• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
January 23, 2009 1:53 PM PST

Apple reaches $22.5 million settlement in Nano scratch suit

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

Apple has reached a $22.5 million settlement agreement in the class action iPod Nano scratch lawsuit and potential claimants began receiving settlement notices this week, according to the plaintiffs attorney.

The lawsuit, filed in October 2005 in a California Superior Court in Los Angeles County, alleges Apple's iPod Nano is prone to scratches and its alleged defects were not disclosed by the company.

A $22.5 million cash settlement agreement was reached in late October and a court has preliminarily approved the agreement, said the plaintiffs attorney. But it wasn't until this week that notices of the settlement agreement began going out to the potential pool of claimants, estimated to be a few million people.

A court hearing is scheduled for April 28 for final court approval on the settlement agreement.

Under the settlement agreement, potential claimants must have purchased an iPod Nano that was subject to scratches that affected the enjoyment of using the media player device, or impaired its operation.

Users who opt to file a claim may be eligible to collect one of two types of payments.

Tier one payments of $25 per iPod Nano purchased, may be distributed to claimants who did not receive a free slip case when they originally purchased their iPod Nano.

Tier two payments of $15 may be distributed to users who received a free slip case with their original iPod Nano purchase.

Those payment figures, however, may shift in one direction or the other, depending on how many users file a claim.

If there are additional funds leftover, after all tier one and two users file a claim, then the remainder will be distributed to those claimants--but that additional payout will be capped at 150 percent of the type of tier they filed under. And any money left in the fund after those additional payouts will be award to charities.

But if the number of claimants outstrips the $22.5 million fund, then the payouts will be reduced on a prorated basis.

Apple declined to comment on the settlement agreement.

However, on the lawsuit Web site, Apple denies all allegations in the lawsuit and in the class action, noting it is "entering into this settlement to avoid burdensome and costly litigation. The settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing or an indication that any law was violated."

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
Recent posts from Apple
Gates: Apple is 'a force in doing good things'
Judge rules for Apple in Psystar case
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
Apple banks on retail stores
Photos of Apple's fourth Manhattan store
Microsoft denies Windows 7 is based on Mac OS
Microsoft exec: Mac OS inspired Windows 7
Google plans Chrome Mac beta for December
by terminalblue January 23, 2009 2:26 PM PST
meh...seems like the end user have gotten kinda screwed here
Reply to this comment
by Thomas, David January 23, 2009 2:38 PM PST
The end user's weren't screwed. Anyone who read a review of the product, or actually picked one up and fiddled with it (while at a store), would have a clue about ability to get scratches. For those to whom it was a totally new product, no reviews, none in hand, etc., the settlement is more than adequate.
Reply to this comment
by 1badcowboy January 23, 2009 2:41 PM PST
so how much did the lawyers on each side get?
Reply to this comment
by Hep Cat January 23, 2009 3:20 PM PST
33%. It's the normal contingency fee. Give me a break - don't blame the lawyers.
by lorincpartain January 23, 2009 2:42 PM PST
Uh is this for real. Which trial lawyer cooked this one up ? I mean really ? Your ipod got scratched so there is a class action lawsuit ? If I was Apple I would be indignant and would go to trial just on principle even if it did cost more. Ridiculous load of crap. What's next? OMG my iPod is prone to fingerprints when i touch it, watch Apple I am suing. lol
Reply to this comment
by lord_cobra January 23, 2009 3:05 PM PST
no kidding. What a huge waste of time, money, everything! Hell, I'm going to sue GM or Dupont because my paint on my fricken car scratched. I know companies just give into these idiots because it is easier but if I was the judge I would have thrown the case out.

Uh oh, my cell phone just got scratched. Yaa! Free money!
by timber2005 January 23, 2009 4:10 PM PST
It wasn't that they could be scratched, its that they were scratched more easily than previous ipods. The iPod classic (then it was called either the photo or video I think) was what people judged the screen by. People weren't seeing scratches on the ipod classic from sweatpants... but a nano on the other hand, did.

Sweatpants might not be the exact material, but I know for a fact jeans were. Jeans shouldn't scratch a screen, ever. That should be the minimum scratchproof level.
by gregdawson January 23, 2009 4:23 PM PST
I agree... this is a load of crap. I still have my first gen nano and it's still alive and kickin... although, I'll assume it wasn't one of the ones affected. Regardless, not sure the affected bunch needed a class-action suit...
by Perry_Clease January 23, 2009 5:33 PM PST
Regulars here know me as a staunch Apple FanBoy, but this case in my opinion had merit. I examined a number of those iPods and from what I could see the case material was not the same as the usual iPod stuff. It was like the mix in the plastic, lexan, or what ever it is, was not done properly, you could mar it with your fingernail.
by seven7dust January 23, 2009 3:08 PM PST
stuff like this makes me sick to stomach
I should probably find something that I can sue Apple with too !
Reply to this comment
by SeizeCTRL January 23, 2009 4:30 PM PST
blah blah...

it was a huge design flaw. when the included cases scratched the screen, then there was a problem with the material used for the screen surface. same thing happened with the the very first 60gb video iPods. I saw a few people with both Nanos and 5g's that used the included case that constantly scratched the screen each time you put it in or took it out of the case. so if the case scratched it, imagine what would happen if you just put it in your jean pockets and walked around for an hour or so. when that generation came out, there was much more focus on pictures and video so the screen was very important compared to earlier models.

you should not have to go out and buy screen protectors when you just forked over a nice big wad of cash to Apple because they used some extremely cheap Chinese plastic.

but you are an Apple apologist most likely and will blame the user for the scratches and not a Apple for their choice of cheap plastic just to shave off 2 cents of their profit margin.

notice how the iPod Touch and the iPhone now have glass screens and the previous gen nano/iPod had a much more scratch resistant screen. WONDER WHY? cause their cheap ass plastic just cost them $22.5 million.
by jm18668 January 23, 2009 4:55 PM PST
After reporting $1.61 billion in revenue for the first quarter of 2009, $22.5 million seems like a rounding error. Although I disagree with the principle of the settlement, it was definitely worth the money just to make the lawsuit go away.
by Dani210 January 23, 2009 11:30 PM PST
yep :) apple is rich, and just like bmw, they can afford to fix their customers' high end products at no cost to them. :) thats apple, and thats why everybody loves them ;) just like apple giving away $100 to the first iphone users lol
by quaglax January 23, 2009 3:16 PM PST
This is great! I've seen ipods, and ishit device's and they scratch EXTREMELY easily. You would think savvy apple would use scratch proof glass (such as the Zune) but noooooo...they obviously think they are too "leet" for that. Well its came back to bit em in the ass. Good job on this. All my friends ipods, nano's etc. look like **** with scratches all over them.

Obviously the only ones getting mad here are the crapple fan-boys. ^^
Reply to this comment
by Hep Cat January 23, 2009 3:22 PM PST
Your erudite and thoughtful commentary is extremely stimulating, despite the lack of reason, punctuation, or proper grammar. Please, may I subscribe to your newsletter?
by lorincpartain January 23, 2009 3:49 PM PST
If you don't like the product, DONT BUY ONE. If the Zune is so much cooler, GO BUY IT !!
by snicka12 January 23, 2009 7:00 PM PST
i have a zune, its all scratched up, and its always ben in a case! and just recently the headphone jack stoped working! yeah....zunes are great! i use it as a case for my new ipod now, so no one will steal it.
by Dani210 January 23, 2009 11:32 PM PST
haha, zunes, those pieces of crap are actually worth something
by bbabadu January 23, 2009 3:21 PM PST
Hey - look at the bright side, If it weren't for this lawsuit, Apple might be using these $'s to market their products in your miserable cesspool of a country. Your welcome.
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo January 23, 2009 3:53 PM PST
Uh, excuse me?
by Markus2008 January 24, 2009 6:52 AM PST
It's funny how you didn't mention your own country, sack up or shutup...
by evanschimpf January 23, 2009 3:44 PM PST
woo

i just made $25!
Reply to this comment
by mghotbi January 23, 2009 6:57 PM PST
No one benefits but the lawyers. Class action lawsuits in the US are an absolute joke.
Reply to this comment
by honorable1 January 23, 2009 7:19 PM PST
Pure greed by Stupid Americans after yet another handout. Woe is me.

The USA is DEAD. The Constirution is dead. The Economy and AmeriKan hedgemony is Dead.

Why? Greed, Greed and more grred and litigiousness. Watch as more and more companies abandon the US for less BS waters in other countris.



AmeriKans are a bunch of whiney wqannabees looking for handouts. You will get the socialism you deserve. While I and other expatriate ourselves to forgien lands, and freedom opporuntities, the USA is going down the tubes. Thank GOD for BHO, who will finally lay to rest the Constituion our Republic was founded upon. GOD help you all.


[Editor's note: Profanity deleted]
Reply to this comment
by Dani210 January 23, 2009 11:41 PM PST
then why is the whole world coming down with us??? i think i recall japan formally stating it is in an economic recession. and also, can you identify any other country more powerful than us? China? Russia? India? we're still at the top, and even if someone passes us up, they won't dare attack us, cuz we got amigos and allies. canada is right above us, and basically all of europe is on our side. and now we got obama. and we're united behind him, even if at least 30% didnt vote for him, that 30% is still gonna be on his side, they aren't sore losers, we're still together. so now who's the sob
by Markus2008 January 24, 2009 6:56 AM PST
Sooo, what country did you expatriate to? Oh, and can I get your new address?
by BobBobBobBobBobBobBob January 23, 2009 10:42 PM PST
The real story about this lawsuit.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/28813376/site/14081545?__source=yahoo%7Cheadline%7Cquote%7Ctext%7C&par=yahoo

"In the ensuing months, Tomczak claimed he was the target of numerous online attacks for his lead role in what some perceived as a "frivolous" suit, and he reportedly tried to have his name removed from the action. Instead, the original law firms filed actions against Tomczak to keep his name attached to the suit, forcing Tomczak to retain his own attorney to fight the original lawyers."

What an idiot... this is what you get dealing with devils.
Reply to this comment
by Copyrightlawyer January 24, 2009 8:46 PM PST
I must tell you that based on the 21 years that I have been in this profession, this is just one of countless border-line (if not frivolous) lawsuits that are filed each year. I have good news though. Juries on average are getting stingier and judges are getting stronger backbones as more and more frivolous suits are getting poured-out. I have to say I am quite surprised that Apple did not fight this one harder. They could have taken it to trial, then appealed, then looked for a settlement, which would have worn out plaintiffs' counsel and, in the end, driven the settlement down -- and possibly eliminated any liability at al if the case were litigated correctly. If I were Apple's attorney I would have told them to pay me $1 million to fight the case and, in the end, they would save 15-20 million. Oh well. Score one for the bad guys, but I promise you, results like these are getting fewer and fewer.
Reply to this comment
by rbboulware April 13, 2009 6:00 PM PDT
No wonder our economy is in the tank. So damn what if you got some scratches on an Ipod! I received the form for a class action law suit and I threw it in the trash. No body but a bunch a greedy lawyers are going to get the money. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!! Stop letting these IDIOTIC lawsuits ruining our world.
Reply to this comment
by rbboulware April 13, 2009 6:08 PM PDT
my views
Reply to this comment
by cceber May 6, 2009 3:07 PM PDT
While this lawsuit does seem ridiculous to some, I can barely read my music due to the scratches on my Nano screen. I hardly think $25 helps make a difference, but overall I think it's the message to Apple to stop ignoring customer's needs. I've just come across a problem with iTunes deleting files if you connect iTunes to an external drive. Which seems logical considering the amount of music most people have. I had emailed them a year ago about this and they did not acknowledge any problems and blamed it on the hard drive. I'm wondering why there isn't a lawsuit for all the music that has been lost due to iTunes deleting files without warning. http://maba.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/itunes-7-might-delete-your-files-silently/#comment-18935 Their actions are irresponsible because they know it's happening (like the scratches), yet they take no responsibility for these issues.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right