• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
February 11, 2009 9:05 AM PST

High-end ideas reshape compact-camera market

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 17 comments

Compact-camera manufacturers have begun testing the waters with a wealth of high-end features as they search for new ways to gain revenue, market share, and recognition.

In earlier digital photography days, a camera with an extra megapixel of resolution, face recognition, or image stabilization could stand apart from the herd. But now that herd has grown larger, most folks who'll buy a digital camera already have done so, the economy has put consumer spending on ice--and camera makers are making some bolder bets with high-end features.

Among them: Nikon's built-in GPS support to record where a photo was taken, Casio's high-speed video, and the Micro Four Thirds camera system from Panasonic and Olympus.

Premium features aren't an easy sell. They tend to appeal to market niches rather than the mainstream. Early implementations are often rough around the edges. And it's hard enough to convince people to buy a new camera, much less one with the higher price of premium features.

But winning those customers can have a good payoff with better profit margins. And that's critical in this day and age. Market research firm IDC expects that after years of growth, the shipments of digital cameras will decline in 2009.

"It's crowded, and it's getting crowdeder," IDC analyst Ron Glaz said of the digital camera market. "We're anticipating that with the slowdown in economy and disposable income, we'll start seeing consolidation of the vendors." In other words, even though something in the neighborhood of 38 million digital cameras are sold annually, some companies will throw in the towel.

Even as the compact-digital market saturated in recent years, digital SLRs showed strong market growth. Some high-end compact models are geared for those thinking of buying an SLR, but who want something less bulky and complicated. Another type: SLR owners who need something they can slip into a pocket or easily take on a trip.

Dethroning Canon
The company to dethrone here is Canon, the leader of the compact camera market. Not only does it have seemingly innumerable cameras for every variation of consumer, but it also has long offered its G series for enthusiasts who are willing to pay a premium for high-end features. The current PowerShot G10 offers 14.7 megapixels of resolution, full manual controls, support for raw image format, a durable body, and a relatively fast lens.

"There have always been competitive products for the G-series. However, the range of competitors has expanded recently. Now, not only high-end point-and-shoot, but also low-end DSLR products are priced about the same as the G10," Canon said in a statement. The company has offered a new G-series model each year since 2006, and Canon believes the G10 to be the leading high-end compact camera in the United States.

Canon shares dominance in the SLR market with Nikon, and in the compact market, Nikon's Coolpix P6000 is aimed straight at Canon's G10. The P6000's chief distinguishing feature is its built-in GPS receiver, which enables the camera to know where it is when a photo is taken. That location data is written into the image file through a process called geotagging that lets people sort their photos not just by when they were taken or by what folder on a computer they were stuffed into, but also by where they were taken.

"Having GPS in the camera makes all the sense in the world to me," Glaz said. "People are now capturing thousands of pictures a year. There are only a few things they remember about them--I was in Paris, it was around the holidays." So location data is important, especially as software arrives that can convert a photo's latitude-longitude information into a place name. That will let people search for photos by typing in text, not just by looking at image thumbnails on a map.

The Micro Four Thirds contenders
The P6000 and G10 are self-contained, one-off cameras. If you don't like them, you can wait a couple years and buy the next model in the category. But Olympus and Panasonic are trying something much more ambitious in the market: the Micro Four Thirds standard.

The two companies already sell SLRs that use the earlier Four Thirds standard, which governs the sensor size along with the interchangeable lenses mounting system and communication with the camera body. Micro Four Thirds is a smaller variation that employs the same size sensor but smaller lenses, and cameras forsake SLRs' space-consuming flip-up mirror.

"We're looking at (Micro Four Thirds) as the ability to offer a high-end interchangeable lens camera in an extremely small, compact body at an affordable price that would appeal to individuals coming up from the point-ad-shoot space, looking for a more sophisticated camera system they could grow with," said Sally Smith Clemens, product manager for Olympus Imaging America. It's for the person who demands high image quality but wants to be able to fit a camera and three lenses in a small fanny pack.


Casio's EX-FH20 camera can shoot slow-motion video. This one slows down time by a factor of 14 but has a native resolution of only 224x168 pixels. At 1000 frames per second, it's a 224x56 strip.
Casio's EX-FH20 camera can shoot slow-motion video. This one slows down time by a factor of 14 but has a native resolution of only 224x168 pixels. At 1000 frames per second, it's a 224x56 strip.

So far, Olympus has only shown a slim Micro Four Thirds concept model, and despite some speculation to the contrary, that's all it'll show at the Photo Marketing Show in March, Smith Clemens added. But Panasonic already has its first first Micro Four Thirds model for sale, the $670 Lumix DMC-G1.

While Olympus' Micro Four Thirds effort is steered initially toward small models resembling the rangefinder cameras from the film era, Panasonic's G1 is relatively expensive and bulky, smaller than an SLR but not something that fits into a pocket easily. Some wags have called the G1 a "Barbie SLR." But it shows what can be done with Micro Four Thirds, leading Popular Photography magazine to name the G1 camera of the year.

DxO Labs has found the G1's sensor quality to be superior to that of Canon's G10, boding well for Micro Four Thirds models. Sensor size has a lot to do with image quality--and price--and Micro Four Thirds sensors, at 17.3mm by 13mm are vastly larger that those used in compact cameras. That's important when shooting in dim conditions and when trying to get the best range of colors and tones.

Panasonic's ambition
Panasonic, which hasn't had much success with its Four Thirds SLR line against giants Canon and Nikon, is eagerly pursuing the Micro Four Thirds direction. Along with the G1 and two lenses, a 14-45mm model and a 45-200mm model (the equivalent of 28-90mm and 90-400mm in 35mm camera terms), Panasonic plans to release three more lenses this year: a 7-14mm f4, a fast 20mm f1.7, and an image-stabilized 14-140mm f4-5.6.

"I do see this being a big part of our future," said David Briganti, Panasonic's national marketing manager for imaging. "The only people having extreme success in the true digital SLR world are Canon and Nikon. Sony is a huge player in the digital compact camera space, but even Sony has struggled despite the huge efforts with their Alpha line. We'll still have Four Thirds models, and there will be potential for new models in the future, but we feel there's a huge opportunity that's been missed by camera manufacturers today," the step-up from ordinary compact cameras.

Panasonic believes there are 23 million people in the market who are willing to buy digital SLRs, but only 7 million have done so, and Micro Four Thirds is aimed at the other 16 million.

Micro Four Thirds, though, is a hybrid technology that remains unproven in the market, Glaz said. "Nobody knows if people will buy them. The G1 is kind of in a no-man's land at this point," he said.

Why not make things even easier by skipping the interchangeable lenses altogether and shipping an model with a big zoom range? In short, physics constraints preclude ultrazoom cameras with large image sensors, Briganti said. In general, the larger the sensor, the larger the lenses to support it must be.

There is room for improvement, though. The G1 can't shoot video--despite not being encumbered by the mirror that makes video in SLRs so difficult. But Panasonic plans a new model this year that will support high-definition video, Briganti said.

Casio's need for speed
Casio has long had a niche with its very slim compact cameras, but in 2008 it started offering a new selling point: super-high-speed video. Most digital cameras shoot video at 30 frames per second, but Casio's $1,000 EX-F1 can shoot much faster: 512x384-pixel resolution at 300 frames per second or 336x96 at 1,200 frames per second, for example.

Later came the EX-FH20, which at $600 isn't as expensive, then at the Consumer Electronics Show, the still cheaper EX-FS10 and EX-FC100. These cameras also will take a high-speed burst of full-resolution still images, making it easier at least in theory to capture that exact moment when the your son's bat hits the baseball.

"The megapixel wars have peaked out," said Bill Heuer, head of Casio's digital camera division. "We challenged R&D to come up with something to use technology to do things that haven't been done before...Our goal is to establish categories that are profitable to us and to the retailer."

With the camera industry now operating at the breakneck speed of computing technology, it's certain other camera makers will try to stake their claims with high-end options. Fujifilm's $400 F200EXR has a sensor designed to work better in low-light conditions.

But it's not just a research and development challenge. The industry now has to convince budget-constrained consumers that the new high-end features aren't just gimmicks but are actually advances worth spending money on.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Nikon app teaches photography on the fly
Smile! Flickr has an official iPhone app
Corel Digital Studio 2010 opens up to consumers
Adobe tests raw support for Olympus E-P1, new Nikons
Adobe's next Lightroom to forsake PowerPC Macs
How Flickr needs to change
Adobe kills low-end Photoshop, urges users online
Toshiba plans 64GB SDXC memory cards for 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by professionaladventurer February 11, 2009 10:24 AM PST
Well written: Point of fact, I have a Canon 30D and a Canon G10 depending on my needs. I am a journalist. I carry the 30D for high quality shoots and my G10 when when I am on rescue calls, (I am with Alaska Mountain Rescue) or anytime I need a "pretty good" camera but want to go light and fast. I have tried Sony and Panasonic but found them to be "not quite" there yet.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland February 11, 2009 5:50 PM PST
I was trying to focus on cameras that had something unusual to set them apart.The LX3 is a nice camera by most accounts (it won DP Review's high-end compact challenge if memory serves), but it's not not nearly as widely used as the Canon G10, which I see as the incumbent against which rivals compare themselves. The LX3 is an advanced but relatively ordinary compact camera.
by nextcube February 11, 2009 1:32 PM PST
I have an EOS40D and when the time came for a point&shoot, I wound up with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 rather than the G10. While there is a lot to like about the G10, the extra stop on the lens and the wider wide-angle sold me on the LX3. I was surprised that the LX3 didn't get mentioned in this article...
Reply to this comment
by Shankland February 11, 2009 5:51 PM PST
(sorry, I misplaced this response above, so repeating here)

I was trying to focus on cameras that had something unusual to set them apart.The LX3 is a nice camera by most accounts (it won DP Review's high-end compact challenge if memory serves), but it's not not nearly as widely used as the Canon G10, which I see as the incumbent against which rivals compare themselves. The LX3 is an advanced but relatively ordinary compact camera.
by kcotham February 11, 2009 1:40 PM PST
I can see the writing on the wall, Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds is the future. But I absolutely detest the aspect ratio of 4:3 that these cameras produce (as well as every point and shoot made). The "traditional" 3:2 ratio of 35mm cameras is closer to the golden ratio and produces more aesthetically pleasing photos. It is also closer to what the human eye sees. The 4:3 ratio is unnatural. I use a point and shoot because of it's portability, for those spur of the moment photos. It's better to have a so-so camera than none at all. But when photography is the purpose of my trip, I default to 35mm (Nikon FM3A). If I want a 3:2 ratio with a digital (all but the full sensor SLRs that are too expensive for my budget have 4:3 sensors), I have to crop the photo, basically losing a big portion of those megapixels I paid for with my hard earned dollars.

I'd rather see more affordable full size sensors in 3:2 than micro 4:3. If they can shrink down the 3:2, that would be nice too. Too many megapixels crammed on a tiny sensor is detrimental to image quality. Bigger sensors is what we need, not smaller. If you don't believe me, take a photo with a compact using a 10MP 1/2.3 inch sensor and then compare that with a photo taken with a DSLR with a 36x24 mm 10MP sensor!
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss February 11, 2009 5:38 PM PST
but most pictures are of people, most not with their arms out, and people are mostly taller than wider.
by Shankland February 11, 2009 5:49 PM PST
I tried an Olympus E-3 for awhile and thought I'd loathe the 4:3 aspect ratio--I tend to like to exaggerate the vertical or horizontal aspects of a photo. But in fact I found I rather liked it. I was quite surprised. I don't expect everyone to share my taste though.

On a side note, plenty of landscape photographers have coped with the even squarer 5:4 aspect ratio without ill effects. Having a squarer image makes it easier to develop optics, because more of the image is toward the center of the image circle. Those pesky corners are the ugly part.
by skrubol February 12, 2009 8:09 AM PST
All Canon dSLR's have 3:2 sensors, and I believe all Nikon's do as well. The Rebel XS can be had, with lens for under $500, so if a 4:3 SLR is in your budget, a 3:2 SLR can be had for only a few dollars more.
by kcotham February 19, 2009 6:40 PM PST
@gggg sssss
That has absolutely nothing to do with anything. There are certain "rules" for aesthetics, these "rules" are based on biology and thousands of years of art. Technology is trying to impose an artificial standard.
by kcotham February 19, 2009 6:44 PM PST
@skrubol
No, not all of Canon and Nikon's DSLR's have 3:2 sensors, only the top models do. The DSLR's with 24x36mm sensors are in the range of $3000 MSRP for just the body. Look it up if you don't believe me. The $500 range cameras have DX sensors.
by andy/cnet February 11, 2009 5:49 PM PST
What about Sony? They are a big player with Cybershot series cameras.
Reply to this comment
by junebugbaker February 12, 2009 7:42 AM PST
can anyone tell me what model the yellow olympus camera is on the home page for for this story???
Reply to this comment
by tande04 February 12, 2009 7:50 AM PST
Its the olympus micro 4/3rds concept.

Its been met with raves (bringing back the ol' range finder in a digital format) but still hasn't been released.
by talepictures February 14, 2009 12:14 AM PST
You can shoot with both the panasonic G1 and the Olympus e-30 using the 3:2 ratio if you want. So I'd expect that to be the same for all future four thirds products. Especially on micro four thirds products because they use only live view so you will also see the 3:2 ratio in the viewfinder!
Reply to this comment
by iamotaku February 14, 2009 7:41 AM PST
I currently shoot 1D Mark III bodies with the 16-35mm 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 90% of the time. What's missing in all the tiny cameras is fast glass. The first company to come out with constant 2.8 lenses will win. I hate walking into a room with massive camera gear hanging all over me. Give us something that is small, quiet with fast glass and will shoot above iso 400 without getting too chunky and every pro out here would eat it up.
Reply to this comment
by Tom Budlong February 15, 2009 12:52 AM PST
These guys are missing a big market - field photo recording done by innumerable professionals and hobbyists. The gadget would include a quality point and shoot, GPS with UTM and datum capability (so you can go-to predetermined position), an electroic compass to record direction, and a micro keyboard for entering comments with each picture. All these are available with individual small gadgets now, and combining them into one should not be such a technical trick.
Reply to this comment
by GreenGuruForever February 26, 2009 5:26 PM PST
I agree about Professional Field Use:
1. Flip out & rotatable viewfinders are key
2. Add in Azimuth for another type of field measurement.
3. Your could even have some distance-measurement techonology that would measure/optionally display a "pinned" target (& distance) from the Camera.
4. Stereo mike jack is key for all sorts of science reasons.
5. Why not a thermometer too?
6. More weather-proofing/damp-proofing is important, including a built-in automatic lens cover.
7. Full 1920 HDMI is great to give field reports and so on..
8. Evaluate different remote control options and features... for a range of users, professions or situations.
9. Compass Heading, Azimuth, Distances, Notes, etc should be able to be shown on the image - with various display formats available.
10. Movie Mode: 24, 25 & 30 fps Movie Modes should allow universal international adoption..
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

13 games for newer iPhones

So you've got an old iPhone or iPod and want to see what some of the latest games are doing with the newer hardware? We've checked out 11 titles to show you the differences.
• Images: Old vs. new

Intel to pay AMD $1.25B in settlement

Antitrust and intellectual property fights come to an end for now. AMD will drop pending litigation, and Intel will "abide by" a long list of prohibitions.
• AMD: Our claims are 'ratified'

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right