December 10, 2008 9:46 AM PST

New Canon SLR bumps Sony on sensor test

by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

The Canon 5D Mark II is the new fourth-place member of DxO Labs' test of image sensor scores.

The Canon 5D Mark II is the new fourth-place member of DxO Labs' test of image sensor scores.

(Credit: DxO Labs)

One verdict is in on Canon's EOS 5D Mark II: its sensor ranks very high on DxO Labs' test of sensor performance.

The black-spot issue notwithstanding, Canon's new full-frame SLR came in at fourth place with a score of 79.0, bumping Sony's 78.9-scoring Alpha A900 down a peg but still trailing Canon's top-end EOS-1Ds Mark III at 80.3. Nikon's D700, the closest rival to the 5D Mark II, is a notch ahead at 80.5.

More relevant for the potential upgrade market, new Canon SLR's score is significantly better from that of its predecessor, the 5D, whose score is 70.9. On a pixel-by-pixel basis, the 12.8-megapixel 5D's sensor actually has a lower signal-to-noise ratio, but when measured over an entire 8x10 print, the 5D Mark II's higher 21.1-megapixel resolution wins on that measurement.

The DxOMark Sensor test measures how well a camera's sensor fares when it comes to dynamic range, color depth, and low-light performance. The test doesn't measure any number of other camera issues such as autofocus, value, or image processing. But it's still useful given DxO Labs' engineering rigor and the central role a sensor plays in the abilities of a camera.

Pixel-peepers have been devouring DxO's new statistics; the curious can try this link to a comparison of the 5D Mark II, Nikon D700, and Sony A900. However, it should be noted, DxO Labs considers that scores must be at least of 5 points apart to be significant.

There's been much discussion about whether the $2,700 5D Mark II performs better than the $6,500 1Ds Mark III, which has the same resolution. The DxOMark tests give the edge to the top-end model based on its better color and dynamic range--the ability to capture both bright and dark regions--but the 5D Mark II wins out in low-light performance. Digging deeper into the charts, though, the 5D Mark II fares better in dynamic range at higher ISOs.

The sensor on Canon's 5D Mark II fares significantly better than that on the 5D.

The sensor on Canon's 5D Mark II fares significantly better than that on the 5D. (Click to enlarge.)

(Credit: DxO Labs)

All these cameras perform better than the common herd by virtue of full-frame sensors measuring 36x24mm, the size of a full frame of 35mm film. Most digital SLRs have a smaller sensor that can't capture as much information overall, but those models are vastly more affordable.

Black spots?
Not all is well, though, among 5D Mark II photographers. Some have found an issue where the camera produces dark spots immediately to the right of extremely bright areas. Though the spots aren't obvious from a distance, photographers accustomed to having their shots scrutinized by the reviewers at microstock sites have expressed worries that iStockphoto, for example, will reject the shots.

Some examples are visible on photos published by Stephan Hoerold, for example, when viewed close up; Andrew Yip also published examples. And his shots showed them despite having several image processing options turned off, which an earlier report said worked around the problem.

Two iStockphoto forum discussions have sprung up about the black spot issue, too. "I cancelled my pre-order with WolfCamera yesterday and I sent Canon an email telling them why. I don't want to deal with the hassle of getting a camera just to have to ship it back for repairs," wrote user swilmor in one forum post. "Kind of stinks because I was really looking forward to getting it so I can start submitting to Getty."

It also appears a similar problem afflicted an earlier high-end Canon SLR, the 1D Mark IIN, according to images posted in 2007 at the Fred Miranda forums.

(Via Adorama)

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Nikon app teaches photography on the fly
Smile! Flickr has an official iPhone app
Corel Digital Studio 2010 opens up to consumers
Adobe tests raw support for Olympus E-P1, new Nikons
Adobe's next Lightroom to forsake PowerPC Macs
How Flickr needs to change
Adobe kills low-end Photoshop, urges users online
Toshiba plans 64GB SDXC memory cards for 2010
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right