise missiles with a range of 3,000 kilometers. And three nuclear missiles, at least.

A prototype was successfully tested last year (witnessed by the deputy mayor of Xian) and will enter mass production and active service in the People's Liberation Army Air Force by 2010.

Then again, it's an enlarged version of the H-6 with the underwing engines, a project that was canceled in the 1970s. It has four Ws-10A engines based on Russian or U.S. technology--or both--and was designed by the 603 Institute.

Oh, and it was made possible by stolen American technology. Even with pilfered stealth technology, though, China will probably not have had "enough time to (successfully) fabricate and assemble a working aircraft," Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense hopes.

And the "Flying Dorito"? The stealth McDonnell Douglas A-12 carrier-borne attack aircraft was canceled in the 1990s by then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney. Or was it?

Mark Rutherford is a West Coast-based freelance writer. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Email him at markr@milapp.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Military Tech
Nation prepares for deadly bat virus
MIT MAV jockeys: We don't need no stinkin' GPS
Army shows more than one way to look under a car
Military looks for better touch with PacBots
Driverless car also parks itself
Race to develop long-range UAV enters second lap
Congressional commission focuses on China's cyberwar capability
Robomule Rex follows soldiers, voice commands
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (25 Comments)
by contentcreator--2008 March 15, 2008 8:58 AM PDT
The first half of the flying wing looks like a so-so job by a visual effects student. Should we play the "where's waldo" game to find the tells? Shadow direction, shadow sharpness, black level, white level, color balance, noise level, focus? No wonder we see a compressed version on youtube, not actual JPEG photos where the construction would be even more obvious.
Reply to this comment
by snaniwsp March 15, 2008 9:00 AM PDT
an obvious photo shop job...CNET got suckered. The Chinese can't even build their own jet engines without help.
Reply to this comment
by tomanjeri March 15, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
Of course it's a mockup you tool. No gov't is going to release photos of a secret military plane.
by ciggieoxo March 15, 2008 9:06 AM PDT
The US has so many loans owed to China and China has invested in US companies plus we are a huge consumert of Chinese imports, China wouldn't use its weapons against the US because we have been bought out by China. They have to protect their assets,
Reply to this comment
by carlosmante March 15, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
Now all this technology should American Heroe Hugo Chavez.
All weel deserved after all junk dumping of Chinese trash By Gringo Companies to American Countries like Mexico.
Reply to this comment
by boriquajake March 15, 2008 7:30 PM PDT
Mira, cabrón, a menos que vayas a aprender el inglés, no intentes escribir tus pendejadas, OK.

Y mas, los unicos "Americanos" somos los gringos, puto. Si, vives en un continente "americano" pero el unico pueblo conocido como "America" es el de los Estados Unidos de America, cabrón.
by chupamiverdga March 15, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
Who are you kidding? This stuff appears to have been lifted from a grocery store tabloid! The bomber "pictures" are obvious fakes, and the "author" named no resources from which he did his "research".
What's he going to write about next, an amazing new diet plan derived from space alien technology?
Reply to this comment
by nedcoyle March 15, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
First thing I thought of upon seeing the slides of the "stealth" - Photoshop. Probably a bootleg copy purchased on the streets of Shanghai or Hong Kong.
Reply to this comment
by 42istheanswer March 15, 2008 11:46 AM PDT
Bring it on.
Reply to this comment
by xItOut March 15, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
Ha .. this guy must use the same intelligence as the Bush admistration.
Reply to this comment
by mrquique March 15, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
That?s why other countries always take us by surprise. It?s the dollar the strongest currency? We Americans are so egocentric for our own good. So much that we don?t see how the world changes around us. You will only believe it when you see it flying.
Reply to this comment
by arlandean March 15, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
I concur...strongly
by mikalg March 15, 2008 1:25 PM PDT
I cannot believe how fake looking these images are of the "stealth bomber". Does the Chinese public actual believe everything the state pumps out on its government media?

Jesus, I've seen UFO pictures that looked better than this...Big Foot too!
Reply to this comment
by parliament_fuck March 15, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
That "Chinese quasi-official Web site" is not a PRC site at all. It's the Ministry of Defense for Taiwan. Get a clue.
Reply to this comment
by williamQ March 15, 2008 2:34 PM PDT
Mark Rutherford quote: "A prototype was successfully tested last year (witnessed by the deputy mayor of Xian)..."

Ahh, so *that's* how we legitimize this laughable Photoshop hack.

Mr. Rutherford: The prinicpal has been notified -- it's time for you to return to study hall!
Reply to this comment
by arlandean March 15, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
"...not have had 'enough time to successful fabricate and assemble a working aircraft,'..."

Dangerous thinking: based on other comments here and the apparent general military perception that the Chinese stealth aircraft isn't ready for prime time is dangerous. Regardless of whether the bomber is ready now or not, the day will come when it will be.

And true to form there will be many in the West who'll be convinced that China couldn't possibly be a serious threat. We seem to have a terrible habit of underestimating emerging threats and potential enemies.

Well then, let's all just wait until it's too late. Meanwhile we can congratulate ourselves on having the most technologically advanced military machine on the planet connected to the blindest and wrong-headed way of perceiving (or mis-perceiving) too much of the rest of the world.

In other news, Airbus gears up to build US Air Force Tankers...so what...right?
Reply to this comment
by drsanto March 16, 2008 8:48 AM PDT
I couldn't agree more.

There are a LOT of other nations and even para-military forces that take war and war strategy more seriously than we do. Take Lezbollah, for example. Lezboallah was monitoring Israeli communications, for heaven's sake! In many ways, the war between the two was a proxy war between the US and Iran.

Increasingly, the United States is under Cyber attack by the PLA's Cyber Warfare forces. The amount of activity is greater than low-intensity conflict and is reaching the level of force-on-force conflict. If the PLA compromises enough computers (and it probably has), it can gleam information that allows it to move ahead from a technological perspective. Not only do we have to protect our systems, but we need to ensure that we identify and incapacitate attacking computers.

Finally, we're exporting our manufacturing to Asia. As a result, the Asians are getting and learning the technology before we do. It has gotten to the point where they are researching and developing technology locally. This is NOT GOOD for the US, which overly depends on technology for it's military edge.

Former Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Moorer warned us about China...

DRS
by lkrupp March 15, 2008 3:54 PM PDT
I thought April 1 was a couple of weeks away yet.
Reply to this comment
by wildchild_plasma_gyro March 15, 2008 4:35 PM PDT
Its got to be said.
China dosent have to put its hands up and say ok we wont be a nuclear nation.
China dosent have to dampen its taoist ways to please the west.
And China dosent have to facisise its world into unbalanced class structure claiming false freedom.
This sort of thing will encourage Japan to want more of their worth that this self proclaimed kind western world has held back from them.
So they might ruturn to their philosophies and steghen their nuclear potential and become a full scale alli of China s opposed to a free mason run shell of their former ways just to get some economy their way.

India might transform wanting a less westernised way and want more for their world.

This stuff is significan't to the rise of Asia.
I don't support this stuff out of hate i sulute this stuff out of want for fairness here on earth and a shire hate towards the ambiguius levels of decent in my own place of residence.
Reply to this comment
by wildchild_plasma_gyro March 15, 2008 4:39 PM PDT
Personally id case it in a water melting carbonised coat protectect by a polymer nano layers.
Well hey theres plently more time to improve the crafts electro stelfyness.
Reply to this comment
by Chiatzu March 16, 2008 4:13 AM PDT
lol @ bootlegged photoshop job. Probably so. Looks completely fake to me too. Amateurs.
Reply to this comment
by sszx223 March 16, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/22/stealth.bomber.crash/

They are laughing at us. While our planes are crashing China is developing out the ass. Just wait yall.. just wait.
Reply to this comment
by Kilotango7 March 21, 2008 5:23 PM PDT
I think someone took the footage from the next ace combat... I mean seriously. Nanotechnology in the skin of an aircraft? Carbon fiber is a material not commonly seen in aircraft either. Unless you plan on making a little Berkut 360 or something. Dont get me wrong, China is on the rise. But they arent there yet. Their airforce is still highly reliant on soviet/russian technology and what they can manage to steal from the US. Its true, the Chinese have decent computer making skills but they couldnt assemble a engine to save their lives. Why do you think they are using rolls royce engines in the H-6?

You want air superiority? Check these bad beasts out> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F22
Reply to this comment
by cywarone March 22, 2008 7:49 PM PDT
This is terrible reporting. You have no real sources for this. This is pure propaganda. Try to do some real reporting, I trust CNET and this is not up to your standards.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (25 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

advertisement

About Military Tech

The military establishment's ever increasing reliance on technology and whiz-bang gadgetry impacts us as consumers, investors, taxpayers and ultimately as the "defended." Our mission here is to bring some of these products and concepts to your attention based on carefully selected criteria such as importance to national security, originality, collateral damage to the treasury and adaptability to yard maintenance-but not necessarily in that order.

Mark Rutherford is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Military Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right