January 7, 2009 8:03 PM PST

Canon fix looks good for SLR's 'black dot' glitch

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

Updated at 8:25 p.m. PST with preliminary test results, and at 10:36 p.m. PST with another photographer's results.

Canon on Wednesday released new firmware for its EOS 5D Mark II camera that the company said "improves and mitigates" the "black dot" problem that marred some images from the high-profile, high-end SLR.

Version 1.0.7 of the 5D Mark II firmware software is downloadable from Canon's Web site. (I encountered some dead ends on the site, but eventually found the 9MB download on the U.S. site at this address.)

I've just run some tests. My preliminary opinion is that there's grounds for optimism that the firmware indeed seems to have taken care of the problem. See the shots below taken at ISO 800 and 3,200, magnified to three times regular size.

This scene of San Francisco by night, taken with a 5D Mark II using the new version 1.0.7 firmware, shows no evidence of the black dot problem.

This scene of San Francisco by night, taken with a 5D Mark II using the new version 1.0.7 firmware, shows no evidence of the black dot problem.

(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)
Increasing the ISO to 3,200 amplified the black dot problem, but here, too, it appears to be a non-issue.

Increasing the ISO to 3,200 amplified the black dot problem, but here, too, it appears to be a non-issue.

(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET News)

Unfortunately, I don't have any test images that would let me show before-and-after comparisons, but the photos I just took look to me like the kinds where I saw black spots before. I could pretty reliably predict what types of shots would produce black spots.

Given the limits of my test, I'd welcome 5D Mark II owners to share their own findings in the comments section below.

Andrew Yip, who tested and detailed the black dot earlier, also was pleased after testing the firmware and publishing results on his blog.

"It looks like the black dots problem is fixed," Yip concluded. He also published before and after versions for more direct comparisons.

The 5D Mark II, a $2,700, 21.1-megapixel, full-frame camera that can shoot 1080p video as well, debuted in late 2008, but the black dot problem quickly surfaced when people photographed subjects such as Christmas tree lights and buildings at night. The issue showed up in generally darker shots with very bright regions; immediately to the right of the bright area a black patch was sometimes visible when the picture was viewed up close or printed large.

The firmware deals with another problem, vertical bands, sometimes occurred as well when shooting images in sRAW1, a quarter-size size raw image format, Canon said.

Those using Canon's Digital Photo Professional and Picture Style Editor software should update to new versions of those programs, too, Canon said. Using the older versions with the new firmware can imbue dark, low-contrast areas of a photo shot in sRAW1 or sRAW2 with a magenta tinge, the company warned.

Canon 5D Mark II 'black dots' problem.

These magnified close-ups that Stephan Hoerold took with his Canon 5D Mark II show lights on a building at night. The dark spots appear to the right of the very bright areas. The three shots show images taken at ISO 100, ISO 200, and ISO 3,200. Photo used with permission.

(Credit: Stephan Hoerold)

Here are the full release notes from Canon:

Canon's 5D Mark II SLR

Canon's 5D Mark II full-frame SLR

(Credit: Canon)

What has changed in Firmware Version 1.0.7?

It improves and mitigates the following image quality phenomena.

"Black dot" phenomenon (the right side of point light sources becomes black)

When shooting night scenes, the right side of point light sources (such as lights from building windows) may become black. The phenomenon may become visible if the images are enlarged to 100% or greater on a monitor or if extremely large prints of the images are made. This firmware improves and mitigates this phenomenon.

Vertical banding noise

If the recording format is set to sRAW1, vertical banding noise may become visible depending on the camera settings, subject, and background. The firmware improves and mitigates this phenomenon.

Why is it required to update the Digital Photo Professional and Picture Style Editor software?

If the existing software applications are used to display sRAW1 and sRAW2 images that were captured by a camera with Firmware Version 1.0.7, dark, low-contrast areas in the images may appear slightly magenta. If the updated software applications are used to display sRAW1 and sRAW2 images, the color of the images will appear normal, regardless of the camera firmware version.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Nikon app teaches photography on the fly
Smile! Flickr has an official iPhone app
Corel Digital Studio 2010 opens up to consumers
Adobe tests raw support for Olympus E-P1, new Nikons
Adobe's next Lightroom to forsake PowerPC Macs
How Flickr needs to change
Adobe kills low-end Photoshop, urges users online
Toshiba plans 64GB SDXC memory cards for 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by Travis Ernst January 8, 2009 7:32 AM PST
As your article pointed out, it is where there is a great contrast in light situations. Such as pictures of light displays at night when this tends to occur. Also setting the ISO to very high levels makes it more susceptible for that to happen.

Even mounting a light ND may help, or going faster shutter if you are operating in one of the manual modes and new to this level of camera. I found I don't have to use my ND's as much on the Canon as I did with the Sony, but I still have them, same thread size. Having the ND400 comes in handy when you do open shutter or lunar shots.

I still have the first 5D. It'll be a bit before I upgrade again.
Reply to this comment
by apmkel January 10, 2009 8:43 PM PST
I have a similar problem with a powershot A650. You can see the same thing here in these photos - http://www.liifedance.com/10photos.html.

I'm assuming that there is no fix for the lower end cameras? This happens when I shoot on the highest quality in the largest size on manual settings.

Thanks
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right