OLPC, Microsoft working on dual-boot XO laptop
Apparently Nick Negroponte is willing to work with some huge powerful corporations whose interests compete with his own.
Negroponte told IDG News Service Wednesday that the OLPC project is working with Microsoft on a version of the XO laptop that would be capable of booting either Linux--the current OS--or Windows. It appears the two organizations are shooting for something like Apple's Boot Camp: not true virtualization, but the ability to boot either operating system depending on the applications you'd need to run.
Nigerian students check out their XO laptops, which might soon run Windows and Linux.
(Credit: Khaled Hassounah)This could help the OLPC address some of the reasons why a few governments have spurned its XO laptop in favor of Intel's Classmate, which runs either Linux or Windows, but not in dual-boot fashion. While the XO's design is certainly innovative compared to many of the other options out there, the support model is not. XO customers are essentially responsible for supporting the product themselves, and some governments haven't wanted to snap up an unproven technology product with the additional support burden.
Microsoft and the OLPC have been talking for months about getting Windows to run on the XO laptop, but until now the discussion had appeared to indicate that project would result in two different XOs, a Linux one and a Windows one. A dual-boot XO is an entirely different prospect altogether, one that might require additional processing power, storage, memory, or all three.
The news comes less than a week after the bitter divorce between the OLPC and Intel over Intel's Classmate PC. The OLPC wants Intel to stop selling in the same markets in which the OLPC--equipped with an AMD processor--is being promoted.
Microsoft has also derided the OLPC in the past, preferring to focus on its Windows Starter Edition product or an entirely different notion of bringing computing to the developing world on cell phones. Just this week at CES, Bill Gates said "OLPC hasn't done that well. We're in literally over 100 countries with special versions of Windows, including Starter Edition. OLPC is nowhere compared to where we are on this thing."
Who knows whether this is another marriage doomed from the start, but give Negroponte credit for recognizing the need for Windows on the XO. Like it or not, it's a Windows-dominated world, and pretending that developing nations won't want access to the huge library of Windows applications out there isn't really serving their needs.
And a dual-boot solution is an elegant way of supporting both operating systems without forcing one or the other on the user. I wonder if a dual-boot XO would require beefier hardware, and therefore nudge that cost up a little more, but it's unclear right now what type of performance requirements we'd be looking at with this version of Windows.
Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom. 





Nick Negroponte, why don't you load emacs, over engineered KDE/Gnome etc. Thats what children need!
Nick Negroponte should shutup and try to work with Intel instead of bad mouthing Intel every day
2) emacs? Everyone knows that vi is better. ;)
3) Children need stimulation and challenge. They are also, by and large, smart enough to explore and learn things that were once the exclusive domain of adults.
4) If he wants to rig it so that it runs Windows, so what? MSFT isn't going to be making any real profit off the deal (the economics of XO dictate that they really can't), and quite frankly, the system requirements can't really go up to the point where XP would be even halfway usable, at least not without meeting or exceeding the cost of a Classmate PC...
If OLPC does this, then it's either-or, and OLPC would have less of a claim towards being a superior solution (basically, mesh networking and power efficiency would be all they'd have left, compared to the Classmate's color screen and a standard (Linux or Windows) UI).
/P
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kool_skatkat/
Meh, I know it's terrible, but some part of me really doesn't want third-worlders with computers.
Granted I see nothing wrong with education the poor and such, but a part of me just knows some of them are going to be offering me these great opportunities to move countless millions to offshore bank accounts.
Most of them just want to improve the conditions they live in. Is that too much to ask of you to approve of, perhaps?
/P
Third world does not mean starvation.
* how to build clean water wells
* how to perform basic first aid and medical care in a remote area
* how to build safe sanitation facilities
* how to generate electricity without stringing 400 miles of heavy copper cable
* how to make homes more energy efficient with basic tools and techniques
Meanwhile, these same laptops can contain educational subjects that would be otherwise impossible to get access to in a remote area with few teachers, let alone any who specialize in science, math, etc.
After awhile, you may just end up with people smart enough to pull themselves out of grinding poverty.
/P
computer since its design (1gb ram) isn't enough to support
Windows.
And the result of this added cost will be the addition of the world's
most hacked operating system? Doesn't seem worth it to me.
They could load it with Edubuntu or Xubuntu (which requires less resources).
Hasn't failed me, I just use the Ubuntu Server.
As for a dual-boot Windows - is Microsoft going to give away Windows for free for the XO? And if it's going to be embedded XP, isn't that going to be obsolete soon? So we might have a software cost increase, a definite hardware cost increase and I see a "$300" XO on the horizon :-( Dual-booting doubles the support nightmare for the XO and really makes zero sense to me. It's exactly why never see any laptop/desktop sold as dual boot - the support issues just become overwhelming.
/P
Even if OS/2 could already do everything the Linux version could do, adding it would be stupid.
XO has been a failure so far, but I bet there's more XO's running Linux than computers running OS/2.
OS2 is virtually dead now. It's not like you can run down to Office Depot or Staples and buy OS/2K8... heck, for that matter, I don't think it's been for sale this decade has it?
This system isn't targeted at what you vastly refer to as the "developing nations." It's targeted at kids in the least developed nations.
At the moment, we continue to live by a Windows-dominated world, but I doubt this will last for long. Insofar as the "huge .... Windows applications out there," the world's already proven that it can well do without app's like Microsoft Office (Open Office part of Ubuntu d/l is just fine) or Windows Media Player (VLC part of Ubuntu d/l is just fine). What other Windows app's did you have in mind that the developing world can't do without? Go ahead and let's discuss garbage like Windows Live Messenger, Outlook Express, really, the list of broken garbage is endless and we all can happily live without it.
Not just kids in these nations.
But really, if computing for these kids were all so important to Bill and Melinda personally, why not give away Vista Starter Basic Home whatever you're calling it this week? Ship it with a stripped box including a stripped Intel processor. And if your colleagues at Intel can't provide it, shop around like the rest of us. There are others out there that are just as good - some would say better.
Linux.
* OLPC's former CTO announced yesterday that she is setting up
a for-profit organization to make a $75 laptop for developing
nations.
[i]"If XO-class laptops do spread Windows, start buying anti-
virus companies stocks."[/i]
I have a better idea - do that, and while you're at it buy a Mac.
Or install Linux. That way you won't have to worry so much
about it.
Meanwhile, let's bring in the developing countries into the
computing world anyway. We can always use more engineers
and scientists. :)
/P
This is completely understandable; and. not unexpected.
Why do we have to forcefeed Windows on people when Linux is perfectly adequate and free?
It makes no cents...
Meanwhile the FUD machine is going to be going full blast, and so will the bribery machine.
- by mikemikef August 22, 2008 7:22 PM PDT
- 1. Some kids need to advance beyond survival.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(44 Comments)2. There are too many free windows programs on the net to pass up.