CEA confirms Apple-related exhibits at CES 2010
CES 2010 will have several Apple-related booths to visit, but are Apple and CEO Steve Jobs really planning to attend?
(Credit: James Martin/CNET News)The Consumer Electronics Association has confirmed plans to host a Mac-centric area at CES 2010, but Apple has still not commented on whether it plans to participate.
Jason Oxman of the CEA confirmed Saturday that the group "dedicated a special area at the 2010 CES to Apple-related CE manufacturers." That immediately sets up an alternative for companies thinking about exhibiting at Macworld 2010, which will not have Apple present for the first time in 12 years.
"We decided to create this special area based on discussions we've had with companies regarding 2010 show participation. We are pleased with the feedback we've received regarding this space," Oxman said in an e-mail.
Oxman, however, deferred all questions regarding whether Apple would participate to the company itself, which did not return calls Friday and Saturday seeking comment on reports that it will be involved. "(Apple) is a member of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) and we are delighted to have a longstanding relationship with them," he said.
Cult of Mac and AppleInsider reported Friday that Apple would indeed be present at next year's CES, calling it a "done deal." Such a move would be quite surprising given Apple's December statement that it was pulling out of Macworld 2010 because it no longer felt trade shows were an effective means of reaching its customers.
Tom Krazit writes about the ever-expanding world of Internet search, including Google, Yahoo, online advertising, and portals, as well as the evolution of mobile computing. He has written about traditional PC companies, chip manufacturers, and mobile computers, spending the last three years covering Apple. E-mail Tom. 
I think thats why they are starting out with just a couple of booths and moving up to a regular show. It would bring a lot of Macboys into CES and expand their exposure to the rest of the world.
Also, the trick isn't to steal thunder from Windows 7...
The biggest reason Vista flopped as hard as it did was due to the monster amount of hype MSFT gave it (e.g. "the WOW starts NOW!"), only to see it get run over by a shipload of failure with bugs, bloat, and widespread general woes.
If you let MSFT get carried away again, odds are good that it is likely to fail when the product doesn't meet the overly-high expectations set for it.
I can say this because of simple research, even in this website's talkbacks... In the months leading up to Vista RTM, the fanboys were positively raving about how cool it was, and how much of a game-changer it was supposed to be. According to those same folks, it was supposed to be this really cool thing... And yet when it released to the world, it came out totally different from the betas, and sucked hard when it met OEM attempts to make it run.
Sometimes, the best way to defeat a competitor is to let them stumble on their own, ne?
Of course, if Windows 7 turns out to be something decent, then all bets are off. But, in order to do that, I'm suspecting that the feature set will be fairly light (and certainly not game-changing), which again gives the competition room for making some killer marketing points. Right now, Windows 7 still has to outshine XP, let alone its competition. The trick will be to see if the folks --who aren't Windows fanboys-- will see that in the product or not.
Meanwhile, OSX is about to go full 64bit with Snow Leopard. To be fair, I think that Apple will have its own hurdle in that regard because IIRC Snow Leopard won't support PPC (G4/G5) processors (not sure yet, though)... though this won't affect the majority of users (esp. among 'switchers') - just the folks who have the old-school goods, like myself.
Should be an interesting year...
/P
I gave an honest opinion of it. I said it was a resource hog. I didn't like that it took 15 GB HDD space just to install it, nor the 1/2 GB min memory requirement (1 GB with aero). I did like the UAC and how they locked down the kernel. Compatability with our corporate apps was fine. Some of the features I found interesting but overall, no real "must have" to warrant upgrading from XP.
You, on the otherhand have made outrageous lies about microsoft products, like "any 13 year old can write a script" to hack a windows box. I'm still waiting for you to find one out of the millions of 13 year olds. I don't care if you don't like microsoft, but when you post a bunch of BS, I will defend them.
@Seaspray: Funny, but the vast majority of fanboys were hotly defending Vista to the teeth, and were extolling the alleged virtues of it left, right, and sideways. Aero was supposed to be the big OSX dock-killer, Vista's internal searching functions (which finally convinced me that no, Fedora's implementation of beagled wasn't the biggest CPU-sucker in existence after all), etc etc...? Sorry, but your alleged negative opinions must've been drowned out. As for the rest? Get a grip.
/P
Besides, having been to a few Mac Expos, they are held more to sell the magazine instead of the Mac.
YES, I could very well see CES having a Mac / iPhone / iPod vendor section... I've seen a TON of iPhones, Macs, iPods in attendees hands and all over the show floor, but if Apple did attend, they'd still be back to the same problem of MacWorld... and would have to have a product rollout when CES decides, not Apple... which is part of the reason Apple at MacWorld is no longer.
Lastly, Las Vegas is too sleazy for Apple's presence, this town has no soul... special events in Cupertino or San Francisco is how it's going to work from here on out, sit back and enjoy...
I worked at Apple until 2 days ago and I know!
- by ShawnLevasseur January 13, 2009 9:27 PM PST
- Note that this story had no statement from Apple itself. I suspect that Apple will not be at CES. It would suddenly be a small fish in too big a pond at CES.
- Reply to this comment
-
(22 Comments)Apple can have the press flocking to 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino CA at the drop of a press release. If they didn't want to be the 800lb gorilla of a Mac centric show, they are highly unlikely to be a part of a show where they can't be the center of attention, and use their pull to get what they want.
Now I do believe that CES, which by many reports has had a smaller turnout and is likely to have a hard time attracting exhibitors due to a poor economy, is trying to woo the vendors who traditionally bypassed CES for Macworld Expo. It's the logical thing for them to try to do. Grab business from a competitor that's suddenly perceived as a show with less going for it.
Apple probably hasn't said that they aren't going to CES, because all this has hit rather quickly, and Apple doesn't exactly fire off statements casually. I'm sure that they'll confirm their 'no trade show' stance and brush off CES as well as Macworld Expo.