March 16, 2009 12:25 PM PDT

Despite iMac boost, Mac sales still set to decline

by Tom Krazit
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 64 comments

Apple's new iMacs will help offset a poor February, but sales are still forecast to decline.

(Credit: CNET)

As expected, February was not a good month for Mac sales.

Piper Jaffray has analyzed a month's worth of NPD Group data on Apple's Mac sales during February, and is projecting that Apple will sell between 2 million and 2.2 million Macs during the first calendar quarter of the year, which ends in a couple of weeks. That's the same number it was working with based on January's NPD figures, and the estimates would range from a 13 percent decline to 4 percent decline compared to Mac shipments in Apple's first fiscal quarter of 2008.

Two offsetting events occurred during in February. On the bad side, Mac sales in February were down 16 percent compared to the same month last year, according to NPD. February was a brutal month for consumers as the stock market plunged, and Piper believes Apple also faced a tough comparison in that the MacBook Air began shipping last February.

On the good side, Apple's new iMacs, Mac Minis, and Mac Pros that are now shipping were not included in Piper's earlier analysis, and should help offset February's decline. Apple's desktop group was a source of weakness in an otherwise strong first fiscal quarter, and although desktops aren't strong for anybody these days the new systems appear to have been well-received by consumers.

Piper says the financial community as a whole is expecting Apple to post about 2.2 million Mac shipments in the quarter, which would be a 4 percent decline and the first quarter Mac shipments have declined year-over-year in a long time. So, in their thinking, the situation could be a lot worse: if Apple makes the Wall Street estimates the fallout could be minimal because of the overall poor health of the economy, even though Mac growth has come to a halt.

Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom.
Recent posts from Apple
Ex-Googler Lee sees Apple tablet debut in January
Apple misses its mark on Windows 7 Boot Camp support
Report: Apple event to be held January 26
Apple wins appeal in earbud hearing-loss lawsuit
Aha! It's the iGuide, not iSlate--maybe
Nokia hits Apple with latest patent complaint
Analyst: Apps the secret to Apple's tablet success
AT&T resumes online iPhone sales in NY
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (64 Comments)
by Vegaman_Dan March 16, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
Sales go up, sales go down.

Remember this classic line from years past?


"It's the economy, stupid."
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan March 16, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
No disrespect meant by the 'stupid' part, of course, that was just the quote.

It means that this is not an unexpected result and can be closely tied to the economy and should not be perceived or misconstrued by readers to think that it is a decline of Macintosh popularity/demand.

Trying to avoid a Mac/PC/Linux debacle here.
by ferretboy88 March 16, 2009 2:43 PM PDT
We made it past Jimmy Carter and we can get past this current decline.
by Mr. Dee March 16, 2009 12:44 PM PDT
Windows PC's are cheaper, offer just as much of what the Mac offering or even more. Windows Vista works, its secure and reliable. I think people are not understanding Apple's position in the market. They are selling high end luxury system's that are for a certain class of people: Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie, Madonna, Bono, Sting. People get what they want from a Windows PC.
Reply to this comment
by anilsudh March 16, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
Sorry, Windows PCs do not offer the same specs or software or Mac. The ones that do are priced the same or higher than the Mac. So please stop spreading the myth that Windows PCs are cheaper than Macs. They are only cheaper because they use recycled hardware from 10 years ago.
by drbyte March 16, 2009 1:02 PM PDT
For $699 you get a new quad core PC (with 64 bit OS) with a large hard drive and 4 to 6gb of RAM and a video chip set that will do great for non-gamers. Surf the web safely and you can avoid most threats. Try to spend that kind of money for a new mac and you'll end up with an Mini, and that's not exactly today's technology.

Mac's are great machines but those prices need to come down a great deal if they want to appeal to everyday buyers. Have you seen the prices for a moderately equipped mac pro machine? Lexus $
by ppgreat March 16, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
Are there really still tech savvy people out there who believe the "more expensive than PC's" FUD??
by CDubber March 16, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
@ Mr. Dee: Troll Different.

I don't get what I want from a Windows PC. And I'm not a celebrity So your lame generalization fails.

P.S. you seem to be the only person on the planet who doesn't work for Microsoft with anything good to say about Vista. Hmm...
by Dylan_Wisor March 16, 2009 1:55 PM PDT
I'm curious. What do Paris Hilton, Madonna, Bono and I have in common that makes us require a Mac?
Methinks you're subconsciously expressing your Apple jealousy.

Your loyalty to Microsoft makes you look dumb.
by Mark_Anderson March 16, 2009 2:11 PM PDT
Mr Dee's and anilsudh's comments show stupidity can indeed arise at the polar ends of any discussion.

Ugh.
by pithenumber March 16, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
@ppgreat
yeah there are
because PC's are faster and cheaper
I hate Vista too, I love 7 though
do people still believe the "Apple uses better quality chips than everybody else" FUD
or the "Apple people are tech savvy" FUD
by Vegaman_Dan March 16, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
I have a Dell GX620 that has OS X on it that can outperform Apple products in the same price point. The same OS, different hardware. Yes, the Dell hardware was much less and the performance greater than Apple's own product all the way through.

I think that just shows that there's a lot of variables out there. It's a different product for different people. There's no one true solution for every situation.
by Mr. Dee March 16, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
I forgot a few others: Steve Jobs, Mariah Carey, Gwen Stefanie, Michael Jackson, Zac Efron
by rakker91 March 16, 2009 3:35 PM PDT
ppgreat and anilsudh, yeah, there are tech people out there that believe the TRUTH that they're more expensive. Go do an apples to apples comparison. I just did: apple macbook, $1,199, Dell Inspiron 13 $630. Same processor, same hard drive (had to upgrade the macbook from default) same memory (had to upgrade the macbook from default). Only difference is the video card--dell only had the integrated intel as an option, but the 9400M is NOT a $400 difference. Went with no pre-installed software on either machine.

Do some research. We're not stupid, we actually DO compare prices.

CDubber: I've used vista for 2 years, and recommend it to everyone, provided that you have a good machine to run it on. Biggest problem I had was with crappy drivers from NVidia. They've fixed 'em now. Windows 7 looks even better, but I wouldn't hesitate to recommend vista.
See more comment replies
by Chapmaniac March 16, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
PCs *are* cheaper than Apple computers and manufacturers rely on volume pricing rather than 10 year old parts to achieve that end. Anyone who thinks otherwise has fallen victim to a severe case of brand loyalty (to put it nicely).

Case in point, I'm configuring a laptop model for my mother-in-law at Dell.com. The grand total, (tax and shipping) for a 15.6" screen, built-in webcam (which will work with a host of IM clients), 250 GB hard drive, 3 GB RAM with a dual core Intel processor AND a Netgear wireless router is *under* $550 (because they're offering a special savings of $140 right now). Apple has no such offering for the consumer in that price range and you can basically turn blue holding your breath waiting for Apple to announce a $140 discount on any *current* hardware.
Reply to this comment
by liven2 March 16, 2009 2:32 PM PDT
How about providing us a link to this phantom machine that is so much cheaper and matches the Mac laptops in all spec (hardwares and software)... I would like to see a spec by spec comparison...

I was just on Dell's site and if I tried to load it with comparable software, Hardware, RAM, bus speeds, and other features it is more like $1,600.00 -- XPS M1530 Intel® Core? 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.4GHz/800Mhz FSB, 3MB Cache)... This was still missing DDR3 RAM, faster bus, built in camera and illuminated LED lit keyboard.

The Dell is not as cheap as you make it out to be when you put it "spec per spec"... PLUS the Dell came in at over 6.1lbs and was quite a bit thicker and mostly plastic. While The Mac version is Unibody aluminum, and was 5.5 pounds and much thinner. Also, you're not getting OS X nor any of the iLife apps, which believe it or not do add tremendous value! Let's not forget long term cost of this PC for Virus and maintenance software every year and so on...

CAn you get a Cheaper PC (Dell, HP or whatever) than a Mac? SURE!!! But PLEASE people look at all the specs, long term cost and SOFTWARE... It is the whole package folks!!! Geesh!
by steve4lee March 16, 2009 4:03 PM PDT
A couple of years ago I was looking for a computer for the secretary's office. When I tried pricing Dells at their web site, I found I never got the same price twice. I'd start with a $700 machine, and it always wound up between $1600 and $1800 by the time I added basic stuff we wanted or needed to it. We settled on a $1200 iMac because it was a better deal, and the secretary was more comfortable with Macs anyway, and I had some projects coming up that would be more convenient if there was a Mac around the office, rather than my heading home whenever I needed to work on them.

YMMV, of course, but that experience certainly made me skeptical of the idea that Macs are overpriced.
by pithenumber March 17, 2009 5:25 PM PDT
@liven2
what's with the software argument?
open source software is free and superior
if there's not open source, there's always proprietary freeware

yes, I have a Mac, the only iLife software that I use is garage band. the rest of the stuff, I can find for free, and I get to make changes and not get sued

Mac OS doesn't add much value, its better than Vista at least, I wouldn't pay more extra to get it though. I can always hackintosh Mac OS on if I wanted, for only $99
by liven2 March 17, 2009 9:44 PM PDT
@pithenumber

I have a very strong feeling you are not a mac user nor have you really used Ilife apps and benefited from the integration of them... I am not saying open source is bad but most will not go that route nor has anything I have used open Source offers the complete seamless feel as the the whole I life package.. What you end up is a piece meal solution that kind of get the job done... That offers much less value!! in fact is a hinderance for most...
by gary85739 March 16, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
Macs are nice computers, albeit, over priced...

Bring down the prices and Mac sales will improve.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber March 16, 2009 2:14 PM PDT
good luck with lowering prices
by another_cissp March 16, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
anilsudh: Do you have any example or are you just trying to earn your unreasonable apple user merit badge?
Reply to this comment
by Michichael March 16, 2009 1:47 PM PDT
I saw a nice side by side comparison of a system's statistics between a new laptop and a macbook... forget where the image was, but it boils down to same hardware stats on everything with a 1000 dollar price difference.
Reply to this comment
by Sporlo March 16, 2009 6:33 PM PDT
that means the laptop had to be under $600, which is unlikely if it had the EXACT same specs.
by Dalmatian28 March 16, 2009 2:25 PM PDT
I have build great quad core PC for $650.00... what can you buy that is produced by Apple for $650.00?
The answer is simple.... Apple will sell you bunch of underpowered outdated "junk"! Try upgrading any of the Apple's junk....it will cost you fortune. The guy that you replied to was 100 % correct! Do little research before you start correcting people!
Reply to this comment
by goodspeed8701 March 16, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
Yes apple should bring down the price of a mac so it will improv along with windows os. cos people that bought it will also buy windows 7 so more work can be done.
Reply to this comment
by Deelron March 16, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
And according to http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10189362-92.html?tag=mncol a whole 11 days ago..

"PC shipments worldwide will drop 8 percent in the first half of this year, according to a forecast update Thursday to IDC's Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker."

So it likely has nothing to do with value of the machine (regardless of opinion) 4-13% decline is right around the 8% drop for the whole industry.
Reply to this comment
by djames42 March 16, 2009 2:37 PM PDT
I love all the comparisons from people who really have never used the platform of which they speak poorly (and no, "I played with one for ten minutes at the Apple Store" does not qualify). I'm sure many of you are perfectly happy with Vista. I've been running Windows 7 at home for a month and it seems stable enough. It allows me to check email, edit documents, surf the web, and most of the other tasks I need a computer to do. And unlike with my Mac, I can also play some pretty sweet games. When I have time.

Just as a Honda Civic would get me to work and back just fine, it doesn't do it with as much comfort and joy as my European Sport/Luxury car does.

I (much) prefer the consistent user interface on the Mac to the cluttered and inconsistent interface of a Windows Box. I prefer the fact that under the pretty hood is a full-featured Unix environment in which I can shell script (supplanting with AppleScript) to my heart's content. I prefer the fact that I can use the iWork suite as an alternative to either MS Office or OpenOffice, because, even if it doesn't have 8,000 functions (7,900 of which I'll never use), it has a much better interface. I prefer that I can create a Keynote presentation in a third of the time of what it takes to create a PowerPoint presentation because Apple knows how to create an interface that works well and doesn't get in the way.

And lets not forget that with the 'premium' cost of the Mac comes a suite of software that, in many cases, rivals anything available commercially for the PC.

I'm not going to bash those who like buying a cheaper machine that gets the job done, because I'm sure most of you are happy with what you've got. As they say, ignorance is bliss. I, as a former PC user, discovered many years ago the joyful computing experience that comes with a Macintosh--one I didn't have when I was using a Windows machine. I'm willing to pay a bit more for that experience.
Reply to this comment
by liven2 March 16, 2009 2:50 PM PDT
Bravo...!!! People just look at hardware... it is the experience the software that helps push it over the edge for me. PLus the new Unibody Macbooks are just very solid and well built machines.... NOTE I do not hate windows! I just want some fair comparison here and so many people who post about macs really have not used one in real life for any time. They just spew the same old crap they heard somewhere at sometime..

PLease stop and look at the big picture folks you get so much more than just hardware with your Mac... If you want cheap then go cheap and get the PC. But the value you get with the Mac is much deeper than the Hardware... It really is the software the tight integration of hardware and software that makes those babies such an amazing experience. :)
by Rolker March 16, 2009 3:00 PM PDT
I must admit that I only tried OS X for a short while, so I may not be total sure, but I didn't understand what the fuss is all about. It IS a nice OS, but it is not that different from other OSes.
I just may be used to Windows environment, but I don't see any reason to move to OS X. It is just not worth the money, and no - it is not the same comparison as Honda and a luxury car.
The OS X "experience" is not that great or unique that is worth moving to it.
Just look at the iphone - the OS there is unique compared to other OSes in the mobile world. This probably will change soon, but this is why the iphone is doing so well. OS X is not that unique.
by liven2 March 16, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
Rolker--- How long did you use it for? Did you own the Mac? Did you give a few month full time useage? No Windows using.

The reason I am asking is so many who use Windows based PC's all there life try use their Mac like a Windows machine. Making things harder and often missing so many of the features... Taking 5 steps to do things like in Windows vs not seeing you cna do the same step in one. Things like QuickLook, Expose, Spaces, iLIfe APps, drag and drop features, PDF creation, Disc burning, and so much more... Sometimes being a long time Windows person causes to use your Mac in a way that after a week of use you see no big deal... BUT Sir there are so many things I am sure you are not seeing!!!
by Rolker March 17, 2009 3:57 AM PDT
liven2

You are probably right. I didn't use it enough to have a real "taste" of it.
My point was that I just don't have a reason to move to OS X. I'm very pleased with Windows, and it works great for me.
I know people that own Macs and they are very happy with them. I know a lot of people that own Windows based PC and they're very happy too. So, I guess it goes down to personal taste or what you're used to.
by liven2 March 17, 2009 6:21 AM PDT
Rolker --

This is fair and would never debate that and I feel anyone should use what they like most and fit their needs best. I have many friends who also use windows but I would not say the love it they just "use" it and tollerate it. You often find people love their Macs and once they dive into one most of them as "why did I not do this sooner?" Or "I will never go back!" NOW I will admit that my world bubble is small and I have this experience with about 15 people I know well.

One place where this was huge was my old job where we switched from all Windows PC's and went to All Mac and many were very resistant but after about 6 months everyone was praising the Mac and going to be getting one at home. It was quite an amazing social Mac conversion expereince! :) Nothing Wrong with Windows, but again once the light comes on when using the Mac to get comfortable with it, it is often pure WoW factor for most. BUT I am sure not everyone! IN some cases Windows will do just fine for where the need is. :)
by rapier1 March 17, 2009 8:23 AM PDT
So I use a Mac every day for 8+ hours a day at work. I have been for around 5 years now when I switched from an XP box and have upgraded several times. At home I have a homebrew box running Vista. So really, I am in a position to talk about it. I'm quite happy with Vista and OS X is perfectly acceptable for what I need it to do. I do not think either is superior than the other - each is used in different ways to accomplish different things. If I was forced to make a choice I'd probably dump OS X though. Fortunately, I don't have to and can continue using my computers as tools, not as a personal statement.
by CarlosFromPhilly March 17, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
I've been using osx for a few years now. My girlfriend's system has been the most used system in our home for awhile now. Being an avid computer user (i clock equal hours in front of osx and linux, coupled with years of windows experience), i can honestly say that the platform falls short in a few places.
1) availability of software: plain and simple, it's just not there. this is a windows world, and mac is only an afterthought (from time to time) in the way things work. popular things like autocad, defacto gis software, games, office suites etc. Aren't written or ported for osx. While this isn't entirely the fault of apple, it still affects the platform. When a consumer buys a mac, it illustrates that they're not in the productivity sector. A beautiful interface for browsing and sychronizing your ipod is what it comes down to...
2) availability of hardware: i wanted an ultra light but capable laptop (not netbook). on a whim, i looked into apple's options: there were none. The mac air was not only overpriced, but larger than its competitors and without otherwise standard options like optical drives, etc. Dell's e4200 is lighter, has better battery life, smaller (ultra portable, right?), faster, more memory and is cheaper. That's just one example. Work in an environment requiring fingerprint scanning (or other high-level security features)? Tough. Want one with internal broadband wireless? no. Card readers? nope. Apple gives you the bare minimum at an excessive price, one "high end" option and the $999 version of the computer the rest of the world has been using for the past two years.
3) customer loyalty: My GF purchased a G5 from apple, as a student. She didn't have lots of money, but she saved and pinched where she could to make it happen (i chipped in too). What does she get for her money? An increasingly worthless platform. An increasing number of applications are closing support to ppc. Again, not apple's fault-- but a consumer who bought into a platform only to be forced (essentially) to upgrade before the hardware itself was truly obsolete is a bad thing to see. She realizes that this summer will be her last summer as a mac user... she'll be purchasing a dell or building her own next fall.
I won't get into the OS itself and its increasing problems playing nice with others, annoying noises from the console, lack of home/end support (key combo? really?), terrible support for high res video files (2009 and still no x64 support? typical... mac waits five years before catching up with what the rest of the world does), too much backround process running (watch top for a few minutes to see what i mean), etc; what i will say, though, is that apple's safe, sterile environment is a fantastic choice until you need to really push the system. Then, it just falls apart at the seams...
by ferretboy88 March 16, 2009 2:43 PM PDT
Make a normal mouse and key board so when people go into an Apple store they can actually use the thing. This will help sales.
Reply to this comment
by liven2 March 16, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
Uhh PLease define normal?... Who ever forced you to use the mouse? OMG this is the oldest a lamest argument out there!! Are you such an ignoramus that you cannot use the mouse they have.. Is the button and scroll wheel to hard to click and roll? LOL it is not hard!!! I hope you were kidding!

FINALLY.. Get your own third party mouse use it with you mac.. Apples Mouse is and option only!
by mailbox001 March 16, 2009 3:03 PM PDT
Has anyone realize that Apple commercials demonstrates the iPod & iPhone UI, but I never seen a commercial demonstrating the Mac UI?
Reply to this comment
by Sporlo March 16, 2009 6:39 PM PDT
Probably because those commercials were trying to sell iPhones/iPods, not iMacs. Simple logic, right?

Besides, showing the Mac UI wouldn't nearly be as exciting enough to put into a TV commercial. I don't find it practical advertising for Mac OS X on TV. It's not a new sight; iPhone OS is relatively new, it attracts people's attention.
by William Crow March 16, 2009 3:07 PM PDT
Its the Mac OS that makes it worthwhile. Its much more secure. Personally, I spend worlds less time reading and being concerned about virus', etc. I switched to Apple about 3 years ago, after being Windows forever. I will NOT go back.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior March 16, 2009 10:50 PM PDT
Looks like you are begging for a virus. Just regurgitating stuff that other people say does not mean it is true.

tell me your ip address, I'll send viruses over to you expecially made for Macs. :)
by Steve.Stapleton March 16, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
I've used Macs since I bought my first one in June of 1985 and even had weird ones, such as the MacXL and the TAM, I love my Mac and very grateful the care and support that comes with it. I miss the old OS 9 days, but love the genius bar. That being said, there are very good, low-cost PCs available that are perfectly satisfactory. If one only has $400 to spend, one can buy a PC and cannot by a Mac. Apple doesn't compete in the low cost market. I think that is a wise choice on their part and provides me with an experience I am willing to pay for. I have also found my Macs last as useable machines FAR longer than even expensive PCs. This is composed on a G4 MacMini that is now more than six years old and is perfectly fine for most things. To argue over what is best is meaningless. Best can only derive from specific circumstances. If one has appendicitis, an appendectomy is the best operation. If one has clogged heart arteries, the appendectomy is considerably less satisfactory.

Can ANYONE tell me how to rename a printer in OS X? Not rename the queue on my specific computer, but how to go out over the network to the HP 4si and tell it is now called "Den," not "HP4SI," so any computer sees it with the new name. There was a small utility called Apple Printer Utility (APU) that did this just in in OS 9 and I've yet to find anyway to do so in any version of OS X. I keep the TAM on the network just to run the APU.
Reply to this comment
by nickh2 March 16, 2009 5:32 PM PDT
The first Mac mini shipped Jan 2005. Makes yours at most, just over four years old.

How to rename your printer (Mac OS X 10.5) Go to: System Preferences > Print & Fax. Highlight the printer name and click on Options & Supplies. Edit the name in the text entry box at the top. Click OK.
by random truth March 16, 2009 6:56 PM PDT
@nickh2
He probably meant the mac cube... It was released in 2000.
by sharmajunior March 16, 2009 10:53 PM PDT
I have a computer running windows 98 over 10 yrs old. No complaints, still works.
by Steve.Stapleton March 17, 2009 10:16 AM PDT
Nickh2 -- Going to System Preference > Print & Fax will NOT change the name of the printer, only the name of the print queue on your system. Go to another system, add that printer, and the printer will still have its old name. I don't want to change the name of the queue, but the name of the printer itself. I name my printers by their location in my house. I recently moved the printer that was under the stairs to the guest room and want to change its name so when a guest logs on to the network he sees the printer named as "GuestRoom," not "UnderStairs." The System Preferences simply doesn't affect the printer's name.

And you are correct, I looked up my receipt and I bought my MacMini on Feb 2, 2005, so my system is only four years old. I am getting old now and my memory plays tricks on me.
by ReasonableGuy March 16, 2009 4:00 PM PDT
Arguing that everyone should use a Windows machine because they are cheaper out of the box, makes as much sense as saying everyone should drive a Ford Fiesta, because it is less expensive than most other cars.

Apple cannot and will not race to the bottom. Apple actually spends money on research and development of both hardware and software. Most other PC manufacturers don't spend much on hardware R&D (relying on Intel and board manufacturers) or software (Microsoft is it).

Is Windows getting better? Yes. Would Microsoft have made the improvements it has if it did not have Apple to goad it on? No. So even if you do subscribe to the cheapest is the best notion, you still benefit by Apple existing, and by Apple keeping its profit margin high enough that it can invest in R&D.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior March 16, 2009 10:57 PM PDT
and that is why they are still behind in pricing parts at a decent rate. have you seen the price of the RAM that Apple sells on apple store (through their R&D) and compared it to the same RAM at other retailers.

Apple has 8 GB RAM DDR3 for 1200 bucks. You get a macbook for under that...LOL
by Earl Benzar March 16, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
Actually a 4% decline from 2008 isn't that bad put in context, but you make it seem like the sky is falling for Apple. Here's the reality:

Per Gartner, as reported by ZDNet on March 2nd:

"The global PC industry will suffer its 'sharpest decline in history' in 2009, as overall demand for PCs falls by 11.9 percent compared with 2008, according to analysts at Gartner."

In addition, IDC is calling for a 5% drop in the global PC market, which tracks with the Mac numbers.

So if Apple Mac q1 sales drop by 4% over 2008, then they are actually doing better than the market space estimates overall (a bit over the IDC estimate and quite a bit over the Gartner estimate).
Reply to this comment
by HeavyJim March 16, 2009 4:53 PM PDT
"Your loyalty to Microsoft makes you look dumb."

Same can be said of apple fans.
Reply to this comment
by Sporlo March 16, 2009 6:40 PM PDT
Rather, loyalty to either company makes a person look no less intelligent nor more intelligent than they currently are. I can't possibly think of a way it could.
by hc2008 March 16, 2009 6:50 PM PDT
I own a couple of macs that run my business and have a couple of windows machines on my network. Since I have a home office, I'm really considering getting a netbook just for the sake at tossing it onto the night stand next to the bed and loading it up with something like Rosetta Stone and just surfing the web. I would never rely on a netbook or cloud computing for anything crucial or even vaguely important to my business operations.
Reply to this comment
by SamuraiArtGuy March 16, 2009 9:04 PM PDT
I do have to say, despite my loyalty to the platform, for the most part the Mac OS does what I ask and for the most part stays out of my way, and with far less (I won't say "none") of the security issues legendary on he PC side.

That said, as a freelance designer in the current economy, a new Mac Pro is right OUT of the question. The Steve has decreed there shall be no mid-range mac. And for the cost of an Apple Display and a Pro Mac, I could buy a MacBook Pro AND the 24" iMac. *** Apple. I just did a much more modest upgrade, I bartered a project for a used G5 tower, and picked up a replacement keyboard in eBay.

Indeed, it IS the economy. Sorry Apple. But I do hope they continue to innovate.

But yes, the price criticism is QUITE justified.
Reply to this comment
by Briarios March 16, 2009 9:35 PM PDT
I think it's odd that people keep referencing Dells against Macs. You can get better P.C.'s for better prices elsewhere. And while I do think Macs are overpriced, they are very good computers- and for the crowd that needs what they can offer (I.E. photographers, video editors, et. all) they're excellent computers.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (64 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right