November 9, 2009 4:20 PM PST

Apple updates Mac OS X Snow Leopard

by Jim Dalrymple
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 91 comments

Apple on Monday released an update for Mac OS X Snow Leopard, bringing the current version to 10.6.2.

(Credit: Apple)

An important issue that caused data to be deleted when using a guest account has been fixed, according to Apple. While the bug didn't affect all users, it was widespread enough to cause concerns for users over the past couple of weeks.

In addition to fixing a number of security issues, Mac OS X 10.6.2 also addresses 14 problems found in the operating system, including an issue that caused some users to be logged out of their systems unexpectedly.

If you use Exchange contacts, you'll be pleased to know that your Spotlight searches will now show those contacts in the results. Setting up an Exchange server shouldn't cause Apple's Mail app to crash with the new version.

The update also includes what Apple calls "general stability improvements" for iWork, iLife, Aperture, Final Cut Studio, MobileMe, and iDisk.

Apple also updated Mac OS X Leopard Server to version 10.6.2, addressing issues with the company's server product.

The server update fixed problems with adding and removing imported users in Server Preferences, syncing content using a Portable Home Directory, and filtering incoming mail messages.

Other issues fixed with the server version include creating images using Apple's System Image Utility and automating the installation of NetRestore images.

Mac OS X 10.6.2 client and server are available as free updates from Apple's Web site.

Jim Dalrymple has followed Apple and the Mac industry for the last 15 years, first as part of MacCentral and then in various positions at Macworld. Jim also writes about the professional audio market, examining the best ways to record music using a Macintosh. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. He currently runs The Loop. You can follow him on Twitter @jdalrymple.
Recent posts from Apple
Ex-Googler Lee sees Apple tablet debut in January
Apple misses its mark on Windows 7 Boot Camp support
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Apple wins appeal in earbud hearing-loss lawsuit
Aha! It's the iGuide, not iSlate--maybe
Nokia hits Apple with latest patent complaint
Analyst: Apps the secret to Apple's tablet success
AT&T resumes online iPhone sales in NY
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (91 Comments)
by snigglepop November 9, 2009 4:43 PM PST
I hope it fixes the kernel panics that randomly bring down my system about 3-4 times a week since i installed snow leopard. Unfortunately the release notes don't indicate it does, I guess I'll see if they go away.
Reply to this comment
by bonesbautista November 9, 2009 5:15 PM PST
@spop, I haven't had any issues with SL, but used to with Leopard from time to time. Try booting into your Mac with a Safe Boot, which includes a disk check/repair and directory repair - I haven't had one problem since I started using a Safe Boot once every two weeks. Couple of other standard Mac tips - Repair the Permissions with Disk Utility, and be sure to leave your Mac on over a few Sunday nights so the OS can run its daily/weekly/scripts (or use a utility like Onyx and have it run the scripts for you). My last kernel panic led me to learning a bit more about how to keep my Macs running perfectly - not one problem since.
by rationalreview November 9, 2009 5:19 PM PST
Every Mac OS in history has required a lot of little maintenance tricks in them that will keep them up and running without the big failures they are known for. Just take the little time to do them and you'll be happier for sure.
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 9, 2009 5:23 PM PST
there was something about fixes for the kernel.
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 9, 2009 5:25 PM PST
@bb
surprised u had to do those things.
only use safe boot when having problems doing normal boot.
repair permissions occasionally
have to admit permissions are the one annoying maintenance thing for macs.
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 9, 2009 5:26 PM PST
though ive never done it (the repair permissions).
by NeverFade November 9, 2009 6:05 PM PST
@ snigglepop

Yes, your memory could very well be going bad. Did you buy 3rd party ram, or was in the ram that came with the machine. 3rd party has a tendency to do this, and I would very much believe that it is a memory problem to be doing this. Take out ram, and do the trial and error until you find the set that is causing the problem.
by Maclover1 November 9, 2009 6:28 PM PST
I own three Macs after leaving Windows in Oct of 2007. With Leopard and Snow Leopard I have NEVER booted into safe mode. I have run the permission repair only once to see what it does.

If you have to go into safe mode once every two weeks then you have a hardware problem.
by catch23 November 9, 2009 6:54 PM PST
@Maclover1
Ah, yes. Every problem with a Windows box is proof positive MS sucks, every problem with an Apple box is proof positive the user has done something wrong or the problem isn't with the OS.
I'm sure the users deleted those files with the bug they fixed...

As long as you can move the goal posts where ever you want, Apple looks nice, doesn't it?
by BingItOn November 9, 2009 7:33 PM PST
@catch23
Well said. 10.6.2 is just a SP for SP called SL.
by websterphreaky November 9, 2009 8:05 PM PST
Geez, KERNEL PANICS???!!! On OS X .... Snow Leo Pard???

Is that like those Blue Screen of Death that hasn't occured on Windows PC's since Windows XP???

I thought OS X was Sooooooooo Perfect?? Yeah, Perfectly BUGGY!
See more comment replies
by macman1138 November 9, 2009 5:04 PM PST
Snigglepop,
Sounds like you may have some little hardware problems causing your KPs. Reseating RAM is a good start.
Also, you need do do some HD maintenance as well.
The 10.6 on my 3 Macs (2 iMacs and 1 MacBook) has been well behaved from the start.
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee November 9, 2009 5:04 PM PST
I hear 10.6.3 is coming in the next 24 hours.
Reply to this comment
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 9, 2009 5:13 PM PST
in that case your sources are very wrong.
by rationalreview November 9, 2009 5:20 PM PST
No, they probably aren't going to release it in 24 hours, but... they are known for slowly updating huge holes in their software. So wait a few weeks.
by LaTene_Man November 9, 2009 6:09 PM PST
Failed attempt at humour Mr. Dee, very poor indeed. What a troll.
by BingItOn November 9, 2009 7:32 PM PST
I am already running 10.6.4 and it sucks.
by A_K47 November 9, 2009 8:13 PM PST
Mr Dee...are you Steve Balmer in disguise? Good job with your Windooze 7...l

Have a nice update Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday( repeat cycle infinitely for best results!)
by jalpoi7 November 9, 2009 11:38 PM PST
@A_K47

Joe go smoke a cigar
by jalpoi7 November 9, 2009 11:41 PM PST
@A_K47

Joe go smoke a cigar
by ittesi259 November 10, 2009 9:57 AM PST
rationalreview....um, dunno if that was meant as some kind of MS slam toward Apple....but Microsoft admitted to not fixing a hole for 7 YEARS to appease application developers.....a whole that remained through multiple versions of their OS and they knew about it the whole time.
by fhinner November 9, 2009 5:42 PM PST
OK a little maintenance is OK, but guys, guys, every single time screwing with the mail plug-ins like Growl...come one give me a break.

I would even take this one if Mail would at least be stabile, but it still crashes every now and again with no hope but the little (in my case silver) button....
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 November 10, 2009 9:35 AM PST
Don't feel too bad. Every OS needs maintenance from time to time. For instance, I defrag my PC hard drive about once a year. I could schedule it to automatically do it once a month but it doesn't really need it that often.
by PC_Mike November 9, 2009 6:13 PM PST
This is exactly why I'm still running Leopard 10.5.8. I think Apple rushed Snow Leopard out to production in hopes of getting in front of Windows 7 debut. Steve, it's not going to work. Apple still having minor issues with the OS while Windows 7 doesn't. I know - I'm using both of them.
Reply to this comment
by cbscowards November 9, 2009 6:25 PM PST
Uhh... PC_Mike... MS was releasing updates to W7 before it the ink dried on the boxes. Every OS has updates. It's a good thing. Get over it.
by frankwick November 9, 2009 6:27 PM PST
Rushed SL?? Are you crazy? Considering it contains very few new features, it took forever to release. It was supposed to be a release to fix bugs and boost speed. (Sounds like a service pack for money to me).
by ballmerisanape November 9, 2009 6:27 PM PST
No.. your not.. you even said so.. your using 10.5.8....

Nice try..
by Maclover1 November 9, 2009 6:45 PM PST
Scratches head....Looks at Windows update on Windows 7 in Parallels VM and see 11 Windows 7 updates including a critical update and on this Windows 7 with only Office 2007 there are a total of 35 updates and Windows 7 is not even 30 days old.

I think you are talking about Steve Balmer.
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 9, 2009 7:32 PM PST
sl was a major code overhaul. making the entire os with cocoa. putting in new techs. putting thousands of little features. making the os run better overhaul. had fewer apps crashing since got sl.
by BingItOn November 9, 2009 7:38 PM PST
@Maclover1
Office 2007 is now almost 3 years old. The update for office will be installed regardless of which OS you choose. Nice try, go back on defending Crapple Snow kitty SP.
by Maclover1 November 10, 2009 4:39 AM PST
@bing 11 of those are Windows updates in less than 30 days. At this rate lets say we will average 15 a month? 180 per year. Of course there will be a service pack which will lump all up.

I do think Windows 7 will have fewer service packs, maybe 2, since its really just Vista service pack 3. So Vista will have 5 service packs in total?
by BingItOn November 10, 2009 9:32 AM PST
@Maclover1

I cheked all the updates I got on windows 7 and as per my observation Microsoft integrated H/W vendor updates to the windows update sites to make it seemless for the end user. So anytime any H/w vendor releases updates it gets installed through windows updates. Check yourself. Not necessarily kernel patch oops did I just said that? I know it is sad to see so many CRAPpy bugs from CRAPple SP.
by Seaspray0 November 10, 2009 9:43 AM PST
You guys put way too much into who updates, how many, etc. Do you really think the public cares? Why don't you guys to back to the play yard and count the grains of sand in the sandbox.
by shellcodes_coder November 9, 2009 6:33 PM PST
That file deleting feature was a core innovative feature of endangered os--snow leopard, so why did they fix it? BTW, 7 has already managed to surpass SL's total market share in less than two weeks
Reply to this comment
by Maclover1 November 9, 2009 6:59 PM PST
Windows Fan girls only have their market share numbers left to brag about. Software only of course. Move over to their hardware division and things like the Zune or Xbox are in last place when it comes to market share/units sold.

Of course Market share means nothing if you are loosing money and slowly loosing market share. Look at Market Cap.

Microsoft = 257 Billion
Apple = 181 Billon
Dell = 30 Billion

or how about share price...

Microsoft = $28 a share
Apple = $201 a share
Dell = $15 a share

Apple has 29 Billion in cash and since Dell has a market cap of $30 Billion Apple could almost purchase Dell with cash only. BTW Microsoft has 25 Billion in cash reserves.

My question would be if Apple were to take say 15% of the Market share that you are talking about (OS sales) would Apple have enough cash to buy Microsoft? Would its market cap be over 300 Billion? Would its share price hit $400 a share?

Pick your numbers carefully.
by DrtyDogg November 9, 2009 7:15 PM PST
@Maclover: Wow what an "expert" analysis. Now go back to your iPhone.
by BingItOn November 9, 2009 7:48 PM PST
@Maclover1
-- Apple has 29 Billion in cash and since Dell has a market cap of $30 Billion Apple could almost purchase Dell with cash only.


Where it will turn to get another $1 Billion. Microsoft? How about Dell buys CRAPple. But wait... Dell Shareholders are smart they will not want to spend money on the company whose Honeymoon period can get over any time. As I can see the future after SL release.

Be careful with your iPhone, it can explode any time and if you don't say it to anyone you may be eligible for free replacement from CRAPple.
by Maclover1 November 10, 2009 4:35 AM PST
@websterfreak Microsoft has more shares? You dont say?? share price X number of shares = market cap. That is why I listed Microsofts market cap as higher than the rest. Thanks captain obvious.

My question still stands. If market share is everything, or equates to everything like you Windblow's lovin ladies think, then if Apple goes from its modest 7% or whatever it is to say 15% or market share then it will surpass Microsoft in real value......ie market cap.

Or if Microsoft has a few more quarters/years of loss and their stock price drops then their market cap will drop.
by sharmajunior November 10, 2009 7:07 AM PST
Hahahaha, people think Microsoft is a hardware company.

They are intially a software company people. Hardware is a side business which obviously isn't doing as well as they would like it to be.

Maclover1 doesn't even know that it is because of Microsoft's failures and successes that Apple is where it is today...plus that monopoly gig as well. Otherwise, Apple would have died away a long time ago. If you don't have choice and competition, you will never innovate and never know what you may have missed.
by mesonto November 9, 2009 7:04 PM PST
It just works! (snicker, snicker)
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 9, 2009 8:38 PM PST
Wow... reading these comments proves beautifully that the doublestandard does indeed still exist.
Reply to this comment
by ckh1272 November 9, 2009 11:58 PM PST
In regards to what?? The Mac-heads defending the updates or the Win-heads trolling and slamming. Which one??
by sharmajunior November 10, 2009 7:10 AM PST
ckh1272

You just proved vegaman_dan's point....LOL
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 8:40 AM PST
"by sharmajunior November 10, 2009 7:10 AM PST
ckh1272

You just proved vegaman_dan's point....LOL"

@sharmajunior--What point?? He made a vague statement and all I am asking for is clarification. Thanks for the ignorance though. It is apparently contagious here.
by BingItOn November 10, 2009 9:26 AM PST
@ckh1272 -- It is apparently contagious here
Yes you are correct I understand how a defender of CRAPple feels.
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 6:50 PM PST
@BingItOn--Once again you read too much into something. This has nothing to do with what I use, which if you remember, I have 2 XP Pro systems, 1 Vista system, and an SL system. Quit reading into something where there is nothing.
by goodspeed8701 November 9, 2009 9:38 PM PST
Before SL was released I said it will be so buggy and the ******** wanted to eat me alive! What is happening now tards? My friend deleted all is documents randomly without knowing it after playing a game.
Reply to this comment
by ckh1272 November 9, 2009 11:57 PM PST
Your "friend" deleted all of his docs without knowing. Pardon me while I laugh at the folly of that statement. If he deleted his docs, it was knowingly. If they disappeared without his input, it's without his knowledge. See the difference there?? Seeing as how this was a "guest account" issue, why would he be playing a game on a guest account?? Many, many holes to fill there.
by goodspeed8701 November 10, 2009 6:46 AM PST
CKH The problems with you is ignorance... He deleted is files without knowing after playing a game. Ask your fellow ******* if I am making this up. They all saw it cnet even break the news.
by sharmajunior November 10, 2009 7:13 AM PST
ckh1272 is like the typical redhead....ignorance is bliss. "I am American, I own the world."...When something happens that you don't like, that's exactly what people like you do. Just so intolerant of others.

If you can't stand watching your precious little SL get updated, then you may perhaps want to build your self your own operating system that you can at least brag about being so secure because no one else uses it.
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 8:46 AM PST
@goodspeed8701--I know about the guest account issue. Their is no ignorance here. YOU said HE deleted the files unknowingly. Now how am I being ignorant?? If HE, deleted them, it was HIS fault. Comprende?? It sucks that some users had that issue (my SL upgrade went just fine) but your blatant ignorance of the situation is no better than the macheads who think that their systems are virus and malware proof. Get over yourself.

sharmajunior-same applies to you. No ignorance here on my end. BTW, that intolerance thing is a two way street.
by Seaspray0 November 10, 2009 10:06 AM PST
Lets put the blame where it resides. Goodspeed8701, tell your friend he is a stupid dumb f**k for playing a game that TELLS HIM it will randomly delete his files if he plays it.
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 6:51 PM PST
@Seaspray0-Exactly what I was trying to say. There was an article just last week regarding this stupid "file deleting" game. It has nothing to do with the OS.
by doozer0804 November 9, 2009 10:13 PM PST
I have had a mac for 2 years. Never once have I called support, never performed a permissions repair, never had to clear cookies and cache in safari, never had to perform a registry repair, never had to reinstall software, never had to purchase security software or subscriptions. I have only spent $120 on software to do what I wanted to do. It is still just as fast as the day I bought it. Who among u can say that?
Reply to this comment
by BingItOn November 9, 2009 11:28 PM PST
You forgot to mentioned, never switched it on.
by Renegade Knight November 10, 2009 8:41 AM PST
I can't even say that for my Mac. However I did spend less money on software then you for it. ;)
by cloudmatt November 10, 2009 8:52 AM PST
@doozer
I fail to see your point. I ran a vista machine for more than 2 years. No need of tech support. Didn't bother with defrags re-installs etc. spent a load on Software but I doubt games count, both because they can only lead to more instabilities then less and OSX can't run them(don't give me the "just use Boot camp/other windows embedded platform". It's still useing xp hence not osx). thing still runs like clockwork.

with any computer the final word about stability is the pink squidgy thing attached to the keyboard. congrats to you you are proficient enough to not screw up a mac? I'm sure most people here have kept systems running stable without effort for even longer, from all walks of life.
by randy620 November 14, 2009 2:11 AM PST
I have had this PC for 8 years. Paid $700 for it, never had a crash, never had a virus, just updated to Win 7 and it is not like a new PC. Oh, I spend about $200 on software I needed in those 8 years.
by als09 November 9, 2009 10:54 PM PST
Too little too late for myself. A very frustrating occurrence regardless of how much is backed up or not. An OS should not cause all data to disappear. All I can do now is *sigh*.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior November 10, 2009 7:14 AM PST
I am with you. My upgrade to SL killed my previous files and also broke my Airport WiFi card.
by jalpoi7 November 9, 2009 11:43 PM PST
@A_K47

Joe go smoke a cigar
Reply to this comment
by A_K47 November 10, 2009 7:06 AM PST
@jalpoi7

???
by ckh1272 November 9, 2009 11:54 PM PST
@BingItOn, websterphreaky, shellcodes_coder, and everyone else who thinks that whatever they run is perfect--Get over yourselves and look up the term "double standard". You claim that the "macheads" troll the Windows articles, looking to slam it every chance they get, yet here you all are proving (once again) that is indeed a two way street in regards to the level of ignorance that is so prevalent here. Thanks for the laugh.
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder November 10, 2009 4:48 AM PST
frustrating laugh...
by sharmajunior November 10, 2009 7:15 AM PST
Haahahhahaha, again ignorance is bliss. It wasn't the typical windows user who started all this.

It was the Macfans who came trolling in and started all these flame wars.

Talk about a hypocrite.
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 8:49 AM PST
You seemed to have overlooked something (besides your ignorance). The first three "flaming" posts are by catch23, BingItOn, and websterphreaky in that order. Want to try that BS again? Oh, thanks for proving my point.
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 8:50 AM PST
One more thing. How can it be the Macfans who are trolling?? It's an Apple related article genius. Did you forget that when you put on your blinders??
by Seaspray0 November 10, 2009 11:12 AM PST
@ckh1272. I totally agree with you. It truely amazes me how something simple ike an update can get twisted by fanboys into a flaming fiasco, and yes it happens on both sides.
by BingItOn November 10, 2009 12:37 PM PST
@ckh1272

You always turn and twist the fact. The point of this article is Crapple Service Pack (SL) is getting another SP updates. And all the MAC trolls are defending it here including you. Sometime it is easy to accept the fact and move on. But I think it is the difficult concept for many people to understand.
by ckh1272 November 10, 2009 6:53 PM PST
@BIngItOn--Say it with me "something out of nothing". That is all you do. Just because you insist that SL is a service pack doesn't make it so. Twist that BS anyway you want. You're one of the few screaming it here. Beat that dead horse on your own time for once.
by BingItOn November 11, 2009 10:13 AM PST
@ckh1272 -- Beat that dead horse on your own time for once
Says who, denying the fact that SL is actually a SP with new name leads yo nowhere.
by sharmajunior November 11, 2009 2:38 PM PST
It doesn't matter who started it in this forum. I am talking about who started it at first ever on this forum (you know, many years ago). It was typical Macfans who did it and now they can't stand being teased for an update (which is a good thing) on Snow Leopard. I have tried it, it works fine except for the 2 trips it made me make to the Apple store. Just an ordinary happy Windows and Mac user.
by ckh1272 November 12, 2009 8:48 AM PST
"by sharmajunior November 11, 2009 2:38 PM PST
It doesn't matter who started it in this forum. I am talking about who started it at first ever on this forum (you know, many years ago). It was typical Macfans who did it and now they can't stand being teased for an update (which is a good thing) on Snow Leopard. I have tried it, it works fine except for the 2 trips it made me make to the Apple store. Just an ordinary happy Windows and Mac user."

@sharmajunior--Okay, then I have a little challenge for you. First off, prove it. Second, that is the typical response of a 1st grader, i.e. "they started it". See how foolish that sounds? If you are going to perpetuate the cycle and make it worse, then YOU and everybody else with that mindset are just as guilty, be it a Mac, Windows, or Linux user. Jesus, some of you really need to grow up.
See more comment replies
by shellcodes_coder November 10, 2009 2:47 AM PST
475 MB? Oh man, that's too big!! It's much better to get security updates every week rather than waiting for months and downloading 100s of MB of updates as opposed to downloading few MB of updates every week :)
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder November 10, 2009 2:55 AM PST
SL was released in a hurry because of the heat of Windows 7...this is just another proof!! khaauu...oops SL can't roar!!
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg November 10, 2009 3:53 AM PST
The story also fails to mention that Apple "fixed" netbook support.
Reply to this comment
by shycelticwitch November 10, 2009 6:07 AM PST
This took WAY too long for such a serious issue! I restate my concern that Apple is putting less effort into computers and OS and too much into phones and MP3s, and I don't like either one of those that they make. The iPod is ok, but the iPhone is a toy, and a very breakable one at that.
Reply to this comment
by holyhope November 10, 2009 7:16 AM PST
I really like OSX on my Dell. It is solid and never kernal panics. I am waiting till Snow Leopard is stable, then will go to it because of the NVidia math support. Good solid OSX.
by 8301 November 10, 2009 6:29 AM PST
Don't forget that the 10.6.2 update drops support for the Intel Atom chip, as every news outlet (except CNET, naturally) seems to have figured out. That spells big trouble for the hackintosh Netbook; I guess those of us who like OS X but don't like paying $1,300 for a laptop have one less option available to us. I could go on about the implications on Apple's vertical integration policies but it would be lost on the Mac and PC trolls who are inevitably going to turn this bit of information into another slapfight.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight November 10, 2009 8:40 AM PST
Good point. It also signals that any Mac Netbook/Tablet won't be OS X powered, or won't be based on that Chip.
by kaiman75 November 10, 2009 7:06 AM PST
Kernel panics on Macs are like BSD on Windows machines, but are usually hardware related (rather then driver related). My guess is that you may have a bad hard drive... which isn't the fault of OSX.
Reply to this comment
by BingItOn November 10, 2009 2:00 PM PST
Okay, and it happens on MAC hardware. They don't test on their own hardware before rushing to the market. For windows MS has no controls on h/w whatsover. I wonder what will happen when CRAPple just sells OS.
by Josh Freedman November 10, 2009 7:42 AM PST
I'm not sure where the 457MB number is coming from.

I just downloaded and installed 10.6.2 and it was 157.7MB. The whole process took about 10 minutes.

Now I am right back to work, as usual.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (91 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right