• On TV.com: Julie is HOT (and so is TV in a FLASH)
June 19, 2009 10:45 PM PDT

Report: Steve Jobs had liver transplant

by Steven Musil

Steve Jobs health

Apple CEO Steve Jobs briefly addressed his state of health onstage at an Apple event last October.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET News)

Steve Jobs, who has been on medical leave from Apple for the past six months, received a liver transplant in Tennessee two months ago, according to a report Friday in The Wall Street Journal that did not cite sources.

Earlier this year, Apple's CEO was reported to be relocating from California to Tennessee, which has a shorter waiting list for patients seeking organs, the report noted. In January, after Jobs announced that he would step aside from his day-to-day duties for a six-month medical leave of absence, Bloomberg reported that Apple's CEO was considering a liver transplant. In a telephone interview at the time, Jobs refused to comment on his health status.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but an Apple representative told the Journal that Jobs "continues to look forward to returning at the end of June, and there's nothing further to say."

Jobs is expected to return to the helm of Apple this month after nearly six months of medical leave. Jobs announced in January that he would be stepping down temporarily from the chief executive post while recuperating from a hormone imbalance. Some hoped his return to the company would coincide with an appearance at the Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this month to announce the new iPhone 3G S, but that did not pan out for Apple faithful.

Jobs, 54, has been the subject of heated speculation regarding his health since last June's Worldwide Developers Conference, when he appeared to have lost a great deal of weight. At the time, Apple insisted that Jobs' health was a private matter but revealed in early January that Jobs was suffering from a hormone imbalance that was impeding his body's ability to absorb certain proteins.

In August 2004, Jobs underwent successful surgery to treat a rare form of pancreatic cancer, which sidelined him until September of that year. Much of the speculation over the past year had been over whether that cancer had returned.

Tim Cook, Apple's chief operating officer, has been running the company during Jobs' absence.

Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven.
Recent posts from Apple
In Apple parody, Florida says 'there's no app for this'
Apple updates Mac OS X Snow Leopard
Apple Store opens in the Louvre: Where next?
Rickrolling iPhone worm is never gonna give you up
Apple said to be working on 'world mode' iPhone
Smartphone market unfazed by recession
Steve Jobs, Fortune's CEO of the decade
Apple, RIM grab market share from Nokia
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 4 pages (145 Comments)
by cvaldes1831 June 19, 2009 10:57 PM PDT
Get well soon, Steve. We miss you.
Reply to this comment
by bvdon June 19, 2009 11:33 PM PDT
Hope to have him around a long time. Get well, Mr. Jobs.
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee June 20, 2009 9:49 AM PDT
I agree, although I often disagree with your obnoxious user base (and there are many of them on CNET), I do hope you have a full recovery so I can continue bashing whatever new over expensive product you release in the future.
by savvydude June 19, 2009 11:35 PM PDT
I pray God's blessing on Mr. Jobs and his family. We look forward to his soon returning to Apple.
Reply to this comment
by LeeNipp June 22, 2009 4:15 AM PDT
instead of praying to god, hope that he has well trained medical professionals and a well developed aftercare / fallow up program. he will be a lot less likely to die.
by fooldog01 June 22, 2009 5:21 AM PDT
Because "hoping" is somehow more effective than praying. Way to fail at being a jerk.
by free_fight49 June 19, 2009 11:58 PM PDT
get well soon steve, and keep bringing out new products!
Reply to this comment
by Atlas_ June 20, 2009 12:18 AM PDT
I was going to say something silly about macs, but I changed my mind before I hit submit.

Get well soon Mr. Jobs.
Reply to this comment
by Jackmiles2006 June 20, 2009 12:42 AM PDT
We Miss you Steve.
Reply to this comment
by hankthedwarf June 20, 2009 1:27 AM PDT
Get well, Steve. We need the real tech pioneers like you around.
Reply to this comment
by EbsanU June 20, 2009 1:28 AM PDT
Best wishes buddy, I still hate Apple though.
Reply to this comment
by assman June 20, 2009 1:54 AM PDT
I hope this isn't a case of Steve Jobs using his riches to buy a place at the top of the transplant waiting list.

Anyway, this entire report is based on an UNCONFIRMED source, so it could potentially be entirely false.. though I doubt it.

Good to have you back Steve. Guess it was a bit more serious than a "hormone imbalance" eh?
Reply to this comment
by solitare_pax June 20, 2009 3:31 AM PDT
On the other hand, should the media be reporting on a person's private health after that person declined to comment on it?

Get well soon Mr. Jobs.
by assman June 20, 2009 4:26 AM PDT
Well.. he owns a public cooperation so some might consider him to be a public figure. His health affects the public's investment in the company's stock.
by pdskep June 20, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
For his condition, a liver transplant is of minimal usefulness. Essentially he took a liver from someone for whom it might actually have helped. Once selfish, always selfish.
[CNET editor's note: Offensive language deleted.]
by 3tire June 20, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
Since you know so much about his medical condition, I would assume you are a doctor of his? And, you would describe everyone who has ever had a transplant with the same language pdskep?
by drhamad June 20, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
Certainly we don't know his medical condition, pdskep, but based on the likely fact of what happened... a liver transplant doesn't always help, but it CAN help very significantly.
by pdskep June 20, 2009 1:52 PM PDT
It was reported in Jan. he might be seeking a liver transplant because of his pancreatic cancer. Read up on the procedure for the type of cancer Jobs has. There's a high likelihood the cancer will reemerge in his new liver and will have already spread to other organs since it was not cured by the original surgery.
by pdskep June 20, 2009 1:54 PM PDT
@hamad. It may help. Maybe, but how much would it have help those who didn't get one? If there were an oversupply of donor organs the issue would be moot.
by mutualin4mation June 21, 2009 5:29 AM PDT
I'm going to guess that the WSJ can stand behind this story. They're not a bunch of bloggers.
by 3tire June 21, 2009 6:46 AM PDT
pdskep, ah so calling him selfish is based on your having read a lot about cancer? Not on actual medical knowledge?
[CNET editor's note: Offensive language deleted.]
by assman June 21, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
@mutualin WSJ is the one that said the information was unconfirmed by either Apple or Steve Jobs.
See more comment replies
by nicmart June 20, 2009 4:52 AM PDT
If it is true, Apple and Jobs have some explaining to due. Have they met their legal obligations to stockholders?
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease June 20, 2009 6:48 AM PDT
What are the legal obligations? Give us a link to the laws and regulations that apply in this case.
by Seaspray0 June 20, 2009 7:37 AM PDT
Publicly traded companies do have some responsibility to report on the health of their key executives and a liver transplant isn't exactly a hormone imballance (which is what the company stated). I'm no expert on the laws, but they may not need to state the nature of medical conditions to meet that obligation.
by ewelch June 20, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
Considering Apple has said over and over that his health is a concern, but not time to panic, and that there are plenty of people in place to run the company, yes, they have met their legal obligation.
by make_or_break June 20, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
Considering that the severity of his health "concern" was not fully disclosed, there could be some SEC-related "issues" here. Moreover there appears to have been some misinformation (or at lest disinformation) in the initial disclosures; 'hormone imbalance' is a real stretch from the actual need of having to gut your own liver for a new one. Like it or not, there's money to be made on BAD news as well.

Plus, there's always some underlying reason for liver disease; noisy, Apple-bashing "PCs" (and nervous AAPL investors) do want to know.
by drhamad June 20, 2009 1:10 PM PDT
Yeah it's an interesting question. With what eventually came out as being his health problem (hormone imbalance/etc) I'd have said "who cares." But if his cancer became an issue again, and he needed to have a liver transplant... THAT is a real health concern of interest to investors.
by nixermac June 21, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
Not while on leave. The explanation is due only when actively employed or attending office. Steve was on leave and his medical conditions may have required a liver transplant. Even hormonal imbalance can cause issues with the liver.

Moreover all you folks need to read the HIPPA requirements. Steve is not required to declare his health conditions and we must not discuss it either. If Steve decided to make his health records public then we can dissect the information every bit.

Get well soon Steve.
by Random_Walk June 22, 2009 8:26 AM PDT
"Have they met their legal obligations to stockholders?"

Considering the massive growth and profits that Apple has been pulling into their bank account, in spite of a recession? I can say with certainty that they have.

And your next dumb question is...?
by b_baggins June 22, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
@Seaspray0,

It's called Key Man Insurance, and its designed to specifically meet concerns like yours.
by Voice_Of_Logic June 20, 2009 5:09 AM PDT
Well this is good news. It will be cool to see him around again.
Reply to this comment
by mikestatic1 June 20, 2009 5:42 AM PDT
Welcome back, Steve. Best wishes for a long and happy life.
Reply to this comment
by lonestarState June 20, 2009 6:03 AM PDT
Wonder if the liver he got has some honky tonk in it! Cheers!
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 June 20, 2009 6:22 AM PDT
Give the man some privacy already.
Reply to this comment
by das7282 June 20, 2009 6:49 AM PDT
Hmmm? I wonder?... Or rather I have no doubt he was moved to the front of the waiting list of transplant recipients just because of who he is...
Reply to this comment
by ckh1272 June 20, 2009 7:01 AM PDT
Well, since you have no proof, then it's just pure speculation. Give it a rest.
by compbry15 June 20, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
Not to mention he moved to Tennessee supposedly, where the line was shorter. If he was able to cut the line, wouldn't a move be kind of unneeded?
by ikramerica--2008 June 21, 2009 2:31 PM PDT
Makes sense to me. And he may have been seeking a transplant since his original cancer treatment, thus making it a mulit-year wait. From what I understand, the list is national, but you must be available to have the transplant ASAP close to the location of the organ. By moving to Tennessee, the list was shorter of people ahead of him. Then they factor in blood type, the suitability, severity of condition, etc. So it took 3 months or so of waiting in Tennessee, not being able to travel far, being available 24/7, to get the transplant.

Do non-wealthy people have the luxury of being able to easily afford that kind of move? Some don't, but many find a way. It's common. And there are also various organizations that make a place for you to live for this purpose. Ronald McDonald house for children, is one of them.
by b_baggins June 22, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
Liver transplants can use live donors because the liver can regenerate. The donor has a portion of his liver removed and transplanted into the recipient. about 6 weeks later, both have complete livers.
by blusky08 July 9, 2009 7:47 AM PDT
Human beings have a strong survival instinct, so let's not be casting any stones. How many of us here would be tempted to move a little further to the front of the line by any means possible? Lists, fairness, etc., mean little in the face of death.
by jjacobus June 20, 2009 7:53 AM PDT
So if you're rich, you can get to the head of the transplant line while my niece died because she because of a lock of donors. If the family could have afforded to move her to another state, might have been different. Non-celebritys don't get those options. Meanwhile Jobs deceives shareholds of Apple, Pixar, Disney by withholding material issues that could affect stock price. The elitist scumbag.
Reply to this comment
by ewelch June 20, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
Sorry for your loss, but that was out of line.
by SeizeCTRL June 20, 2009 11:20 AM PDT
How was it out of line? He makes a very valid point... that if you are rich, you get to do things like move to another state just to get higher up on the 'give me a liver so I can move back to Cali' list. There should be a law that if he be required to spend several years living in the state where he got the transplant.

Say you had kidney failure and had been on a waiting list for over a year... then all of sudden some rich celebrity guy moves to your state because he has a better chance of getting a kidney... and just when they find you a donor, they give it to the rich and powerful CEO, then he packs his bags and moves back to his state leaving you still needing a kidney, forcing you to wait even longer. Would you still consider that out of line?

Would you feel differently about this if it was Bill Gates or maybe Rush Limbaugh? Don't be an Apple apologist over this because of some brand loyalty... this just seems very unethical and unfair to anyone else on a liver waiting list.
by baconstang June 20, 2009 2:11 PM PDT
His liver might have been an easier match than your niece.
by nixermac June 21, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
May she rest in peace. God be with her. I understand that the loss of your niece does cause bitter circumstances. In the case of Steve receiving the liver transplant, we are not ever sure of it. Also he moved to TN since the line was shorter. USA is a free country and for personal benefits I have the right to purchase a house in any of the fifty nifty states and move there too as and when I like. I can move out when I like. I can have my records in AK and stay in NY.

If Steve did receive the liver in TN he got it faster there because the lines are shorter there. It is perfectly legit. Don't we all get in the shortest line when we can?
by Random_Walk June 21, 2009 8:39 PM PDT
"So if you're rich, you can get to the head of the transplant line while my niece died because she because of a lock [sic] of donors."

Something smells fishy. A given donor's liver may or may not be a fit to a given recipient due to blood type, age/size, how the donor died, presence/abscence of such things as hepatitis, etc. Lots of factors involved, none of them having to do with money. Anybody who really did have a close relative waiting on a transplant list would know this (because most doctors go way the hell out of their way to explain it). For a peek, see this: http://www.medpagetoday.com/Gastroenterology/LiverTransplantation/14434

'course, don't let that get in the way of a good old fashioned baseless OS rocks/sucks argument...
by b_baggins June 22, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
I call BS right now. Liver transplants can use live donors. So if your niece died because of lack of donors, then you're an SOB because you didn't get tested.
by Hillymeg June 20, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
When I read this, I kept wondering if Jobs' decision was ethical - my mom has pancreatic cancer and I know the disease has terrible odds, so my immediate thought was, "Is he taking a liver from someone who might have a better chance at life?" We're blogging about it at Everyday Ethics if you want to weigh in:
[CNET editor's note: Prohibited spam link deleted.]
Reply to this comment
by islandgirl45cv June 20, 2009 12:42 PM PDT
When I read this, I kept wondering if Jobs' decision was ethical - my mom has pancreatic cancer and I know the disease has terrible odds, so my immediate thought was, "Is he taking a liver from someone who might have a better chance at life?" We're blogging about it at Everyday Ethics if you want to weigh in: [CNET editor's note: Link deleted]



This is just a despicable comment and an attempt to push your own blog and agenda. BTW, I posted a response on your blog.beliefnet but in case it is mysteriously deleted, I'm including part of it here.

First, I worked several years ago at a hospital with a kidney transplant program. Each and every prospective patient went through an extensive transplant review process to determine if the person was a viable candidate for organ transplant. Their individual wealth played no role in that, and some had been on more than one regional transplant list waiting for a kidney. You don't buy organs here in the U.S.

Second, it's been widely reported that Steve Jobs did not suffer from a "normal" pancreatic cancer, but from a rare tumor called "islet cell cancer," which generally has a much better prognosis. According to comments I read on another blog from a physician who treats islet cell tumors, it is common for them to metastasize (seed) into the liver - but a liver transplant can cure patients in those instances.

If you're going to debate ethics, start with the truth, not a false statement that pushes your agenda.
by b_baggins June 22, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
Maybe you should have read a little more and then you would have realized that liver transplants can use live donors. The pattern here is becoming pretty obvious. The more ignorant a person, the more likely they are gripped with class envy.
by saeednas June 20, 2009 8:09 AM PDT
We pray for your complete recovery , Steve ! We owe you so much ! Hope to see you healthy, getting back to the tech world !!!
Reply to this comment
by June 20, 2009 8:10 AM PDT
Jobs stopped all charitable giving by Apple when he returned to Apple. He has had cancer and I wonder why he needed a liver transplant. What happened to his liver. I am sure you would have had to have lived in Tennessee for a certain amount of time to become a resident but it seems that Jobs became an instant resident. Is he now a California resident again. Tennessee probably has some explaining to do.

For all the people who complain about Microsoft, Bill Gates is a great giver and has donated over 50 billion to charity. Apple and Jobs has given how much? Apple drones should stop praising Jobs. When Apple went public Steve Wozniak shared with the other employees a good portion of his stock. Steve Jobs refused to share any. He is not a good person.
Reply to this comment
by ewelch June 20, 2009 9:36 AM PDT
Not true about charitable giving. He just doesn't make a big deal out of it.
by pentest June 20, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
Gates does it for publicity, hardly a charitable action.
by sgrmba June 20, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
Untrue - he did move to keep it private, as is preferred with all things they do. They are consistent in this approach. A great deal of donations come from them publicly and privately and great efforts are taken to keep that out of any PR.
by pennmike June 20, 2009 10:18 AM PDT
Wow. That's a whole heck of a lot of assumptions on your part. Have any facts to support them? Residency law in Tenn., for starters? Whether or not transplant lists in a given state are tied to legal residency, or mere presence in a state?
by svgtom June 20, 2009 10:26 AM PDT
@pentest

Your comment is a cheap and pathetic excuse to trash Gates and MS. Bill Gates did not form a charitable donation for publicity. He is now devoting his life to his charitable organization. Did you ever think that maybe the guy just wants to do some good in the world?
by monkeyfun14 June 20, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
@unamed user


That would be against what his Fanboy handbook tells him.
by baconstang June 20, 2009 2:15 PM PDT
I hope Gates is better with charity than with OS's.
by dudesmiles June 20, 2009 8:13 AM PDT
i bet the hospital used windows
Reply to this comment
by ckh1272 June 20, 2009 9:30 AM PDT
I am blown away by the last 3 out of four comments (esp. the last two). To the poster refuses to display a user name (cowardly, if you ask me), unless you have proof of what Steve Jobs and Apple have done with their money, please use that BS to fertilize the yard!

To dudesmiles-I bet you thought you were clever. <sarcasm>

To hillymeg-I sympathize with your plight, but using this story to push a website/blog is a little self righteous. Once again, provide proof that there are/were misgivings regarding Jobs health, then your post looks more credible. BTW, My G-mother died from colon and liver cancer within six months of diagnosis, so don't think I am personally slamming anyone.

To the rest of the posters: Try to keep the negative BS to yourselves. This was a story about a serious subject and shouldn't be subjected to the normal trolling BS that accompanies every other article. Let the facts come out first before making assumptions.
Showing 1 of 4 pages (145 Comments)
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right