• On GameSpot: Handheld Xbox coming...eventually.
October 1, 2007 10:15 AM PDT

Set camera clock to GMT for better geotagging?

by Stephen Shankland

Tell me what to do here, folks.

I encountered a rat's nest of problems with geotagging recently because I'd left my camera clock to local time on a vacation eight time zones away. Some have suggested to me that I change my camera clock to Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), the closest thing the planet has to an absolute time zone reference point, as an easier way to embed location information in my digital photos.

I've been reluctant to make the GMT switch because I didn't want a photo I took at, say, 8 p.m. California time to be indexed on my computer as 4 a.m. the next day. Maybe I'm too parochial, but I sometimes want to know the real time I took my shot, not some relative time where I have to subtract seven or eight hours. And of course the issue extends to photo-sharing sites: might a friend be unable to find a wedding photo I uploaded, because he's searching by date and doesn't know to look one day in the future?

But on the flip side, I plan to geotag my photos routinely now, and I don't want to repeat my earlier problems.

So tell me, geotaggers, should I tell my camera clock it's nearer to Big Ben than the San Francisco Ferry Building? What are the downsides, and are there any other upsides?

Feel free to e-mail advice to me directly at stephen.shankland@cnet.com or post below in the Talkback section so others can benefit.

Also, for finer time adjustments, here's a good tip I heard from Jeffrey Early, author of the GPSPhotoLinker geotagging software (who was one of the folks who suggested I move to GMT). Geotagging software often lets you precisely synchronize your camera and GPS times, but what's the best way to see if your camera clock has drifted away from your GPS. Take a photo of the GPS clock and compare the subject of the photo with its timestamp.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Nikon app teaches photography on the fly
Smile! Flickr has an official iPhone app
Corel Digital Studio 2010 opens up to consumers
Adobe tests raw support for Olympus E-P1, new Nikons
Adobe's next Lightroom to forsake PowerPC Macs
How Flickr needs to change
Adobe kills low-end Photoshop, urges users online
Toshiba plans 64GB SDXC memory cards for 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
New direction for CNet - actual tech discussions?
by M C October 1, 2007 12:29 PM PDT
I've been considering using GMT myself - but rejected it for the same reason (and if the pics are from a time zone (or continent) other than "home," the "was it that morning or afternoon?" guessing game gets even more complex.

When/if public posting of my photos becomes my biggest priority, I'd definitely make the switch, but not before.
Reply to this comment
Also...
by M C October 1, 2007 12:33 PM PDT
If a photo-sharing site doesn't have the tools to adjust the photographer's time to the viewer's time, that's a problem the site should address.

If the site DOES have that function, "universalizing" the camera's clock becomes moot.
Post also at DP Review
by 62Sparkplug October 1, 2007 2:02 PM PDT
Not that this isn't a good place to post your question, I would,
however, suggest that you also posting your question on DP
Review's "Open Talk" Forum at:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1018

Good shooting!
Reply to this comment
Do we really need timezones?
by elbowgr October 2, 2007 5:20 AM PDT
Use of an absolute time of GMT (actually UTC - more or less the same but more accurate) is more common than you think, especially when you look at web sites, applications and science. Java's time is based on UTC and many web applications (bulletin boards) work the same way. They need to serve an audience around the world and UTC is the common standard.

What?s more important to you? Having a definite time for your geotagging, or a convenient time that matches expectations? If it is important that your most sensitive photos have the correct absolute time then I?d go with using GMT, also the same if I was frequently travelling around the world.

What is local time anyway but a fudge of the real time so that everyone wakes up at 7am no matter what where in the world they are. Right now, somewhere it?s 5pm and someone is leaving the office. Local time is made even more perplexing by it then being adjusted by summertime which is too arbitrary. (?Hey guys, we won?t tell you to wake up an hour early, instead we will change our clocks.?)

It?s too bad that in these days of worldwide communications that we have to deal with over 25 different times zones and an international dateline to calculate local time. Why not just switch to UTC for most communications? I?ve personally experienced issues dealing with time zones (EST -5 , CST -6 , PST -8, GMT & India +5.5) and Summertime (July & Brazil = EST + 3 / December & Brazil = EST + 1).

What would it hurt to say that in Boston, the work day starts at 14:00 and ends at 22:00 and in the summer starts an hour earlier? It?s not that radical, Arthur C. Clarke mentioned a single world time zone in a book of his many years ago.
Reply to this comment
Timezone
by bofh October 25, 2007 9:31 PM PDT
For a recent trip to Japan, I had to fight through this issue. I ended up settling on PST (my home time zone) as I did not want to miss being able to tie the times properly but I may look into using GMT instead.

The additional problem I have is that I merge data between a NMEA file and an image using Downloader Pro after the fact so it will require some synchronization to make sure everything ties together properly.

But for now, my pictures are showing up where I expected them to be and I'm pretty happy with the results.

http://flickr.com/photos/jauderho/sets/72157602229609984/
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right