• On mySimon: Toys Of The Year Award Winners
September 9, 2009 12:04 PM PDT

Apple's iPod refresh: What you need to know

by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 94 comments

Apple on Wednesday unveiled a refreshed lineup of iPods, as well as new iTunes, and iPhone/iPod Touch system software at an invite-only event at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in downtown San Francisco.

While there were no tablet computers, or an updated version of the Apple TV (as rumors had suggested), Apple's CEO Steve Jobs surprised everyone by anchoring the keynote, making it his first public appearance since October 2008.

Read on to get a quick overview of what was announced, and why it matters.


Price cuts and new hardware

Apple introduced an updated version of the iPod Nano that sports a built-in video camera and microphone located on the lower left-hand side. It also features a slightly larger 2.2-inch display, up from 2 inches. There is still no Wi-Fi or built-in Web browser, so users will first have to sync the videos to their computers to access and edit the files. The upgraded device also has an FM tuner, a feature iPod users have been pining for, for a very long time.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs takes to the stage once again to demo the new camera and FM tuner-equipped iPod Nanos.

(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET)

The new iPod Nano will come in two versions, one 8GB ($149), and one 16GB ($179). That represents a $20 price cut on the high end. The system software also makes use of some of the added features in iTunes 9, like Genius Mixes. And it's inherited the VoiceOver control from its siblings, the iPod Shuffle and Touch.

The buttonless iPod Shuffle remains, though there are new colors, capacities and a lower entry price. The new 2GB flavor, which is available in five colors, runs $59, along with the same colors in a 4GB version that costs $79. There's also a $99, 4GB "special edition" that's made of polished stainless steel and currently available only at Apple's online and retail stores.

The low end of the iPod Touch line got price cuts, and the device got capacity bumps on the higher end. The 8GB model is now $199, down from $229. Meanwhile, the 16GB model has been shelved in favor of a 32GB version, which costs $299. At the high end, users can now get a 64GB model, which runs $399. Both the 32GB and 64GB models are packing faster internals, similar if not the same to the recently released iPhone 3GS, and are now capable of OpenGL ES 2.0 which boosts 3D performance.

The iPod Classic remains untouched in features and price, although the capacity has been bumped from 120GB to 160GB.


New software

iPhone/iPod OS 3.1

Apple announced the release Wednesday of OS 3.1, which will be a free update to both iPhone and iPod Touch owners.

With 3.1, users on both platforms can now get Genius recommendations for applications they've purchased. These show up in the App Store app, as well as in iTunes, and function in a similar fashion to Genius for music. It takes your purchase information and sends it to Apple, which will analyze it for similar purchases, and offer up recommendations. This may end up being a more precise system since there are fewer apps than music tracks.

3.1 also adds a new security feature for iPhone owners--the capability to lock down the device over the air using MobileMe. Previously, if your phone was lost or stolen, this feature would only be enabled if the user had set it that way.

iTunes 9

Apple introduced a new version of iTunes, which offers iPhone and iPod Touch users a way to better organize applications they have added to the device. Users can now drag and drop apps to multiple home screens at once, instead of doing so on the device itself.

iPhone and iPod Touch users can now rearrange apps on their home screen right in iTunes, instead of on the device itself.

(Credit: Apple)

Another new feature in iTunes 9 that users in households are sure to enjoy is something called Home Sharing. This lets you automatically sync purchases across multiple computers within a household. This means they don't have to be redownloaded, or transferred from portable devices, which can save time if you're in a hurry.

The Genius feature and DJ feature have been mashed together to create something called Genius Mixes. The software can create multiple stations of music without the user having to pick a song for it to start from.

The software also has a new purchase-centric feature called iTunes LP, that adds a handful of digital pack-ins to purchased albums such as liner notes, photos, videos, lyrics, and links to online resources. This confirmed rumors Apple had been cooking up such a feature going back earlier this year.

In the same vein of iTunes LP, there's iTunes Extras--basically repackaged bonus features from movies and TV shows. This aims to add a little more value to rented and purchased video content, and steer customers toward Apple's store instead of some of the competition.


Other tidbits

Apple is now offering 30,000 ready-made ringtones for $1.29 a pop. These come from all four major labels, and differ from the current system, which allows you to make your own ringtone from any song you've purchased from the store for a fee of 99 cents. The new system cuts out the need to even buy the song.

Apple has sold 30 million iPhones since the launch of the device.

More than 20 million iPod Touches have been sold.

More than 100 million iPod Nanos have been sold.

Users have downloaded 1.8 billion apps from a catalog of more than 75,000.

Apple has 100 million registered iTunes users.

Users have submitted more than 27 million music libraries to contribute to the Genius feature, totaling 54 billion songs.

iPhone developer Tapulous demonstrated an upcoming title called Riddim Ribbon that lets players race on their own music tracks. Looks quite similar to PC title Audiosurf.

EA demonstrated Madden 10 which uses virtual, onscreen controls.

Gameloft has had 20 million game downloads. The company demonstrated a new first-person shooter game called Nova that's reminiscent of Halo.

Correction: This post initially included some incorrect pricing information. The OS 3.1 update only costs money for those who had not yet upgraded to 3.0 or higher. Also, the iPod Shuffle price cut refers to the 2GB model.

Related stories
Video: Jobs, new iPods take the Apple stage
Photos: Apple event high notes

Josh Lowensohn writes for Webware.com, CNET's blog about Web applications and services. E-mail Josh, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/Josh.
Recent posts from Apple
Apple to buy Quattro Wireless for $275 million
Major Apple product announcement set for January 27
Apple pulls iPhone app that upset Hollywood
Ex-Googler Lee sees Apple tablet debut in January
Apple misses its mark on Windows 7 Boot Camp support
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Apple wins appeal in earbud hearing-loss lawsuit
Aha! It's the iGuide, not iSlate--maybe
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (94 Comments)
by ThisShows10 September 9, 2009 12:52 PM PDT
That is so ridiculous that Apple is charging money for ipod touch users for this update. I already paid $10 for the last update to 3.0 and the one before that to 2.0.
Reply to this comment
by LaTene_Man September 9, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
Agreed, 0.1 updates should be free, only full versions should cost.
by thompsonator September 9, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
you can find it online and upgrade for free then hold **** when u click update and choose the 3.1 software ive done it before so i know from experience it works its also good for downgrading software although i dont know why you would want to
by dukepuppy September 9, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
The update IS free for iPod Touch users with 3.0. It is $4.95 for iPod users with 2.0 or 1.0.
by ddhboy September 9, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
I got 3.1 for free on my iPod Touch. I already had 3.0 so...
by basraw September 9, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
so I'm still on version 2.2.1, and I only have to pay $4.95 while you suckers paid $9.95 and $4.95 to get to 3.1..hahahaha
by Vegaman_Dan September 9, 2009 1:19 PM PDT
Well, Steve Jobs said in the announcement that the update was free to iPhone and iPod Touch users, however Apple's site shows a $4.95 upgrade. I would tend to believe Apple more on this one and think that Mr. Jobs simply misspoke himself. Touch owners are used to being second class citizens and having to keep paying and paying.

Remember, it's an accounting practice that they have to follow. Yes.... other companies do the same and charge zero or a penny per instance and take a loss to offer the upgrades to avoid angering customers, but Apple doesn't follow this model, instead charging customers for what other companies choose to give away free. That's Apple's choice and your choice if you buy the product. Deal with it.

Remember, Apple isn't in this for the good will or charity. They are a for profit business and you have to give them credit to be able to get people to pay for things like this. And they will. I know I will fork over yet another upgrade fee for my Touch. I'm used to bending over when it comes to Apple. It's just the way they operate.
by Josh.Lowensohn September 9, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
Yes, sorry--this erroneously stated the update cost $4.95 based on information from Apple's 3.1 update page. It's since been fixed and noted.
by Vegaman_Dan September 9, 2009 5:36 PM PDT
Hmm, so if Apple *doesn't* charge for the 3.1 OS update on the Touch this time, how do they defend charging for updates previously?

Interesting. Inconsistent actions generate very interesting questions as to the reasons behind these moves.
by paintedangel September 10, 2009 9:16 PM PDT
Can you read? The 3.1 upgrade is free if you have already upgraded to 3.0
by mikebellman September 9, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
What's the incentive for iPod Touch users to upgrade? What is the importance of OS 3.1 that I missed?
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn September 9, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
Honestly? Only the app recommendations and genius stations, both of which you can do in iTunes. The incentive here is that you can do both things on the device instead.
by Vegaman_Dan September 9, 2009 1:21 PM PDT
The incentive is $4.95 you pay to Apple to ... well... um....

Sorry, can't think of any reason. You'll do it anyways though. You know you will.
by nevets88 September 9, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
You might run into that one or several apps that require a higher OS. And then, like me, you'll be really pissed off. I've been wanting cut&paste, but refuse to ante up the $10 for the previous update, but eventually I probably will, if a compelling enough app comes along.

When your OS doesn't handle the app, the app won't install, and you get no message telling you why. Of course you can check the compatibility notes, but, a message box would be easy enough to pop up, no?
by kaibelf September 9, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
So, as nevets88 says, it's your choice. However, don't expect something for nothing.
by dkarageo September 9, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
It was pretty lame, just a Nano-only event. The Touch just basically got a capacity bump, and if you're into video games, a better processor. That's it. Yawn.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 11, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
I was looking forward to a camera in the touch. It didn't happen. Now the Zune's looking like it's got potential.
by jakemochas September 11, 2009 7:02 PM PDT
yeah i know... NOTHING REALLY HAPPENED... just a bunch of little things... we didn't see even the itablet or apple tv... and no camera on the iPod touch?!?!? what are they thinking! MS has me on the ZUNE HD now
by parallelrhymes September 9, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
no point in touch users to pay 5 dollars to upgrade

and will there not be a new touch with a camera?
Reply to this comment
by ryan3883 September 9, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
just to make it clear all zunes get free upgrades and this was a joke of a refresh for apple. Wait till you see the new zune hd when it hits stores. the faster ui beautiful oled screen hd radio apps/games and the zune pass just blows the ipod touch away
Reply to this comment
by Get_a_life_Leo September 9, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
Except it has minimal apps available on a smaller screen which is the major selling point of the iPod touch (as well as having Internet features that play second fiddle - this is not a focus on the ZuneHD). Good for playing music though.....

Microsoft might double its market with the ZuneHD and reach 2.2%.
by SeizeCTRL September 9, 2009 7:41 PM PDT
But it's still a valid point. It sort of pisses me off that I have a 32gb iPhone 3GS and an iPod Touch 2g, but I have to pay to update the iPod Touch.

The iPod and iTunes saved Apple... it's their cash cow and they will use it to rape your wallet. Microsoft doesn't need to pillage your bank account to make money, so they don't need to charge for a firmware update.

I love my iPhone and Touch... it just makes no sense why I have to pay to upgrade one and not the other.
by Sourdust September 10, 2009 5:52 AM PDT
The Zune HD isn't out yet so I don't get why you're raving about how great it is. And of course MS offers upgrades for free. They have cashcows that let them do this. You praise MS here but I'm sure you complain about them regarding Windows and Office pricing.
by Seaspray0 September 10, 2009 7:03 AM PDT
@sourdust. That depends on how you pay for it. If you buy it off the shelf, then it's expensive. If you buy a new computer and it comes with it, that's another story since OEM's are given a massive discount and pass that on to you (even office is given a discount to OEM's). Upgrades are a different price altogether. Judging by the pre-sales of windows 7 upgrade, I'd say the public is satisfied with the price since it's a best seller on places like amazon.
by kwhsy82 September 11, 2009 9:21 AM PDT
Let's be real: Both Microsoft and Apple charge for their products. Microsoft didn't have $13 billion of revenue last quarter by giving away things for free.

Microsoft (and other companies) often compete by figuring out how to make money on large installed bases and are more likely to compete on price where they have low market share. Charging for Zune updates wouldn't even be noticeable in MSFT revenues; conversely, they aren't giving away Windows 7. The same applies to Apple: They have an installed base and are trying to figure out how to profit from it. Both Microsoft and Apple have successfully charged their customers to update their operating systems.

Personally, I don't think $10 or $29 is exorbitant, but conversely, I'm not planning to upgrade for my Touch. I wouldn't even bother if it were free. I'm also not upgrading to Windows 7 -- Vista now works for me. I'll just get Windows 7 when I upgrade my laptop next year.
by dragonsky1 September 9, 2009 1:06 PM PDT
The new Nano's seem interesting, and it's about time they added the FM feature. I know it's one some people have been wanting for a while, though I've never seen the need for it.

Also the Home Sharing sounds great. It will save me a lot of time syncing the libraries on my two Macs and iPods.
Reply to this comment
by snickerz232 September 9, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
I'm kind of surprised that the iPod Touch didn't get a camera and that the 16 gb version got canceled. I was waiting on this announcement to see if the iPod Touch had anything new to offer before I decided to get the Zune HD but now I'm going to upgrade from a 1st gen iPod Touch to a Zune HD =]
Reply to this comment
by exjoburger September 9, 2009 2:56 PM PDT
Yeah, I would have thought the iPod Touch was a prime candidate for a camera.
by Sporlo September 9, 2009 7:46 PM PDT
Yeah, kinda sucks. iPod touch IS a better device for a camera, but the decision to add it to the nano is basically to make their lineup more rounded. You have to choose between the two, games, or camera. Kinda evens out sales I guess.
by atomD21 September 12, 2009 7:47 PM PDT
I would've ditched the 8 gb version and put the 16 at $199, personally... but then again, I don't even own a black turtleneck...
by dmccown September 9, 2009 1:13 PM PDT
According to http://www.tcmagazine.com/comments.php?id=29425&catid=3, and other reports I've read, the iPod Touch 3.1 update is free for those already running 3.0. Need official confirmation from Apple site.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan September 9, 2009 1:24 PM PDT
Jobs said it was free, however the Apple site shows it costs $4.95. I'm going to lean towards Apple on this one- if they gave it away free, they would then have to explain to Touch owners the reasons for charging them for previous upgrades in the OS.

Not a good position to be in, so $4.95 is much more likely.
by Josh.Lowensohn September 9, 2009 2:35 PM PDT
We just corrected--it is in fact free for 3.0 users, although that was a little unclear from Apple's post-keynote update page.
by nate0511SrA September 9, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
I just dont get why the Nano would have features that the touch doesnt get. It is supposed to be the "higher end" device and with a $400 price tag it should come with all the bells and whistles.
Reply to this comment
by contentcreator--2008 September 9, 2009 1:24 PM PDT
I'd rather have less memory plus a camera on the touch at the same price point. Anything as big and feature-y as a touch, should have a camera, you can do something with it there. I have a nano already, can't think when I'd ever use a camera on it --- photos as I jog? Think this is a design-for-usage fail for Apple.
by Get_a_life_Leo September 9, 2009 1:27 PM PDT
To differentiate it from the iPhone which is the real cash cow for Apple. The touch is the iPhone's poor cousin (training wheels Jobs once quipped). For $400 you do get 64Gb of memory which the iPhone doesn't have.
by markredf150 September 9, 2009 4:59 PM PDT
Yeah, it's really weird. I was expecting to walk into my local Apple store this weekend and take home a 16GB Touch with camera for about $200 but I guess I'll have to just buy a refurb 16GB on the Apple Online Store. GRRR it would have been much nicer had Apple just doubled the capacity across the board and added cameras but I think it's safe to say the 4G Touch will most likely have a camera. Oh and since the Nano has a camera now, does it even shoot stills? Or just video?
by agrolimond September 9, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
I do not use the IPOD but I had one that I grilled by error(wrong charger). Well I won it and am glad that I cannot upgrade it any and I don't need or want it. I do not hate Apple or the products I just don't have a need.
Reply to this comment
by paintedangel September 10, 2009 9:24 PM PDT
Then why waste your time and ours commenting on the damn thing?
by pooyan69 September 9, 2009 1:18 PM PDT
Why oh why Apple charges for updates. Moreover this update is nothing special. If MS gives free massive updates for ALL Zune players of the past and present, why can't Apple?
Reply to this comment
by shellcodes_coder September 10, 2009 6:18 AM PDT
Agree with you. Anyways you must have heard of CrApple tax. That's why they are doing so
by atomD21 September 12, 2009 7:52 PM PDT
shellcodes...I'm not an Apple fanboy, but I think you should change your name to CrApple tax.
by ddhboy September 9, 2009 1:22 PM PDT
3.1 is free to those who already got 3.0, and should be amended in the post. Anyway, this was a waste of time. No camera in the ipod touch is a total waste and I can't tell you the difference between 3.0 and 3.1. The funny thing is, is that the applications their using to advertise 3.1 already ran they way they do in 3.0, so all this is pretty useless.
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn September 9, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
It has been amended--thanks & sorry for any confusion.
by Staszek September 9, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
I could be wrong but what I heard when I was listening was it would be free if you already had 3.0. But you would have to pay if you were below that level on the touch.

So maybe the live blog is wrong.
Reply to this comment
by lil-yankee September 9, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
I guess apple is going to handle the music business to Microsoft and zune.
I know that a company can't keep inovating all the time, but this time arround, they could really use some new features. The zune HD is looking good, hope Microsoft doesn't screw it up, have and iPhone so don't really care but competition is always good $-)
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 11, 2009 7:28 AM PDT
The only thing stopping me on a Zune (now that the touch doesn't have the anticipated camera) is the lack of capacity. Heck the touch has the same problem. I need 128gb. 64 can only do part of the job.
by lil-yankee September 11, 2009 8:36 PM PDT
I feel you there, but then, most people would never eve need all that space, I guess your just gonna make a tough decision. I will give the zune a try, looks like an amazing player.
by chabig83 September 9, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
Yes. I too will get the as yet unkown, unreleased Zune HD as well. An app library of 75,000 apps, a universe of compatible accessories, and the lack of DRM aside, I'm sure the people who brought Vista to the world will produce the right DRM solution for me.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan September 9, 2009 1:31 PM PDT
Well, Apple hasn't exactly produced the right DRM solution either yet. :/ They had their chance this time and it didn't happen. Maybe next year?
by Random_Walk September 12, 2009 5:32 PM PDT
" Well, Apple hasn't exactly produced the right DRM solution either yet."

Actually, they have as per music - they got rid of it. Also, iTunes lets you strip the DRM off of anything in it.

Can the Zune do that?
by scrubbingbubbles September 9, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
simple marketing. If someone is trying to decide between an iphone and an ipod and the ipod has all the features that the iphone has minus phone capability....they are less like to switch carriers\phone that they already have....at least that is my thought
Reply to this comment
by Dust_Puppy September 9, 2009 1:31 PM PDT
Sort of weird how they're niching-out the Nano with no camera on the other two. Supposedly this is the last "classic" refresh --- they could have hit it out of the park with a 200GB . . . such is life.

Was going to retire my old 3G 30GB for a new 64GB touch, but at $400, that's an iPhone AND a classic.

No Beatles . . . some things never change.

Very weird how all *6* people who own a zune in the US are trolling on this thread :/
Reply to this comment
by B-Ri September 9, 2009 1:55 PM PDT
It's also very weird how you are bashing the Zune when an update like this from apple just screams for more competition. I hope the Zune is great, that goads Apple into improving things too. Never thought they would put an FM tuner in an iPod but there you go. Sometimes me too is the name of the game. Just usually that's coming from MS not Apple.
by snickerz232 September 9, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
If you were referring to my comment you must have missed the part where I said I own a first generation iPod Touch. My home button broke however, so I decided that I would prefer to get a Zune HD over another iPod Touch. I still love the iPod Touch but right now an OLED screen, HD video output, and the Zune Pass are sounding good to me.
by BigGuns149 September 9, 2009 8:10 PM PDT
I know that Toshiba makes a 250GB 1.8" HDD(MK2529GSG), but what 200GB 1.8" HDD are you talking about? They could have used a 250GB HDD, but that drive AFAIK only comes in a 2 platter version and Apple stopped selling 2 platter iPod classics a while back. Toshiba announced a 160GB single platter drive today, which is what presumably is in this ipod. The only reason that they brought back the 160GB was because they were able to get a drive that wouldn't look "fat."

Honestly, I don't think that there would be enough demand to justify a 250GB iPod in addition to a 160GB even if Apple weren't opposed to making a thicker ipod because a 250GB iPod would be more expensive and even Apple who historically has been stingy about price cuts has gotten into price cutting mode this year (eg. look at the MBP price cuts this year.). The ipod classic by many estimates is the least popular model and only hasn't been discontinued because it fills a small niche market that a flash player couldn't affordable fill as of yet.
by jajouka September 9, 2009 1:31 PM PDT
I would have paid the $399 for the 64gb iPod Touch if it had a camera. So I'm sticking with my 32gb and will spend the money on the remastered Beatles box set. Sorry Apple. Maybe you'll get my money next year, unless Zune beats you to the camera.
Reply to this comment
by blackberryken September 9, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
Holy crap.......... some Apple folk who sneer at their awe mighty?

Don't flame me, I have an iPod, I don't know which one or what generation, haven't used it in over a year.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 September 10, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
Too late! <flicks a bic> flame! flame! flame! Sorry about that, dude.
by FranckMartin September 9, 2009 1:43 PM PDT
I always wondered if you can get the mobileme features after you lost your phone? $99 to locate your lost phone, I'll pay for it anytime, but otherwise, the current mobileme features are not useful to me.

One thing I hate about iTunes, is to regionally code everything. There is no world store. And thing found on one store are not available in another... Got some rebate coupon from movies I purchased in the US, but cannot use them on the French store and I live in Fiji... Grrr....

http://www.avonsys.com/
twitter: FranckMartin
Reply to this comment
by SiliconValleyJoe September 9, 2009 7:08 PM PDT
"Hating" iTune may not do any good. I believe music and movie companies have distribution channels they protect overseas.

This is NO different than getting a Region-1 DVD that will not play in Asia or an Asian DVD that will not play here.
Showing 1 of 3 pages (94 Comments)
advertisement

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right