• On The Insider: Judge Bans Real Housewives Sex Tape
December 16, 2008 2:00 PM PST

Pentax's white SLR for Imperial stormtroopers

by Stephen Shankland
Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

(Credit: Pentax)

It can be hard to get your lower-end SLR to stand out in the crowd of options these days, which is doubtless why Pentax on Tuesday announced a white version of its entry-level K2000 SLR and two bundled lenses.

The "very limited edition" model comes with white versions of the smc DA L 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL and smc DA L 50-200mm F4-5.6 AL lenses beginning in February, Pentax said. The company won't announce prices until later, but the ordinary versions of those products cost about $800 today.

News.com Poll

Ugly or beautiful?
What do you think about the look of Pentax's limited-edition white K2000?

It's ugly
It's beautiful
Meh



View results

In the compact camera market, distinctive colors have proved a useful marketing tool, but I'm a crotchety curmudgeon who's generally scorns such superficial gimmicks.

So why do I find myself actually liking the look a little?

Maybe it's a Pavlov conditioning reaction that makes me salivate when I see Canon's distinctive but high-priced L-series telephoto lenses. Or maybe it's just because it's a different look. I don't care for the silver variants of Canon's Rebel line of entry-level SLRs.

There's something slightly whimsical about a white SLR studded with black buttons, eyecup, and hand grip. It reminded me of an Imperial stormtrooper from Star Wars. Or perhaps a ptarmigan in winter plumage. Or maybe James Bond's underwater-ready Lotus Esprit from The Spy Who Loved Me.

I don't think I'd buy it though. Aside from the premium pricing I'd expect with a "very limited edition" product, I'm not sure how well the white Pentax will hold up against wear and tear, though. The problem with getting something for its distinctive appearance is you're committed to keeping it looking good.

I included some more photos below. Do you think it's ugly or wondrous?

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

(Credit: Pentax)

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

(Credit: Pentax)

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

Pentax's limited-edition white K2000.

(Credit: Pentax)

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Yahoo enables twittering via Flickr
Olympus' compact E-P1: A breath of fresh air
Phase One to absorb high-end Kodak photo assets
Apple's new iPhone 3G S sports new camera, video
Apple update supports new Canon, Nikon SLRs
Canon 5D Mark II's manual video controls arrive
Manual video control coming to Canon 5D Mark II
Phase One takes lead in camera sensor test
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Penguinisto December 16, 2008 2:28 PM PST
Well... it could be useful for wildlife photography in the wintertime, I guess.

(otherwise, what's the point? any other lenses you'd have would kind of stand out like a sore (insert body part here). :)
Reply to this comment
by kelmon December 17, 2008 3:29 AM PST
In that respect, it's going to look like a reverse Canon when it has L series lenses mounted...
by Angry_Ginger December 16, 2008 3:31 PM PST
Its neat only when I think of a 'storm trooper' holding it in an advert. But imagine trying to find those lens to match it, uh no thanks. Agree with Penguinisto on the sore (insert body part here) comment.
Reply to this comment
by lk335 December 16, 2008 3:46 PM PST
So sexy! I love it!

I shoot with a K100D right now and the body failed on me this past week so I was looking to buy a replacement anyways.... i want!

but alas... for the price this will be...I'll buy a K20D instead.
Reply to this comment
by conquerors_choi December 16, 2008 9:56 PM PST
Unmarked ...

but whatever it contains functions, that would be not as much as others brand machine...maybe..
Reply to this comment
by djacobow1 December 17, 2008 11:00 AM PST
"Only Imperial Stormtroopers [focus accuracy] could be so precise."
Reply to this comment
by DigitalFrog December 17, 2008 12:11 PM PST
"These are not the SLRs we're looking for......Move along!"
Reply to this comment
by gonar_acosta December 30, 2008 9:52 PM PST
I want one.
no one else will
I'll find it in five years at goodwill where I got my k1000 and fall in love all over again.
everyone will loathe it
Reply to this comment
by wileypeter December 31, 2008 2:27 PM PST
What a terrible idea.

A) Your hands are all over it in all sorts of situations. Not only will it show dirt, it will attract dirt like nobody's business.

B) That thing is going to be a reflection nightmare. It won't matter if you're opposite a mirror, but a window? It's going to be a bright white beacon in any reflective surface available. I suppose Adobe should be happy about the additional Photoshop use, but I can't imagine it being a plus for anyone else.

A triumph of marketing over function. Well, maybe triumph is a strong word.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right