Rock bottom for Palm and Hawkins?
Suddenly, it seems even more fitting that a company called Elevation Partners recently took a stake in Palm.
This might be rock bottom for the storied mobile-computing company. The decision to cancel the Foleo even before letting people get their hands on it is an embarrassing admission that Palm's vision of the computing world is way off base from the rest of the world, and it's a black mark on the otherwise stellar career of Palm founder Jeff Hawkins.
It's hard to dump too much on Hawkins. The man invented the Palm Pilot and the Treo. I once invented a novel method of stacking beer cans in a fridge (the key is not to buy any food). But after Hawkins unveiled the Foleo at the D: All Things Digital conference--arguably the most prestigious gathering of the computing elite--with proclamations like "it's the best idea I've ever had" and "the most exciting product I have ever worked on"--Palm's decision to cancel it without even a product launch must be mortifying for Hawkins.
Now, Hawkins has his own company, Numenta, which is trying to develop a computer that works like the human brain. If he pulls that off, we'll forget all about the Foleo.
But what is Palm going to do? Speaking of mortifying, Ed Colligan must be wondering why he gave Hawkins $10 million to go down into the basement and come up with Palm's Next Big Thing, only to emerge with the Foleo. Almost universally panned by analysts and bloggers, the Foleo was a lightweight Linux "mobile companion" that was designed to read e-mail, but didn't work with corporate e-mail software from RIM or Motorola, among a multitude of other sins.
Palm founder Jeff Hawkins (right) shows The Wall Street Journal's Walt Mossberg the Foleo, canceled Tuesday by Palm.
(Credit: CNET Networks)Palm has squandered its position in the mobile-computing world by failing to improve its operating system since 2004, come up with a noticeably different Treo since the Treo 600, or clearly articulate any vision of where the company thinks smart phone development is headed. The company wisely hooked up with Microsoft to ship Windows Mobile Treos, otherwise this post might have been written a year ago. But it has watched companies like Motorola, RIM, LG, Nokia and even Apple pass it by while it tried to make its biggest splash of the year with a product canceled just three months later. Imagine the reaction if Apple had canceled the iPhone in April.
Jack Gold of market research firm J. Gold Associates thinks Elevation Partners is starting to throw its weight around a little. "Hopefully they are coming in and cracking the whip and making them do the right thing," he wrote in a research note distributed Tuesday. After all, Palm clearly still hasn't found what it's looking for.
Palm also announced Tuesday that Bruce Dunlevie of Benchmark Partners is resigning from Palm's board, while Scott Mercer will stay. Mercer was going to resign from the board to make way for Fred Anderson and Roger McNamee of Elevation Partners, but now Dunlevie (who's also on the board at Numenta) is out. Anderson and McNamee haven't formally assumed their positions yet as the deal hasn't formally closed, but perhaps their impact is already starting to be felt.
While it's embarrassing, Colligan made the right decision. You've got to know when to fold them, and the Foleo wasn't going to beat anything better than a pair of sixes.
You're supposed to have an intervention after the downtrodden hits rock bottom, but Colligan's moment of clarity could still allow Palm to recapture some of its past glory.
However, Palm better think long and hard before the next time it tells people it's about to change the world of mobile computing. The company is in danger of watching a category it helped create leave it in the dust.
Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
created QuickDraw) indicates Numenta is working on some great
ideas.
To address your post, they're working on a way of computing that
accesses and stores information like the brain; by reference, using
few resources, and long-term. But I guess you just wanted to make
a snarky post, and you've succeeded in that by completely missing
the point and citing emotions, not qualities of the human brain.
The company's ability to exploit those breakthrough has come to an end. For Palm to regain primacy in the product and market space, it needs to use cutting-edge technologies out there today to develop either a new form factor or a new interface or both, for an infomation-entertainment device.
It also needs to take a new in-depth read of the market and place itself firmly into a segment that it can recapture. Should it go for the business segment or the entertainment segment?
The iPhone is a phenomenal piece of technology, but it is far from perfect. It is weak as a PIM with integrated functions. Its tie to AT&T for the next two years puts a world-class piece of hardware together with a less-than-worldclass content delivery platform.
So Palm has areas it can exploit. But a "pPhone" won't do it. Palm needs to up the ante with a new breakthrough device that will push the game beyond the admittedly impressive level that Apple has created.
This is Palm's challenge. Is Hawkins up to it? I doubt it. Palm needs new blood with new ideas in the design function.
Treos are too big to be phones and too small to be useful PDAs. I wouldn't want a screen any smaller than I have on my T|X and I would certainly want no lower resolution. Perhaps Palm would do well to ignore phones and focus on PDAs that play well with phones from other vendors and add value in the process. Then, they'd get out of the competitive phone business and provide something useful to those like me.
A truly useful advance in the PDA market would involve a dramatically better OS and a UI more like one finds on the Mac. That is, let the OS and hardware handle most of the UI functionality and make it easy for the software to look good and do the right things.
Sadly, I don't know whether any of those things are possible now as the Windows juggernaut holds so much sway with developers and Blackberries have gained so much usable business functionality.
I don't know what I'm going to do when my T|X dies. Perhaps I need to lay in a stock of them now....
In other words, the implementation was killed, not the vision.
Instant On: insanely good. I would almost buy one just for that.
Can't sync my Palm to it: bad. Although, if it would do everything my Palm E2 does, so I could switch to using it instead: good.
Bluetooth & WiFi: good.
Price: seemed a bit expensive for what you get.
Size & form factor: very good
I forget how the Foleo is powered, but AA batteries (NiMH) would be good. At least as an alternative, or an add-on auxiliary power source.
--
Fix the bad, and keep the good, and it will do as well as the Palm Pilot did. Sascha Segan's recent PC Mag article (search for "four pillars") articulates this well.
Maybe they should concentrate on their core and build a better Treo phone...I have been waiting for one with built in GPS capabilities for months, My Motorola phone works perfectly as a GPS device. Even RIM has a Blackberry now that will do that, and good old Palm is still hanging out there with a "dumb" smart phone.
Get with it dudes!
Keys: Bigger
Screen: Brighter
Size: smaller
Style: sleeker
Price: cheaper
Then Palm might have a chance for profitability
So what if the Folio died? It's coming out with a lot of new ideas to see which ones takes that's going to make this company. They can't just keep slinking along.
Looks like you jumped the gun on Sept. 4th.
It is now Sept. 6th and HP just announced a new line of iPaqs and
Apple just announced that the iPhone can be had for $399.
NOW Palm has hit rock bottom.
Good night, and sweet dreams Palm.
recently as five years ago I still had semi-high hopes for Palm
getting off its collective backsides and doing something to
reinsert itself into this nitch, and now - thanks to Apple et. al. -
all of a sudden, fast growing segment of the computing market
place.
It seems it was back in the mid '90s, after "partnering" with
Microsoft, that Palm enjoyed a sudden and quick (as in short-
lived) burst of industrial creativity, then they just kept sinking
slowly and surely toward obscurity. They've already been
railroaded and no one seems to really feel it, not even Palm.
Of course you never know, but I stopped holding my breath a
couple of years ago. Up until now Palm has not even had any
real competition, (maybe that's the problem), and what did they
choose to do with that time? ...squander it away. What a shame.
Bye Palm.
iMac. If Palm could come out with something like an iPod touch at
the SAME price, with WiFi, browser, email, the usual PDA apps but
mure usable, a similar killer interface without tons of buttons and
supporting 3rd parth applications, they might be able to pull a
great comeback. If they don't do it soon and Apple wakes up first
and adds the PDA stuff to the iPod, Palm will be the first Edsel of
the 21st century.
My feeling is that Palm has an issue with life cycles of the new products (such as LifeDrive and Zire ). Support is minimal. Updates for pressing software issues as in the case of LifeDrive are not forthcoming.When I write to Palm, I get the impression of a total lack of will to improve the service and the products.
Therefore, my next products will be Windows-based products.
This is written with great sorrow as the third party developers have some very good products and they are let down by Palm.
- Foleo A tough portable.
-
by kjim9
September 7, 2007 9:29 AM PDT
- I was looking forward to the Foleo and wanted one. I was planning on upgrading it with flash drive and/or cracking the case to add memory. It looked to be a tough small laptop without a moving hard disk. Of course, I use linux and linux doesn;t scare me. With the extra memory applications could be added as needed.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(23 Comments)Jim K