• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
July 17, 2009 3:58 PM PDT

Apple withholding promo codes for 17+ iPhone apps

by Jim Dalrymple

Apple giveth, and Apple taketh away.

(Credit: Apple)

That's the way some developers are feeling after Apple began refusing to give developers promo codes for iPhone applications rated 17+.

Apple allows its iPhone developers to request up to 50 promotional codes for their apps when they are uploaded to the App Store. The promo codes allow developers to do things like market their apps by providing codes to media outlets, according to The Unofficial Apple Weblog.

The codes were welcomed by developers, who were forced to build separate ad-hoc versions of their apps in order to give versions away. Even with the Apple imposed four-week time limit, the promo codes served a very important purpose.

With the release of iPhone OS 3.0, Apple implemented a rating system for apps it sells in the App Store. This allows users to adjust their parental controls on the iPhone, restricting the use and ability to download objectionable content.

You may think that objectionable content in an iPhone app would be limited to pornography, but it's not. Under the new rules, any application that contains a built-in Web browser are also rated 17+ because they have access to the Internet.

As Ars Technica points out, some apps on the store like Wobble iBoobs is not rated, and the classic first person shooter, Doom, is rated 12+. However, e-book reader Eucalyptus is rated 17+ because you can search the Internet and access the Kama Sutra.

Apple defines the 17+ rating as:

Applications in this category may also contain frequent and intense offensive language; frequent and intense cartoon, fantasy or realistic violence; and frequent and intense mature, horror, and suggestive themes; plus sexual content, nudity, alcohol, tobacco, and drugs which may not be suitable for children under the age of 17.

Obviously, Apple still has some work to do to satisfy developers.

Jim Dalrymple has followed Apple and the Mac industry for the last 15 years, first as part of MacCentral and then in various positions at Macworld. A guitar player for 20 years, Jim also writes about the professional audio market, examining the best ways to write and record songs on a Macintosh with Logic Pro and Pro Tools. Jim is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Apple
In Apple parody, Florida says 'there's no app for this'
Apple updates Mac OS X Snow Leopard
Apple Store opens in the Louvre: Where next?
Rickrolling iPhone worm is never gonna give you up
Apple said to be working on 'world mode' iPhone
Smartphone market unfazed by recession
Steve Jobs, Fortune's CEO of the decade
Apple, RIM grab market share from Nokia
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (29 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by jessiethe3rd July 17, 2009 4:02 PM PDT
all hail Apple the app control mafia!
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher July 17, 2009 10:20 PM PDT
Were you the whack job that filed the lawsuit?
by freedeveloper July 21, 2009 6:40 AM PDT
POSTER CHILD A Classic example Worldport Navigator 2.0 (www.worldport.us) (great app). No mature content, no mature links whatsoever. A 17+ rating is required because you can access Google, Yahoo, MSN, and Ask. It would make more sense to rate such apps "17+ for open Web access" but apparently there is no such rating and developers must instead select intense nudity, or intense mature or suggestive themes to get a 17+ rating and then get on the App store. Either parents trust their children with Web access or they do not. Safari? Google bookmarks? IE Explorer? MSN? Every computer and device that has Web access has just become adult rated? Something is not adding up here.
by bluemember July 31, 2009 6:34 AM PDT
There's an app called "Quicky" that basically a fully featured web browser that allows you to view saved websites. It has a rating of frequent/intense in all categories!
by Freiheit13 July 17, 2009 4:36 PM PDT
And thus we see but one example of the futility (stupidity?) of censorship and content ratings. What offends 50% of people is tame to the other 50% and vise versa. Personally I just can't comprehend in this country (USA) how nudity is considered morally offensive but aggravated homicide is considered perfectly alright for children to enjoy.
Reply to this comment
by manualfunky July 17, 2009 9:30 PM PDT
thats because americans are naturally loud and aggresive... just ask any other race of humans about their opinions on americans
by qwerty-berty July 18, 2009 2:49 AM PDT
@manualfunky

Personally I don't know any of the 300 million Americans, but I do know it's a country of great diversity built up with immigrants from Mexico, Spain, Africa, Italy, UK, Germany, Japan - in fact from just about every corner of the earth. I'll bet at least a few are loud and aggressive but a whole bunch more are decent human beings.

Not sure which country you come from but I now know at least one ignorant, racist person from there.
by jedikitty July 17, 2009 5:42 PM PDT
I agree with Freiheit13 - stupidity would be the word I'd pick to describe Apple's antics. Hey, Apple, isn't a bit too late to try to be such a prude?
Reply to this comment
by tektaktyks July 17, 2009 6:18 PM PDT
no worries,when ppl get tired of apple and the company get in trouble they can always ask microsoft for help...again
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher July 17, 2009 10:27 PM PDT
People are tired alright. Tired of the bloated, virus-infested and buggy software that comes
from Microsoft and are switching to Apple in droves.
by ywkhgqo July 18, 2009 5:55 AM PDT
don't mind the happy_switcher, he's just sad apple's market share is still barely at 10% and it just came out that apple's laptops are being proportionally outsold yet again this summer.
by Perry_Clease July 18, 2009 6:36 AM PDT
@ywkhgqo " it just came out that apple's laptops are being proportionally outsold yet again this summer."

Your right about that, see these stories: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10277303-37.html?tag=mncol;mlt_related and http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10281042-37.html?tag=hotTopicsBody.1

Apple may as well pull the plug and give the money, what little of it still remains, back to the stock holders.
by Williame789 July 17, 2009 7:37 PM PDT
A web browser? Maybe now we can have another browser, a better browser like Firefox.
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor July 18, 2009 9:39 AM PDT
What does Safari on the iPhone lack? What would make Firefox for the iPhone better?
by krosafcheg July 17, 2009 8:22 PM PDT
Apple is the freakin moral police now, too? Come on. 2009.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease July 17, 2009 8:42 PM PDT
Did Apple stop you from buying the apps in question? Did you read the article?
by mayadanteamihan July 18, 2009 7:39 AM PDT
A company tries to protect your children and you're objecting vehemently to it?

What's the world coming to?
Reply to this comment
by July 18, 2009 11:24 AM PDT
Isn't that a parent's responsibility? I'm all in favor of parental controls but I don't want my content provider telling me what I can and can't buy or what I can and can't get a promo on.

This rule is particularly ridiculous as they are basing the rating on an app's ability to access internet content when the iPhone itself includes a browser that allows you to do just that. It seems unbalanced to expect iPhone developers to have to accept limitations when the device itself is positioned as an internet access device. It's a bit like giving with one hand and taking with the other.
by Perry_Clease July 18, 2009 4:25 PM PDT
Read the article, they are not pulling the apps:

"Apple allows its iPhone developers to request up to 50 promotional codes for their apps when they are uploaded to the App Store. The promo codes allow developers to do things like market their apps by providing codes to media outlets, "
by EskWIRED July 18, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
Apple's attitude reminds me strongly of the early days of AOL: they alienated many, many customers with overly restrictive policies designed to keep AOL a "family-friendly" service.

The business success of the AppStore is currently emulating that of the early-era AOL, in that it is a smashing success. Time will tell if the AppStore's success continues to follow AOL's trajectory, with early success followed by an eventual crash-and-burn when better, less restrictive competition emerges.
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor July 18, 2009 9:41 AM PDT
It's so easy to criticize.

We don't have all the facts. We don't see all the things the decision makers are seeing. They aren't idiots. They know certain things will give bad PR and yet they still choose to do them. Whine and complain people. It doesn't really matter that much.
Reply to this comment
by EskWIRED July 18, 2009 9:57 AM PDT
I disagree that the wisdom of the decision makers is inarguable, and I disagree that the consumer is powerless.
by myles taylor July 19, 2009 9:46 AM PDT
I didn't say that they were wise; I just said they don't just blindly make hard decisions without considering the consequences. And I don't think the consumer is powerless either. I meant that people whining about it in the comments isn't making any difference. The consumer has all the power; not the people who aren't buying anything.
by EskWIRED July 18, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
I dislike Safari. I think that the implementation of "tabs vs. new pages" is inelegant.

I like choice. I like to try several apps, and use the one I like best. It is not a matter of one or another having more features, it is a matter of, among other things, user interface.

I've used several mobile browsers on other platforms, and Safari is nowhere near my favorite. I wish there were more choices.
Reply to this comment
by shevaberg July 18, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
I love how people ***** about MS being closed source and dosent do enough for the public... but wait it is APPLE then they think it is the greatest thing in the world to have a closed system.. All hail open source except on the mac where it competes with apples own products and then they are allowed to be used on them...
Reply to this comment
by EskWIRED July 18, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
Yes. I object. It is not Apple's job to protect my children; I handle that.

If your attitude were universal, every piece of entertainment and every piece of software would be rated G.

Children need protection, but adults deserve freedom of choice.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease July 18, 2009 4:26 PM PDT
Did Apple prevent you from buying the apps? This is about supplying comp apps to reviewers:

"Apple allows its iPhone developers to request up to 50 promotional codes for their apps when they are uploaded to the App Store. The promo codes allow developers to do things like market their apps by providing codes to media outlets, "
by EskWIRED July 19, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
Nobody claimed they were preventing you from buying the apps mentioned. But the fact is, there are plenty of apps that they will not allow customers to install.

The content of my device is my business, and not theirs.
Reply to this comment
by shanefreely July 27, 2009 9:56 AM PDT
I remember reading how the developer of Naughty loaded dice had a ton of trouble with apple over this. First apple rejected them because their sex dice app has a secret menu so that the dice can be controlled, and then finally accepted but not allowed to promote themselves with promo codes.

http://cultofmac.com/q-a-how-sex-game-apps-get-approved-by-apple/
Reply to this comment
(29 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right