January 22, 2008 1:45 PM PST

Apple posts nice Q1, but pessimistic on Q2

by Tom Krazit
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 36 comments

Updated at 3:45 p.m. PST following the conference call, with changes throughout.

Apple's first quarter hit on all cylinders, as the company continued its financial run on the strength of its Mac business. But anyone looking for reassurance about the overall health of the economy later this year didn't get it from Apple.

The company posted revenue Tuesday of $9.6 billion for its first fiscal quarter, which ended December 29. That's better than the $9.5 billion expected by financial analysts, and Apple also gave them good news with its earnings-per-share number of $1.76, better than expectations of $1.62 per share. That translates to net income of $1.6 billion, up 58 percent from last year.

Mac sales were up 44 percent compared with last year, as Apple continued its resurgence in personal computers. But investors will wonder if the iPod gravy train is coming to an end, as Apple's iPod sales of 22.1 million iPods was well below Wall Street expectations of 24.7 million. That's just 5 percent unit growth compared with last year, but iPod revenue was up 17 percent, so perhaps Apple sold more high-end iPod Touches than iPod Nanos or Shuffles as a percentage of its mix during the quarter.

Apple executives supported that argument during a conference call with financial analysts after the release of the company's earnings. Apple gained iPod share internationally, but iPod units sales in the U.S. were flat, said Tim Cook, Apple's chief operating officer.

While not specifically addressing the missed Wall Street target for iPod unit sales, Cook did say that iPod unit sales met the company's own expectations. And the iPod Touch is off to a good start, he said, which accounted for overall iPod revenue growth that matched last year's first-quarter revenue growth.

"This was the most expensive iPod we've introduced in some time," said Peter Oppenheimer, Apple's CFO. The company thinks the iPod Touch really belongs in a different category than the broader music player market, saying the iPod Touch has a chance to "become the first mainstream mobile Wi-Fi platform." Nintendo and Sony might have minor quibbles with that statement, but Oppenheimer's point was that you can't necessarily use years of iPod sales to chart the progress of the iPod Touch.

On the Mac front, Apple enjoyed another spectacular quarter, with Mac unit growth of 44 percent and revenue growth of 47 percent compared with last year. "The Mac business is on fire," Cook said, and the increases were led primarily by the new iMac desktops Apple introduced last August. Apple estimates that 19 percent of the Mac installed base is running Leopard, Mac OS X 10.5, and Leopard generated $170 million in revenue for Apple during the first quarter it went on sale, compared with the $100 million that Tiger, Mac OS X 10.4, generated for Apple in 2005.

CEO Steve Jobs already tipped the company's hand on iPhone shipments at Macworld, noting that Apple had sold 4 million iPhones as of his keynote speech. Apple sold 2.3 million iPhones during its first quarter, and Cook reiterated Apple's goal of shipping 10 million units during 2008.

In other business, Apple plans to double the number of Best Buy stores that are selling Macs within the next six months, going past an analyst prediction earlier this month that it would pull that off by early 2009. Apple sold 504,000 Macs through its own retail stores, up 64 percent from last year's first quarter, and just like last quarter, 50 percent of those buyers were new to the Mac, Cook said.

All in all, it adds up to a very solid first quarter for Apple. Even the disappointing iPod sales sold had a silver lining, since Apple took in 17 percent more revenue on only 5 percent unit growth. But the guidance will not help assuage a shaky stock market.

Apple is notorious for providing conservative guidance below Wall Street's expectations, but it guided well below expectations with predictions of $6.8 billion and 94 cents a share. Lots of companies would kill for that kind of performance, but Wall Street wanted more of Apple, with expectations of $7 billion in revenue and earnings per share of $1.09.

Analysts asked several times whether Apple foresaw a slower second quarter based on the economic environment, and perhaps wisely, Oppenheimer declined to attach his name to a negative forecast that could send stocks plunging Wednesday.

"We'll leave the economic forecasting to others. I am confident in our business, our strategy, and our products," Oppenheimer said. He may be right to be confident, but if average consumers pull back substantially on their spending, we're all going to feel it. Apple shares fell 11 percent in after-hours trading.

Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
Recent posts from Apple
Ex-Googler Lee sees Apple tablet debut in January
Apple misses its mark on Windows 7 Boot Camp support
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Apple wins appeal in earbud hearing-loss lawsuit
Aha! It's the iGuide, not iSlate--maybe
Nokia hits Apple with latest patent complaint
Analyst: Apps the secret to Apple's tablet success
AT&T resumes online iPhone sales in NY
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (36 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Officially beleaguered yet?
by lkrupp January 22, 2008 2:49 PM PST
Let's see. Apple has just reported on its most fabulous quarter ever
in the history of the company. Apple has about $18 billion in cash
in the bank. The whole country is panicking about a possible
recession and the stock market is tanking.

Yep, I'd say Apple is officially a beleaguered company once again.
Let's start the death-spiral countdown clock again shall we.
Reply to this comment
Yes, but
by Lee in San Diego January 22, 2008 2:57 PM PST
Other tech companies were beleaguered first, are cheaper, and
come with an FM tuner. :)
Apple Stock: from $202.96 to $136.70
by john55440 January 22, 2008 3:22 PM PST
According to Bloomberg, Apple's stock went from a 52-week high of (12/27/07) $202.96, to $136.70 in today's after hours extended trading.
Reply to this comment
Point?
by drhamad January 22, 2008 4:55 PM PST
?
So did everyone else's, nice try
by technewsjunkie January 22, 2008 5:59 PM PST
Get a life.
View reply
How about other tech stocks?
by afterhours January 22, 2008 8:21 PM PST
Over the same period, Intel went from $27 to $19. I can't imagine anyone who gambles on stock really has a handle on what companies have longevity. The Market is a reactionary force, not a proactive prognosticator. They on Wall Street are betting folks, not people who make stuff. Yawn on your assessment.
...and in other news:
by Penguinisto January 25, 2008 9:53 AM PST
http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2008/01/23/microsoft-bear-argument.aspx

From the article:
"[i]Despite the hubbub over Vista's features, revenue inched just 15% higher in fiscal 2007. The company is guiding investors to expect a 15% to 17% advance this fiscal year. Then that's all she wrote -- make that all she coded -- for Microsoft. Analysts expect the top line to inch just 10% higher next year."[/i]

...and yet MSFT gets rewarded by Wall Street.

Meanwhile, we have Apple kicking arse and playing it safe in their predictions (only roughly twice the percentage rate of growth that MSFT is predicting), but they get punished for it.

Ain't that just a kick in the pants?

Personally, I'll put money on Apple... they have the brighter future of the two corps.

/P
Geesh
by Nodack January 22, 2008 3:23 PM PST
Apple totally kicked butt and had another record quarter so of course the stock is tanking
right? :)

The stock market does look scary right now. Apple is covering their butts with the second
quarter predictions. It's hard to believe so many people are freaking out this bad though. Of
course the quarter after Christmas is going to be slower. That goes without saying, but aapl
at $137 in after hours trading? Down $60 in a month when the company is looking the best it
has ever looked?

I guess it makes sense. I wish I would have sold at $200 so I could pick it up again now at a
bargain.
Reply to this comment
Pessimistic?
by sbwinn January 22, 2008 3:28 PM PST
In other words . . . gloomy, negative, defeatist, downbeat,
cynical, bleak, fatalistic, dark, despairing, despondent,
depressed, hopeless.

That's not what I got at all. Their numbers are always down
from Quarter 1 to Quarter 2. Note: Q1 = Christmas. In the last
two years their revenue has dropped 73% and 75% between from
Q1 to Q2. This year they are projecting 70%.

Their products set the standard in their categories. They have
entered established markets and eaten everyone else's lunch.
They are poised to do amazing things in mobile computing.
Pessimistic hardly seems like the right word.
Reply to this comment
Agreed - that is not pessimistic
by drhamad January 22, 2008 4:53 PM PST
I don't quite get the article title either. They're projecting strong
Q2 revenues...
View reply
How can Apple's success continue?
by www.hdgreetings.com January 22, 2008 4:29 PM PST
Apple has released a string of products with design, execution, and branding so good it's magical.

The thing is how long can they continue to release products that no one exceeds?

Even the legendary quality advantage of Toyota is getting narrower and narrower compared to American cars, and that was a huge gap at one point.

It's hard to imaging it could last another 20 years.
Reply to this comment
Good points
by Lee in San Diego January 22, 2008 5:27 PM PST
n/t
Patents
by MaLvaDo39 January 22, 2008 7:30 PM PST
Others can catch up on quality, but not on innovation if patents
are in place.

That's how-
And who has caught Toyota?
by afterhours January 22, 2008 8:03 PM PST
Nice analogy. I'm curious what products you would consider have caught Toyota. I'd rather drive a 4runner than a Hummer, a Camry hybrid than a... wait, what GM or Ford or Chrysler product would you suggest I drive compared to that?

The Mac hardware is superior to most. Not necessarily all -- but most PCs I've had the pleasure or displeasure of owning. Alienware -- maybe, but I'm not a gamer or looking for neon accent lighting in my computer.

The Mac OS continues to prove its resiliance. Far less concern about security. Not bulletproof as shown by even Mac morons that download sketchy sw, but there's morons under any rock. And many orders of magnitude less threats overall.

Yes, the WinFanBois will wet themselves thinking a Mac might suck -- but they generally are speaking from a lack of experience. The MacFanBois -- they do have better kit, but it's just a freakin' adding machine. Pity one has to tear down anything good in this culture of cynics. The Mac is overall a better experience - and Apple will just have to live through another 20 years of dire predictions about their fate, eh?
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
by Nicholas Buenk January 22, 2008 9:37 PM PST
Said by the famous Alan Kay of xerox parc, it is something that
apple tries to follow. This is why they can continue to be
successful.
View reply
For as Long as....
by RompStar_420 January 23, 2008 9:04 AM PST
Steve Jobs continues to smoke my creation:

Rompstar - Romberry x Peak19 x Trainwreck x SweetTooth

lol
How can Apple's success continue?
by alfred_bowman January 23, 2008 9:08 AM PST
Here's a difference - Toyota cars aren't designed by Microsoft.
Toyota
by alegr January 23, 2008 2:45 PM PST
Looks like Toyota quality is getting worse because they started producing their cars in the US...
Q@
by scweezil January 22, 2008 5:20 PM PST
They are still projecting 37% higher than Q2 of last years...I'd call
that growth.
Reply to this comment
Irrational markets
by hardmanb January 22, 2008 5:53 PM PST
Apples entire product ecosystem is in place, and growing sales and revenue. 2008 will see much more introduction into other countries, and foreign sales and revenue growth are the best insurance against a recessionary US Market.

If the market thinks (steadily growing, cash-rich and debt-free) Apple should be downgraded, what will they think about the others? Especially those with major problems like Sprint, Motorola, Palm. 2008 looks bloody for Tech stocks.
Reply to this comment
I agree...
by slickuser January 22, 2008 7:26 PM PST
market is full of morons who react with panic...
technical damage to lot of good stocks like AAPL, INTC is not fair!
Sprint... Motorola... Microsoft
by jessiethe3rd January 24, 2008 3:40 PM PST
Sprint - laying off people
Motorola - bad bad earnings
Microsoft - earnings up - outlook good
Half Empty?
by wethackrey January 22, 2008 8:12 PM PST
You wonder why we're sliding into in a recession? It is, no small measure, due to guys like Tom Krazit who label Apple's Q1 as simply "nice" and their Q2 forecast and guidance as "pessimestic". $6.8 Billion in revenue is hardly "pessimestic", no matter what the "what have you done for me lately" Wall Street types expect.

Let's be sure to also point out that Apple's iPod sales of "only" 22.1 million was "disappointing" and downplay the fact that iPod revenue was actually UP by 17 percent. Somehow this is a bad thing. It would be better, I guess, to have to sell more units to make less money.

As a Mac and iPhone user, I'm plenty happy with Apple. And as an Apple investor who bought at under $30 BEFORE THE SPLIT, I'm plenty happy as well.
Reply to this comment
I agree...
by slickuser January 22, 2008 9:42 PM PST
News titles like this here in news.com and in reuters scare investors who are stupid to react in panic. They don't see the big picture...

Recession is happening due to media not because of bad economy.

BAN all the news about recession and ban CNBC for 3 months. Economy will be back to normal...
"You wonder why we're sliding into in a recession? "
by ralfthedog January 23, 2008 11:33 AM PST
The reason for the recession is debt. The planned stimulus package might feel good, (From what I understand a shot of heroine feels good for a bit) All it will do is get more Americans buy more cheep garbage from China.

If we want a stimulus package that will work, We need some kind of a federal matching fund for people who pay off debt. If your minimum payment on your credit card is $100 and you pay $600 the government matches your payment by $500. Matching should be even better (x1.2?) for mortgages.

I don't like the idea of adding to the national debt, however this would trade $1 of national debt for reducing $2 or more of American debt.
View reply
More Half Empty
by wethackrey January 23, 2008 4:45 AM PST
To reinforce my earlier point, Nick Wingfield, writing in the Wall Street Journal, chimed in with more of this "the glass is half empty" nonsense. He leads with "Apple Inc.'s shares sank after the company issued a tepid outlook, stoking worries that sales of its gadgets may suffer from a weakening economy." This despite Apple specifically stating that they would "leave the economic forecasting to others". A "tepid" outlook. Wingfield should be so lucky as to have a Q2 as "tepid" as Apple's.
Reply to this comment
Stock: Apple Down 18% today vs MS down 2% today
by john55440 January 23, 2008 10:17 AM PST
Apple stock is falling much faster/farther than the market as a whole, or other tech companies

Right now, Apple stock is down 18%, for today alone. In contrast, Microsoft stock is "only" down 2% for the day. (Source: Bloomberg.)
Reply to this comment
Who cares?
by His SHadow January 23, 2008 10:55 AM PST
Microsoft's stock has done nothing for what, 5 years? It's moribund. Apple is changing the face of personal computing at all levels and Microsoft gives us a projector hidden in a table and an annoying shopping cart, all the while charging a 900% markup on software that hasn't done anything interesting in 10 years. Nobody cares what Microsoft is doing.
excellent!
by ralfthedog January 23, 2008 11:40 AM PST
When a good stock goes down, that is called a buying opportunity. People who make money in the stock market buy for the long term. Most people who play short term would do better putting a $20 into the shredder hoping it will turn into a $100.

The only problem I have with Apple is the P/E ratio (Not that bad) and the fact that it does not pay a dividend.
Marketing Expenses versus R&D
by sanenazok January 23, 2008 1:00 PM PST
What's Apple? By FAR their biggest expense is marketing:
R&D = 246 mil
Marketing = 960 mil
In all honesty, they have some nice ads. Apparently they have nearly a billion dollars worth of ads.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000119312508009715/0001193125-08-009715.txt
Reply to this comment
After todays earning and forecast annoucement...
by jessiethe3rd January 24, 2008 2:23 PM PST
You'll see what's going up. BTW - you have got to be living under Apple's manufacturing rock to not know that Microsoft has released more applications over the last 2 years then in the history of the company. Microsoft doesn't make computers moron - they make software... yeah it's not flashy... yeah it's not as beautiful - but let's remember - they make software.

When they do make hardware they do a darn good job of it - see Xbox 360 (version 2 xbox) has been clubbing the competition pretty well since its release.

Apple's number one application by a secondary vendor... guess what it is? No - it's not Open Office - it's Microsoft Office. Microsoft is kicking ass and taking names in the corporate sector - stealing away business from the likes of IBM and Oracle as they shuffle out low cost software.

Sorry man - your comments just don't make any sense.
Reply to this comment
New information about future Apple technology.
by ralfthedog January 25, 2008 12:22 AM PST
I have just found out from an inside source that the next version of the iPhone will incorporate anti positron technology. This is a very reliable source and I am 100% sure that it is true.
Reply to this comment
(36 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right