• On GameFAQs: Is it OK to lay my Wii down on its side?
May 18, 2009 3:07 PM PDT

GPS upgrade behind schedule and over budget

by Mark Rutherford
(Credit: GAO)

Ubiquitous, reliable, and free to the public, the Global Positioning System (GPS) is now taken for granted, but don't dump those maps from the glove box just yet, since it's uncertain for how long the U.S. government can continue to deliver.

The US plans to invest more than $5.8 billion through 2013 to modernize and replenish the existing GPS satellite constellation. But facing cost overruns of $870 million and "significant" technical problems, the US Air Force, which is in charge of GPS acquisition, has struggled to build and deploy the next generation satellites on schedule, according to a Government Accounting Office report. A failure to complete development next year before old satellites begin to fail could have wide-ranging impacts on all GPS users, the report warned. (PDF)

Part of the problem has been an acquisition "reform" program, which instead of improving matters by placing more responsibility on the contractors, led instead to "requirements creep," relaxed specifications, late part delivery, test failures, and poor performance.

In addition, the program suffered from the "cluster" factor, i.e. a lack of management continuity. Diffuse leadership contributes to late delivery and cost growth. Part of the program has had seven different managers, the first five of whom only served one year each. The diverse array of officials and organizations involved made it difficult to pare back and control requirements, according to the GAO.

Then there were the mergers. For example, the aerospace and defense bits of Rockwell were acquired by Boeing shortly after it won a GPS contract. A year later, Boeing merged with McDonnell Douglas. The work was moved again. Next Boeing acquired Hughes Electronics' space and communications business, which meant another move; all the while shedding "valuable workers and knowledge."

Among the consequences of degraded GPS: more delays and cancellations on intercontinental flights, degraded 911 services and "smart bombs" get a little dumber. A decrease in accuracy of GPS guided munitions would force the military to use either bigger bombs or more of them to get the same bang. Can you say collateral damage?

Mark Rutherford is a West Coast-based freelance writer. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Email him at markr@milapp.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Military Tech
Nation prepares for deadly bat virus
MIT MAV jockeys: We don't need no stinkin' GPS
Army shows more than one way to look under a car
Military looks for better touch with PacBots
Driverless car also parks itself
Race to develop long-range UAV enters second lap
Congressional commission focuses on China's cyberwar capability
Robomule Rex follows soldiers, voice commands
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by chuchucuhi May 18, 2009 4:11 PM PDT
I kind of wondered what had happened to the GPS upgrade, doesn't sound like it's going very well at all, where's the GPS czar hehe.
Reply to this comment
by Hunnter2k3 May 18, 2009 4:24 PM PDT
High-altitude blimps.
That is all.

But seriously, why not?
These things are much easier to deploy, we can replace them with incredible ease.
Space "space" is overrated, we still have plenty of space in the skies with is within reach with much cheaper technologies.
Come on guys, get to it! Bring back the blimp!
Reply to this comment
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About Military Tech

The military establishment's ever increasing reliance on technology and whiz-bang gadgetry impacts us as consumers, investors, taxpayers and ultimately as the "defended." Our mission here is to bring some of these products and concepts to your attention based on carefully selected criteria such as importance to national security, originality, collateral damage to the treasury and adaptability to yard maintenance-but not necessarily in that order.

Mark Rutherford is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Military Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right