• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
March 10, 2009 9:25 PM PDT

Apple to let naughty words flow on Tweetie 1.3

by Steven Musil
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 14 comments
Share

Apple has apparently had a change of heart about a Twitter iPhone app that sometimes presents users with language some might find objectionable.

The popular Twitter app for iPhone and iPod touch--called Tweetie 1.3--was apparently rejected because it gives users access to the Twitter Trends section, which displays the most frequent topics or words on Twitter at any given moment. This section sometimes lists swear words--including a particular four-letter word that begins with the letter F--that apparently raised Apple's disdain.

Naughty words aside, the iPhone Tweetie app wins Apple's approval in an apparent reversal.

(Credit: twitpic)

In an e-mail earlier Tuesday, app developer Loren Brichter said Apple quoted this part of the company's guidelines as a reason for the decision:

Applications must not contain any obscene, pornographic, offensive, or defamatory content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, etc.), or other content or materials that in Apple's reasonable judgement may be found objectionable by iPhone or iPod Touch users.

However, Apple relented Tuesday, according Brichter.

"Great news! 1.3 has now been approved! Alright Apple!," Brichter tweeted late this afternoon.

It's not the first time Apple has washed an app maker's mouth with a bar of soap. In February, the company rejected--for a second time--an application designed to let iPhone owners watch clips featuring the exploits of Stan, Kyle, Cartman, and Kenny on the often-irreverent TV show "South Park."

In the past, the company has also banned a book from the App Store for using dirty language, yet approved a fast-growing category of fart-related applications, leaving many to wonder exactly what sort of standards are used to evaluate iPhone applications.

However, even before the reversal, Tweetie's developer seemed to be willing to give Apple the benefit of the doubt.

"This could have been just a goof on Apple's part," Brichter told my colleague Dong Ngo earlier Tuesday. "The App Store is still very young, they're working out the kinks."

Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven.
Recent posts from Apple
Apple grabs top U.S. retail sales spots in October
Apple updates Mac Pro with 3.33GHz chip option
Time shows off tablet-size version of Sports Illustrated
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
Report: Apple accused of NAND price manipulation
What if: Apple Newton vs. Apple iPhone
Apple App Store collector's items: 10 rarities
iPhone officially lands in South Korea
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by gstah March 10, 2009 10:05 PM PDT
I'm glad they had a change or heart. Seems ironic since you can go into iTunes and type in f**k and get a few "un censored" hits. Most song names are "sanitized", but not everything. Seems hypocritical that they made a stink about Tweetie. While I love the app store, it sure does have a lot of room for improvement. I feel bad for developers trying to get on as a new dev, and even established ones since there still does not seem to be any clear rules or reasoning that clears up doubt about what is allowable and what is not. It's a crap shoot. This kind of thing, and the well publicized delays for re registration have gone on far too long and Apple really needs to put the kind of attention and resources toward it to stay in front.
Reply to this comment
by sciontcya March 11, 2009 12:13 AM PDT
[CNET editors note: Prohibited content deleted.]
@#$% **&T$ !!!

:)
Reply to this comment
by vekleft March 11, 2009 1:39 AM PDT
apple is becoming the "big brother" they once criticized.
they won't allow south park on the iphone?
i should trash mine when the at&t service contract is over.
what happened to them?
Reply to this comment
by mikeburek March 11, 2009 2:42 PM PDT
Hmm, you've got a point there. Yes they have a good product, but sometimes it seems like they want people to think and act within a set of boundaries. Which is exactly what their 1984 commercial was supposed to be against. They didn't remove Big Brother, they just replaced it with a prettier one.
by mike234x March 11, 2009 1:39 AM PDT
It's insane that Apple even attempts to do this. It's not like the application uses any offensive words, it simply displays offensive words that are on the web. Do I have to worry that Safari is going to start blocking web pages that Apple deems offensive?

I have an iPod Touch, but this is the last Apple product I'm buying (not just because of this); I think Apple is out of control, and their products, while pretty, are overpriced and underperforming.
Reply to this comment
by Beluga-aquamarine March 11, 2009 1:53 AM PDT
Surely you wish to dispose of your iPod in disgust?

Let us know if your selling it.
Reply to this comment
by Shaun822 March 11, 2009 6:11 AM PDT
iTunes sells all kinds of explicit content music and audio books, what gives with the twitter app?
Reply to this comment
by GreatSK March 11, 2009 6:14 AM PDT
Another interesting app which was denied, see vid on the bottom to get the point, as the page is dutch http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/56116/apple-weigert--even-apeldoorn-bellen--iphone-app.html
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian March 11, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
The "curse word" is no longer there from my understanding, so the app isn't an issue anymore. They're called "curse words" for a reason, Apple has been counting the curse words on the internet and realized we're dangerously close to invoking the curse ...

;-)
Reply to this comment
by rkinne01 March 11, 2009 2:25 PM PDT
I still find it amusing that Apple will sell R rated movies, gangsta rap, and x-rated pod casts but won't allow an App that MIGHT contain some "bad" words.
Reply to this comment
by mikeburek March 11, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
Maybe that's the real reason there isn't MMS on the iPhone - so you can't send/receive naughty pictures easily. Because you can't get those things through email or the web.
Reply to this comment
by mikeburek March 11, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
I guess the EU (or UK) was right about suing Apple for their false advertising of delivering you the "full" internet.
Reply to this comment
by rollaire2 March 11, 2009 6:35 PM PDT
Wow man, Tweet just keeps on getting better.

RT
www.privacy.at.tc
Reply to this comment
by Harrison912 March 11, 2009 8:23 PM PDT
I'm basically on Twitter to socially market my safety and security web site and raise awareness for it's products so you won't find me using any bad language whether it's allowed or not.
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right