• On ZDNet: Why I Will never buy a Mac
September 25, 2007 12:42 PM PDT

Binary? Decimal? Excel 2007 finds it all so confusing

by Stephen Shankland

Microsoft on Tuesday confirmed a bug in Excel 2007 that can cause it to produce erroneous answers for a particular multiplication task.

Specifically, the problem can crop up when the answer to a multiplication problem should result in 65,535. You fans of binary arithmetic don't need to be told that's 2 to the 16th power minus one, or maximum integer that can be described with two bytes, counting up from zero. So it's a good bet some binary-to-decimal translation is involved in the problem.

A repair is in the works, Microsoft said, without sharing much more in the way of detail.

"We are currently in the process of developing and testing a fix for the flaw," Microsoft said in a statement Tuesday. "Microsoft places a high priority on quickly responding to customer feedback, and we are committed to finding ways to provide a better software experience."

News of the bug surfaced Saturday on an Excel mailing list, and Slashdot picked it up Tuesday. The latter forum, with a disproportionate population of Microsoft bashers, gleefully pounced on the problem.

One commenter said Microsoft's fix will offer a new rendition of the hated Clippy: The fix will trigger the appearance of "an animated sprite of Charles Babbage's head," who will say, "It looks like you're trying to multiply two numbers. I can help show you how to use the Method of Finite Differences to find a good approximation of your answer using only addition and subtraction. Would you like me to bring up a wizard so that we can get started on finding an appropriate power series?"

Another commenter was more constructive, observing that even when the problem crops up, the correct results are placed in a graph.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Yahoo enables twittering via Flickr
Olympus' compact E-P1: A breath of fresh air
Phase One to absorb high-end Kodak photo assets
Apple's new iPhone 3G S sports new camera, video
Apple update supports new Canon, Nikon SLRs
Canon 5D Mark II's manual video controls arrive
Manual video control coming to Canon 5D Mark II
Phase One takes lead in camera sensor test
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
"disproportionate population of Microsoft bashers"
by MadKiwi September 25, 2007 3:09 PM PDT
On what do you base that statement? Give me the statistics.

Comments like that make me think "Microsoft shill", which, admittedly, has about the same degree of foundation as the comment I'm questioning... almost.
Reply to this comment
well, OK, so I made that statistic up
by Shankland September 25, 2007 5:44 PM PDT
I have no statistical basis whatsoever for the "disproportionate" label, I confess. But I've been reading Slashdot for years, and there certainly is a large quantity of Microsoft bashers and, it appears to me, a larger fraction than on a lot of forums I read. A more neutral venue might not choose to portray Bill Gates with an unflattering Borg eyeball, however tongue-in-cheek that icon is.
View reply
How to trigger the bug
by news reader September 26, 2007 8:48 PM PDT
To trigger the bug, type this into a cell:

=round(850*77.1,0)

The answer should be 65535, but it will instead show 100000. If you leave out the "round", then it will say 100000 on the screen but actually be about 65535 in memory. But if you use the "round", then the error is present in memeory too.
Reply to this comment
Bug will carry over to Charts etc
by KCatRJ September 27, 2007 2:49 PM PDT
We dont have all the information on this problem yet! This version of the equation will carry the wrong answer over to charts etc. =ROUND(850*77.1,2)*2
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right