• On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
January 4, 2009 2:25 PM PST

Unibody 17-inch MacBook Pro reportedly in works

by Steven Musil
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 35 comments
Share

It appears Apple is getting ready to expand its MacBook Pro lineup.

The Mac maker plans to unveil a 17-inch MacBook Pro, possibly as early as this week at the Macworld Expo in San Francisco, according to reports on 9to5Mac and AppleInsider. Like the 13- and 15-inch models, the 17-incher is expected to sport a unibody construction. But unlike those smaller models, the new MacBook Pro will have a fixed internal battery, much like the MacBook Air's battery setup, according to the report.

The site also reported that we can expect a Mac Mini makeover that will include the same Nvidia chipsets that Apple introduced in October in new MacBooks, the MCP79 chipset. That chipset uses the Nvidia 9400M graphics processor, and would give the Mini a boost in graphics processing power over the Intel integrated chipsets it currently uses.

New Mac Minis are high on the list of systems expected to arrive at Macworld 2009. The Mac Mini has been the subject of much speculation about its future this year after it appeared the systems were headed out to pasture, but it appears Apple will bring it around for another go.

Another unconfirmed rumor has Apple phasing out the 13-inch plastic MacBook.

Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven.
Recent posts from Apple
Apple grabs top U.S. retail sales spots in October
Apple updates Mac Pro with 3.33GHz chip option
Time shows off tablet-size version of Sports Illustrated
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
Report: Apple accused of NAND price manipulation
What if: Apple Newton vs. Apple iPhone
Apple App Store collector's items: 10 rarities
iPhone officially lands in South Korea
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (35 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Mark_Anderson January 4, 2009 3:05 PM PST
Sorry, for a minute there I thought you said it had a fixed internal battery.

I mean seriou-

Oh? You did?

Oh my.
Reply to this comment
by AppleProLeo January 5, 2009 6:46 AM PST
What this article forgets to mention is this 'rumor/report' also reports that this fixed internal battery will be of a new Silver Zinc technology that will last almost twice as long as the current models to make up for all you "I need the ability of a backup battery"
by Goodbye Helicopter January 4, 2009 3:11 PM PST
doubt the part about the battery.
That would cause people to only buy the 15
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease January 4, 2009 3:57 PM PST
Not necessarily. With a fixed battery the MacBook could be thinner, and some people want that while others need to swap batteries frequently. Whatever, we soon find out.
by pithenumber January 17, 2009 8:55 AM PST
@perry
what's with "thin" and "desktop replacement" they don't go together, I don't need a travel notebook if its going to sit on my desk 90%of the time.
by SpiritWater January 4, 2009 3:53 PM PST
That 17" Macbook will probably cost a good $2999 and more like $3999 when you get all the basics selected (i.e. a maintenance package and productivity software.)



A fixed battery will not work for many pros. I hope this rumor is incorrect. We'll see soon.



Here's hoping the entry level Mac Mini is $499 with an Nvidia GPU.


[Edited to remove prohibited spam.]
Reply to this comment
by ckurowic January 4, 2009 3:54 PM PST
Who cares if the battery is fixed honestly. Whine whine whine.
Reply to this comment
by bakedpatato January 4, 2009 4:11 PM PST
Um...who cares?
How about if you need to use the laptop, you drain the battery and you need the laptop again(on the go pros, for example)?
Or if you're like me and you use your laptop as a desktop replacement with occasinal battery usage and the battery dies on you and you don't want to pay Apple outrageous prices to get the battery replaced?
etc...
by Penguinisto January 5, 2009 6:45 AM PST
*shrug* - most airports have charging areas nowadays. Come to think of it, most airplanes allow you to charge your battery right there at the seat. Most hotels have means to charge your laptop, and etc etc etc... Otherwise, if you need to spend more than four hours on-battery, odds are very good you're either in a very undeveloped area without power of any kind (not exactly road-warrior territory), or you're on Mars.

The funny thing is, a typical laptop user never buys a new or second battery - in fact the majority never do. I'll even go further and say that for most users, once the typical cheap PC/laptop battery goes to crap (where you only get 20 minutes' power), it rarely if ever gets replaced.

Even on my end, I find myself driving 15-hour road trips to Southern California once in awhile... but it's cheaper to buy a small inverter that converts power from the cigarette lighter (about $25 for one), than it is to buy a 2nd laptop battery.

Now, all this said, the whole thing is rumor anyway. But if it's fixed, BFD - the percentage of folks who require swappable batteries --no matter what, and in spite of 4-hour-plus battery life-- likely bought the wrong form factor in the first place.
by AppleProLeo January 5, 2009 6:46 AM PST
@bakedpatato

What this article forgets to mention is this 'rumor/report' also reports that this fixed internal battery will be of a new Silver Zinc technology that will last almost twice as long as the current models to make up for all you "I need the ability of a backup battery"
by random truth January 4, 2009 4:30 PM PST
You missed the other part of the rumour. It said the batteries would use a different technology than lithium-ion. A different tech would be silver zinc, fuel cells, or super capacitors. All of which last significantly longer than lithium-ion batteries. Silver zinc lasts at least 5 years, fuel cells last indefinitely (until mechanical failure), and super capacitors generaly will outlast the computer.
Reply to this comment
by random truth January 4, 2009 4:44 PM PST
P.S. If it is only a lithium-ion battery and it is non-removable. Steve jobs must have brain cancer.
by toddsellers January 4, 2009 4:32 PM PST
I personally couldn't care less. In my opinion, a 17" laptop makes no sense.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease January 4, 2009 5:02 PM PST
I have a 17" HP Pavilion. I don't take with me when I travel the way I do my MacBook, it stays in the office. But, yes it is almost too big, and it is heavy. If Apple can get a thin, read light, 17" MacBook then I would consider it when it is time to replace the MacBook. It is all speculation at this point anyway.
by pithenumber January 17, 2009 8:58 AM PST
I would never travel with a 17 inch notebook, it can't open up fully most of the time in economy class on flights
by blinkdt January 4, 2009 5:02 PM PST
" . . . a 17" laptop makes no sense."

How very wrong you are, my friend. My lightweight 17" (Dell studio 1735) is a true desktop replacement system, sporting a beautiful screen, full keyboard, and space for two internal hard drives. Mmmmm, how sweet it is!
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease January 4, 2009 5:03 PM PST
The big screen it a plus when you do graphics.
by bakedpatato January 4, 2009 5:22 PM PST
agreed. bigger screens are a plus for anything from word processing to Photoshop:I would hate to have a 1920x1200 15inch panel. I'm young,but a 17 inch 1920x1200 panel is painful enough(I have a old Dell Inspiron e1705, and I still like it, toddsellers must not need much power for whatever he does with a computer as the 17 inchers get all the goodies like SLi and the Quad Penryn)
by Penguinisto January 5, 2009 6:46 AM PST
I agree on the screen size - it makes graphics quite nice.
by AppleProLeo January 5, 2009 7:01 AM PST
17" is a stupid idea.

Too big for one the go.

Nor to I understand this desktop replacement business - so you brought a LAPtop to use only on your DESKtop. What's was wrong a freaking iMac, it uses up virtually the same surface area on the desk as a 17" laptop while still giving you better performance and an even bigger screen - oh and not mention costs far less, use the money saved to buy a MacBook as a backup on the go, kitchen, garden (do Americans have gardens?) computer.
by Perry_Clease January 5, 2009 7:17 AM PST
"Nor to I understand this desktop replacement business - so you brought a LAPtop to use only on your DESKtop. What's was wrong a freaking iMac, it uses up virtually the same surface area on the desk as a 17" laptop while still giving you better performance and an even bigger screen - oh and not mention costs far less, use the money saved to buy a MacBook as a backup on the go, kitchen, garden (do Americans have gardens?) computer."

I bought a new iMac a few months ago. I seriously thought about getting a new MacBook Pro and use that as a desktop Mac replacement. However, even though I still travel several times a year it is not as much and for as long as I used to. Furthermore, my "old" MacBook is still fills the bill. Now all of that being said my iMac, and the one it replaced, are luggable around the house/home office; I frequently take them out back and work on the patio. Eventually I will need to replace my MacBook and the new models will almost certainly be lighter, more powerful, yet a bigger screen.

As to cooking and gardening, I do both which is one of the benefits of working at home. I am still harvesting tomatoes and chilies, but we had a frost last night so I will probably pull the plants today or tomorrow and get the plot ready for spring.
by Penguinisto January 5, 2009 12:50 PM PST
@AppleProLeo:

For work reasons, yeah - too big unless you do graphics for a living. OTOH, when I travel, I like to have a nice fat screen size to keep entertained with on the plane, mess with graphics/CG artwork to while away spare time at the hotel room/lobby/coffee-shop, etc. Kinda fun to fire up a movie without having to flip through the (usually crap) hotel cable channel lineup, etc.
by AppleSuxLeo January 4, 2009 5:22 PM PST
Yawn...
Reply to this comment
by AppleProLeo January 5, 2009 7:05 AM PST
5:22 PM yep SuxLeo it getting quite late for you - isn't it.

Come to think of it, it's way past your bed time.
by websterphreaky January 4, 2009 6:00 PM PST
Rumor - Steve Jobs is actually dead ... there has been an impersonator pretending to be him, just listen to Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club album backwards 5 times.

About as valid as your stupid rumors.

But here's a fact - what ever crApple does release, it will be Buggy, Flawed and will die one month after the warranty ends, and when ever you buy it for the usual "Mac Premium", crApple will release a newer model a month later.
Reply to this comment
by AppleProLeo January 5, 2009 7:12 AM PST
Can't wait - need some way to use up all those ridicules digits in my bank account before I die.

Bring on more Premium crap Apple. If I have to eat crap, rather eat crap that looks good I say.
by random truth January 4, 2009 6:02 PM PST
Wow, now it is the average cnet article about apple. Theirs the negative comment by applesuxleo. Seriously, get a life. Do you have confidence issues? You go into threads that you obviously have no interest in, then you comment negatively on them. Once again, people read/buy about things they like.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease January 4, 2009 6:07 PM PST
Add Webster to that comment.
by iBuzz January 4, 2009 8:31 PM PST
The battery on my 14-month old MacBook Pro just died last week. Seriously... it just gave up the ghost. If I remove the power cable while the laptop is on, the laptop shuts off immediately. Luckily, the battery is removable so I ordered a replacement online and continue to use my laptop with the power cable until the replacement arrives. What would've happened if I couldn't remove the battery? Would I have to FedEx my laptop to be repaired? The closest Apple store is about a two-hour drive for me. A non-removable battery is simply a stupid idea. Come on, Apple. You are smarter than that!
Reply to this comment
by chabig83 January 4, 2009 10:08 PM PST
The battery would be no more difficult to replace that the Air's battery. I'm sure you can do it yourself in just a few minutes.
by myles taylor January 4, 2009 9:48 PM PST
Since the 17" is usually a desktop replacement, I don't think a removable battery is all that important. Not like the Air where it's made for being mobile and was therefore a bigger issue.

I hope they redesign the Mini casing completely. Make it look flatter or something, kind of like a larger version of the Apple TV or the Time Capsule. They have the technology and the Mini is just outdated as it is right now.

I think this will be an update Macworld and I'm actually looking forward to that. Instead of trying a new product, I'm glad to see all the current products updated.
Reply to this comment
by 3rdalbum January 5, 2009 5:09 AM PST
Why is a fixed internal battery so desirable for Apple? It can't be cheaper, as my $478 Aspire One has an external replaceable battery. It's not more convenient. It's not safer - imagine having to send back your whole computer when the batteries start exploding again. It might make the machine a little thinner. That's it.

Yes there's a price premium for buying a Macintosh, but you also pay a price in terms of features.
Reply to this comment
by gmclean0402 January 5, 2009 7:55 AM PST
Fixed battery? Ugh.
I can live with that, but if it has a glossy screen and no matte option, no market here :-(

I'm going to buy up an old model and upgrade the crap out of it.. that should tide me over until Apple gets inundated with glossy screen complaints and sees the light rather than the reflection...
Reply to this comment
by seven7dust January 5, 2009 9:19 AM PST
mac mini with 9400m + dual display = Mouthwatering Awesome
Reply to this comment
by botscop January 5, 2009 10:55 AM PST
this lowlife fixed battery gimmick is starting to show apples greed. the design is either with or without. so they either intend for you to be enslaved by the dang battery or not.
Reply to this comment
(35 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right